NATION

PASSWORD

White Pride

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Lydenburg
Senator
 
Posts: 4592
Founded: May 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lydenburg » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:13 pm

Old Tyrannia wrote:Surely people can find a better way to identify themselves than their skin tone? It's like founding a "Ginger Pride" club. Nonsense.


This. Same goes for so-called "Black Pride" as well.

Ek bly in Australie nou, maar Afrika sal altyd in my hart wees. Maak nie saak wat gebeur nie, ek is trots om te kan sê ek is 'n kind van hierdie ingewikkelde soms wrede kontinent. Mis jou altyd my Suid-Afrika, hier met n seer hart al die pad van Melbourne af!


User avatar
Torisakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16482
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Torisakia » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:30 pm

Apparently we can't live in a time where one can be proud of themselves without "DAS WASIS". I'm beginning to question why people use their skin to identify themselves. Next thing you know people will be segregating themselves based on the number of symmetrical moles they have.
Royal Alexandre Hockey Invitational II Champions, NS Sports' Unofficial Champions of Life™
Pro: truth
Anti: uptight short sided narrow minded hypocrites, neurotic psychotic pigheaded politicians, short-haired yellow-bellied sons of Tricky Dick who try to mother-hubbard soft soap me with pockets full of hopes, tight-lipped condescending mama's little chauvinists, Schizophrenic egocentric paranoiac primadonnas

User avatar
San france
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby San france » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:32 pm

I think it is ok to have a pride for minorities. That doesn't mean that majorities can't have one but when it come down to it, pride is for minorities that have been oppressed. You don't have a straight pride because the overwhelming majority is straight, why should there be a white pride, and to commemorate what? slavery? oppressing? colonization? american Indian genocide?
Of course there are good things that have been done by white people but it is important to focus on minorities that want to have there says.


I am proud gay rights, pro race equality, anti-feminist but pro gender equality and pro secularism

User avatar
Devvo Mate
Diplomat
 
Posts: 889
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Devvo Mate » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:33 pm

San france wrote:I am proud gay rights, pro race equality, anti-feminist but pro gender equality and pro secularism


If you're pro-gender equality you can't be anti-feminist.

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:33 pm

Old Tyrannia wrote:Surely people can find a better way to identify themselves than their skin tone? It's like founding a "Ginger Pride" club. Nonsense.


That is nonsense. Having gingervitis is not something to be proud of.
Last edited by Mike the Progressive on Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Paledonn
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 370
Founded: May 19, 2014
New York Times Democracy

Postby Paledonn » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:35 pm

Schiltzberg wrote:
The United Kingdoms of Austinarya wrote:Imagine the third world without colonialism, they wouldn't have any infrastructure or wealth if it wasn't for Europe.

Imperialism from the European powers is what destroyed many cultures, governments, and traditions, and the only thing that blinds you from seeing that is your naïve, one-sided ethnocentrism. Before the Europeans started to imperialize Africa in the 1600's, there were several large empires and stable governments in that part of the world. The local cultures had everything under control until the Europeans arrived and demanded this control from them. The Europeans exploited the natural resources, and brought them to Europe to benefit their economy. The Africans were given nothing for these crops and resources that were most likely planted and harvested by the Africans themselves. Africans were enslaved and brought to other European colonies, especially in North America, and in many of the European colonies, were given absolutely no say in the government. Then in the twentieth century, the Europeans hastily pulled out of Africa, which was a good thing, but they refused to help out the new governments in their former colonies, so many of these new governments became weak and unstable. Africa was pushed so far behind to curb because of this, and to this day is not able to compete with the other nations of the world in this new globalized economy. But I guess the Europeans got what they wanted, right? This happened not only in Africa, but also in North America, South America, Australia, and parts of Asia as well.

But they sure made a fortune selling each other into the new slave trade! :P

User avatar
New Carloso
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5377
Founded: Feb 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Carloso » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:35 pm

Devvo Mate wrote:
San france wrote:I am proud gay rights, pro race equality, anti-feminist but pro gender equality and pro secularism


If you're pro-gender equality you can't be anti-feminist.

Well, technically you can

Feminism is widely considered by many to refer to the more militant form of gender equality for women.
THE OFFICIAL FACTBOOK OF CARLOSO | FatChineseGuy: Official Mascot | Proud Member and Minister for Defence of the INTERNATIONAL FREEDOM COALITION! | FEEL FREE TO JOIN ATLAS | CARLOSSIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:36 pm

New Carloso wrote:
Devvo Mate wrote:
If you're pro-gender equality you can't be anti-feminist.

Well, technically you can

Feminism is widely considered by many to refer to the more militant form of gender equality for women.


Only by those who don't understand it and ignore how diverse and divided the feminist movement actually is.

