Independent Republic of Not My Problem wrote:The Cobalt Sky wrote:...Or just get searched, convicted, and sentenced more often. And when they do get sentenced, it's for longer.
http://upw-prod-images.global.ssl.fastl ... 9fff46.png
http://upw-prod-images.global.ssl.fastl ... 89c87a.png
The DOJ has run through this crap numerous times.
Riddle me this mr stats man:
Of those arrests, who and how many resisted without violence? With violence?
Do they have prior run ins with the law?
Prior convictions? Plea bargains?
What were the extenuating circumstances?
What led to the initial contact with the officers?
Once in custody, were they cooperative?
Were they on parole or have pending charges?
All these, and more, have a significant impact in how your case gets handled by the system. Compounding issues of repeat arrests and convictions also tend to skew statistics done by lazy statisticians as they frequently, sometimes intentionally, ignore the number of unique events, in favor of bulk numbers.
Did you miss this part?
“For every 10,000 residents, about 3,400 more black people are stopped than whites, and 360 more Latinos are stopped than whites. Stopped blacks are 127% more likely to be frisked -- and stopped Latinos are 43% more likely to be frisked -- than stopped whites. Stopped blacks are 76% more likely to be searched, and stopped Latinos are 16% more likely to be searched than stopped whites.
Stopped blacks are 29% more likely to be arrested, and stopped Latinos are 32% more likely to be arrested than stopped whites.
Now consider this: Although stopped blacks were 127% more likely to be frisked than stopped whites, they were 42.3% less likely to be found with a weapon after they were frisked, 25% less likely to be found with drugs and 33% less likely to be found with other contraband. We found similar patterns for Latinos.
Not only did we find that African Americans and Latinos were subjected to more stops, frisks, searches and arrests than whites, we also found that these additional police actions aren't because of the fact that people of color live in higher-crime areas or because they more often carry drugs or weapons, or any other legitimate reason that we can discern from the rich set of data we examined.”
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/oct/23 ... oe-ayres23
Stopped and searched more. That's clearly bias.
And there is clearly a disparity with drug sentencing:
""The race issue isn't just that the judge is going, 'Oh, black man, I'm gonna sentence you higher,'" she said. "The police go into low-income minority neighborhoods and that's where they make most of their drug arrests. If they arrest you, now you have a 'prior,' so if you plead or get arrested again, you're gonna have a higher sentence. There's a kind of cumulative effect.""
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/1 ... 41346.html
You also have yet to provide a legitimate counterexample.



