NATION

PASSWORD

Abortion: Pro-Life or Pro-Choice?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do you support an individual's right to have an abortion?

Yes, absolutely!
1064
55%
Yes, but only in certain circumstances (please specify in a post)
509
26%
No, never!
365
19%
 
Total votes : 1938

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Tue Apr 14, 2015 1:03 pm

Kelinfort wrote:
Luminesa wrote:
It's not meant to be an analogy, it's meant to be two situations that I'm putting side-by-side and saying, "This is why this system of thinking is not consistent. It's also quite dangerous, because if you say you can do whatever you want with your body, even allowing harm to come to others or yourself, then by this line of thinking, there are no limits to what you can do, (ex: the movie "The Purge"). But there are limits to what you can do, and that is why we have laws." Something like that.

:rofl:

The Purge?! The Purge has shit to do with bodily sovereignty. Hurting another autonomous being is fundamentally against personal sovereignty. Oh and I do support legalising all narcotics.

Image

Thus I am forced to laugh with you.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Luminesa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60420
Founded: Dec 09, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Luminesa » Wed Apr 15, 2015 6:34 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Luminesa wrote:
1.) Well, what do you think of, when you hear 'inherent dignity' and 'should protect'?
2.) By that same line of thinking, couldn't a baby outside the womb be considered the same thing?


1) Not sure hence why I said it depends.
2) nope since they are not directly removing nutrients from the body of the "host"


What do you mean it depends, exactly?

I dunno, babies remove sleep from their parents. That's something.
Catholic, pro-life, and proud of it. I prefer my debates on religion, politics, and sports with some coffee and a little Aquinas and G.K. CHESTERTON here and there. :3
Unofficial #1 fan of the Who Dat Nation.
"I'm just a singer of simple songs, I'm not a real political man. I watch CNN, but I'm not sure I can tell you the difference in Iraq and Iran. But I know Jesus, and I talk to God, and I remember this from when I was young:
faith, hope and love are some good things He gave us...
and the greatest is love."
-Alan Jackson
Help the Ukrainian people, here's some sources!
Help bring home First Nation girls! Now with more ways to help!
Jesus loves all of His children in Eastern Europe - pray for peace.
Pray for Ukraine, Wear Sunflowers In Your Hair

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Wed Apr 15, 2015 6:37 am

Luminesa wrote:
Lost heros wrote:1: Dignity? And there's a very big distinction between a fetus and a baby. Specifically, one survives solely on the nutrients of someone else as a parasite, one isn't.
2: So does a parasite.
3: There's a difference between personal autonomy and bodily autonomy.


1.) Well, do you not believe that each person is born with some sort of inherent dignity that we should protect?
2.) And you could argue that both do that, just in different ways. A baby in the womb will take some of the nutrients from inside the mother, through the placenta. A baby out the womb will wake up momma at two in the morning because she wants her bottle, or because her diaper is full.
3.) Wouldn't 'personal autonomy' be a branch off the subject of 'bodily autonomy'?

1: What are you even saying.
2: The key difference is that the mother has a choice but the pregnant woman doesn't.
3: No. Personal Autonomy refers to our actions in a society, while bodily autonomy refers to our actions within our bodies.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Liberusy
Diplomat
 
Posts: 722
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberusy » Wed Apr 15, 2015 6:39 am

I am pro-life and pro-choice. I support the right to life and the fetuses choice [which if given the choice they would choose to live]. In seriousness though I hate it when I am called [by pro-choicers] anti-choice or even anti-women. No I am pro-life, If you call me anti-choice then likewise I will call you pro-abortion, anti-life or pro-child murder.
Rand Paul 2016!! If you have any questions TG me.
I am a high school student and Libertarian!!!
http://www.isidewith.com/results/818236075
Libertarians: 94%
Constitution Party: 80%
Republicans: 77%
Conservative Party 75%
Democrats: 37%
Green Party: 34%
Socialist: 17%

"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty" -Thomas Jefferson
"The duty of youth is to challenge corruption" -Kurt Cobain
"That others may live" -USAF PJ Motto


User avatar
Luminesa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60420
Founded: Dec 09, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Luminesa » Wed Apr 15, 2015 6:40 am

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
Kelinfort wrote: :rofl:

The Purge?! The Purge has shit to do with bodily sovereignty. Hurting another autonomous being is fundamentally against personal sovereignty. Oh and I do support legalising all narcotics.

