NATION

PASSWORD

Natural Born Citizen

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17523
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Natural Born Citizen

Postby Page » Mon Feb 23, 2015 5:59 pm

Obama was born in Hawaii. No one who vaccinates their children and doesn't think Sandy Hook was staged disputes that. But I am interested in the interpretation of who is qualified to be the President of the United States as per the current constitutional requirement.

It's been established that a person born on an American military base on foreign soil can be President, as McCain was. As far as I can tell, the easiest and most straightforward definition of a natural born citizen is "naturalized at the moment of birth." As in, anyone who is granted American citizenship solely because they were born is a natural born American citizen.

Therefore I think anyone born to an American citizen mother, regardless of where, even if they were born on foreign soil that's not a military base or an embassy, qualifies to be President of the USA.

Do you agree with this interpretation?

EDIT: In support of my argument, military bases are not US soil. Therefore this interpretation already has precedent: http://military.findlaw.com/family-empl ... broad.html
Last edited by Page on Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
Iwassoclose
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1320
Founded: Dec 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Iwassoclose » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:00 pm

Nope.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:01 pm

honestly it's a bunch of bullshit and shouldn't be there anyway
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:07 pm

Alyakia wrote:honestly it's a bunch of bullshit and shouldn't be there anyway

Why? It makes perfect sense.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:07 pm

Murkwood wrote:
Alyakia wrote:honestly it's a bunch of bullshit and shouldn't be there anyway

Why? It makes perfect sense.


why does it make perfect sense?
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:09 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Murkwood wrote:Why? It makes perfect sense.


why does it make perfect sense?

Citizenship is something that is to be given, not earned. If your parents were American, you should have nothing to earn.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:10 pm

Murkwood wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
why does it make perfect sense?

Citizenship is something that is to be given, not earned. If your parents were American, you should have nothing to earn.


are you sure we aren't actually talking about two different things?
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:11 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Murkwood wrote:Citizenship is something that is to be given, not earned. If your parents were American, you should have nothing to earn.


are you sure we aren't actually talking about two different things?

What are you talking about?
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Devvo Mate
Diplomat
 
Posts: 889
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Devvo Mate » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:12 pm

Murkwood wrote:Citizenship is something that is to be given, not earned. If your parents were American, you should have nothing to earn.


You're completely missing the point. If someone is born to American parents in Toronto, the child is ineligible to be president. Is this fair?

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:13 pm

Devvo Mate wrote:
Murkwood wrote:Citizenship is something that is to be given, not earned. If your parents were American, you should have nothing to earn.


You're completely missing the point. If someone is born to American parents in Toronto, the child is ineligible to be president. Is this fair?

No. If your parents are American, you should be and are American.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:13 pm

Murkwood wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
are you sure we aren't actually talking about two different things?

What are you talking about?


you sound like you're talking about who is a citizen not who is eligible to be president based on when they became a citizen.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17523
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:13 pm

Devvo Mate wrote:
Murkwood wrote:Citizenship is something that is to be given, not earned. If your parents were American, you should have nothing to earn.


You're completely missing the point. If someone is born to American parents in Toronto, the child is ineligible to be president. Is this fair?


Well what I'm saying is that if such a case went to court, the court correctly interpreting the constitution would deem such person eligible. The constitution would not have to be amended for this to occur.
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
Romalae
Minister
 
Posts: 3199
Founded: May 31, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Romalae » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:17 pm

My father was born in Guatemala to German parents, and moved to the USA when he was two years old and eventually became a naturalized citizen. Other than those two years, he's been an American all his life and even has an MD and PhD; an upstanding citizen. Shouldn't someone like him be qualified to run for president even though he wasn't born here and his parents weren't American citizens at the time?

I mean he's never known a world that is not America.


And also I would probably benefit greatly if my dad became president. :D
Economic Left/Right: -3.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.79

Location: Central Texas
Ideology: somewhere between left-leaning centrism and social democracy
Other: irreligious, white, male

User avatar
Russels Orbiting Teapot
Senator
 
Posts: 4024
Founded: Jan 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Russels Orbiting Teapot » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:24 pm

Romalae wrote:My father was born in Guatemala to German parents, and moved to the USA when he was two years old and eventually became a naturalized citizen. Other than those two years, he's been an American all his life and even has an MD and PhD; an upstanding citizen. Shouldn't someone like him be qualified to run for president even though he wasn't born here and his parents weren't American citizens at the time?

I mean he's never known a world that is not America.


And also I would probably benefit greatly if my dad became president. :D


We have to draw an arbitrary line somewhere. At birth seems like a pretty valid time.

Maybe it should be at 3 years old, because after that is usually when the first memories are formed?

The intention is clearly to limit the possible influence of foreign nations on the president.

Considering that it's the only office that has this requirement, I don't see a huge need for reform.

User avatar
Romalae
Minister
 
Posts: 3199
Founded: May 31, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Romalae » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:28 pm

Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:
Romalae wrote:My father was born in Guatemala to German parents, and moved to the USA when he was two years old and eventually became a naturalized citizen. Other than those two years, he's been an American all his life and even has an MD and PhD; an upstanding citizen. Shouldn't someone like him be qualified to run for president even though he wasn't born here and his parents weren't American citizens at the time?

I mean he's never known a world that is not America.


And also I would probably benefit greatly if my dad became president. :D


We have to draw an arbitrary line somewhere. At birth seems like a pretty valid time.

Maybe it should be at 3 years old, because after that is usually when the first memories are formed?

I would find this reasonable and agreeable. I mean, I can totally understand that there'd be legitimate concerns about someone who spent a large amount of time living elsewhere during their formative years, but for someone who was too young to make any memories, it doesn't seem reasonable to exclude them from anything.

The intention is clearly to limit the possible influence of foreign nations on the president.

Considering that it's the only office that has this requirement, I don't see a huge need for reform.

True, it's not a huge deal. I was just putting that out there to foster some thought.
Economic Left/Right: -3.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.79

Location: Central Texas
Ideology: somewhere between left-leaning centrism and social democracy
Other: irreligious, white, male

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:28 pm

Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:
Romalae wrote:My father was born in Guatemala to German parents, and moved to the USA when he was two years old and eventually became a naturalized citizen. Other than those two years, he's been an American all his life and even has an MD and PhD; an upstanding citizen. Shouldn't someone like him be qualified to run for president even though he wasn't born here and his parents weren't American citizens at the time?

I mean he's never known a world that is not America.


And also I would probably benefit greatly if my dad became president. :D


We have to draw an arbitrary line somewhere. At birth seems like a pretty valid time.

Maybe it should be at 3 years old, because after that is usually when the first memories are formed?

The intention is clearly to limit the possible influence of foreign nations on the president.

Considering that it's the only office that has this requirement, I don't see a huge need for reform.


do you remember when people panicked over catholics in the white house? they'll just listen to the pope! we'll be run by a foreign nation!

there have been plenty of nations with foreign born leaders i can think of and zero (0) of them have fallen to a foreign menace. it's almost like it's pretty silly actually.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Draakonite
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1782
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Draakonite » Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:35 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:
We have to draw an arbitrary line somewhere. At birth seems like a pretty valid time.

Maybe it should be at 3 years old, because after that is usually when the first memories are formed?

The intention is clearly to limit the possible influence of foreign nations on the president.

Considering that it's the only office that has this requirement, I don't see a huge need for reform.


do you remember when people panicked over catholics in the white house? they'll just listen to the pope! we'll be run by a foreign nation!

there have been plenty of nations with foreign born leaders i can think of and zero (0) of them have fallen to a foreign menace. it's almost like it's pretty silly actually.


Augustus III of Poland maybe?

User avatar
Cetacea
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6539
Founded: Apr 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cetacea » Mon Feb 23, 2015 7:01 pm

So they still haven'tpassed the 61st Amendment?
but what about the Schwarzenegger Presidential Library?
Last edited by Cetacea on Mon Feb 23, 2015 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Arkiasis
Senator
 
Posts: 3586
Founded: Aug 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkiasis » Mon Feb 23, 2015 7:07 pm

For a nation of immigrants it's goddamn hypocritical for that to be a requirement. What's so wrong with an immigrant being a President? Please, try and tell me without making yourself sound like a xenophobe. Hell, the immigrant earned their citizenship, they've worked harder to become a citizen than someone who just happened to plop out of a vagina in the right place.
The Republic of Arkiasis
NSwiki | IIwiki | Factbook | Map
Economic Left/Right: -4.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.56
I like: You <3
I dislike: Fax machines
Move along, nothing to see here.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon Feb 23, 2015 7:10 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:
We have to draw an arbitrary line somewhere. At birth seems like a pretty valid time.

Maybe it should be at 3 years old, because after that is usually when the first memories are formed?

The intention is clearly to limit the possible influence of foreign nations on the president.

Considering that it's the only office that has this requirement, I don't see a huge need for reform.


do you remember when people panicked over catholics in the white house? they'll just listen to the pope! we'll be run by a foreign nation!

there have been plenty of nations with foreign born leaders i can think of and zero (0) of them have fallen to a foreign menace. it's almost like it's pretty silly actually.

The current President of Estonia was born in Stockholm and spent most of his life in the USA. Last time I checked, Estonia has yet to apply to Swedish dominion or 51st statehood.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon Feb 23, 2015 7:11 pm

Arkiasis wrote:For a nation of immigrants it's goddamn hypocritical for that to be a requirement. What's so wrong with an immigrant being a President? Please, try and tell me without making yourself sound like a xenophobe. Hell, the immigrant earned their citizenship, they've worked harder to become a citizen than someone who just happened to plop out of a vagina in the right place.

Considering how long it can take to become a citizen, that'd be one hell of a dedicated intelligence operation. Plus, there's nothing stopping a natural born American being influenced by a foreign state.

User avatar
Jaslandia
Minister
 
Posts: 2652
Founded: Aug 11, 2013
New York Times Democracy

Postby Jaslandia » Mon Feb 23, 2015 7:18 pm

Draakonite wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
do you remember when people panicked over catholics in the white house? they'll just listen to the pope! we'll be run by a foreign nation!

there have been plenty of nations with foreign born leaders i can think of and zero (0) of them have fallen to a foreign menace. it's almost like it's pretty silly actually.


Augustus III of Poland maybe?

That may not be the best example to prove your case. As the monarch of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was elected by a vote of the nobility since 1573, Poland-Lithuania had numerous foreign rulers, with Augustus III just happening to be a foreign monarch who wasn't competent. It's worth noting that one of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth's greatest kings, Stephen Báthory, was also a foreigner. The fact of the matter is, if Poland-Lithuania is any example, completely foreign leaders are not any more or less likely to be susceptible to foreign influence than native leaders.

In addition, Poland-Lithuania did not fall under Augustus III. The last King of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was actually a native Pole, Stanisław August Poniatowski. While Poland-Lithuania did decline under Augustus III, that decline had been gradually occurring for nearly a century by the time Augustus III came to the throne, and it would have been difficult for any leader to reverse it.

Sorry about my rant, but I just needed to clear up some things. Carry on.
Call me Jaslandia or Jas, either one works
This nation (mostly) represents my political views.
Factbook
Puppets: Partrica, New Jaslandia, Kasbahan
Pro: Regulated Capitalism, Two-state solution, nice people, Nerdfighteria, democracy, science, public education, rationalism, reason, logic, politeness, LGBT rights, feminism, UN, Democratic Party

Anti: Religious extremism/fundamentalism, terrorism, dictatorship, oppression, hatred, bigotry, racism, homophobia, anti-Semitism, conspiracy theories, Stalinism, theocracy, social conservatism, corruption, Nazism, Vladimir Putin, Republican Party

In-between: Religion, socialism, Barack Obama

RP Population: 675,000,000

User avatar
Middle Pacific
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 131
Founded: Feb 24, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Middle Pacific » Tue Feb 24, 2015 12:10 pm

Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:
Romalae wrote:My father was born in Guatemala to German parents, and moved to the USA when he was two years old and eventually became a naturalized citizen. Other than those two years, he's been an American all his life and even has an MD and PhD; an upstanding citizen. Shouldn't someone like him be qualified to run for president even though he wasn't born here and his parents weren't American citizens at the time?

I mean he's never known a world that is not America.


And also I would probably benefit greatly if my dad became president. :D


We have to draw an arbitrary line somewhere. At birth seems like a pretty valid time.

Maybe it should be at 3 years old, because after that is usually when the first memories are formed?

The intention is clearly to limit the possible influence of foreign nations on the president.

Considering that it's the only office that has this requirement, I don't see a huge need for reform.


A rational and reasonable manner would be to constitutionally require that anyone running for President of the United States hold exclusively American citizenship and have resided in the country for a considerable period of time (14 is the current requirement, I believe).

America is a country built by immigrants, and well qualified immigrants, who came to this country lawfully, who are productive citizens, and took an oath of allegiance to the United States and earned their citizenship, should be allowed to run for President of the United States.

The natural born requirement (which mind you, wasn't absolute - the clause exempted citizens of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution from the requirement, one of the reasons possibly being that several founding fathers could have been effected otherwise) was put in the Constitution with so little debate or discussion at the constitutional convention, which is the reason why there is so much argument over how it is to interpreted. It's supposed intended effect was to prevent European aristocrats from moving to America and seeking the Presidency. Either way, it is no longer necessary. It is as necessary as a fugitive slave clause in the 21st century.

Quite frankly, it is far more patriotic and makes more sense to support, all other things being equal, an immigrant who came to our country because he/she believes in everything we stand for, for President, rather than someone who happens to have had become a citizen by accident of birth and doesn't care about what the United States stand for.
#LoveWins: Beautiful progression video of the March of Marriage Equality, Chorus singing after SCOTUS decision
Proud American living in the great state of Hawaii.
Asian/Native Hawaiian. Buddhist. Progressive-liberal. Resident of Honolulu, Oahu Island.

Barack Obama / Joe Biden for America 2012 David Ige / Shan Tsutsui for Hawaii 2014/2018
Hillary Clinton / TBD for America 2016 Mazie Hirono & Brian Schatz for US Senate 2012/2014
Tulsi Gabbard & Mark Takai for US House of Representatives 2014/2016
Policy positions: Increased funding for NASA / 7th Mission to the Moon and Mission to Mars by 2030, renewable energy at 50% by 2035, strengthen naval presence in Asia-Pacific and military presence in NATO states in Eastern Europe.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Tue Feb 24, 2015 12:23 pm

Yes! I can totally become president of the USA (if I bother living there for the requisite 20 years or whatever since I've never actually lived in that country).


Natural Born citizen for life, yo.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Tue Feb 24, 2015 12:39 pm

If you're good enough to be a citizen you're good enough to run for office.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Al-Haqiqah, Azurius, Corporate Collective Salvation, Eragon Island, Fort Viorlia, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Iujhj, Luxeinia, Rosartemis, The Caleshan Valkyrie, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads