NATION

PASSWORD

Dating: What are your deal-breakers?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

I wouldn't date someone who:

Is conservative.
98
13%
Is liberal.
63
8%
Is libertarian.
55
7%
Doesn't care about politics.
54
7%
Is religious.
67
9%
Is atheist.
59
8%
Smokes weed.
136
18%
Doesn't smoke weed.
15
2%
Is an alcoholic.
184
24%
Has a fucking problem with my drinking, I can quick whenever I wa-blalralralhghghhh.....hyuah....hhwauuuh...blarlalrhrlhhhl....hwuh....uck...*spits*....I'm fine.
44
6%
 
Total votes : 775

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Zottistan » Sat Feb 07, 2015 12:14 pm

-Ebola- wrote:
The Princes of the Universe wrote:One-night stands, right? :p


More like just climbing in people's bodies without asking. Bodily sovereignty is less of a concern when you're dealing with different species.

Is that a vore thing? It sounds like a vore thing.
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
-Ebola-
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1872
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby -Ebola- » Sat Feb 07, 2015 12:23 pm

Zottistan wrote:
-Ebola- wrote:
More like just climbing in people's bodies without asking. Bodily sovereignty is less of a concern when you're dealing with different species.

Is that a vore thing? It sounds like a vore thing.


When you put it that way, I suppose vore is very popular among viruses. :)
There are viruses on the internet! Make sure your computer is protected.
African, asexual, and proud.
Racism is foolish. You're all the same inside. I would know.

User avatar
The New United States
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 193
Founded: Jun 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The New United States » Sat Feb 07, 2015 12:49 pm

I would not want to date any girl that:
1) Consumes alcohol
2) Consumes recreational drugs
3) Throws curse-words around for no reason
4) Wants to fornicate
5) Is anti-theistic

I wouldn't mind dating a girl that is not of my religion (including non-religious folk), but only if they were to respect my beliefs and not try to force drugs, alcohol, sex, etc on me.

User avatar
New DeCapito
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1215
Founded: Dec 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New DeCapito » Sat Feb 07, 2015 12:51 pm

Stupid people. They just annoy me for some reason.
Liberal, egalitarian. Correct me if I become too outspoken.

User avatar
Krinanje
Secretary
 
Posts: 27
Founded: Sep 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Krinanje » Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:04 pm

Smart people anoy me becuz they R against physual novels bunch of bullshit innit m8
Last edited by Krinanje on Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The United Neptumousian Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2027
Founded: Dec 02, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby The United Neptumousian Empire » Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:26 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
The United Neptumousian Empire wrote:There's nothing strong about shirking sacred vows. Marriage is a life long contract. If you divorce, then you're an oathbreaker.


Nope. An act of disloyalty makes you an oathbreaker.

The person who did nothing wrong doesn't deserve further guilt because they want to divorce the disloyal person. Theres nothing to feel sorry about leaving a toxic marriage to preserve your self-respect.

I would love my wife, but I will always love myself a bit more.
If they've done nothing wrong, they wouldn't be getting divorced, because divorce itself is immoral.

Agnostic
Asexual Spectrum, Lesbian
Transgender MtF, pronouns she / her

Pro-LGBT
Pro-Left Wing
Pro-Socialism / Communism

Anti-Hate Speech
Anti-Fascist
Anti-Bigotry
Anti-Right Wing
Anti-Capitalism

Political Compass
Personality Type: INFJ
I am The Flood

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43457
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:28 pm

Being a conservative. (Also, being able to accept my liking of anime/manga)
Last edited by New haven america on Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Calimera II » Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:31 pm

The New United States wrote:I would not want to date any girl that:
1) Consumes alcohol


What.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:50 pm

Calimera II wrote:
The New United States wrote:I would not want to date any girl that:
1) Consumes alcohol


What.


Not everyone likes a girl who drinks alcohol. Why the surprise?

I like a girl who knows her drinks as opposed to not drinking. I drink alcohol but only on meals.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:52 pm

The United Neptumousian Empire wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Nope. An act of disloyalty makes you an oathbreaker.

The person who did nothing wrong doesn't deserve further guilt because they want to divorce the disloyal person. Theres nothing to feel sorry about leaving a toxic marriage to preserve your self-respect.

I would love my wife, but I will always love myself a bit more.
If they've done nothing wrong, they wouldn't be getting divorced, because divorce itself is immoral.

So I shouldn't have divorced my husband when he began abusing me?
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Zottistan » Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:53 pm

Calimera II wrote:
The New United States wrote:I would not want to date any girl that:
1) Consumes alcohol


What.

I'd be inclined towards the same thing to be honest. I can't stand to be around drunks or tipsy people.
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
Sebastianbourg
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5717
Founded: Apr 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sebastianbourg » Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:54 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Calimera II wrote:
What.


Not everyone likes a girl who drinks alcohol. Why the surprise?

I like a girl who knows her drinks as opposed to not drinking. I drink alcohol but only on meals.

But that's a bit extreme I'd say. Sure, you don't want an alcoholic but it's difficult to find someone who never drinks.

User avatar
-Ebola-
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1872
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby -Ebola- » Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:54 pm

Zottistan wrote:
Calimera II wrote:
What.

I'd be inclined towards the same thing to be honest. I can't stand to be around drunks or tipsy people.


Not everyone who drinks alcohol is going to drink enough to get drunk.
There are viruses on the internet! Make sure your computer is protected.
African, asexual, and proud.
Racism is foolish. You're all the same inside. I would know.

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Zottistan » Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:55 pm

-Ebola- wrote:
Zottistan wrote:I'd be inclined towards the same thing to be honest. I can't stand to be around drunks or tipsy people.


Not everyone who drinks alcohol is going to drink enough to get drunk.

I am aware.
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:56 pm

Zottistan wrote:
Calimera II wrote:
What.

I'd be inclined towards the same thing to be honest. I can't stand to be around drunks or tipsy people.

I am the greatest drunk in the history of the universe, I just want to have sex and put on pretty dresses.
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:58 pm

The United Neptumousian Empire wrote:If they've done nothing wrong, they wouldn't be getting divorced, because divorce itself is immoral.


See what you're doing here? You're shifting the blame. Same as when other people call us out when our partners cheat. "You must have done something for them to cheat/abuse you".

Nobody deserves to live in a shit life just because of morals. At least I won't. Its your choice if you can live with a disloyal or abusive partner but I won't be the one in such a relationship so not my business. If I ever am that's why divorce is an option.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Feb 07, 2015 2:00 pm

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
The United Neptumousian Empire wrote:If they've done nothing wrong, they wouldn't be getting divorced, because divorce itself is immoral.

So I shouldn't have divorced my husband when he began abusing me?


According to him it was your fault he abused you because you divorced. Why did you divorce? Didn't you get the memo? Clearly it said the blame shifts if you ever divorce so now you are responsible of your ex husband abusing you. *nods*
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Feb 07, 2015 2:02 pm

Sebastianbourg wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Not everyone likes a girl who drinks alcohol. Why the surprise?

I like a girl who knows her drinks as opposed to not drinking. I drink alcohol but only on meals.

But that's a bit extreme I'd say. Sure, you don't want an alcoholic but it's difficult to find someone who never drinks.


Not as difficult if you know where to look.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Sat Feb 07, 2015 2:04 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:So I shouldn't have divorced my husband when he began abusing me?


According to him it was your fault he abused you because you divorced. Why did you divorce? Didn't you get the memo? Clearly it said the blame shifts if you ever divorce so now you are responsible of your ex husband abusing you. *nods*

Apparently the only way to remain innocent is to continue to be abused for the rest of your life.
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Calimera II » Sat Feb 07, 2015 2:05 pm

The New United States wrote:I would not want to date any girl that:
1) Consumes alcohol
2) Consumes recreational drugs
3) Throws curse-words around for no reason
4) Wants to fornicate
5) Is anti-theistic

I wouldn't mind dating a girl that is not of my religion (including non-religious folk), but only if they were to respect my beliefs and not try to force drugs, alcohol, sex, etc on me.

There are no girls like this.. However.....

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Feb 07, 2015 2:09 pm

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
According to him it was your fault he abused you because you divorced. Why did you divorce? Didn't you get the memo? Clearly it said the blame shifts if you ever divorce so now you are responsible of your ex husband abusing you. *nods*

Apparently the only way to remain innocent is to continue to be abused for the rest of your life.


I'll be honest. I would not abuse my partner as long as I'm sane and able. If for some reason I end up becoming a threat for my partner I'd hope she has the sense to leave me or point a gun/knife at me if I am the direct threat.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Sebastianbourg
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5717
Founded: Apr 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sebastianbourg » Sat Feb 07, 2015 2:11 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Sebastianbourg wrote:But that's a bit extreme I'd say. Sure, you don't want an alcoholic but it's difficult to find someone who never drinks.


Not as difficult if you know where to look.

Well, his profile says he's in Jordan and a decent segment of Jordanian society would fulfil the criteria he has established. Je comprend maintenant.

User avatar
Kazarogkai
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8065
Founded: Jan 27, 2012
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Kazarogkai » Sat Feb 07, 2015 2:55 pm

I cant stand religion so that is an issue, I also dislike liberals but may be able to tolerate them under curtain circumstances. What I cant stand though are Libertarians especially the more extreme Anarchist variants who I loath with a passion. I don't like smokers and am a Teetotaler so there is also that. Overall I can be categorized as a Reactionary more than likely with a Radical-Centrist slant but I could possibly get along with a Socialist or maybe a Smithsonian-Capitalist so long as we avoided the subject, but that is unlikely isn't it? That is just in terms of personal beliefs mind you in terms of personality I wouldn't like someone who was overly reckless and brash, someone without loyalty or integrity, I will not accept these things. Physically there wouldn't honestly be a lot for the most part, I expect the basics like good hygiene, good health, etc. Nothing notable.
Centrist
Reactionary
Bigot
Conservationist
Communitarian
Georgist
Distributist
Corporatist
Nationalist
Teetotaler
Ancient weaponry
Politics
History in general
books
military
Fighting
Survivalism
Nature
Anthropology
hippys
drugs
criminals
liberals
philosophes(not counting Hobbes)
states rights
anarchist
people who annoy me
robots
1000 12 + 10
1100 18 + 15
1200 24 + 20
1300 24
1400 36 + 10
1500 54 + 20
1600 72 + 30
1700 108 + 40
1800 144 + 50
1900 288 + 60
2000 576 + 80

User avatar
The United Neptumousian Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2027
Founded: Dec 02, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby The United Neptumousian Empire » Sat Feb 07, 2015 3:22 pm

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
The United Neptumousian Empire wrote:If they've done nothing wrong, they wouldn't be getting divorced, because divorce itself is immoral.

So I shouldn't have divorced my husband when he began abusing me?
No, you would be correct to have separated yourself from him, for your own well being. In such a situation, I would never remarry, because I do not believe in such. I cannot remarry, if I am still married in the eyes of God.
Last edited by The United Neptumousian Empire on Sat Feb 07, 2015 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Agnostic
Asexual Spectrum, Lesbian
Transgender MtF, pronouns she / her

Pro-LGBT
Pro-Left Wing
Pro-Socialism / Communism

Anti-Hate Speech
Anti-Fascist
Anti-Bigotry
Anti-Right Wing
Anti-Capitalism

Political Compass
Personality Type: INFJ
I am The Flood

User avatar
The United Neptumousian Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2027
Founded: Dec 02, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby The United Neptumousian Empire » Sat Feb 07, 2015 3:24 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
The United Neptumousian Empire wrote:If they've done nothing wrong, they wouldn't be getting divorced, because divorce itself is immoral.


See what you're doing here? You're shifting the blame. Same as when other people call us out when our partners cheat. "You must have done something for them to cheat/abuse you".

Nobody deserves to live in a shit life just because of morals. At least I won't. Its your choice if you can live with a disloyal or abusive partner but I won't be the one in such a relationship so not my business. If I ever am that's why divorce is an option.
No, I'm not saying there is any blame on the person who was cheated on, that's disgusting. Why would you even make that assumption? Cheaters suck. But that doesn't matter, marriage is still a holy, life long vow. It can't be dissolved by infidelity.
Last edited by The United Neptumousian Empire on Sat Feb 07, 2015 3:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Agnostic
Asexual Spectrum, Lesbian
Transgender MtF, pronouns she / her

Pro-LGBT
Pro-Left Wing
Pro-Socialism / Communism

Anti-Hate Speech
Anti-Fascist
Anti-Bigotry
Anti-Right Wing
Anti-Capitalism

Political Compass
Personality Type: INFJ
I am The Flood

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Basozuria, Bienenhalde, Gaybeans, Google [Bot], Grinning Dragon, Krusilov, Ostroeuropa, The Rio Grande River Basin, The Two Jerseys, Vangrisak

Advertisement

Remove ads