The Holy Therns wrote:Things just can't go wrong on their own, they have to do it at the same time. :/
What happened?
Advertisement
by Jute » Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:45 am
The Holy Therns wrote:Things just can't go wrong on their own, they have to do it at the same time. :/
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."
by Ava Ire » Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:50 am
"Down to Gehenna or up to the Throne, he travels the fastest who travels alone." ~
by Hurdegaryp » Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:50 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Dumb Ideologies » Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:53 am
by Jute » Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:53 am
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."
by Ava Ire » Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:54 am
Jute wrote:The IBM Watson supercomputer will analyze your text and give you personality results based on it. (Recommended minimum 3500 words)
I plugged in a rp post I made here and an old fanfiction chapter I wrote and got this:
Melancholy 96 %? That was supposed to be a comedy fanfic...
Conservation 74 % and Liberty 30 %? But all political tests have been telling me I'm by no means a conservative, but a solid liberal...
"Down to Gehenna or up to the Throne, he travels the fastest who travels alone." ~
by Gallade » Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:54 am
by Hurdegaryp » Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:56 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Hurdegaryp » Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:58 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Jute » Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:59 am
Ava Ire wrote:Jute wrote:The IBM Watson supercomputer will analyze your text and give you personality results based on it. (Recommended minimum 3500 words)
I plugged in a rp post I made here and an old fanfiction chapter I wrote and got this:
Melancholy 96 %? That was supposed to be a comedy fanfic...
Conservation 74 % and Liberty 30 %? But all political tests have been telling me I'm by no means a conservative, but a solid liberal...
Interesting. But how truly accurate is it?
IBM wrote:
The service requires at least 3500 words written by an individual to produce a portrait with meaningful results. In some cases, depending on the quality of the available data, fewer words might suffice, but 3500 words is the general recommendation. Of course, more words are always likely to produce better results.
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."
by Dumb Ideologies » Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:00 am
Ava Ire wrote:Jute wrote:The IBM Watson supercomputer will analyze your text and give you personality results based on it. (Recommended minimum 3500 words)
I plugged in a rp post I made here and an old fanfiction chapter I wrote and got this:
Melancholy 96 %? That was supposed to be a comedy fanfic...
Conservation 74 % and Liberty 30 %? But all political tests have been telling me I'm by no means a conservative, but a solid liberal...
Interesting. But how truly accurate is it?
by Gallade » Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:00 am
by Lordieth » Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:02 am
Jute wrote:Ava Ire wrote:Interesting. But how truly accurate is it?IBM wrote:
The service requires at least 3500 words written by an individual to produce a portrait with meaningful results. In some cases, depending on the quality of the available data, fewer words might suffice, but 3500 words is the general recommendation. Of course, more words are always likely to produce better results.
by Jute » Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:03 am
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."
by Gallade » Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:06 am
by Lordieth » Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:06 am
by Gallade » Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:09 am
by Hurdegaryp » Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:10 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by The Blaatschapen » Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:11 am
by Gallade » Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:13 am
by Gallade » Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:15 am
by Hurdegaryp » Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:20 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
Users browsing this forum: Cachard Calia, El Lazaro, EuroStralia, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Perikuresu, Point Blob, Southland, The Lone Alliance, TheKeyToJoy, Train mountain, Washington Resistance Army