Image

Thus I am forced to laugh with you.


The reason I put "The Purge" was, again, to use an extreme to explain my point. In "The Purge", there are no limits to what the characters can do. Of course, it might not have been the best example, but it all comes back to the idea "Hey, it's our bodies, we can do what we want with them." Bodily sovereignty effectively says, then, "I can do whatever I want without limits."

A better example might be "Crime And Punishment", which obviously hits more of the philosophical spectrum than "The Purge".

And legalizing heroin wouldn't stop all the deaths from happening. People would still overdose on it. Thus, bad idea. But that's another discussion.
Catholic, pro-life, and proud of it. I prefer my debates on religion, politics, and sports with some coffee and a little Aquinas and G.K. CHESTERTON here and there. :3
Unofficial #1 fan of the Who Dat Nation.
"I'm just a singer of simple songs, I'm not a real political man. I watch CNN, but I'm not sure I can tell you the difference in Iraq and Iran. But I know Jesus, and I talk to God, and I remember this from when I was young:
faith, hope and love are some good things He gave us...
and the greatest is love."
-Alan Jackson
Help the Ukrainian people, here's some sources!
Help bring home First Nation girls! Now with more ways to help!
Jesus loves all of His children in Eastern Europe - pray for peace.
Pray for Ukraine, Wear Sunflowers In Your Hair

User avatar
Wawakanatote
Envoy
 
Posts: 270
Founded: Feb 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wawakanatote » Wed Apr 15, 2015 6:41 am

Merizoc wrote:This'll end well.

No, a fetus is not a person. Yes, a fetus is made of human cells. No, it does not think. Yes, a woman has bodily sovereignty.

There we go. Preemptive strike.
OOC Factbook
Pro: Marxism-Leninism
Anti: Capitalism, Fascism
We do not exist under communism, but under the
primary stage of socialist development (nep/state capitalism)
Please adjust accordingly
Full Nation Name: Supranational Union of Socialist Republics
Government: Federal Intergovernmental P&E Union
Political Leaders: C.Song Liyuan, V.C.Lev Bronshtein
National Anthem: "Hymn of the Union"
"Seek Truth From Facts!"- Deng Xiaoping, Chairman of the Central Advisory Commission
"Peace, Equality, Unity" | "Мир, равенство, единство" | "和平,平等,团结"

For more information go to: Our National Factbook

Take NS stats with a grain of salt

User avatar
Luminesa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60420
Founded: Dec 09, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Luminesa » Wed Apr 15, 2015 6:47 am

Lost heros wrote:
Luminesa wrote:
1.) Well, do you not believe that each person is born with some sort of inherent dignity that we should protect?
2.) And you could argue that both do that, just in different ways. A baby in the womb will take some of the nutrients from inside the mother, through the placenta. A baby out the womb will wake up momma at two in the morning because she wants her bottle, or because her diaper is full.
3.) Wouldn't 'personal autonomy' be a branch off the subject of 'bodily autonomy'?

1: What are you even saying.
2: The key difference is that the mother has a choice but the pregnant woman doesn't.
3: No. Personal Autonomy refers to our actions in a society, while bodily autonomy refers to our actions within our bodies.


1.) Why do we have laws against killing people?
2.) Oh, I see what you're saying. (Though a pregnant woman is a mother.) But if you're the parent, and your baby is up crying at night for a bottle, is it really a good decision to just let them cry, rather than taking care of them?
3.) Okay. I see now. Bodily autonomy is "my body, my choice". Personal autonomy is "I can do whatever I want, and you can't stop me." Or something along those lines. If that's the case, though, philosophically, bodily autonomy leads to personal autonomy.
Last edited by Luminesa on Wed Apr 15, 2015 6:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Catholic, pro-life, and proud of it. I prefer my debates on religion, politics, and sports with some coffee and a little Aquinas and G.K. CHESTERTON here and there. :3
Unofficial #1 fan of the Who Dat Nation.
"I'm just a singer of simple songs, I'm not a real political man. I watch CNN, but I'm not sure I can tell you the difference in Iraq and Iran. But I know Jesus, and I talk to God, and I remember this from when I was young:
faith, hope and love are some good things He gave us...
and the greatest is love."
-Alan Jackson
Help the Ukrainian people, here's some sources!
Help bring home First Nation girls! Now with more ways to help!
Jesus loves all of His children in Eastern Europe - pray for peace.
Pray for Ukraine, Wear Sunflowers In Your Hair

