Mike the Progressive wrote:Theo Roosevelt wrote:Obama's foreign policy has been more than acceptable.
His FP has been mixed. He seemed more than willing to offer support during the Arab Spring to the people who craved democracy to only withdraw it after the regimes were toppled. While the Iraq War was a mistake, withdrawing only weakened the Iraqi government even further and contributed to the relatively easy rise of ISIL. He relies too heavily on drones and special forces, when Afghanistan and Iraq showed us conventional warfare is not dead and successful operations require more boots. Don't even get me started on Syria.Theo Roosevelt wrote:The problem is his domestic policy. The United States is a cultural melting-pot with an apathetic populace that doesn't exemplify this greatness.
This has been a problem for some time.Theo Roosevelt wrote:Liberals are not hard enough on Obama. His race has nothing to do with what he can do better as President of the United States.
Then you misunderstand. I did not say his race limits his presidency. Rather I think his race, the historical break from the traditional Anglo-Saxon, is what will define his presidency. People will not look back at history and think Obama brought universal healthcare. They won't look back and think of his Ron Paulish like support of gay marriage. They won't look back and remember how he appeared on the Colbert Report. He will be remembered as the first black president -a huge deal on its own- but not much else.
Hey, I saw that episode! I was laughing the entire time at how they changed roles for an entire day.