I quite like this quote by him.
...nipples protruding...
-Donald Trump
Advertisement

by Rhubenstein » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:34 pm

by Thermodolia » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:34 pm
The United Territories of Providence wrote:Thermodolia wrote:If is the key word here. We're talking about the guy that read from green eggs and ham, during the funding crisis.
It would be too little too late if he could moderate himself. You can't shut down the government and then try to preach to Democrats about compromise.

by Master Shake » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:35 pm


by Thermodolia » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:36 pm

by Master Shake » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:37 pm

by Estva » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:38 pm

by The United Territories of Providence » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:38 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:39 pm
Master Shake wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
You think he'd win against China? The man can't even win his timeslot.
He'd do a better job then Nixon and Kissinger...giving up all of America's middle class jobs and manufactoring doomed us to become a service industry paradise where everyone works at fast food or retail...

by Estva » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:40 pm
The United Territories of Providence wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Well if he pulls that off, then I guess he's the man for the job.
Absolutely not. He's way to conservative for my taste. I'm hoping for a Paul/Walker or maybe Paul/Kasich ticket. Cruz is a conspiracy theorist, he's an anti-intellectual and he's barely qualified to be a senator. If he wants to fight the good fight for the tea party in congress, more power to him...but he could never win the white house with any of his past views. He makes Reagan look like a RINO.

by Master Shake » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:40 pm
Estva wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Paul might actually do it. But he would have to get out from underneath his father's shadow. Which is easier said than done.
The issue is Paul is not liked by social conservatives, considering he has argued for drug legalization, police demilitarization, and gay marriage legalization. He'll have to hide those views to get nominated.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:41 pm
Master Shake wrote:Estva wrote:The issue is Paul is not liked by social conservatives, considering he has argued for drug legalization, police demilitarization, and gay marriage legalization. He'll have to hide those views to get nominated.
Any sane politician should be against the bolded term above. Are we actually allowing this nonsense to happen?
The police already can beat the crap out of us as long it isn't filmed....

by Estva » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:41 pm
Master Shake wrote:Estva wrote:The issue is Paul is not liked by social conservatives, considering he has argued for drug legalization, police demilitarization, and gay marriage legalization. He'll have to hide those views to get nominated.
Any sane politician should be against the bolded term above. Are we actually allowing this nonsense to happen?
The police already can beat the crap out of us as long it isn't filmed....

by Thermodolia » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:41 pm
Estva wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Paul might actually do it. But he would have to get out from underneath his father's shadow. Which is easier said than done.
The issue is Paul is not liked by social conservatives, considering he has argued for drug legalization, police demilitarization, and gay marriage legalization. He'll have to hide those views to get nominated.

by Estva » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:43 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Estva wrote:The issue is Paul is not liked by social conservatives, considering he has argued for drug legalization, police demilitarization, and gay marriage legalization. He'll have to hide those views to get nominated.
I am well aware that Paul is not well liked with the social conservative crowd. I think the guy is great. i'm all for drug legalization and gay marriage legalization.

by Master Shake » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:43 pm

by The United Territories of Providence » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:43 pm
Estva wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Paul might actually do it. But he would have to get out from underneath his father's shadow. Which is easier said than done.
The issue is Paul is not liked by social conservatives, considering he has argued for drug legalization, police demilitarization, and gay marriage legalization. He'll have to hide those views to get nominated.

by Thermodolia » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:44 pm
Estva wrote:Master Shake wrote:
Any sane politician should be against the bolded term above. Are we actually allowing this nonsense to happen?
The police already can beat the crap out of us as long it isn't filmed....
It's not so much a liberal vs. conservative thing as it is a establishment vs. anti-establishment one. Libertarians and progressives have both fought it while the establishment members did little.
EDIT: He supports limiting the powers of the police...

by Master Shake » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:45 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Estva wrote:It's not so much a liberal vs. conservative thing as it is a establishment vs. anti-establishment one. Libertarians and progressives have both fought it while the establishment members did little.
EDIT: He supports limiting the powers of the police...
Which is a good thing. We don't need to be in a police state.

by Thermodolia » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:45 pm
Estva wrote:Thermodolia wrote:I am well aware that Paul is not well liked with the social conservative crowd. I think the guy is great. i'm all for drug legalization and gay marriage legalization.
That's great, but it won't win him the nomination.
The only "libertarian" thing I think he can do throughout the whole campaign is an anti-surveillance schtick, which Hillary has pretty universally refused to comment on.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:46 pm

by Thermodolia » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:46 pm
The United Territories of Providence wrote:Estva wrote:The issue is Paul is not liked by social conservatives, considering he has argued for drug legalization, police demilitarization, and gay marriage legalization. He'll have to hide those views to get nominated.
He doesn't believe in Marriage Equality, he said that is a states rights issue.
He only favors federal legalization of Medical Cannabis
Conservatives love demilitarized police because they don't like the idea of police over reach or big government building local armies to police the people.
He's our candidate for 2016. He doesn't have to hide anything, he should run on those things. Minorities like him, Young people like him, and Conservatives, Moderates and Libertarians like him.

by Estva » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:48 pm
The United Territories of Providence wrote:He doesn't believe in Marriage Equality, he said that is a states rights issue.
The United Territories of Providence wrote:He only favors federal legalization of Medical Cannabis
The United Territories of Providence wrote:Conservatives love demilitarized police because they don't like the idea of police over reach or big government building local armies to police the people.
The United Territories of Providence wrote:He's our candidate for 2016. He doesn't have to hide anything, he should run on those things. Minorities like him, Young people like him, and Conservatives, Moderates and Libertarians like him.

by Estva » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:49 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Estva wrote:That's great, but it won't win him the nomination.
The only "libertarian" thing I think he can do throughout the whole campaign is an anti-surveillance schtick, which Hillary has pretty universally refused to comment on.
True, but I'll vote for him. Only because the libertarians can't get their damn act to together.

by Liriena » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:49 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Master Shake » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:50 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Master Shake wrote:
sigh...this thread is going at a mile a minute...
I mean police militarization...
Demilitarize the shit out of the pigs!
Jesus, I was protesting police brutality while you weren't even a dirty thought crossing your father's mind, and even I don't call them "pigs".

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Fartsniffage, Neu California
Advertisement