User avatar
Luminesa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60420
Founded: Dec 09, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Luminesa » Wed Apr 15, 2015 6:52 am

Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:Does a sperm and egg cell in a petri dish next to each other have inherent dignity? Why does this collection of DNA magically begin to have dignity when you push the one into the other so it can burrow in and start swapping DNA?


No, because if every egg had human dignity, I'd be committing mass murder every time I had my period. But when you put them together, you have a human being, which is now growing and developing.
Catholic, pro-life, and proud of it. I prefer my debates on religion, politics, and sports with some coffee and a little Aquinas and G.K. CHESTERTON here and there. :3
Unofficial #1 fan of the Who Dat Nation.
"I'm just a singer of simple songs, I'm not a real political man. I watch CNN, but I'm not sure I can tell you the difference in Iraq and Iran. But I know Jesus, and I talk to God, and I remember this from when I was young:
faith, hope and love are some good things He gave us...
and the greatest is love."
-Alan Jackson
Help the Ukrainian people, here's some sources!
Help bring home First Nation girls! Now with more ways to help!
Jesus loves all of His children in Eastern Europe - pray for peace.
Pray for Ukraine, Wear Sunflowers In Your Hair

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Wed Apr 15, 2015 6:57 am

Liberusy wrote:I am pro-life and pro-choice. I support the right to life and the fetuses choice [which if given the choice they would choose to live]. In seriousness though I hate it when I am called [by pro-choicers] anti-choice or even anti-women. No I am pro-life, If you call me anti-choice then likewise I will call you pro-abortion, anti-life or pro-child murder.

If you called me anti-life, that would be right. I sacrificed Yahweh.
Luminesa wrote:
Lost heros wrote:1: What are you even saying.
2: The key difference is that the mother has a choice but the pregnant woman doesn't.
3: No. Personal Autonomy refers to our actions in a society, while bodily autonomy refers to our actions within our bodies.


1.) Why do we have laws against killing people?
2.) Oh, I see what you're saying. (Though a pregnant woman is a mother.) But if you're the parent, and your baby is up crying at night for a bottle, is it really a good decision to just let them cry, rather than taking care of them?
3.) Okay. I see now. Bodily autonomy is "my body, my choice". Personal autonomy is "I can do whatever I want, and you can't stop me." Or something along those lines. If that's the case, though, philosophically, bodily autonomy leads to personal autonomy.

1) I have yet to see relevance in this argument, but this argument is pretty contradictory if you call a fetus a person, however I make no implications in this argument.
Luminesa wrote:
Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:Image

Thus I am forced to laugh with you.


The reason I put "The Purge" was, again, to use an extreme to explain my point. In "The Purge", there are no limits to what the characters can do. Of course, it might not have been the best example, but it all comes back to the idea "Hey, it's our bodies, we can do what we want with them." Bodily sovereignty effectively says, then, "I can do whatever I want without limits."

A better example might be "Crime And Punishment", which obviously hits more of the philosophical spectrum than "The Purge".

And legalizing heroin wouldn't stop all the deaths from happening. People would still overdose on it. Thus, bad idea. But that's another discussion.

The Purge has as much to do with bodily autonomy as Napoleon being a hero.
Luminesa wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
1) Not sure hence why I said it depends.
2) nope since they are not directly removing nutrients from the body of the "host"


What do you mean it depends, exactly?

I dunno, babies remove sleep from their parents. That's something.

Babies removing sleep from parents really isn't a issue.

None of your points are relevant or upstanding or even good.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:20 am

Luminesa wrote:
Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:Image

Thus I am forced to laugh with you.


