Conserative Morality wrote:"Parents want their children to be like them, non-homophobes oppose heteronormativity, Pope is indeed Catholic"
No he isn't.
Not necessarily, anyway.
Advertisement

by The Archregimancy » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:35 am
Conserative Morality wrote:"Parents want their children to be like them, non-homophobes oppose heteronormativity, Pope is indeed Catholic"

by Ifreann » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:37 am
New Stephania wrote:
I did forget about that quote, but what she meant is open to interpretation without the author fleshing it out. If she means she teaches her child being straight is undesirable then I am with you, if she means she teaches her child being gay or straight is just fine then it's not the same thing you are suggesting.
by Iwassoclose » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:44 am
Dakini wrote:*shrug* Parents generally consider it desirable that their children go on to be financially successful. That doesn't mean that they don't support their children in their decisions to become artists.
I'm going to echo the "you didn't understand the point of the article" comment because you clearly didn't.

by Madiganistan » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:45 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:"Parents want their children to be like them, non-homophobes oppose heteronormativity, Pope is indeed Catholic"
No he isn't.
Not necessarily, anyway.

by Desperate Measures » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:47 am
Iwassoclose wrote:Dakini wrote:*shrug* Parents generally consider it desirable that their children go on to be financially successful. That doesn't mean that they don't support their children in their decisions to become artists.
I'm going to echo the "you didn't understand the point of the article" comment because you clearly didn't.
I understand it fine. But you guys are pretending as if her interactions and her preferences is not going to color her actions and bleed over to how she treats her child. She is no better then the straight parent interfering with their gay child while saying everything is fine. Leave the child be.

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:47 am
Seierus wrote:When else would she start going on about it? When she's teen, she'd probably just be too busy with Instagram (or whatever they will use then), and as an adult, I think she'd already decided on her sexuality.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by The Black Forrest » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:49 am

by New Stephania » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:49 am
Ifreann wrote:New Stephania wrote:I did forget about that quote, but what she meant is open to interpretation without the author fleshing it out. If she means she teaches her child being straight is undesirable then I am with you, if she means she teaches her child being gay or straight is just fine then it's not the same thing you are suggesting.
She did flesh out why she wants her daughter to be gay. Because she believes that she would be who she is and where she is today if she were not gay.
by Iwassoclose » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:51 am
Desperate Measures wrote:Iwassoclose wrote:
I understand it fine. But you guys are pretending as if her interactions and her preferences is not going to color her actions and bleed over to how she treats her child. She is no better then the straight parent interfering with their gay child while saying everything is fine. Leave the child be.
Guide to parenting: Don't have a view. DO NOT INTERACT. Do not develop healthy conclusions.
by Cannot think of a name » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:51 am
Iwassoclose wrote:Dakini wrote:*shrug* Parents generally consider it desirable that their children go on to be financially successful. That doesn't mean that they don't support their children in their decisions to become artists.
I'm going to echo the "you didn't understand the point of the article" comment because you clearly didn't.
I understand it fine. But you guys are pretending as if her interactions and her preferences is not going to color her actions and bleed over to how she treats her child.
Iwassoclose wrote: She is no better then the straight parent interfering with their gay child while saying everything is fine. Leave the child be.

by Mavorpen » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:52 am
New Stephania wrote:Ifreann wrote:She did flesh out why she wants her daughter to be gay. Because she believes that she would be who she is and where she is today if she were not gay.
You misunderstand. She left this statement open to interpretation by not fleshing it out:"It’s more widely acceptable to be gay in America today, but that’s not the same as being desirable. In my house, though, it is."
She could either mean that homosexuality or more desirable than heterosexuality, as Iwassoclose seems to think, or that homosexuality is no more or less desirable.

by The Archregimancy » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:52 am

by Desperate Measures » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:52 am
Iwassoclose wrote:Desperate Measures wrote:Guide to parenting: Don't have a view. DO NOT INTERACT. Do not develop healthy conclusions.
Oh have all the views you want, just don't force them on your kids.
Also, healthy conclusions? Because I am gay and successful, my daughter will also be successful if she is gay.

by New Stephania » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:53 am
Mavorpen wrote:New Stephania wrote:You misunderstand. She left this statement open to interpretation by not fleshing it out:"It’s more widely acceptable to be gay in America today, but that’s not the same as being desirable. In my house, though, it is."
She could either mean that homosexuality or more desirable than heterosexuality, as Iwassoclose seems to think, or that homosexuality is no more or less desirable.
Yeah, Ifreann isn't the one misunderstanding.

by Mavorpen » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:54 am
by Cannot think of a name » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:55 am
New Stephania wrote:Ifreann wrote:She did flesh out why she wants her daughter to be gay. Because she believes that she would be who she is and where she is today if she were not gay.
You misunderstand. She left this statement open to interpretation by not fleshing it out:"It’s more widely acceptable to be gay in America today, but that’s not the same as being desirable. In my house, though, it is."
She could either mean that homosexuality or more desirable than heterosexuality, as Iwassoclose seems to think, or that homosexuality is no more or less desirable.
Here you might expect me to say something about how, if my daughter were gay, she would undoubtedly face challenges and hurdles she wouldn’t encounter if she were straight. Maybe. And maybe if I weren’t an upper-middle-class white lesbian living in a liberal city, I’d have such worries. But no matter what, I’d want my child to be herself. If I lived in, say, North Carolina, with an adopted son from Morocco, I’d like to think I would encourage him to be Muslim, if that’s what he chose. I’d do this even though his life would probably be easier if he didn’t. It’s also easier to succeed as a dentist than an artist. But if my daughter wants to be an artist, I’ll encourage her all the way — and work to destroy any barriers along her path, not put them up myself.
Plus, I’ve never for a single second regretted being gay, nor saw it as anything other than an asset and a gift. My parents were ridiculously supportive from Day One, and I had a great community of friends and mentors who made me feel unconditionally accepted. By the time my daughter comes of age, she’ll have even more of a support network, including two moms, for crying out loud.

by Mavorpen » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:55 am
Iwassoclose wrote:Desperate Measures wrote:Guide to parenting: Don't have a view. DO NOT INTERACT. Do not develop healthy conclusions.
Oh have all the views you want, just don't force them on your kids.
Also, healthy conclusions? Because I am gay and successful, my daughter will also be successful if she is gay.

by Mondoncon » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:57 am
Mavorpen wrote:New Stephania wrote:What am I misunderstanding by saying that the sentence is open to interpretation because the author did not flesh it out?
Tell me. Because I am not saying it is one or the other.
You think it actually matters. It doesn't. What matters is that the mother obviously feels like it'd be easier if her daughter was also gay, because that's much more readily relatable.

by New Stephania » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:57 am
Mavorpen wrote:You think it actually matters. It doesn't.
Cannot think of a name wrote:You guys keep repeating that sentence like the article is only two lines long.
by Cannot think of a name » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:58 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:"Parents want their children to be like them, non-homophobes oppose heteronormativity, Pope is indeed Catholic"
No he isn't.
Not necessarily, anyway.

by Mavorpen » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:59 am
New Stephania wrote:Mavorpen wrote:You think it actually matters. It doesn't.
As an LGBT it matters to me. If what she meant by that sentence is that she wants to teach her daughter than being gay is more desirable than being straight, and make a point of posting it in a paper for people to criticise, I am going to criticise it. If that's not what she meant by that sentence, I have no qualms with the sentence.
You'll notice, unless you simply butted in late, that I was trying to tell Iwassoclose that she might not be saying being gay is more desirable than being straight.

by The Black Forrest » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:59 am
New Stephania wrote:Mavorpen wrote:You think it actually matters. It doesn't.
As an LGBT it matters to me. If what she meant by that sentence is that she wants to teach her daughter than being gay is more desirable than being straight, and make a point of posting it in a paper for people to criticise, I am going to criticise it. If that's not what she meant by that sentence, I have no qualms with the sentence.
You'll notice, unless you simply butted in late, that I was trying to tell Iwassoclose that she might not be saying being gay is more desirable than being straight.

by Mondoncon » Mon Feb 23, 2015 11:00 am

by Lenciland » Mon Feb 23, 2015 11:00 am
Karlsreich wrote:And on the fourth day, God created Saturn. And he liked it. So he put a ring on it.
by Cannot think of a name » Mon Feb 23, 2015 11:00 am
The Black Forrest wrote:New Stephania wrote:As an LGBT it matters to me. If what she meant by that sentence is that she wants to teach her daughter than being gay is more desirable than being straight, and make a point of posting it in a paper for people to criticise, I am going to criticise it. If that's not what she meant by that sentence, I have no qualms with the sentence.
You'll notice, unless you simply butted in late, that I was trying to tell Iwassoclose that she might not be saying being gay is more desirable than being straight.
That's fine. She can teach all she wants. It gets thrown out when puberty hits......
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Ostroeuropa, Warvick
Advertisement