User avatar
Paledonn
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 370
Founded: May 19, 2014
New York Times Democracy

Postby Paledonn » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:37 pm

New Carloso wrote:
Devvo Mate wrote:
If you're pro-gender equality you can't be anti-feminist.

Well, technically you can

Feminism is widely considered by many to refer to the more militant form of gender equality for women.

:eyebrow: Please explain what militant gender equality is.

User avatar
Torisakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16482
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Torisakia » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:37 pm

Devvo Mate wrote:
San france wrote:I am proud gay rights, pro race equality, anti-feminist but pro gender equality and pro secularism


If you're pro-gender equality you can't be anti-feminist.

I think they mean "Tumblr Feminism", not "Equality for everyone Feminism".
Royal Alexandre Hockey Invitational II Champions, NS Sports' Unofficial Champions of Life™
Pro: truth
Anti: uptight short sided narrow minded hypocrites, neurotic psychotic pigheaded politicians, short-haired yellow-bellied sons of Tricky Dick who try to mother-hubbard soft soap me with pockets full of hopes, tight-lipped condescending mama's little chauvinists, Schizophrenic egocentric paranoiac primadonnas

User avatar
Devvo Mate
Diplomat
 
Posts: 889
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Devvo Mate » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:38 pm

New Carloso wrote:Well, technically you can


No you can't.

New Carloso wrote:Feminism is widely considered by many to refer to the more militant form of gender equality for women.


Then many are wrong.

User avatar
New Carloso
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5377
Founded: Feb 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Carloso » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:38 pm

Mike the Progressive wrote:
New Carloso wrote:Well, technically you can

Feminism is widely considered by many to refer to the more militant form of gender equality for women.


Only by those who don't understand it and ignore how diverse and divided the feminist movement actually is.

Indeed. Dem ebul uneducated masses.
THE OFFICIAL FACTBOOK OF CARLOSO | FatChineseGuy: Official Mascot | Proud Member and Minister for Defence of the INTERNATIONAL FREEDOM COALITION! | FEEL FREE TO JOIN ATLAS | CARLOSSIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:38 pm

Paledonn wrote:
Schiltzberg wrote:Imperialism from the European powers is what destroyed many cultures, governments, and traditions, and the only thing that blinds you from seeing that is your naïve, one-sided ethnocentrism. Before the Europeans started to imperialize Africa in the 1600's, there were several large empires and stable governments in that part of the world. The local cultures had everything under control until the Europeans arrived and demanded this control from them. The Europeans exploited the natural resources, and brought them to Europe to benefit their economy. The Africans were given nothing for these crops and resources that were most likely planted and harvested by the Africans themselves. Africans were enslaved and brought to other European colonies, especially in North America, and in many of the European colonies, were given absolutely no say in the government. Then in the twentieth century, the Europeans hastily pulled out of Africa, which was a good thing, but they refused to help out the new governments in their former colonies, so many of these new governments became weak and unstable. Africa was pushed so far behind to curb because of this, and to this day is not able to compete with the other nations of the world in this new globalized economy. But I guess the Europeans got what they wanted, right? This happened not only in Africa, but also in North America, South America, Australia, and parts of Asia as well.

But they sure made a fortune selling each other into the new slave trade! :P


Yes, there were people in Africa who traded in slaves, and people in Africa who enslaved each other. I do hope that you're not using that as a way of excusing or minimizing the fact that it was Westerners who poured so much money into the kidnapping of locals, their transport overseas to a strange land, the stripping of their original names and cultural identities, the outlawing of their native languages, and their subjugation, torture, and rape.

User avatar
Russels Orbiting Teapot
Senator
 
Posts: 4024
Founded: Jan 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Russels Orbiting Teapot » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:38 pm

I wish I could say that I would be OK with the idea of "white pride" as long as it wasn't toxic and didn't involve tearing other people down, but the more I think about it the more it seems an unsalvageable idea. "Whiteness" is not a real thing, and has been defined and redefined by white people as it suited their needs. Do Italians and Irishmen count for white pride, even though they were heavily discriminated against?

We need to do away with the bizarre color coding.

User avatar
New Carloso
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5377
Founded: Feb 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Carloso » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:39 pm

Paledonn wrote:
New Carloso wrote:Well, technically you can

Feminism is widely considered by many to refer to the more militant form of gender equality for women.

:eyebrow: Please explain what militant gender equality is.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_feminism
THE OFFICIAL FACTBOOK OF CARLOSO | FatChineseGuy: Official Mascot | Proud Member and Minister for Defence of the INTERNATIONAL FREEDOM COALITION! | FEEL FREE TO JOIN ATLAS | CARLOSSIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:41 pm

New Carloso wrote:
Mike the Progressive wrote:
Only by those who don't understand it and ignore how diverse and divided the feminist movement actually is.