The reason I put "The Purge" was, again, to use an extreme to explain my point. In "The Purge", there are no limits to what the characters can do. Of course, it might not have been the best example, but it all comes back to the idea "Hey, it's our bodies, we can do what we want with them." Bodily sovereignty effectively says, then, "I can do whatever I want without limits."

A better example might be "Crime And Punishment", which obviously hits more of the philosophical spectrum than "The Purge".

And legalizing heroin wouldn't stop all the deaths from happening. People would still overdose on it. Thus, bad idea. But that's another discussion.

No, it doesn't. Your strawmen are getting annoying. Bodily sovereignty allows you to do what you wish so long as you do not harm another person. Your rights end where mine begin.

What does Dostoyevsky have to do with this?! The main character murders another person, inherently against this concept. As I have already said, we cannot consider a person alive until they are sapient. It is why we can end the life of someone in a vegetative state.

Never said it would, never said this was the discussion, just said that because you keep making shitty examples.

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:24 am

Liberusy wrote:I am pro-life and pro-choice. I support the right to life and the fetuses choice [which if given the choice they would choose to live]. In seriousness though I hate it when I am called [by pro-choicers] anti-choice or even anti-women. No I am pro-life, If you call me anti-choice then likewise I will call you pro-abortion, anti-life or pro-child murder.

Is not true you oppose the woman having any choice in this matter?

User avatar
Luminesa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60420
Founded: Dec 09, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Luminesa » Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:24 am

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
Liberusy wrote:I am pro-life and pro-choice. I support the right to life and the fetuses choice [which if given the choice they would choose to live]. In seriousness though I hate it when I am called [by pro-choicers] anti-choice or even anti-women. No I am pro-life, If you call me anti-choice then likewise I will call you pro-abortion, anti-life or pro-child murder.

If you called me anti-life, that would be right. I sacrificed Yahweh.
Luminesa wrote:
1.) Why do we have laws against killing people?
2.) Oh, I see what you're saying. (Though a pregnant woman is a mother.) But if you're the parent, and your baby is up crying at night for a bottle, is it really a good decision to just let them cry, rather than taking care of them?
3.) Okay. I see now. Bodily autonomy is "my body, my choice". Personal autonomy is "I can do whatever I want, and you can't stop me." Or something along those lines. If that's the case, though, philosophically, bodily autonomy leads to personal autonomy.

1) I have yet to see relevance in this argument, but this argument is pretty contradictory if you call a fetus a person, however I make no implications in this argument.
Luminesa wrote:
The reason I put "The Purge" was, again, to use an extreme to explain my point. In "The Purge", there are no limits to what the characters can do. Of course, it might not have been the best example, but it all comes back to the idea "Hey, it's our bodies, we can do what we want with them." Bodily sovereignty effectively says, then, "I can do whatever I want without limits."

A better example might be "Crime And Punishment", which obviously hits more of the philosophical spectrum than "The Purge".

And legalizing heroin wouldn't stop all the deaths from happening. People would still overdose on it. Thus, bad idea. But that's another discussion.

The Purge has as much to do with bodily autonomy as Napoleon being a hero.
Luminesa wrote:
What do you mean it depends, exactly?

I dunno, babies remove sleep from their parents. That's something.

Babies removing sleep from parents really isn't a issue.


None of your points are relevant or upstanding or even good.


Well, you know how he said that babies in the womb are parasites? Well, by that logic, in which they take nutrients from the mother, babies outside of the womb also take nutrients from the parents, as do most young children, and even teenagers. So wouldn't that be calling me, who is a teenager, a parasite, because I still require for my mom to pay for some things for me? Besides, it's not like the fetus/baby is starving the mother. The way I've heard this said, it sounds like people think the fetus is a blood-sucking leech, or something. :(
Catholic, pro-life, and proud of it. I prefer my debates on religion, politics, and sports with some coffee and a little Aquinas and G.K. CHESTERTON here and there. :3
Unofficial #1 fan of the Who Dat Nation.
"I'm just a singer of simple songs, I'm not a real political man. I watch CNN, but I'm not sure I can tell you the difference in Iraq and Iran. But I know Jesus, and I talk to God, and I remember this from when I was young:
faith, hope and love are some good things He gave us...
and the greatest is love."
-Alan Jackson
Help the Ukrainian people, here's some sources!
Help bring home First Nation girls! Now with more ways to help!
Jesus loves all of His children in Eastern Europe - pray for peace.
Pray for Ukraine, Wear Sunflowers In Your Hair

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:36 am

Luminesa wrote:
Lost heros wrote:1: What are you even saying.
2: The key difference is that the mother has a choice but the pregnant woman doesn't.
3: No. Personal Autonomy refers to our actions in a society, while bodily autonomy refers to our actions within our bodies.


1.) Why do we have laws against killing people?
2.) Oh, I see what you're saying. (Though a pregnant woman is a mother.) But if you're the parent, and your baby is up crying at night for a bottle, is it really a good decision to just let them cry, rather than taking care of them?
3.) Okay. I see now. Bodily autonomy is "my body, my choice". Personal autonomy is "I can do whatever I want, and you can't stop me." Or something along those lines. If that's the case, though, philosophically, bodily autonomy leads to personal autonomy.

1: Because society cannot function without people. It can function without parasitic fetuses.
2: (Not unless she wants to be one) Who says you're taking care of them? You could have a nanny or you might not even be the legal guardian. Genotypic resemblance should not force you.
3: You started well, but went down hill fast. I can't force you to give up a part of your body or do something with your body. However, I can restrict you from taking actions against other people, I.e. Stealing, etc.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:41 am

ell, by that logic, in which they take nutrients from the mother, babies outside of the womb also take nutrients from the parents, as do most young children, and even teenagers

Not really.
So wouldn't that be calling me, who is a teenager, a parasite, because I still require for my mom to pay for some things for me?

Money isn't a fucking nutrient. Stop fucking strawman bing things and make things that aren't, it's fucking annoying.
Besides, it's not like the fetus/baby is starving the mother. The way I've heard this said, it sounds like people think the fetus is a blood-sucking leech, or something.

What you hear is different from what one means
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Liberusy
Diplomat
 
Posts: 722
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberusy » Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:42 am

Kelinfort wrote:
Liberusy wrote:I am pro-life and pro-choice. I support the right to life and the fetuses choice [which if given the choice they would choose to live]. In seriousness though I hate it when I am called [by pro-choicers] anti-choice or even anti-women. No I am pro-life, If you call me anti-choice then likewise I will call you pro-abortion, anti-life or pro-child murder.

Is not true you oppose the woman having any choice in this matter?

Well should my mom be given the choice to kill me? It's just I value someone elses life more then the womens choice.
Rand Paul 2016!! If you have any questions TG me.
I am a high school student and Libertarian!!!
http://www.isidewith.com/results/818236075
Libertarians: 94%
Constitution Party: 80%
Republicans: 77%
Conservative Party 75%
Democrats: 37%
Green Party: 34%
Socialist: 17%

"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty" -Thomas Jefferson
"The duty of youth is to challenge corruption" -Kurt Cobain
"That others may live" -USAF PJ Motto


User avatar
Lucario Mewtwo and Zoroark
Diplomat
 
Posts: 556
Founded: Nov 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Lucario Mewtwo and Zoroark » Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:45 am

I believe in the right to life

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159121
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:49 am

Liberusy wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:Is not true you oppose the woman having any choice in this matter?

Well should my mom be given the choice to kill me? It's just I value someone elses life more then the womens choice.

Should you be allowed to literally live inside your mother without her permission?

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:49 am

Liberusy wrote:I am pro-life and pro-choice. I support the right to life and the fetuses choice [which if given the choice they would choose to live]. In seriousness though I hate it when I am called [by pro-choicers] anti-choice or even anti-women. No I am pro-life, If you call me anti-choice then likewise I will call you pro-abortion, anti-life or pro-child murder.

"Pro-Choice"
Liberusy wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:Is not true you oppose the woman having any choice in this matter?

Well should my mom be given the choice to kill me? It's just I value someone elses life more then the womens choice.

You've been able to use pro choice as a misrepresentation for allow ing murder. Good job
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Miletos
Diplomat
 
Posts: 574
Founded: Apr 11, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Miletos » Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:55 am

Liberusy wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:Is not true you oppose the woman having any choice in this matter?

Well should my mom be given the choice to kill me? It's just I value someone elses life more then the womens choice.


Are you both:
a) a foetus (or at a lesser developmental stage, like an embryo)
b) located in your mother's uterus at this moment in time?

If the answer to both those questions is "Yes!", then yes. If not, no.
Basilîa Mîledås

User avatar
Liberusy
Diplomat
 
Posts: 722
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberusy » Wed Apr 15, 2015 8:05 am

Ifreann wrote:
Liberusy wrote:Well should my mom be given the choice to kill me? It's just I value someone elses life more then the womens choice.

Should you be allowed to literally live inside your mother without her permission?

Well I need to do so at the beginning of my life to survive.
Besides she consented when she decided to have unprotected sex.
Rand Paul 2016!! If you have any questions TG me.
I am a high school student and Libertarian!!!
http://www.isidewith.com/results/818236075
Libertarians: 94%
Constitution Party: 80%
Republicans: 77%
Conservative Party 75%
Democrats: 37%
Green Party: 34%
Socialist: 17%

"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty" -Thomas Jefferson
"The duty of youth is to challenge corruption" -Kurt Cobain
"That others may live" -USAF PJ Motto


User avatar
Tekeristan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5344
Founded: Mar 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tekeristan » Wed Apr 15, 2015 8:06 am

Liberusy wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Should you be allowed to literally live inside your mother without her permission?

Well I need to do so at the beginning of my life to survive.
Besides she consented when she decided to have unprotected sex.


That doesn't always happen.
Condoms and other methods of birth control can fail.
People get drunk as well, and they aren't themselves when they're drunk.

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Wed Apr 15, 2015 8:07 am

Liberusy wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Should you be allowed to literally live inside your mother without her permission?

Well I need to do so at the beginning of my life to survive.
Besides she consented when she decided to have unprotected sex.

No one consents to have a baby with unprotected sex unless they say so.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Liberusy
Diplomat
 
Posts: 722
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberusy » Wed Apr 15, 2015 8:08 am

Tekeristan wrote:
Liberusy wrote:Well I need to do so at the beginning of my life to survive.
Besides she consented when she decided to have unprotected sex.


That doesn't always happen.
Condoms and other methods of birth control can fail.
People get drunk as well, and they aren't themselves when they're drunk.

Don't drink and don't have sex. Before you bring up rape, I will let you know I do believe in exceptions.
Rand Paul 2016!! If you have any questions TG me.
I am a high school student and Libertarian!!!
http://www.isidewith.com/results/818236075
Libertarians: 94%
Constitution Party: 80%
Republicans: 77%
Conservative Party 75%
Democrats: 37%
Green Party: 34%
Socialist: 17%

"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty" -Thomas Jefferson
"The duty of youth is to challenge corruption" -Kurt Cobain
"That others may live" -USAF PJ Motto


User avatar
Miletos
Diplomat
 
Posts: 574
Founded: Apr 11, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Miletos » Wed Apr 15, 2015 8:09 am

Liberusy wrote:
Tekeristan wrote:
That doesn't always happen.
Condoms and other methods of birth control can fail.
People get drunk as well, and they aren't themselves when they're drunk.

Don't drink and don't have sex. Before you bring up rape, I will let you know I do believe in exceptions.


But why do you believe in exceptions? Surely the foetus is always worth the same, no matter what, and so that being the case it's always equally wrong to abort?
Last edited by Miletos on Wed Apr 15, 2015 8:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Basilîa Mîledås

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Wed Apr 15, 2015 8:09 am

Liberusy wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:Is not true you oppose the woman having any choice in this matter?

Well should my mom be given the choice to kill me? It's just I value someone elses life more then the womens choice.

Would you really want to be the child to a person who didn't want you?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Ecliasoo, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Komarovo, Kreigsreich of Iron, Neu California, Port Caverton, Swimington, TheKeyToJoy, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads