
by Dragvania » Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:02 pm

by Sun Wukong » Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:06 pm
Dragvania wrote:Well I was writing a factbook about my military that includes antimatter yet how can I do this when I have so little understanding. Science has not made much progress here either and right now its still a very odd subject with many scattered and mismatched beliefs or thoughts.
I personally like the idea that antimatter dissolves regular matter and leaves behind low levels of radiation and that neutral matter can touch both normal matter and antimatter. This is probably 100% fiction for books and games so im curious what you may think about how antimatter works. I would love to see all types of ideas both fiction and non-fiction to hopefully get a better understanding of how it works in the real world and in nationstates.

by The Conez Imperium » Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:06 pm
by Godular » Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:13 pm

by New Werpland » Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:35 pm

by United Russian Soviet States » Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:03 pm

by Sun Wukong » Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:09 pm
United Russian Soviet States wrote:I don't care about it. Science is science.

by New Kvenland » Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:12 pm

by Wisconsin9 » Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:13 pm

by Kolumb » Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:17 pm
New Kvenland wrote:Matter particle hit antimatter particle. Particles go boom. Make much energy.
Luckily, AFAIK, it's strictly subatomic particles, so even a "big" boom is manageable on our scale.
by Wisconsin9 » Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:23 pm

by United Marxist Nations » Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:25 pm
Quintium wrote:http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=STvbV1zPCRk
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Shnercropolis » Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:43 pm

by New Kvenland » Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:46 pm
Shnercropolis wrote:every particle has an antiparticle. When they touch they create quite alot of energy.
For comparison, 1kg of pure electrons colliding with 1 kg of pure positrons would produce around 10^20 joules of gamma radiation, which is higher than the total world electricity generation in 2008.

by Wisconsin9 » Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:51 pm
New Kvenland wrote:Shnercropolis wrote:every particle has an antiparticle. When they touch they create quite alot of energy.
For comparison, 1kg of pure electrons colliding with 1 kg of pure positrons would produce around 10^20 joules of gamma radiation, which is higher than the total world electricity generation in 2008.
That would be quite the sight to see. Of course, if you were close enough to see it, you'd likely be destroyed by the pure energy, which wouldn't be much fun.

by Shnercropolis » Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:52 pm
wikipedia wrote:The petajoule (PJ) is equal to one quadrillion joules. 210 PJ is equivalent to about 50 megatons of TNT. This is the amount of energy released by the Tsar Bomba, the largest man-made nuclear explosion ever.

by Wisconsin9 » Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:55 pm
Shnercropolis wrote:Wisconsin9 wrote:It's actually only a bit under 43 megatons.wikipedia wrote:The petajoule (PJ) is equal to one quadrillion joules. 210 PJ is equivalent to about 50 megatons of TNT. This is the amount of energy released by the Tsar Bomba, the largest man-made nuclear explosion ever.
50 megatons ~ 2x10^17J.

by Shnercropolis » Sat Mar 07, 2015 9:08 pm

by Wisconsin9 » Sat Mar 07, 2015 9:10 pm

by Sun Wukong » Sat Mar 07, 2015 9:17 pm

by Shnercropolis » Sat Mar 07, 2015 9:21 pm

by AiliailiA » Sat Mar 07, 2015 9:51 pm
Wikipedia wrote:The reaction of 1 kg of antimatter with 1 kg of matter would produce 1.8×1017 J (180 petajoules) of energy (by the mass-energy equivalence formula, E = mc2), or the rough equivalent of 43 megatons of TNT – slightly less than the yield of the 27,000 kg Tsar Bomb, the largest thermonuclear weapon ever detonated.
Not all of that energy can be utilized by any realistic propulsion technology because of the nature of the annihilation products. While electron-positron reactions result in gamma ray photons, these are difficult to direct and use for thrust. In reactions between protons and antiprotons, their energy is converted largely into relativistic neutral and charged pions. The neutral pions decay almost immediately (with a half-life of 84 attoseconds) into high-energy photons, but the charged pions decay more slowly (with a half-life of 26 nanoseconds) and can be deflected magnetically to produce thrust.
Note that charged pions ultimately decay into a combination of neutrinos (carrying about 22% of the energy of the charged pions) and unstable charged muons (carrying about 78% of the charged pion energy), with the muons then decaying into a combination of electrons, positrons and neutrinos (cf. muon decay; the neutrinos from this decay carry about 2/3 of the energy of the muons, meaning that from the original charged pions, the total fraction of their energy converted to neutrinos by one route or another would be about 0.22 + (2/3)*0.78 = 0.74).[56]
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alternate Canada, Astares Amauricanum, Dumb Ideologies, Elejamie, Equai, Greater Miami Shores 3, Hurdergaryp, Immoren, Ithania, Kitsuva, Kubra, Lativs, The Pirateariat, The Viceroyalties of the Indies 1800s RP
Advertisement