Indeed. Dem ebul uneducated masses.


I wouldn't say evil, uneducated or even masses. Just stupid people with stupid views.

User avatar
The New Sisterhood
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Feb 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Sisterhood » Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:02 pm

I (a white Hispanic half-Jew) don't care so much for honoring the entire cultural heritage of any one group of people but would rather prefer to see what qualities they have that are good or bad and look at them in an analytic, historical manner. I care much more about the history of all of humanity than I do about pride for any one group. Further, I think it's rather bigoted to seek to preserve 'White culture' as much as it is to preserve 'Western culture' because that assumes that all white people and Western peoples traditionally held similar enough values to be pigeonholed together, which is not so. The reason there is black pride in the Americas is because many of those people were brought over as slaves and lost their culture. I suspect this 'white pride' is not about rejecting the Greco-Roman-Etruscan cultures, fundamentalist Christianity, the feudal kingdoms of the West, the patriarchic nature of it, the imperialism and so forth, in favor of those people who defied the classical views of history both as individuals and as cultures, be they the Iceni, the Scythians (varying on which group), and the plethora of universal suffrage advocates be they philosophers, warriors, rulers or simple people. It irritates me that a lot of people think that all Hispanics look like Mexicans (or that all Mexicans look the same) and insist on applying stereotypes both to the people of Mexico and the rest of Latin America. I similarly find the phases of obsession and romanticization of foreign cultures as odd as embellishing ones own culture, such as for example the West's embellished depiction of feudal Japan or China and Buddhism, largely ignoring the existence of Buddhist terrorism, the patriarchic nature of fundamentalist Buddhism and thus of Tibet, the very screwed up history of Japan and China, and so on. Not to mention that most other countries in the area are usually understood in a Cold War context with the exception of Mongolia because of Genghis Khan. I am ruddy sick of how many times the Greeks, Romans or Christian Kingdoms or the American Revolution have been depicted in films (which are constantly rehashed) in a heroic manner, including the misogynistic, religiously biased, racist context, not to mention that in the film 300 the Spartans look absurd fighting Persia in nothing but thongs and more historically inaccurate than Vikings having horns on their helmets. The rehashings of the myths of King Arthur and Robin Hood have finally dwindled down along with the Crusades, and I am just as wary of embellishing Middle Eastern or Native American cultures or any peoples.

Finally, as I am an agnostic who largely accepts the the theories of human anthropologists, do so say that all humans came from Africa, that is to say, we are all descendants of black people. So, if that isn't irony enough for how crazy the idea of culture/racial pride is rather than appreciating humanity, I don't know what is.

User avatar
Godular
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11902
Founded: Sep 09, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Godular » Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:04 pm

Hee hee!





I'm human. This is awesome.
RL position
Active RP: ASCENSION
Active RP: SHENRYAX
Dormant RP: Throne of the Fallen Empire

Faction 1: The An'Kazar Control Framework of Godular-- An enormously advanced collective of formerly human bioborgs that are vastly experienced in both inter-dimensional travel and asymmetrical warfare.
A 1.08 civilization, according to this Nation Index Thingie
A 0.076 (or 0.067) civilization, according to THIS Nation Index Thingie
I don't normally use NS stats. But when I do, I prefer Dos Eckis I can STILL kill you.
Post responsibly.

User avatar
Sphermenia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 174
Founded: Aug 03, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sphermenia » Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:05 pm

Carolusborg wrote:
Sphermenia wrote:I am not human

:roll:
What are you then?


I am a wolf

User avatar
Paledonn
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 370
Founded: May 19, 2014
New York Times Democracy

Postby Paledonn » Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:06 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Paledonn wrote:But they sure made a fortune selling each other into the new slave trade! :P


Yes, there were people in Africa who traded in slaves, and people in Africa who enslaved each other. I do hope that you're not using that as a way of excusing or minimizing the fact that it was Westerners who poured so much money into the kidnapping of locals, their transport overseas to a strange land, the stripping of their original names and cultural identities, the outlawing of their native languages, and their subjugation, torture, and rape.

No. Just an example than no particular race is entirely or even nearly entirely good or evil. Not all of he westerners were bad, not all of the blacks were good. This goes to show that people categorize the all whites as shameful slave traders and all blacks as poor slaves. Each race had a huge part in the slave trade. These terrible things were done not only by whites but by blacks as well.

User avatar
Torisakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16482
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Torisakia » Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:13 pm

Sphermenia wrote:
Carolusborg wrote: :roll:
What are you then?


