NATION

PASSWORD

Abortion: Pro-Life or Pro-Choice?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do you support an individual's right to have an abortion?

Yes, absolutely!
1064
55%
Yes, but only in certain circumstances (please specify in a post)
509
26%
No, never!
365
19%
 
Total votes : 1938

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:09 am

The Alma Mater wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
The same circumstance applies.

Look at it this way, if hypothetically speaking there was an afterlife, and each person could choose whether or not they wanted to go there (the alternative being total death and subsequent non-existence), the likely deduction is that most people would choose to go to the afterlife. Just like most fetuses (if they were fully sentient beings) would choose to live rather than never exist as human beings.


Yes. But they aren't, aren't they ? And that is where your argument completely and utterly breaks down.
Basic philosophy. Read about it sometime ;)


Except they will be. The odds of their becoming fully sentient beings is pretty good.

And on a side note, I probably know far more about philosophy than you. Then again, I find it enormously boring and trivial, so who knows.

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:10 am

Arach-Naga Combine wrote:
Pragia wrote:Fun fact, fetal cells are alive.

Irrelevant. Fun fact analogy: cancer cells are alive.

It doesn't matter if it's alive, has a heartbeat, or can talk. You cannot force a woman to carry a fetus.


You most certainly can. I believe what you meant to say was "shouldn't (in my opinion)".
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Arach-Naga Combine
Diplomat
 
Posts: 574
Founded: Apr 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arach-Naga Combine » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:13 am

Pragia wrote:
Arach-Naga Combine wrote:Irrelevant. Fun fact analogy: cancer cells are alive.

It doesn't matter if it's alive, has a heartbeat, or can talk. You cannot force a woman to carry a fetus.

It's also entirely false to say a fetus is not alive.

Nobody said they weren't. I'm just pointing out to you that referencing life is utterly useless in this debate. If living things desire protection, go start picketing cancer treatment centers.
Undisputed snuggling champions of all realities across all multiverses

User avatar
Pragia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7541
Founded: May 08, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Pragia » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:15 am

Arach-Naga Combine wrote:
Pragia wrote:It's also entirely false to say a fetus is not alive.

Nobody said they weren't. I'm just pointing out to you that referencing life is utterly useless in this debate. If living things desire protection, go start picketing cancer treatment centers.

I just adressed a person trying to claim they weren't, please actually read the full post.

User avatar
Tekeristan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5344
Founded: Mar 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tekeristan » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:15 am

A fetus is made out of living tissue.
But I don't really care.

To me, its more of a "Modernization" and rights issue.
Even if its beat down now, it will come up again and again in the future till it is passed.

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:17 am

Arach-Naga Combine wrote:
Pragia wrote:It's also entirely false to say a fetus is not alive.

Nobody said they weren't. I'm just pointing out to you that referencing life is utterly useless in this debate. If living things desire protection, go start picketing cancer treatment centers.


Killing cancer cells is self defense against a (living) entity doing its best at trying to kill you. It's like shooting the robber in your house who is currently aiming a weapon at you.

Killing a fetus is murder against a (living) entity doing its best to survive and thrive. It's like shooting your neighbor when he comes over to ask for a cup of sugar.
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Tekeristan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5344
Founded: Mar 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tekeristan » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:18 am

Patridam wrote:
Arach-Naga Combine wrote:Nobody said they weren't. I'm just pointing out to you that referencing life is utterly useless in this debate. If living things desire protection, go start picketing cancer treatment centers.


Killing cancer cells is self defense against a (living) entity doing its best at trying to kill you. It's like shooting the robber in your house who is currently aiming a weapon at you.

Killing a fetus is murder against a (living) entity doing its best to survive and thrive. It's like shooting your neighbor when he comes over to ask for a cup of sugar.


Its much different if the neighbor is a surprise and takes your sugar anyway.

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:21 am

Tekeristan wrote:
Patridam wrote:
Killing cancer cells is self defense against a (living) entity doing its best at trying to kill you. It's like shooting the robber in your house who is currently aiming a weapon at you.

Killing a fetus is murder against a (living) entity doing its best to survive and thrive. It's like shooting your neighbor when he comes over to ask for a cup of sugar.


Its much different if the neighbor is a surprise and takes your sugar anyway.


Not really. Killing someone who takes your sugar without asking after he's already left your house is still murder.

In any case, that's what condoms and birth control pills and the morning after pills are for: to protect your sugar.
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:22 am

Tekeristan wrote:
Patridam wrote:
Killing cancer cells is self defense against a (living) entity doing its best at trying to kill you. It's like shooting the robber in your house who is currently aiming a weapon at you.

