Kernen wrote:Wallenburg wrote:That's a big chunk of your side. Reconsider that statement. But yes, a minority should not be taken to represent a majority.
Just as the handful of total ban advocates does not represent the large swath of America in favor of mild regulation.
Like your opinions on the Supreme Court decision regarding the interpretation of the Second Amendment, right?
You know, when someone recognizes your argument, you usually should try to do the same with them. That way you don't come across as a complete ass.
Once again,
I recognize gun ownership as necessary for some people, and as a responsible preference for others. But in my opinion, again, rights are universal. If you deny rights to someone that hasn't ceded them by committing a crime, then they are no longer universal.
Driving is considered a privilege. You need a license for it. You also need a permit to own guns. Why would you need a permit to exercise your rights?
I continue to believe that the Second Amendment does not defend gun rights for all, regardless of Republican corruption in the Supreme Court. I believe it protects the right of gun ownership given you pledge to defend your nation in the event the militia is called up. The militia is half-dead, so the Second Amendment has little power. Therefore, gun ownership is a privilege, one that you may exercise as long as you don't fuck with it or don't commit a crime that suggests you cannot handle that privilege responsibly.
I expect no less than 3 hateful, illogical responses to this post. Happy hunting!