Advertisement
by Devvo Mate » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:30 pm
by Saiwania » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:32 pm
Fremskrittspartiet wrote:I am also a bit confused as to why it is so big in USA as it is....
by Pope Joan » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:33 pm
by Arcanda » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:35 pm
Devvo Mate wrote:The amount of people in this thread who are trying to justify the fact their parents had them mutilated is worrying.
by Devvo Mate » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:37 pm
Arcanda wrote:We let some parents pierce the ears of their daughters when they're young, without their consent.Why would it be different for males? You just need to make sure the clinic is operating within the medical standards.Circumcision is the same for everyone as far as I'm aware.If man A is physically fine after it, men B to Z will be fine too.
by Thermodolia » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:37 pm
Devvo Mate wrote:The amount of people in this thread who are trying to justify the fact their parents had them mutilated is worrying.
by Devvo Mate » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:38 pm
Thermodolia wrote:For some of us, circumcision is a religious and cultural thing. It is not genital mutilation.
by Thermodolia » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:38 pm
Pope Joan wrote:This has only enforced my opposition to parental abductions.
The kidnapper will always find some plausible reason. They are still a criminal.
Go back home and let the original jurisdiction decide the issues.
Stop making the kid a pawn in your relationship games.
by Sebastianbourg » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:39 pm
by Valkalan » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:40 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Or an opposing pediatrician for the mother who disputes that diagnosis?
Or do you base it off of an ass-pull that just happens to conform to your desired precepts?
Because that last one is looking like the answer at the moment.
by Thermodolia » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:41 pm
by Saiwania » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:42 pm
Arcanda wrote:Circumcision is the same for everyone as far as I'm aware.If man A is physically fine after it, men B to Z will be fine too.
by Devvo Mate » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:42 pm
Thermodolia wrote: Yes it is, but after someone undergoes female genital mutilation they are unable to ever use there genitals ever again. Not so with circumcision. I am still able to use my dick.
by Galloism » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:42 pm
Scomagia wrote:Galloism wrote:Oh don't get me wrong, I'm against circumcision as an elective procedure. I am no longer convinced the benefits outweigh the risks.
But you don't tell a small child his daddy wants to cut off his penis.
The risks are negligible. The benefits include a reduction in the risk of contracting HIV, HPV, and certain penile cancers.
by Thermodolia » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:44 pm
by Devvo Mate » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:45 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Yes it is. Are you saying we should ban certain religious practices because they don't fall in line with your scientific beliefs? Because that is what my circumcision was. A RELIGIOUS practice.
by Hanchu » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:45 pm
Arcanda wrote:Devvo Mate wrote:The amount of people in this thread who are trying to justify the fact their parents had them mutilated is worrying.
We let some parents pierce the ears of their daughters when they're young, without their consent.Why would it be different for males? You just need to make sure the clinic is operating within the medical standards.Circumcision is the same for everyone as far as I'm aware.If man A is physically fine after it, men B to Z will be fine too.
by Thermodolia » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:45 pm
Devvo Mate wrote:Thermodolia wrote: Yes it is, but after someone undergoes female genital mutilation they are unable to ever use there genitals ever again. Not so with circumcision. I am still able to use my dick.
You've still been mutilated under the pretence of a daft cultural or religious tradition
by Thermodolia » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:46 pm
Devvo Mate wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Yes it is. Are you saying we should ban certain religious practices because they don't fall in line with your scientific beliefs? Because that is what my circumcision was. A RELIGIOUS practice.
If a religion says you should have your nose cut off, is that OK? Are you a bigot if you want that banned?
by DaAngou14 » Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:47 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Yes it is. Are you saying we should ban certain religious practices because they don't fall in line with your scientific beliefs? Because that is what my circumcision was. A RELIGIOUS practice.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Foxyshire, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Jerzylvania, Lagene, Locmor, ML Library, Outer Bratorke, Western Theram
Advertisement