NATION

PASSWORD

Why do you hate Obama?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

what do you not like about Obama

He is too Right Wing
122
23%
He is too Left Wing
83
16%
His foreign policy sucks
126
24%
I don't like him for reasons not properly articulated in the above choices (if so post about it below)
104
20%
too black 4 me
95
18%
 
Total votes : 530

User avatar
Myrensis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5898
Founded: Oct 05, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Myrensis » Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:26 am

Ndaku wrote:Not saying you're incorrect, because you aren't; I'm just finding that people actually find him right wing very hysterical.


Some people don't use the hilariously warped American scale where anything remotely left of Republicans is 'radical socialist leftist'. Anywhere else on the planet Obama and the Dems in general are solidly center-right.
Last edited by Myrensis on Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Atomic Energy
Envoy
 
Posts: 221
Founded: Jul 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atomic Energy » Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:27 am

Thermodolia wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
That's odd given he's center-right ;)

Center-left on some things. But he and Romney are basically the same.
Which is why 2012 election was basically picking between the shiniest of two turds. It also gave fire to the people who say America is a one-party state masquerading as a two-party state.

If I may take a historical moment, the times we're living in are incredibly similar to the period of American history known as both "The Gilded Age", because it may have looked shiny but it was really not, and "The Era of the Forgotten Presidents", because no matter who was in office, it didn't change policy because the Democrats and Republicans were the same. Also similarly, the Republicans and the Democrats were both controlled by business interests, just slightly different ones. The issues of the time were also not represented in the parties. For instance, back then most poor people demanded that the government inflate the currency because deflation was killing small farmers who couldn't afford to pay their debts, but both Republicans and Democrats were anti-free silver (as it was called). In the modern era, most everyone agrees that we should either raise taxes or cut spending to reduce the deficit, but the Democrats in power don't raise taxes and Republicans in power don't cut spending. In the rare occasions when they do, Democrats increase spending and Republicans cut taxes, bringing us back to square one.

tl;dr Obama = Rutherford B. Hayes
Last edited by Atomic Energy on Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Liberal Democrats
ENTP
"I am extraordinarily patient, provided I get my own way in the end."
"Consensus seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects."

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78485
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:30 am

Myrensis wrote:
Ndaku wrote:Not saying you're incorrect, because you aren't; I'm just finding that people actually find him right wing very hysterical.


Some people don't use the hilariously warped American scale where anything remotely left of Republicans is 'radical socialist leftist'. Anywhere else on the planet Obama and the Dems in general are solidly center-right.

I agree with you on that. Which is why you can't go around putting your countries definition of leftist or right-winger on to politicians that are not from your country.
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78485
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:30 am

Atomic Energy wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Center-left on some things. But he and Romney are basically the same.
Which is why 2012 election was basically picking between the shiniest of two turds. It also gave fire to the people who say America is a one-party state masquerading as a two-party state.

If I may take a historical moment, the times we're living in are incredibly similar to the period of American history known as both "The Gilded Age", because it may have looked shiny but it was really not, and "The Era of the Forgotten Presidents", because no matter who was in office, it didn't change policy because the Democrats and Republicans were the same. Also similarly, the Republicans and the Democrats were both controlled by business interests, just slightly different ones. The issues of the time were also not represented in the parties. For instance, back then most poor people demanded that the government inflate the currency because deflation was killing small farmers who couldn't afford to pay their debts, but both Republicans and Democrats were anti-free silver (as it was called). In the modern era, most everyone agrees that we should either raise taxes or cut spending to reduce the deficit, but the Democrats in power don't raise taxes and Republicans in power don't cut spending. In the rare occasions when they do, Democrats increase spending and Republicans cut taxes, bringing us back to square one.

tl;dr Obama = Rutherford B. Hayes

History does have a way of repeating itself.
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:39 am

Nebalon wrote:He's a libtard communist, remember Obama Care (which predictably was a flop). He's attempting to influence the young generation with lofty socialistic promises that he can't keep, such as promising to eliminate the debt. Well surprise! You can't eliminate the debt by taxing the rich into homelessness... And his approval ratings show that people are finally WAKING UP, and don't want to be sheep.


When did he promise to eliminate the debt?

What formerly wealthy people have ended up homeless due to taxes under his administration, or, come to think of it, any administration in modern history?

His approval ratings have been rising lately.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:41 am

The 502nd SS wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Fear, polarization, demonization, and racial dog-whistle politics?

last time I checked dems used those tatics


I suppose that they're a part of every operative's bag of tricks, but whereas Democrats tend to back off when they're called out on it, Republicans seem to revel in this.

User avatar
Brickistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1529
Founded: Apr 10, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Brickistan » Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:05 am

Ndaku wrote:
Atomic Energy wrote:To most leftists, he's not socialist enough, and he didn't keep his promises of butting out of Iraq and shutting down Guantanamo, and taxing the rich to end the deficit, etc etc

Hahaha so that allows them shoot him across classifying him as a right wing?! :rofl:

Not saying you're incorrect, because you aren't; I'm just finding that people actually find him right wing very hysterical.


Not sure I follow... What's hysterical about calling a spade a spade?

Let's look at the Political Compass for the 2012 election:

Image

And the description of Obame is a quite interesting as well:

The Democratic incumbent has surrounded himself with conservative advisors and key figures — many from previous administrations, and an unprecedented number from the Trilateral Commission. He also appointed a former Monsanto executive as Senior Advisor to the FDA. He has extended Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, presided over a spiralling rich-poor gap and sacrificed further American jobs with recent free trade deals. Trade union rights have also eroded under his watch. He has expanded Bush defence spending, droned civilians, failed to close Guantanamo, supported the NDAA which effectively legalises martial law, allowed drilling and adopted a soft-touch position towards the banks that is to the right of European Conservative leaders. Taking office during the financial meltdown, Obama appointed its principle architects to top economic positions. We list these because many of Obama's detractors absurdly portray him as either a radical liberal or a socialist, while his apologists, equally absurdly, continue to view him as a well-intentioned progressive, tragically thwarted by overwhelming pressures. 2008's yes-we-can chanters, dazzled by pigment rather than policy detail, forgot to ask can what? Between 1998 and the last election, Obama amassed $37.6million from the financial services industry, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. While 2008 presidential candidate Obama appeared to champion universal health care, his first choice for Secretary of Health was a man who had spent years lobbying on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry against that very concept. Hey! You don't promise a successful pub, and then appoint the Salvation Army to run it. This time around, the honey-tongued President makes populist references to economic justice, while simultaneously appointing as his new Chief of Staff a former Citigroup executive concerned with hedge funds that bet on the housing market to collapse. Obama poses something of a challenge to The Political Compass, because he's a man of so few fixed principles.


Source

Obame is indeed so right wing as to be nearly identical to Romney. And that's the big issue here. He's much to far-right for his own voters. And while he's far-right enough to be able to appeal to conservatives (at least, the non-batshit crazy part of the Republican Party) he's.. Well... A Democrat.

But here's where it gets kinda funny...

Looking at the comparison they have on their Crowd Chart, Obama is indeed to the left. In fact, only slightly further to the left than Eisenhower:

Image

Source

So what happened? Let's look at the compass for the 2008 election:

Image

Source

Seems to me that Obama, much like (nearly) all other US politicians, has been bought and sold. The actual political line he follows is much closer to his Republican predecessors than to the promises he made during the 2008 campaign. So yes, he is indeed on the right side of the spectrum - borderline on the hard-right area, minus the carzy religious ramblings of the Republican hard-right.

No wonder then, that people dislike him (hate, I think, is too strong a term). He ran on a left-leaning platform of hope a change. And yet, he ended up toeing the republican party line, increasing the wealth-gap and putting further pressure on an already shrinking middle-class.

User avatar
Brickistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1529
Founded: Apr 10, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Brickistan » Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:08 am

Myrensis wrote:
Ndaku wrote:Not saying you're incorrect, because you aren't; I'm just finding that people actually find him right wing very hysterical.


Some people don't use the hilariously warped American scale where anything remotely left of Republicans is 'radical socialist leftist'. Anywhere else on the planet Obama and the Dems in general are solidly center-right.


Agreed.

US politics is now so wildly off-center that "left" and "right" are nearly meaningless.

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:09 am

Brickistan wrote:
Myrensis wrote:
Some people don't use the hilariously warped American scale where anything remotely left of Republicans is 'radical socialist leftist'. Anywhere else on the planet Obama and the Dems in general are solidly center-right.


Agreed.

US politics is now so wildly off-center that "left" and "right" are nearly meaningless.


Actually when you think about Latin America, Africa, and Asia and their political spectrum. It's actually Europe that's so "wildly off-center."

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:10 am

Myrensis wrote:
Ndaku wrote:Not saying you're incorrect, because you aren't; I'm just finding that people actually find him right wing very hysterical.


Some people don't use the hilariously warped American scale where anything remotely left of Republicans is 'radical socialist leftist'. Anywhere else on the planet Obama and the Dems in general are solidly center-right.


Yep. By American standards, I'm a radical leftist. Anywhere else in the world, I'm a centrist at most, and could be considered on the right in some ways.

User avatar
Uawc
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5115
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Uawc » Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:58 am

Why hate a puppet when I can hate the man who has his hand up its ass?
Pro-democracy, pro-NATO, anti-authoritarian, anti-extremism.
Ex-leftist and ex-Muslim.

I stand with Ukraine and Israel.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163884
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Feb 01, 2015 6:33 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Atomic Energy wrote:I've never liked Obama and every day I find more reasons not to like him. Perhaps the most egregious on the list was his same sex marriage flip flop. I think that sums him up the most -- he doesn't REALLY care about the issue, but he knew he'd be more popular if he embraced it, and so he did, and now he's a hero of the more ignorant members of the LGBT community. I also think his Obamacare plan was a stupid melding of Republican ideals (Gingrich's individual mandate, Romneycare) with Democrat ideals (Great Society, Hillarycare), and so it's destined to slowly have part after part repealed until it's just a mangled version of the original.


Yes, the marriage flip-flop. God knows that I like my Presidents to be rigid and narrow-minded, unwilling to embrace differing perspectives or ideas, or allowing their thoughts on a matter to evolve.

Obamacare wasn't great, but it was the best thing that they could get passed.

Where are the death panels I was promised, Obama?!
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Ndaku
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1249
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Ndaku » Sun Feb 01, 2015 7:05 am

Brickistan wrote:
Ndaku wrote:Hahaha so that allows them shoot him across classifying him as a right wing?! :rofl:

Not saying you're incorrect, because you aren't; I'm just finding that people actually find him right wing very hysterical.


Not sure I follow... What's hysterical about calling a spade a spade?

Let's look at the Political Compass for the 2012 election:

Image

And the description of Obame is a quite interesting as well:

The Democratic incumbent has surrounded himself with conservative advisors and key figures — many from previous administrations, and an unprecedented number from the Trilateral Commission. He also appointed a former Monsanto executive as Senior Advisor to the FDA. He has extended Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, presided over a spiralling rich-poor gap and sacrificed further American jobs with recent free trade deals. Trade union rights have also eroded under his watch. He has expanded Bush defence spending, droned civilians, failed to close Guantanamo, supported the NDAA which effectively legalises martial law, allowed drilling and adopted a soft-touch position towards the banks that is to the right of European Conservative leaders. Taking office during the financial meltdown, Obama appointed its principle architects to top economic positions. We list these because many of Obama's detractors absurdly portray him as either a radical liberal or a socialist, while his apologists, equally absurdly, continue to view him as a well-intentioned progressive, tragically thwarted by overwhelming pressures. 2008's yes-we-can chanters, dazzled by pigment rather than policy detail, forgot to ask can what? Between 1998 and the last election, Obama amassed $37.6million from the financial services industry, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. While 2008 presidential candidate Obama appeared to champion universal health care, his first choice for Secretary of Health was a man who had spent years lobbying on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry against that very concept. Hey! You don't promise a successful pub, and then appoint the Salvation Army to run it. This time around, the honey-tongued President makes populist references to economic justice, while simultaneously appointing as his new Chief of Staff a former Citigroup executive concerned with hedge funds that bet on the housing market to collapse. Obama poses something of a challenge to The Political Compass, because he's a man of so few fixed principles.


Source

Obame is indeed so right wing as to be nearly identical to Romney. And that's the big issue here. He's much to far-right for his own voters. And while he's far-right enough to be able to appeal to conservatives (at least, the non-batshit crazy part of the Republican Party) he's.. Well... A Democrat.

But here's where it gets kinda funny...

Looking at the comparison they have on their Crowd Chart, Obama is indeed to the left. In fact, only slightly further to the left than Eisenhower:

Image

Source

So what happened? Let's look at the compass for the 2008 election:

Image

Source

Seems to me that Obama, much like (nearly) all other US politicians, has been bought and sold. The actual political line he follows is much closer to his Republican predecessors than to the promises he made during the 2008 campaign. So yes, he is indeed on the right side of the spectrum - borderline on the hard-right area, minus the carzy religious ramblings of the Republican hard-right.

No wonder then, that people dislike him (hate, I think, is too strong a term). He ran on a left-leaning platform of hope a change. And yet, he ended up toeing the republican party line, increasing the wealth-gap and putting further pressure on an already shrinking middle-class.

Well I can't argue with that can I?!

But I see what you mean. He started out very left wing and ended up appearing on the right side of the spectrum. I guess the million dollar question would be what caused him to be in such a position so drastically?
'Preach the word! Be ready in season and out of season. Convince, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching. I charge you therefore before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, who will judge the living and the dead at His appearing and His kingdom: For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables. But you be watchful in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.' (II Timothy 4:1-5 NKJV)

Non-denominational Christian. Savopia is my WA puppet nation. Feel free to telegram me!

User avatar
Seraven
Senator
 
Posts: 3570
Founded: Jun 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Seraven » Sun Feb 01, 2015 7:05 am

Foreign policies of USA had been changed, and while I myself like it, it also doesn't really minimize the situations.
Copper can change as its quality went down.
Gold can't change, for its quality never went down.
The Alma Mater wrote:
Seraven wrote:I know right! Whites enslaved the natives, they killed them, they converted them forcibly, they acted like a better human beings than the Muslims.

An excellent example of why allowing unrestricted immigration of people with a very different culture might not be the best idea ever :P

User avatar
Firsthome
Senator
 
Posts: 3975
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Firsthome » Sun Feb 01, 2015 7:17 am

Mike the Progressive wrote:
Firsthome wrote:
He's Only like 3% better than romney in my book.

He's too authoritarian and Right wing for me


I'm actually kinda happy he's not left-wing. Honestly I love the Democratic Party (for the most part) as is. I do have some problems with it's foreign policy platform. But aside from that. Better center-right.


He's bit even near the center though.

And I prefer center-left, myself
I have a heart of a five year-old...
it's in a jar in my basement

Springer:"I've got better things to do tonight than die"

DYK:Breathing lowers your life expectancy by 50%.

Laerod wrote:That's like pointing out a thread about kittens contains posts about baby cats.
Left: 8.06, Libertarian: 0.6,7 foreign policy: -5.76, culture: -6.26
GENERATION 4: Social experiment. When you see this, add one to the generation and copy this into your signature.

User avatar
Firsthome
Senator
 
Posts: 3975
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Firsthome » Sun Feb 01, 2015 7:20 am

Ndaku wrote:
Brickistan wrote:
Not sure I follow... What's hysterical about calling a spade a spade?

Let's look at the Political Compass for the 2012 election:

Image

And the description of Obame is a quite interesting as well:



Source

Obame is indeed so right wing as to be nearly identical to Romney. And that's the big issue here. He's much to far-right for his own voters. And while he's far-right enough to be able to appeal to conservatives (at least, the non-batshit crazy part of the Republican Party) he's.. Well... A Democrat.

But here's where it gets kinda funny...

Looking at the comparison they have on their Crowd Chart, Obama is indeed to the left. In fact, only slightly further to the left than Eisenhower:

Image

Source

So what happened? Let's look at the compass for the 2008 election:

Image

Source

Seems to me that Obama, much like (nearly) all other US politicians, has been bought and sold. The actual political line he follows is much closer to his Republican predecessors than to the promises he made during the 2008 campaign. So yes, he is indeed on the right side of the spectrum - borderline on the hard-right area, minus the carzy religious ramblings of the Republican hard-right.

No wonder then, that people dislike him (hate, I think, is too strong a term). He ran on a left-leaning platform of hope a change. And yet, he ended up toeing the republican party line, increasing the wealth-gap and putting further pressure on an already shrinking middle-class.

Well I can't argue with that can I?!

But I see what you mean. He started out very left wing and ended up appearing on the right side of the spectrum. I guess the million dollar question would be what caused him to be in such a position so drastically?


However, this isn't a Worldwide Poltical stances. you need Hitler, Stalin, Siegfried, Mandela, Ghandi, and the Dali Lama. at least
I have a heart of a five year-old...
it's in a jar in my basement

Springer:"I've got better things to do tonight than die"

DYK:Breathing lowers your life expectancy by 50%.

Laerod wrote:That's like pointing out a thread about kittens contains posts about baby cats.
Left: 8.06, Libertarian: 0.6,7 foreign policy: -5.76, culture: -6.26
GENERATION 4: Social experiment. When you see this, add one to the generation and copy this into your signature.

User avatar
Alsheb
Senator
 
Posts: 4415
Founded: Jul 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Alsheb » Sun Feb 01, 2015 7:43 am

I hate Obama because he's simply another Bush carrying another party flag. Also, my stomach turns everytime people start spewing nonsense about how him being a "Black president" would somehow make him better. First off he isn't even black, and secondly: a coloured militaristic and ultra-imperialist puppet of big capital is still a militaristic and ultra-imperialist puppet of big capital.
Anti-Revisionist Marxist-Leninist and Zaydi Muslim Pan-Islamist
About Alsheb: An Islamic people's republic, based upon the principles of Marxism-Leninism and Zaydi Islam
Member of the Committee for Proletarian Morality
Pro: Communism, Marxism-Leninism, Mao Zedong Thought, Axis of Resistance, Syrian Arab Republic, Ansarullah, Hezbollah, Palestine, Iran, Novorossiya, LGBTQ acceptance, feminism, internationalism, socialist patriotism.
Anti: Capitalism, imperialism, racism, fascism, zionism, liberalism, NATO, EU, Wahhabism, revisionism, trotskyism.
Freedom is nothing but a vain phantom when one class of men can starve another with impunity. Equality is nothing but a vain phantom when the rich, through monopoly, exercise the right of life or death over their like.
Jacques Roux

User avatar
Firsthome
Senator
 
Posts: 3975
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Firsthome » Sun Feb 01, 2015 7:47 am

Alsheb wrote:I hate Obama because he's simply another Bush carrying another party flag. Also, my stomach turns everytime people start spewing nonsense about how him being a "Black president" would somehow make him better. First off he isn't even black, and secondly: a coloured militaristic and ultra-imperialist puppet of big capital is still a militaristic and ultra-imperialist puppet of big capital.


I completely Agree.
I have a heart of a five year-old...
it's in a jar in my basement

Springer:"I've got better things to do tonight than die"

DYK:Breathing lowers your life expectancy by 50%.

Laerod wrote:That's like pointing out a thread about kittens contains posts about baby cats.
Left: 8.06, Libertarian: 0.6,7 foreign policy: -5.76, culture: -6.26
GENERATION 4: Social experiment. When you see this, add one to the generation and copy this into your signature.

User avatar
Earl of Sandwich IV
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 449
Founded: Nov 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Earl of Sandwich IV » Sun Feb 01, 2015 8:49 am

The New Sea Territory wrote:
Earl of Sandwich IV wrote:He hates Israel


He gave them Iron Dome. Obviously, he hates them. Logic.

What? Iron Dome was developed by an Israeli company.

User avatar
New Jordslag
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10463
Founded: Sep 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Jordslag » Sun Feb 01, 2015 9:35 am

Earl of Sandwich IV wrote:
The New Sea Territory wrote:
He gave them Iron Dome. Obviously, he hates them. Logic.

What? Iron Dome was developed by an Israeli company.

Developed by Israel. Funded by America.
My favorite games are the Pokemon Games. Shoot me a TG if you want to talk about them.
Don't worry! It's all just a tall tale, okay?
Favorite Ecchi Fan of Lith and Self-Proclaimed Pokemon King of NS.
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
New Jordslag wrote:Then we can have another New York. No such thing as too many New Yorks.


And somewhere in New York, Big Jim P gets a cold shudder down his spine.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:24 am

Alsheb wrote:I hate Obama because he's simply another Bush carrying another party flag. Also, my stomach turns everytime people start spewing nonsense about how him being a "Black president" would somehow make him better. First off he isn't even black, and secondly: a coloured militaristic and ultra-imperialist puppet of big capital is still a militaristic and ultra-imperialist puppet of big capital.


There are more differences than similarities, though if Obama and Bush happen to be close together on whatever your pet cause is, then I can see how it would look otherwise.

Exactly who is saying that Obama's race makes him better as a President?

Yes, he's black by the standards used in the United States. Basically, if you have a skin tone that will cause security to follow you around a store at the mall, you're black.

User avatar
Firsthome
Senator
 
Posts: 3975
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Firsthome » Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:26 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Alsheb wrote:I hate Obama because he's simply another Bush carrying another party flag. Also, my stomach turns everytime people start spewing nonsense about how him being a "Black president" would somehow make him better. First off he isn't even black, and secondly: a coloured militaristic and ultra-imperialist puppet of big capital is still a militaristic and ultra-imperialist puppet of big capital.


There are more differences than similarities, though if Obama and Bush happen to be close together on whatever your pet cause is, then I can see how it would look otherwise.

Exactly who is saying that Obama's race makes him better as a President?

Yes, he's black by the standards used in the United States. Basically, if you have a skin tone that will cause security to follow you around a store at the mall, you're black.


even though white people, even by percentage, actually cause more crimes

One of the reasons I probably don't like Him is because FDR is my Fav president :P
I have a heart of a five year-old...
it's in a jar in my basement

Springer:"I've got better things to do tonight than die"

DYK:Breathing lowers your life expectancy by 50%.

Laerod wrote:That's like pointing out a thread about kittens contains posts about baby cats.
Left: 8.06, Libertarian: 0.6,7 foreign policy: -5.76, culture: -6.26
GENERATION 4: Social experiment. When you see this, add one to the generation and copy this into your signature.

User avatar
New Jordslag
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10463
Founded: Sep 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Jordslag » Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:32 am

Firsthome wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
There are more differences than similarities, though if Obama and Bush happen to be close together on whatever your pet cause is, then I can see how it would look otherwise.

Exactly who is saying that Obama's race makes him better as a President?

Yes, he's black by the standards used in the United States. Basically, if you have a skin tone that will cause security to follow you around a store at the mall, you're black.


even though white people, even by percentage, actually cause more crimes

One of the reasons I probably don't like Him is because FDR is my Fav president :P

The Secret Service (Funny how the acronym is SS) should use their evil Illuminati Black Magic to raise FDR from the grave so we can make him eternal dictator, what with his awesome presidential record and all.
Last edited by New Jordslag on Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
My favorite games are the Pokemon Games. Shoot me a TG if you want to talk about them.
Don't worry! It's all just a tall tale, okay?
Favorite Ecchi Fan of Lith and Self-Proclaimed Pokemon King of NS.
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
New Jordslag wrote:Then we can have another New York. No such thing as too many New Yorks.


And somewhere in New York, Big Jim P gets a cold shudder down his spine.

User avatar
Atomic Energy
Envoy
 
Posts: 221
Founded: Jul 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atomic Energy » Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:36 am

New Jordslag wrote:
Firsthome wrote:
even though white people, even by percentage, actually cause more crimes

One of the reasons I probably don't like Him is because FDR is my Fav president :P

The Secret Service (Funny how the acronym is SS) should use their evil Illuminati Black Magic to raise FDR from the grave so we can make him eternal dictator, what with his awesome presidential record and all.


I still like Ike.
The Liberal Democrats
ENTP
"I am extraordinarily patient, provided I get my own way in the end."
"Consensus seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects."

User avatar
New Jordslag
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10463
Founded: Sep 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Jordslag » Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:37 am

Atomic Energy wrote:
New Jordslag wrote:The Secret Service (Funny how the acronym is SS) should use their evil Illuminati Black Magic to raise FDR from the grave so we can make him eternal dictator, what with his awesome presidential record and all.


I still like Ike.

He's my second choice. Ike is pretty cool, what with his shutting down Nazi schemes and all.

But FDR is my Bae.
My favorite games are the Pokemon Games. Shoot me a TG if you want to talk about them.
Don't worry! It's all just a tall tale, okay?
Favorite Ecchi Fan of Lith and Self-Proclaimed Pokemon King of NS.
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
New Jordslag wrote:Then we can have another New York. No such thing as too many New Yorks.


And somewhere in New York, Big Jim P gets a cold shudder down his spine.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ethel mermania, Loeje, Oriental Sacred Flame, Shearoa

Advertisement

Remove ads