Equality. Standard of Living. The NHS. [Thread split.]

[Grave_n_idle]

When presented with the facts you still refuse to see. Just as I said you wouldn't.

Uh huh. That could be because all you presented was a complete lack of evidence.

Does it not concern you that on the DNC's own website they are blatantly lying about Obamas involvement with ACORN?

No. Even if true, why would it?

What do I care about the DNC?

This has everything to do with it. It is about the ability to commit voter fraud.

Voter fraud is not contingent on the Motor Voter act, nor is the CPS contingent on voter fraud.

Dismissed.

The source said that Obama worked as a trainer for ACORN.

Show me where - as far as I can tell, that's not something you posted.

Did I miss it?

This shows that he knows and teaches Alinksy

No, it MIGHT show that he taught about it. That's not, of course, what you claimed.

ACORN is the embodiment of CPS

This isn't theology. Concepts don't have embodiments here.

Again, you are saying a lot, but saying nothing. You have no leg to stand on, the facts speak for themselves.

The facts might well speak for themselves.

If you ever get around to presenting any that say what you CLAIM they say... well, on the off-chance that happens... then we can talk about it.

[Top Dawgg]

When presented with the facts you still refuse to see. Just as I said you wouldn't.

Uh huh. That could be because all you presented was a complete lack of evidence.

Does it not concern you that on the DNC's own website they are blatantly lying about Obamas involvement with ACORN?

No. Even if true, why would it?

What do I care about the DNC?

This has everything to do with it. It is about the ability to commit voter fraud.

Voter fraud is not contingent on the Motor Voter act, nor is the CPS contingent on voter fraud.

Dismissed.

The source said that Obama worked as a trainer for ACORN.

Show me where - as far as I can tell, that's not something you posted.

Did I miss it?

This shows that he knows and teaches Alinksy

No, it MIGHT show that he taught about it. That's not, of course, what you claimed.

ACORN is the embodiment of CPS

This isn't theology. Concepts don't have embodiments here.

Again, you are saying a lot, but saying nothing. You have no leg to stand on, the facts speak for themselves.

The facts might well speak for themselves.

If you ever get around to presenting any that say what you CLAIM they say... well, on the off-chance that happens... then we can talk about it.

I doubt it. Again, you dont care about the truth. All you seem to care about is your post count. Nice try.

[Grave_n_idle]

I doubt it. Again, you dont care about the truth. All you seem to care about is your post count. Nice try.

Ah. I've posted a lot, therefore my postcount is an excuse for not providing evidence.

Got it.

[Vervaria]

When presented with the facts you still refuse to see. Just as I said you wouldn't.

Uh huh. That could be because all you presented was a complete lack of evidence.

Does it not concern you that on the DNC's own website they are blatantly lying about Obamas involvement with ACORN?

No. Even if true, why would it?

What do I care about the DNC?

This has everything to do with it. It is about the ability to commit voter fraud.

Voter fraud is not contingent on the Motor Voter act, nor is the CPS contingent on voter fraud.

Dismissed.

The source said that Obama worked as a trainer for ACORN.

Show me where - as far as I can tell, that's not something you posted.

Did I miss it?

This shows that he knows and teaches Alinksy

No, it MIGHT show that he taught about it. That's not, of course, what you claimed.

ACORN is the embodiment of CPS

This isn't theology. Concepts don't have embodiments here.

Again, you are saying a lot, but saying nothing. You have no leg to stand on, the facts speak for themselves.

The facts might well speak for themselves.

If you ever get around to presenting any that say what you CLAIM they say... well, on the off-chance that happens... then we can talk about it.

I doubt it. Again, you dont care about the truth. All you seem to care about is your post count. Nice try.

I have to admit, I haven't seen this particular excuse for evading the point before. "Your post count is too high, therefore your argument is irrelevant"

[Grave_n_idle]

I have to admit, I haven't seen this particular excuse for evading the point before. "Your post count is too high, therefore your argument is irrelevant"

It appears to be a pattern. He's already refused to provide evidence, elsewhere, based on how he thinks someone was rude to him.

Seriously.

[Top Dawgg]

I have to admit, I haven't seen this particular excuse for evading the point before. "Your post count is too high, therefore your argument is irrelevant"

It appears to be a pattern. He's already refused to provide evidence, elsewhere, based on how he thinks someone was rude to him.

Seriously.

And you have a pattern of demanding sources, which when placed before you, ignore them completely. That is either spamming or trolling. I provided sources to back up my claims. Provide your sources to back up your counter claims or step away.

[Grave_n_idle]

And you have a pattern of demanding sources, which when placed before you, ignore them completely. That is either spamming or trolling.

Your sources didn't back up your claims, and you've 'refused' to provide any that actually do.

I didn't ignore what you presented, I went through and explained WHY each piece of 'evidence' didn't support your claim - which isn't 'trolling' or 'spamming'.

If you present a source that actually backs even one of your claims, I'll examine it.


So far you haven't.