Killing a fetus is murder against a (living) entity doing its best to survive and thrive. It's like shooting your neighbor when he comes over to ask for a cup of sugar.


Its much different if the neighbor is a surprise and takes your sugar anyway.


Technically speaking, in the case of pregnancy, the woman usually leaves out a 'Welcome' mat (i.e: had sex).

Yeah, not the most accurate analogy, but it's not like a pregnant woman (unless she was raped or really drunk) is totally not responsible for her pregnancy. She would have, after all, known that there's always a chance pregnancy can result from having sex.

User avatar
Tekeristan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5344
Founded: Mar 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tekeristan » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:22 am

Patridam wrote:
Tekeristan wrote:
Its much different if the neighbor is a surprise and takes your sugar anyway.


Not really. Killing someone who takes your sugar without asking after he's already left your house is still murder.

In any case, that's what condoms and birth control pills and the morning after pills are for: to protect your sugar.


If the morning after pills don't work?
Or it is unknown that there was a break in the condom or that the birth control failed?

Not everyone is prepared to raise a child(s) both mentally and financially.

User avatar
Arach-Naga Combine
Diplomat
 
Posts: 574
Founded: Apr 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arach-Naga Combine » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:24 am

Pragia wrote:
Arach-Naga Combine wrote:Nobody said they weren't. I'm just pointing out to you that referencing life is utterly useless in this debate. If living things desire protection, go start picketing cancer treatment centers.

I just adressed a person trying to claim they weren't, please actually read the full post.

You did not respond to any claim that a fetus was not alive. You responded to someone remarking upon the fact that being dead is of no concern to the dead.

Patridam wrote:
Arach-Naga Combine wrote:Nobody said they weren't. I'm just pointing out to you that referencing life is utterly useless in this debate. If living things desire protection, go start picketing cancer treatment centers.

Killing cancer cells is self defense against a (living) entity doing its best at trying to kill you. It's like shooting the robber in your house who is currently aiming a weapon at you.
Killing a fetus is murder against a (living) entity doing its best to survive and thrive. It's like shooting your neighbor when he comes over to ask for a cup of sugar.

Cancer cells have no intent to kill anything. You're special pleading a fetus into having a right to survival because it is alive, and yet special pleading that living cancer cells have no right to survival.
Undisputed snuggling champions of all realities across all multiverses

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:25 am

Tekeristan wrote:
Patridam wrote:
Not really. Killing someone who takes your sugar without asking after he's already left your house is still murder.

In any case, that's what condoms and birth control pills and the morning after pills are for: to protect your sugar.


If the morning after pills don't work?
Or it is unknown that there was a break in the condom or that the birth control failed?

Not everyone is prepared to raise a child(s) both mentally and financially.


Which is why the foster/adoption system exists.

Arach-Naga Combine wrote:Cancer cells have no intent to kill anything. You're special pleading a fetus into having a right to survival because it is alive, and yet special pleading that living cancer cells have no right to survival.


You'll notice I agree abortion should be legal where the mother's life is threatened.

Do cancer cells grow to become a breathing, thinking, sentient and sapient being?
Last edited by Patridam on Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:27 am, edited 2 times in total.
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Arach-Naga Combine
Diplomat
 
Posts: 574
Founded: Apr 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arach-Naga Combine » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:30 am

Patridam wrote:
Tekeristan wrote:If the morning after pills don't work?
Or it is unknown that there was a break in the condom or that the birth control failed?
Not everyone is prepared to raise a child(s) both mentally and financially.

Which is why the foster/adoption system exists.
Arach-Naga Combine wrote:Cancer cells have no intent to kill anything. You're special pleading a fetus into having a right to survival because it is alive, and yet special pleading that living cancer cells have no right to survival.


Do cancer cells grow to become a breathing, thinking, sentient and sapient being?

Most zygotes don't. And you've shifted the goalposts. Does life matter or not?

And glad to see that you aren't a lunatic that thinks women should be forced to carry the products of rape to term. Just someone who thinks they should carry most other zygotes to term against their will.
Last edited by Arach-Naga Combine on Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Undisputed snuggling champions of all realities across all multiverses

User avatar
Pragia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7541
Founded: May 08, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Pragia » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:31 am

Arach-Naga Combine wrote:
Patridam wrote:Which is why the foster/adoption system exists.


Do cancer cells grow to become a breathing, thinking, sentient and sapient being?

Most zygotes don't. And you've shifted the goalposts. Does life matter or not?

Please source that, and miscarriages aren't intentional.

User avatar
Arach-Naga Combine
Diplomat
 
Posts: 574
Founded: Apr 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arach-Naga Combine » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:34 am

Pragia wrote:
Arach-Naga Combine wrote:Most zygotes don't. And you've shifted the goalposts. Does life matter or not?

Please source that, and miscarriages aren't intentional.



Quick secondary source, must attend to other matters.
Undisputed snuggling champions of all realities across all multiverses

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:35 am

Arach-Naga Combine wrote:Most zygotes don't. And you've shifted the goalposts. Does life matter or not?

And glad to see that you aren't a lunatic that thinks women should be forced to carry the products of rape to term. Just someone who thinks they should carry most other zygotes to term against their will.


HUMAN life matters.

As someone who eats bacon and cleans bacteria from floors, not all life matters, but human life certainly does.
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Mondoncon
Envoy
 
Posts: 240
Founded: Feb 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Mondoncon » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:37 am

Patridam wrote:
Arach-Naga Combine wrote:Most zygotes don't. And you've shifted the goalposts. Does life matter or not?

And glad to see that you aren't a lunatic that thinks women should be forced to carry the products of rape to term. Just someone who thinks they should carry most other zygotes to term against their will.


HUMAN life matters.

As someone who eats bacon and cleans bacteria from floors, not all life matters, but human life certainly does.

Why?
Que?

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:38 am

Mondoncon wrote:
Patridam wrote:
HUMAN life matters.

As someone who eats bacon and cleans bacteria from floors, not all life matters, but human life certainly does.

Why?


Are you legitimately asking why human life matters? Why we shouldn't murder people willy-nilly?
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:39 am

Mondoncon wrote:
Patridam wrote:
HUMAN life matters.

As someone who eats bacon and cleans bacteria from floors, not all life matters, but human life certainly does.

Why?


Because we're highly intelligent sentient lifeforms.

In a universe that's mostly inorganic matter and giant balls of flaming gas, we're pretty special.

User avatar
Godular
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11902
Founded: Sep 09, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Godular » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:40 am

Sanctissima wrote:
The Alma Mater wrote:
Yes. But they aren't, aren't they ? And that is where your argument completely and utterly breaks down.
Basic philosophy. Read about it sometime ;)


Except they will be. The odds of their becoming fully sentient beings is pretty good.

And on a side note, I probably know far more about philosophy than you. Then again, I find it enormously boring and trivial, so who knows.


Argument from potential is worthless.
RL position
Active RP: ASCENSION
Active RP: SHENRYAX
Dormant RP: Throne of the Fallen Empire

Faction 1: The An'Kazar Control Framework of Godular-- An enormously advanced collective of formerly human bioborgs that are vastly experienced in both inter-dimensional travel and asymmetrical warfare.
A 1.08 civilization, according to this Nation Index Thingie
A 0.076 (or 0.067) civilization, according to THIS Nation Index Thingie
I don't normally use NS stats. But when I do, I prefer Dos Eckis I can STILL kill you.
Post responsibly.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53356
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:40 am

Patridam wrote:
Mondoncon wrote:Why?


Are you legitimately asking why human life matters? Why we shouldn't murder people willy-nilly?


Abortion =/= murder, try again.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Pragia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7541
Founded: May 08, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Pragia » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:41 am

Godular wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Except they will be. The odds of their becoming fully sentient beings is pretty good.

And on a side note, I probably know far more about philosophy than you. Then again, I find it enormously boring and trivial, so who knows.


Argument from potential is worthless.

How so?

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:42 am

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Patridam wrote:
Are you legitimately asking why human life matters? Why we shouldn't murder people willy-nilly?


Abortion =/= murder, try again.


That's a matter for debate in and of itself, but that actually isn't what he's asking. He's asking "why" in direct response to my assertion "human life matters".
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:42 am

Godular wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Except they will be. The odds of their becoming fully sentient beings is pretty good.

And on a side note, I probably know far more about philosophy than you. Then again, I find it enormously boring and trivial, so who knows.


Argument from potential is worthless.


Potential has quite a deal of worth.

Why do you think people bother living? If potential was utterly meaningless, the human species would have committed mass suicide by now.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53356
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:46 am

Patridam wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Abortion =/= murder, try again.


That's a matter for debate in and of itself, but that actually isn't what he's asking. He's asking "why" in direct response to my assertion "human life matters".


Well, no it's not. By definition it's not and anyone that disagrees is just wrong.

I would have to agree with the question of "why" though, I'm interested in an answer.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Ecliasoo, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Komarovo, Kreigsreich of Iron, Neu California, Swimington, TheKeyToJoy, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads