NATION

PASSWORD

I'm gay, so my child must be as well.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
New Stephania
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 366
Founded: Feb 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Stephania » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:20 am

Iwassoclose wrote:By forcing homosexuality on her and telling her how much better her life would be.

I have had my complaints but you're just going way off the deep end, she's doing no such thing. Read the article.
Nationality: English
Political Ideology: None
Manchester City Fan

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:22 am

Iwassoclose wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:Good thing she is, then?


By forcing homosexuality on her and telling her how much better her life would be.

She is conditioning her kid.

Where is this forced homosexuality? Point out a quote?
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:24 am

Desperate Measures wrote:
Iwassoclose wrote:
By forcing homosexuality on her and telling her how much better her life would be.

She is conditioning her kid.

Where is this forced homosexuality? Point out a quote?

It's from the article in their mind.

User avatar
Iwassoclose
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1315
Founded: Dec 08, 2014
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Iwassoclose » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:24 am

New Stephania wrote:
Iwassoclose wrote:By forcing homosexuality on her and telling her how much better her life would be.

I have had my complaints but you're just going way off the deep end, she's doing no such thing. Read the article.


Its right in the paper

It’s more widely acceptable to be gay in America today, but that’s not the same as being desirable. In my house, though, it is.

User avatar
Wallenburg
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 22344
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:25 am

The way the OP words the topic suggests that the mother is doing everything she can to passively lead her child to be gay.
She should not force her child to be gay. That's just as bad as demanding they be straight. Sexual preference or orientation should not be a basis for discrimination, on whatever side of the discussion.
I want to improve.
grestin went through the MKULTRA program and he has more of a free will than wallenburg does - Imperial Idaho
King of Snark, General Assembly Secretary, Arbiter for The East Pacific


User avatar
Madiganistan
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 467
Founded: Jan 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Madiganistan » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:25 am

Iwassoclose wrote:The circle jerk... :arrow:

You must be new around here.

There's certainly disdain among the oh-so-oppressed communities of the self-described progressive left against demographically normative cultural groups that twists into ironic hatred of those normative groups.. in fact, there's even a digital neighborhood where people defined by this tendency coalesce.

This isn't an example of that. In fact, the linked article actually follows quite a lovely a narrative arc that describes how Sally Kohn came to the realization that she was being a bit of a hypocrite in her parental bias.

Granted, progressives commentating on this piece across the intertoobs seem to have missed that point just as thoroughly as conservatives. But that doesn't seem to be what you or OP are upset about.
I'm obligated to point out that I've been dicking around here under a medley of monikers since mid-2013, since longevity
and post counts are the two primary factors considered when assessing the worth and validity of any given poster's opinion.

Click this link to a context-blind, four-paragraph post I wrote in a random NSG thread in the summer of 2011
that indisputably validates my belief that I am one of the brightest minds in this community.

Pro: Skater II for the Sony PlayStation®
Anti: gua and Barbuda
Economic Left: -1.38
Social Authoritarian: 1.62

User avatar
Iwassoclose
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1315
Founded: Dec 08, 2014
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Iwassoclose » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:26 am

Desperate Measures wrote:
Iwassoclose wrote:
By forcing homosexuality on her and telling her how much better her life would be.

She is conditioning her kid.

Where is this forced homosexuality? Point out a quote?


When my daughter plays house with her stuffed koala bears as the mom and dad, we gently remind her that they could be a dad and dad. Sometimes she changes her narrative. Sometimes she doesn’t. It’s her choice.


Why?

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:27 am

Iwassoclose wrote:
New Stephania wrote:I have had my complaints but you're just going way off the deep end, she's doing no such thing. Read the article.


Its right in the paper

It’s more widely acceptable to be gay in America today, but that’s not the same as being desirable. In my house, though, it is.

How is this forcing homosexuality??? I don't know if you understood the question I asked.

And then right there in the article, "All I ultimately care about is that she has the choice and that whatever choice she makes is enthusiastically embraced and celebrated." I mean.... the pure indoctrination!!! Gasp.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:28 am

Iwassoclose wrote:
New Stephania wrote:I have had my complaints but you're just going way off the deep end, she's doing no such thing. Read the article.


Its right in the paper

It’s more widely acceptable to be gay in America today, but that’s not the same as being desirable. In my house, though, it is.

1. You said "forcing homosexuality on her". Where's that in the article?
2. Saying something is desirable is not the same as saying "your life will be better this way". Even if it were, she's still allowing her kid to do her own thing.

So basically, you have failed to contradict the statement you set out to contradict, which was:

Desperate Measures wrote:
Royal Zakinian Empire wrote:bad, she should let the girl make her own choices regarding her sexuality.

Good thing she is, then?


Nice try, please learn how to debate.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41248
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:28 am

Iwassoclose wrote:
New Stephania wrote:I have had my complaints but you're just going way off the deep end, she's doing no such thing. Read the article.


Its right in the paper

It’s more widely acceptable to be gay in America today, but that’s not the same as being desirable. In my house, though, it is.


My friend wrote back with a slew of helpful advice, ending with a punch to my gut: “Bet it wouldn’t bother you so much if her crush was on a girl.”

She was right. I’m a slightly overbearing pro-gay gay mom. But I’m going to support my daughter, whatever choices she makes.


You might have read the article, but I don't think you made it all the way to the end. Or maybe you just didn't understand the point of the article.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:28 am

We can't criticise how she chooses to raise her own child.

To do so would be homophobic.

User avatar
Iwassoclose
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1315
Founded: Dec 08, 2014
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Iwassoclose » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:29 am

Desperate Measures wrote:
Iwassoclose wrote:
Its right in the paper


How is this forcing homosexuality??? I don't know if you understood the question I asked.

And then right there in the article, "All I ultimately care about is that she has the choice and that whatever choice she makes is enthusiastically embraced and celebrated." I mean.... the pure indoctrination!!! Gasp.


Read the quote that is addressed to your post above.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159013
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:29 am

Christainville wrote:
Ifreann wrote:If I'm not very much mistaken I also detect a hint of hypocrisy. I dare say that this Christainville person is a Christian. I wonder what they have to say about the Christian tradition of inducting one's children into the Christian religion when they are still newborns. My money's on him not having a problem with it.


I'll allow it.

I am a Christian, and I was never inducted into the church. First off, it works every salvation for every man, so you can be introduced to something day and night and never personally except it. So, I was never inducted to it, I haven't been to a church in ages, but I still keep my faith, so its lots of us that were never inducted to this as babies, and are a part of it for the record.

Were you not baptised? That is what I am referring to.

I would love to know how these 2 tie into each other. Because parents forced stuff on their kids? Because parents want things for their kids?

It's pretty simple. You' clearly have a problem with the idea of a child being made to be gay. I'm wondering if you have a problem with even younger children being made to be Christian.
At lest our views didn't get political and take over the world to win elections.

I'll say again that this is not a matter of conservative vs liberal, nor about Christian vs non-Christian.

User avatar
Iwassoclose
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1315
Founded: Dec 08, 2014
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Iwassoclose » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:30 am

Fartsniffage wrote:
Iwassoclose wrote:
Its right in the paper



My friend wrote back with a slew of helpful advice, ending with a punch to my gut: “Bet it wouldn’t bother you so much if her crush was on a girl.”

She was right. I’m a slightly overbearing pro-gay gay mom. But I’m going to support my daughter, whatever choices she makes.


You might have read the article, but I don't think you made it all the way to the end. Or maybe you just didn't understand the point of the article.


Yes, I will support her in whatever decisions she makes but I am going to tell her whats desirable first...

User avatar
Wallenburg
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 22344
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:30 am

I found a gay walrus in my nation's waters. Where are its rights?
I want to improve.
grestin went through the MKULTRA program and he has more of a free will than wallenburg does - Imperial Idaho
King of Snark, General Assembly Secretary, Arbiter for The East Pacific


User avatar
New Stephania
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 366
Founded: Feb 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Stephania » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:30 am

Iwassoclose wrote:
New Stephania wrote:I have had my complaints but you're just going way off the deep end, she's doing no such thing. Read the article.

Its right in the paper

It’s more widely acceptable to be gay in America today, but that’s not the same as being desirable. In my house, though, it is.

I did forget about that quote, but what she meant is open to interpretation without the author fleshing it out. If she means she teaches her child being straight is undesirable then I am with you, if she means she teaches her child being gay or straight is just fine then it's not the same thing you are suggesting.
Nationality: English
Political Ideology: None
Manchester City Fan

User avatar
NeoColumbia
Attaché
 
Posts: 92
Founded: Jun 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby NeoColumbia » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:31 am

Inb4 Saying gays will try to make their "children" gay is nonsensical homophobia.

Reminds me of those jewish lesbians in california that are injecting their adopted son with female hormones.
Pro:Fascism,Noble Liberty, Family,Nationalism,Virtue,Honor,Racism,Self Reliance,Social Accountability,Rightous/Competitive Violence,Healthy Sex life
Anti:Semites,Capitalism,Communism,Anarchism,Tolerance for degeneracy,Nannystates,LGBTQH(wxyz),"Nuerodiversity",Race Traitors,Slutdom,learn my prounouns,special little snowflakes, Nationstates(the forum)

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:31 am

Iwassoclose wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:Where is this forced homosexuality? Point out a quote?


When my daughter plays house with her stuffed koala bears as the mom and dad, we gently remind her that they could be a dad and dad. Sometimes she changes her narrative. Sometimes she doesn’t. It’s her choice.


Why?

So attempting to counteract society's overwhelming heteronormativity is forcing homosexuality? Are 90+% of books, movies etc forcing heterosexuality by showing opposite-sex couples?

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:31 am

Iwassoclose wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:How is this forcing homosexuality??? I don't know if you understood the question I asked.

And then right there in the article, "All I ultimately care about is that she has the choice and that whatever choice she makes is enthusiastically embraced and celebrated." I mean.... the pure indoctrination!!! Gasp.


Read the quote that is addressed to your post above.

I did. I read it. I even asked a question about it!
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Iwassoclose
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1315
Founded: Dec 08, 2014
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Iwassoclose » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:32 am

Dakini wrote:1. You said "forcing homosexuality on her". Where's that in the article?


Read the post that I actually addressed first before jumping the gun.
Last edited by Iwassoclose on Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41248
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:32 am

Iwassoclose wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:


You might have read the article, but I don't think you made it all the way to the end. Or maybe you just didn't understand the point of the article.


Yes, I will support her in whatever decisions she makes but I am going to tell her whats desirable first...


Yep, you didn't understand the point of the article.

User avatar
Madiganistan
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 467
Founded: Jan 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Madiganistan » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:33 am

For every post of constructive conversation in this thread, there's three posts in which someone tells someone else to "read the article."
I'm obligated to point out that I've been dicking around here under a medley of monikers since mid-2013, since longevity
and post counts are the two primary factors considered when assessing the worth and validity of any given poster's opinion.

Click this link to a context-blind, four-paragraph post I wrote in a random NSG thread in the summer of 2011
that indisputably validates my belief that I am one of the brightest minds in this community.

Pro: Skater II for the Sony PlayStation®
Anti: gua and Barbuda
Economic Left: -1.38
Social Authoritarian: 1.62

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:33 am

Iwassoclose wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:


You might have read the article, but I don't think you made it all the way to the end. Or maybe you just didn't understand the point of the article.


Yes, I will support her in whatever decisions she makes but I am going to tell her whats desirable first...

*shrug* Parents generally consider it desirable that their children go on to be financially successful. That doesn't mean that they don't support their children in their decisions to become artists.

I'm going to echo the "you didn't understand the point of the article" comment because you clearly didn't.

User avatar
Ragnarum
Senator
 
Posts: 3889
Founded: Dec 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ragnarum » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:34 am

The title of the article is nothing but clickbait, and there is nothing particularly unusual or insightful or interesting written in it, trust me. Just more cushy and cliched bullshit.
Last edited by Ragnarum on Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:37 am, edited 4 times in total.
Don't copy and paste anything you see in a sig you fucking normie scrub
I deliberately made the star asymmetrical.
AUF GEHTS KAMERADEN
Here are my factbooks (Lots of WIP)

Ragnarum is not communist or even particularly socialist, just so you know.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:35 am

You're going to have to do better than misrepresenting articles in order to peddle this bullshit narrative that liberals are hipocrites with respect to labelling certain things as homophobic.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alcala-Cordel, Arval Va, Bovad, Gran Cordoba, New Temecula, Norse Inuit Union, Novaros, Ottomahn Empire, Senkaku, South Northville, The Deutsches Kaiserreich, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Jamesian Republic, Thermodolia, Tinhampton, Umeria, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads