Argentina's inherited the current inequality from the ''ultra-liberal'' experiment that endured from 1987 until 2003: this experiment was fully supported by the IMF, the United States, the Argentinean elite and of course the magazines and media outlets that are now saying that Argentina is a terrible place to live. Of course: not everything is OK, the inflation isn't nice and there are still many problems, but Argentina is definitely a better place than the place The Economist and Financial Times say it is. Not only did the experiment totally deindustrialise the once industrialised nation, but it also plunged millions into poverty. I am not advocating against some aspects of neoliberalism (fiscal conservatism: I like it!), but I am advocating against the interests of some corporations that want Argentina to become the same nation as it was in that period (1976-2003).
Argentinians in the labor force earning less than US$1,230 monthly, are entitled to benefits upon marriage, birth or adoption of a child, for maternity leave or prenatal care, and for a disability in a child, as well as to a modest unemployment insurance benefit for up to 6 months. The most important poverty relief program administered by the ''ANSES'' is the universal childhood entitlement. This benefit is assigned to 3.7 million children under age 18. Chile doesn't have this, nor does Chile have free education and healthcare, nor does Chile has an national housing scheme like PRO.CRE.AR (more than 125 thousands of houses were already constructed or are being constructed at the moment). Yes, Argentina has it's problems but to say that Argentina is more in unequal than Chile.. No no no no.







