Advertisement

by Kubra » Wed Feb 25, 2015 12:56 pm

by Khorsun » Wed Feb 25, 2015 1:51 pm
Tsuken wrote:I feel things like a Universal Basic Income might be a new "communism". Whether we agree about the effectiveness of it or not, I, in my own personal experiences, have experienced people recoiling from the idea of a UBI in a similar fashion to the way people recoil from ideas like communism or socialism. It might be just because I am talking with people of older generations. In my experiences, things like UBI have been described as an over-idealistic view of welfare.

by Neo-Chicago » Wed Feb 25, 2015 1:53 pm

by Tsuken » Wed Feb 25, 2015 2:09 pm
Khorsun wrote:Tsuken wrote:I feel things like a Universal Basic Income might be a new "communism". Whether we agree about the effectiveness of it or not, I, in my own personal experiences, have experienced people recoiling from the idea of a UBI in a similar fashion to the way people recoil from ideas like communism or socialism. It might be just because I am talking with people of older generations. In my experiences, things like UBI have been described as an over-idealistic view of welfare.
UBI isn't out to remake the image and structure of society, which is what usually scares people away from ideologies, which do entail doing that. Which necessitates sweeping away the old order by force, which involves lots of people dying, things on fire, etc.

by Archegnum » Wed Feb 25, 2015 2:23 pm

by Trotskylvania » Wed Feb 25, 2015 4:47 pm
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

by Burleson 2 » Wed Feb 25, 2015 4:49 pm
Italios wrote:In the south, Yankee sometimes is an insult. In the North East, it's not. In Boston, it's a declaration of war.
Alveda King wrote:To equate homosexuality with race is to give a death sentence to civil rights.
Ieperithem wrote:Hopefully. A nation whose majority consists of "aspiring artists", SNAP recipients, and identity politics obsessed professional victims rather than policemen, engineers, and farmers isn't going to last long.
Lol Democracy wrote:We should give him a Qur'an with a picture of Mohammed as the watermark on every page, can't remove stuff from the Qur'an, can't make pictures of Mohammed > Islam Explodes

by Threlizdun » Wed Feb 25, 2015 5:23 pm

by Hollorous » Wed Feb 25, 2015 5:34 pm
Trotskylvania wrote:Communism is the next communism.
It is, by its very nature, the antithesis of the capitalist order. No other social system can challenge capitalism in toto; ideologies like Islamism or technocracy only challenge the prevailing neoliberal, Western oriented global capitalist order.
Rather than get caught on a detour that will lead us to nowhere, I'm hoping that we go straight to Capitalism vs. Communism, Round two.
In this boxing match, any hitting below the belt must be for the sake of the cause.

by Whiteshore » Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:47 am

by Yuketobaniac » Fri Feb 27, 2015 12:41 pm
Archegnum wrote:Either Islam or Putinism.
nope T-14 it'll prove to be a piece of junk, stick with the T-90 and T-72 and upgrade those to be better hellfire targets XDXDXD

by Jute » Fri Feb 27, 2015 12:43 pm
Whiteshore wrote:For the majority of the 20th century, the main rival to capitalist democracy was communism and it's call for a world revolution by workers and peasants. In the 21st century, what ideology could fulfil the role of Communism in that it provides a credible alternative to capitalist democracy and (preferably) wage a "Second Cold War" against the main capitalist democratic power(doesn't have to be the US)? Could a revival of Technocracy be the next "Communism"? Maybe radical environmentalism combined with populism could be a possible contender?
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by Bolnoa » Fri Feb 27, 2015 2:45 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Armeattla, Dimetrodon Empire, Dreria, El Lazaro, Elwher, Eragon Island, Immoren, Incelastan, New-Minneapolis, Ostroeuropa, Picairn, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, The Rio Grande River Basin, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Thermodolia, Valyxias, Vivida Vis Animi
Advertisement