Muravyets wrote:Do these people think the whole world is dumb?
The whole world? No. Just a big enough chunk that they'd get away with it anyhow.
Advertisement
by Non Aligned States » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:30 pm
Muravyets wrote:Do these people think the whole world is dumb?
by Daistallia 2104 » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:32 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Vervaria wrote:The US has treated waterboarding as torture when it's been used on our soldiers, so I don't see the slippery slope.
Perhaps more to the point, the US military has used it to try to train people 'how to resist torture' - and it was THAT training that our 'enhanced interrogation' program was BASED ON.
by Muravyets » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:33 pm
Non Aligned States wrote:Muravyets wrote:Do these people think the whole world is dumb?
The whole world? No. Just a big enough chunk that they'd get away with it anyhow.
by Daistallia 2104 » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:35 pm
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I think it's really awesome that the torturers might finally have their day in court while the tortured still wait for theirs.
Maybe we can put the torturers in Gitmo and make them wait their turn.
by Lunatic Goofballs » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:36 pm
Non Aligned States wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Don't forget sensory deprivation. That's good stuff.
Perhaps, but it's unreliable. We had a batch of LG-lites with the last experiment. We need less of you, not more, even if they were cheap knockoffs.
by Iron Chariots » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:39 pm
Non Aligned States wrote:Muravyets wrote:Do these people think the whole world is dumb?
The whole world? No. Just a big enough chunk that they'd get away with it anyhow.
by Daistallia 2104 » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:41 pm
Khithali wrote:To clarify my post, I was always under the impression that during the Bush era, the US did not classify waterboarding as torture, thus exploiting a loophole in the international treaty. I do not have any sources for this, it was simply the impression I had received. If I am wrong, feel free to correct me.
by Non Aligned States » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:11 pm
Muravyets wrote:I disagree. I think what lets them get away with it is that a big enough chunk of the world are bone-ass lazy. Hence my remark in my earlier post about how the only thing we lack just happens to be the most important thing in the whole issue -- the will to enforce the law.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:They were weak. The fact that you caught them is testament to that.
by Lunatic Goofballs » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:21 pm
Non Aligned States wrote:Muravyets wrote:I disagree. I think what lets them get away with it is that a big enough chunk of the world are bone-ass lazy. Hence my remark in my earlier post about how the only thing we lack just happens to be the most important thing in the whole issue -- the will to enforce the law.
How do you differentiate between bone-ass lazy and those who think it's a good thing so they don't do anything about it anyway?Lunatic Goofballs wrote:They were weak. The fact that you caught them is testament to that.
Oh no, they weren't knockoffs of you before the experiment. That's after. And as for weak, well, even weakness has its utility when it comes to... vaccinations.
by Non Aligned States » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:29 pm
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Or decoys.
by Lunatic Goofballs » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:31 pm
Non Aligned States wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Or decoys.
Yes... decoys. That's what they are. Decoys. Nothing at all to do with finding the anti-LG serum. Oh no no no.
by Non Aligned States » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:40 pm
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:There is no cure for what I got.
by Lunatic Goofballs » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:54 pm
Non Aligned States wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:There is no cure for what I got.
Your significant other claims otherwise with her rather generous application of 200,000 volts in your relationship every now and again. Though she has first claim on any serum produced.
by Non Aligned States » Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:20 pm
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
Ah, who are we kidding? She wouldn't risk losing the dirty dirty sex.
by The Tofu Islands » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:39 am
Robustian wrote:Enemy combatants are people who are caught fighting...
Robustian wrote:I'm see you're into calling everyone in the military a liar, just for your own stupid ends...
by Daistallia 2104 » Wed Jun 17, 2009 3:00 am
Robustian wrote:It's real simple.
You have no idea what TORTURE is.
* A 27-year-old Iraqi male died while being interrogated by Navy Seals on April 5, 2004, in Mosul, Iraq. During his confinement he was hooded, flex-cuffed, sleep deprived and subjected to hot and cold environmental conditions, including the use of cold water on his body and hood. The exact cause of death was ""undetermined"" although the autopsy stated that hypothermia may have contributed to his death. Notes say he ""struggled/ interrogated/ died sleeping."" Some facts relating to this case have been previously reported. (In April 2003, Secretary Rumsfeld authorized the use of ""environmental manipulation"" as an interrogation technique in Guantánamo Bay. In September 2003, Lt. Gen. Sanchez also authorized this technique for use in Iraq. Although Lt. Gen. Sanchez later rescinded the September 2003 techniques, he authorized ""changes in environmental quality"" in October 2003.)
* An Iraqi detainee (also described as a white male) died on January 9, 2004, in Al Asad, Iraq, while being interrogated by ""OGA."" He was standing, shackled to the top of a door frame with a gag in his mouth at the time he died. The cause of death was asphyxia and blunt force injuries. Notes summarizing the autopsies record the circumstances of death as ""Q by OGA, gagged in standing restraint."" (Facts in the autopsy report appear to match the previously reported case of Abdul Jaleel.)
* A detainee was smothered to death during an interrogation by Military Intelligence on November 26, 2003, in Al Qaim, Iraq. A previously released autopsy report, that appears to be of General Mowhoush, lists ""asphyxia due to smothering and chest compression"" as the cause of death and cites bruises from the impact with a blunt object. New documents specifically record the circumstances of death as ""Q by MI, died during interrogation.""
* A detainee at Abu Ghraib Prison, captured by Navy Seal Team number seven, died on November 4, 2003, during an interrogation by Navy Seals and ""OGA."" A previously released autopsy report, that appears to be of Manadel Al Jamadi, shows that the cause of his death was ""blunt force injury complicated by compromised respiration."" New documents specifically record the circumstances of death as ""Q by OGA and NSWT died during interrogation.""
* An Afghan civilian died from ""multiple blunt force injuries to head, torso and extremities"" on November 6, 2003, at a Forward Operating Base in Helmand Province, Afghanistan. (Facts in the autopsy report appear to match the previously reported case of Abdul Wahid.)
* A 52-year-old male Iraqi was strangled to death at the Whitehorse detainment facility on June 6, 2003, in Nasiriyah, Iraq. His autopsy also revealed bone and rib fractures, and multiple bruises on his body. (Facts in the autopsy report appear to match the previously reported case of Nagm Sadoon Hatab.)
by Fson » Wed Jun 17, 2009 3:14 am
The Tofu Islands wrote:Robustian wrote:Enemy combatants are people who are caught fighting...
That seems to be false.Robustian wrote:I'm see you're into calling everyone in the military a liar, just for your own stupid ends...
Where did I do that? I just said that someone declared an "enemy combatant" wasn't necessarily guilty.
by Lunatic Goofballs » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:03 am
Non Aligned States wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
Ah, who are we kidding? She wouldn't risk losing the dirty dirty sex.
We promised temporary effect variants for her. She'd like it if just once, you attended a formal function clothed in sober tones of polyester and cotton rather than mud. What she usually gets, but without the twitches, muscle spasms and pants wetting electro-therapy induces.
by JuNii » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:34 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Don't forget sensory deprivation. That's good stuff.
by Trve » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:47 am
Parthenon wrote:Enhanced Interrogation Techniques are not torture.
by Khithali » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:05 pm
by Voltairian Prospects » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:50 pm
Parthenon wrote:Vervaria wrote:Brogavia wrote:The were enemy combatants. Thus, they are sources of intel.
Being sources of intel doesn't mean the US can ignore the law whenever it pleases.
Yes it does.
American Lives > Foreign Lives
by Parthenon » Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:13 pm
Voltairian Prospects wrote:I am curious as to what kind of CRAP you intend on spoon feeding your children... If by some freak chance you find/found someone to love you with that attitude.
More concerning, How many times did your parents have to hit you in the head to get you to think that way?
FYI... Your ancestors are more than likely not from America, as it hasn't been around that long.
My suggestion to you is to quit having such a biased opinion and appreciate the lives of others... or... you could go to therepy...
by Trve » Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Parthenon wrote:Voltairian Prospects wrote:I am curious as to what kind of CRAP you intend on spoon feeding your children... If by some freak chance you find/found someone to love you with that attitude.
More concerning, How many times did your parents have to hit you in the head to get you to think that way?
FYI... Your ancestors are more than likely not from America, as it hasn't been around that long.
My suggestion to you is to quit having such a biased opinion and appreciate the lives of others... or... you could go to therepy...
Because I value the lives of my fellow countrymen over those that would want to kill us I must have been beaten as a child? Is that really how the mind of a liberal operates now, claiming child abuse for opposing viewpoints?
[sadistic moment]
I would happily TORTURE a known terrorist if it could generate intelligence that would save american lives. Note the word torture, none of this water boarding nonsense. Something I devised a while back would be a terrorist to a treadmill made out of sandpaper, increase the speed every second they refuse to talk. It wouldn't be a very pretty site if someone refuses...
[/sadistic moment]
by Chumblywumbly » Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:19 pm
Trve wrote:I think whats more disturbing...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Freezerville, Ifreann, Sarduri, Singaporen Empire, Trump Almighty, Uiiop, Valles Marineris Mining co
Advertisement