I am a wolf

On all levels except physical, right? :p
Royal Alexandre Hockey Invitational II Champions, NS Sports' Unofficial Champions of Life™
Pro: truth
Anti: uptight short sided narrow minded hypocrites, neurotic psychotic pigheaded politicians, short-haired yellow-bellied sons of Tricky Dick who try to mother-hubbard soft soap me with pockets full of hopes, tight-lipped condescending mama's little chauvinists, Schizophrenic egocentric paranoiac primadonnas

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:19 pm

Paledonn wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Yes, there were people in Africa who traded in slaves, and people in Africa who enslaved each other. I do hope that you're not using that as a way of excusing or minimizing the fact that it was Westerners who poured so much money into the kidnapping of locals, their transport overseas to a strange land, the stripping of their original names and cultural identities, the outlawing of their native languages, and their subjugation, torture, and rape.

No. Just an example than no particular race is entirely or even nearly entirely good or evil. Not all of he westerners were bad, not all of the blacks were good. This goes to show that people categorize the all whites as shameful slave traders and all blacks as poor slaves. Each race had a huge part in the slave trade. These terrible things were done not only by whites but by blacks as well.


Of course. However, we're not in a position to deal with the repercussions of those who sold their fellow man into bondage for transport to America. We can address the West's (and, more specifically, America's) role in this, how it became such an institution that we kept it even after the rest of the Western world was evolving away from the practice, and how it continued to be such an issue that about half of the nation decided that it would rather involve itself in a bloody battle to break away from the rest of the nation than risk being led by a man who was less than entirely sympathetic to the practice. We can discuss the effects this had on black people once they were freed, and how the lies that white people of the time told themselves to justify the practice (e.g., black people are savages who need civilizing, they're less intelligent than white people and unfit for advanced professions, they need to be controlled due to being ruled by their lusts and passions, they're so lazy that they won't feed themselves without someone standing over them with a whip) have fed into stereotypes and viewpoints that persist both in the dominant culture and in the media to this very day.

User avatar
NeoColumbia
Attaché
 
Posts: 92
Founded: Jun 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby NeoColumbia » Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:28 pm

Jute wrote:
Old Tyrannia wrote:Surely people can find a better way to identify themselves than their skin tone? It's like founding a "Ginger Pride" club. Nonsense.

Yeah, it seems like they're confusing skin color with ethnicity. Why not call it "Anglo-American/German/etc. heritage Pride" or something like that?


No not Really, Most Americans are Eueopean mutts and therefore a generalized "White Pride" makes sense.

The Same way Brown and Black Pride don't refer to a specific homogenous ethnicity but a general racial classification.

Any white person that rejects or fights against the concept of White prided is a castrated coward and a Traitor to his ancestors who he would not exist without.

14/88 White Pride World wide.
Pro:Fascism,Noble Liberty, Family,Nationalism,Virtue,Honor,Racism,Self Reliance,Social Accountability,Rightous/Competitive Violence,Healthy Sex life
Anti:Semites,Capitalism,Communism,Anarchism,Tolerance for degeneracy,Nannystates,LGBTQH(wxyz),"Nuerodiversity",Race Traitors,Slutdom,learn my prounouns,special little snowflakes, Nationstates(the forum)

User avatar
Paledonn
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 370
Founded: May 19, 2014
New York Times Democracy

Postby Paledonn » Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:29 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Paledonn wrote:No. Just an example than no particular race is entirely or even nearly entirely good or evil. Not all of he westerners were bad, not all of the blacks were good. This goes to show that people categorize the all whites as shameful slave traders and all blacks as poor slaves. Each race had a huge part in the slave trade. These terrible things were done not only by whites but by blacks as well.


Of course. However, we're not in a position to deal with the repercussions of those who sold their fellow man into bondage for transport to America. We can address the West's (and, more specifically, America's) role in this, how it became such an institution that we kept it even after the rest of the Western world was evolving away from the practice, and how it continued to be such an issue that about half of the nation decided that it would rather involve itself in a bloody battle to break away from the rest of the nation than risk being led by a man who was less than entirely sympathetic to the practice. We can discuss the effects this had on black people once they were freed, and how the lies that white people of the time told themselves to justify the practice (e.g., black people are savages who need civilizing, they're less intelligent than white people and unfit for advanced professions, they need to be controlled due to being ruled by their lusts and passions, they're so lazy that they won't feed themselves without someone standing over them with a whip) have fed into stereotypes and viewpoints that persist both in the dominant culture and in the media to this very day.

Of course it was all bad. But I don't think that is the black stereotype. And that is definitely not in the media!

User avatar
Devvo Mate
Diplomat
 
Posts: 889
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Devvo Mate » Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:30 pm

NeoColumbia wrote:14/88 White Pride World wide.


Literally the edgiest thing I have ever seen posted here, and that is saying something. As if you're actually praising Hitler, there are people who still genuinely do this. Amazing.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Corrian, EuroStralia, Grinning Dragon, Jilia, Umeria, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads