NATION

PASSWORD

Abortion: Pro-Life or Pro-Choice?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do you support an individual's right to have an abortion?

Yes, absolutely!
1064
55%
Yes, but only in certain circumstances (please specify in a post)
509
26%
No, never!
365
19%
 
Total votes : 1938

User avatar
Godular
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11902
Founded: Sep 09, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Godular » Fri Apr 10, 2015 10:41 pm

Jacobania wrote:Concerning abortion, people like to say "what about in cases of rape!" (less than 0.1% of all abortions btw)

I think the other extreme should be asked of pro-choicer's.

Should a 7-9 pound third-trimester baby be allowed to be aborted (more than 0.1% of all abortions)?


Generally at the point you have stipulated abortions are only done due to medical emergencies.
RL position
Active RP: ASCENSION
Active RP: SHENRYAX
Dormant RP: Throne of the Fallen Empire

Faction 1: The An'Kazar Control Framework of Godular-- An enormously advanced collective of formerly human bioborgs that are vastly experienced in both inter-dimensional travel and asymmetrical warfare.
A 1.08 civilization, according to this Nation Index Thingie
A 0.076 (or 0.067) civilization, according to THIS Nation Index Thingie
I don't normally use NS stats. But when I do, I prefer Dos Eckis I can STILL kill you.
Post responsibly.

User avatar
Russels Orbiting Teapot
Senator
 
Posts: 4024
Founded: Jan 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Russels Orbiting Teapot » Fri Apr 10, 2015 10:48 pm

Jacobania wrote:Concerning abortion, people like to say "what about in cases of rape!" (less than 0.1% of all abortions btw)

I think the other extreme should be asked of pro-choicer's.

Should a 7-9 pound third-trimester baby be allowed to be aborted (more than 0.1% of all abortions)?


Do you have a source for those numbers?

Because I do, and those numbers are pretty much bullshit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_termination_of_pregnancy wrote:In 1997, the Guttmacher Institute estimated the number of abortions in the U.S. past 24 weeks to be 0.08%

0.08% < 0.1%
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/13/us/rape-and-incest-just-1-of-all-abortions.html wrote:in a 1987 survey by the Alan Guttmacher Institute in which abortion patients were asked why they were having an abortion, only 1 percent of the 1,900 women questioned named rape or incest

1% > 0.1%

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Fri Apr 10, 2015 11:14 pm

Jacobania wrote:
FutureAmerica wrote:The world is overpopulated! Beware!


For every human being on this earth, there are over 1 million ants, and if we weighed all the ants on the earth with all of humanity, they would way the same.

How come no one is freaking out about the overpopulation of ants/chickens/numerous other creatures that outnumber people?

We usually kill those animals. If you're anywhere where your argument is, it's not here.
Jacobania wrote:Concerning abortion, people like to say "what about in cases of rape!" (less than 0.1% of all abortions btw)

I think the other extreme should be asked of pro-choicer's.

Should a 7-9 pound third-trimester baby be allowed to be aborted (more than 0.1% of all abortions)?

Source?
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40533
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sat Apr 11, 2015 12:48 am

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
Jacobania wrote:
For every human being on this earth, there are over 1 million ants, and if we weighed all the ants on the earth with all of humanity, they would way the same.

How come no one is freaking out about the overpopulation of ants/chickens/numerous other creatures that outnumber people?

We usually kill those animals. If you're anywhere where your argument is, it's not here.
Jacobania wrote:Concerning abortion, people like to say "what about in cases of rape!" (less than 0.1% of all abortions btw)

I think the other extreme should be asked of pro-choicer's.

Should a 7-9 pound third-trimester baby be allowed to be aborted (more than 0.1% of all abortions)?

Source?



In 2011, most (64.5%) abortions were performed by ≤8 weeks' gestation, and nearly all (91.4%) were performed by ≤13 weeks' gestation. Few abortions (7.3%) were performed between 14–20 weeks' gestation or at ≥21 weeks' gestation (1.4%). From 2002 to 2011, the percentage of all abortions performed at ≤8 weeks' gestation increased 6%.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtm ... ss6311a1_w

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3711005.pdf

This finds that about 1% of abortions are due to rape.
Last edited by Neutraligon on Sat Apr 11, 2015 12:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Sat Apr 11, 2015 1:14 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:We usually kill those animals. If you're anywhere where your argument is, it's not here.
Source?



In 2011, most (64.5%) abortions were performed by ≤8 weeks' gestation, and nearly all (91.4%) were performed by ≤13 weeks' gestation. Few abortions (7.3%) were performed between 14–20 weeks' gestation or at ≥21 weeks' gestation (1.4%). From 2002 to 2011, the percentage of all abortions performed at ≤8 weeks' gestation increased 6%.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtm ... ss6311a1_w

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3711005.pdf

This finds that about 1% of abortions are due to rape.
okay then...

thank's for providing his sources, which proved him wrong
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Globus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 501
Founded: Apr 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Globus » Sat Apr 11, 2015 1:42 am

Just pointing this out. The poll question is rather unfair: "Do you support an individual's right to have an abortion?"

I feel like if I answer yes, I'm saying I'm for civil rights.
I feel like if I answer no, I'm saying I'm against civil rights.

Nonetheless, I do support the right to have an abortion.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Sat Apr 11, 2015 1:49 am

Jacobania wrote:
FutureAmerica wrote:The world is overpopulated! Beware!


For every human being on this earth, there are over 1 million ants, and if we weighed all the ants on the earth with all of humanity, they would way the same.

How come no one is freaking out about the overpopulation of ants/chickens/numerous other creatures that outnumber people?


Because they don't pollute to nearly the same degree.

Jacobania wrote:Concerning abortion, people like to say "what about in cases of rape!" (less than 0.1% of all abortions btw)

I think the other extreme should be asked of pro-choicer's.

Should a 7-9 pound third-trimester baby be allowed to be aborted (more than 0.1% of all abortions)?


Yes, absolutely. This happens every time a baby is born by c-section. Note that "aborted" does not mean killing the baby necessarily, just removing it from the woman's body.

Globus wrote:Just pointing this out. The poll question is rather unfair: "Do you support an individual's right to have an abortion?"

I feel like if I answer yes, I'm saying I'm for civil rights.
I feel like if I answer no, I'm saying I'm against civil rights.

Nonetheless, I do support the right to have an abortion.


Well, yes. People that don't support an individual's right to have an abortion are against civil rights.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Globus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 501
Founded: Apr 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Globus » Sat Apr 11, 2015 1:57 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Globus wrote:Just pointing this out. The poll question is rather unfair: "Do you support an individual's right to have an abortion?"

I feel like if I answer yes, I'm saying I'm for civil rights.
I feel like if I answer no, I'm saying I'm against civil rights.

Nonetheless, I do support the right to have an abortion.


Well, yes. People that don't support an individual's right to have an abortion are against civil rights.


Some people against abortion are against it because they consider it murder.

If people against abortion are against civil rights and against murder, does that make me for civil rights and for murder?

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Sat Apr 11, 2015 2:03 am

Globus wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:

Well, yes. People that don't support an individual's right to have an abortion are against civil rights.


Some people against abortion are against it because they consider it murder.

If people against abortion are against civil rights and against murder, does that make me for civil rights and for murder?

To them, yes, at least, most of the time.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Sat Apr 11, 2015 2:04 am

Globus wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:

Well, yes. People that don't support an individual's right to have an abortion are against civil rights.


Some people against abortion are against it because they consider it murder.

If people against abortion are against civil rights and against murder, does that make me for civil rights and for murder?


No. They are factually incorrect if they consider it murder. The fact is, though, that they are restricting people's rights to decide what to do with their own bodies. That's a restriction of civil rights, plain and simple.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Mushet
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17402
Founded: Apr 29, 2008
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Mushet » Sat Apr 11, 2015 3:56 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Jacobania wrote:
For every human being on this earth, there are over 1 million ants, and if we weighed all the ants on the earth with all of humanity, they would way the same.

How come no one is freaking out about the overpopulation of ants/chickens/numerous other creatures that outnumber people?


Because they don't pollute to nearly the same degree.

Jacobania wrote:Concerning abortion, people like to say "what about in cases of rape!" (less than 0.1% of all abortions btw)

I think the other extreme should be asked of pro-choicer's.

Should a 7-9 pound third-trimester baby be allowed to be aborted (more than 0.1% of all abortions)?


Yes, absolutely. This happens every time a baby is born by c-section. Note that "aborted" does not mean killing the baby necessarily, just removing it from the woman's body.

Globus wrote:Just pointing this out. The poll question is rather unfair: "Do you support an individual's right to have an abortion?"

I feel like if I answer yes, I'm saying I'm for civil rights.
I feel like if I answer no, I'm saying I'm against civil rights.

Nonetheless, I do support the right to have an abortion.


Well, yes. People that don't support an individual's right to have an abortion are against civil rights.

The wording still kinda frames it in a politically charged way, much like referring to this as a Right to Life debate.
"what I believe is like a box, and we’re taking the energy of our thinking and putting into a box of beliefs, pretending that we’re thinking...I’ve gone through most of my life not believing anything. Either I know or I don’t know, or I think." - John Trudell

Gun control is, and always has been, a tool of white supremacy.

Puppet: E-City ranked #1 in the world for Highest Drug Use on 5/25/2015
Puppet Sacred Heart Church ranked #2 in the world for Nudest 2/25/2010
OP of a 5 page archived thread The Forum Seven Tit Museum
Previous Official King of Forum 7 (2010-2012/13), relinquished own title
First person to get AQ'd Quote was funnier in 2011, you had to have been there
Celebrating over a decade on Nationstates!

User avatar
Mefpan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5872
Founded: Oct 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mefpan » Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:24 am

Jacobania wrote:Concerning abortion, people like to say "what about in cases of rape!" (less than 0.1% of all abortions btw)

I think the other extreme should be asked of pro-choicer's.

Should a 7-9 pound third-trimester baby be allowed to be aborted (more than 0.1% of all abortions)?

Those are still low numbers and people who choose to have an abortion that late into a pregnancy tend to have a really fucking solid reason for doing so - as tends to be the case with most late-term pregnancies that are aborted.

What? Does anyone here honestly believe women will go through nearly a full pregnancy just to kill an almost-baby and chuck it onto an imaginary pile of dead fetuses erected as an effigy to their dark and fell progressive gods?

Please don't answer that. Knowing these forums, someone will genuinely believe that to be the case.
I support thermonuclear warfare. Do you want to play a game of chess?
NationStates' umpteenth dirty ex-leftist class traitor.
I left the Left when it turned Right. Now I'm going back to the Right because it's all that's Left.
Yeah, Screw Realism!
Loyal Planet of Mankind

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:26 am

Mefpan wrote:Does anyone here honestly believe women will go through nearly a full pregnancy just to kill an almost-baby and chuck it onto an imaginary pile of dead fetuses erected as an effigy to their dark and fell progressive gods?

Yes, I honestly believe that.NOT
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Mefpan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5872
Founded: Oct 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mefpan » Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:28 am

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
Mefpan wrote:Does anyone here honestly believe women will go through nearly a full pregnancy just to kill an almost-baby and chuck it onto an imaginary pile of dead fetuses erected as an effigy to their dark and fell progressive gods?

Yes, I honestly believe that.NOT

You just did that to spite me, didn't you.
I support thermonuclear warfare. Do you want to play a game of chess?
NationStates' umpteenth dirty ex-leftist class traitor.
I left the Left when it turned Right. Now I'm going back to the Right because it's all that's Left.
Yeah, Screw Realism!
Loyal Planet of Mankind

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:30 am

Mefpan wrote:
Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:Yes, I honestly believe that.NOT

You just did that to spite me, didn't you.

Yes.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:22 am

Jacobania wrote:Concerning abortion, people like to say "what about in cases of rape!" (less than 0.1% of all abortions btw)

I think the other extreme should be asked of pro-choicer's.

Should a 7-9 pound third-trimester baby be allowed to be aborted (more than 0.1% of all abortions)?


when you know why those abortions are done you will know why they must be allowed.
whatever

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:35 am

Globus wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:

Well, yes. People that don't support an individual's right to have an abortion are against civil rights.


Some people against abortion are against it because they consider it murder.

If people against abortion are against civil rights and against murder, does that make me for civil rights and for murder?

what matters is what YOU think after you have thought it through.

there are few easy answers in life. this is one of them. I am guided by knowing that no one counts the unborn as people. that is why your age starts when you are born not when you were conceived. that's why women who have had miscarriages don't count those losses when people ask them how many children they have. that's why we don't have funerals for spontaneous abortions. that's why we don't count the upwards of 50% of all fertilized eggs that don't implant as tragedies.

and that's why abortion isn't (wasn't when it was illegal in this country) punished the same way as the murder of a child.

civil rights is for people and the only person involved in abortion is the woman getting one.
whatever

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159079
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:44 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Globus wrote:
Some people against abortion are against it because they consider it murder.

If people against abortion are against civil rights and against murder, does that make me for civil rights and for murder?

what matters is what YOU think after you have thought it through.

there are few easy answers in life. this is one of them. I am guided by knowing that no one counts the unborn as people. that is why your age starts when you are born not when you were conceived. that's why women who have had miscarriages don't count those losses when people ask them how many children they have. that's why we don't have funerals for spontaneous abortions. that's why we don't count the upwards of 50% of all fertilized eggs that don't implant as tragedies.

and that's why abortion isn't (wasn't when it was illegal in this country) punished the same way as the murder of a child.

civil rights is for people and the only person involved in abortion is the woman getting one.

Once we invent abortion vending machines there won't even be a doctor involved.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:07 am

Ifreann wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:what matters is what YOU think after you have thought it through.

there are few easy answers in life. this is one of them. I am guided by knowing that no one counts the unborn as people. that is why your age starts when you are born not when you were conceived. that's why women who have had miscarriages don't count those losses when people ask them how many children they have. that's why we don't have funerals for spontaneous abortions. that's why we don't count the upwards of 50% of all fertilized eggs that don't implant as tragedies.

and that's why abortion isn't (wasn't when it was illegal in this country) punished the same way as the murder of a child.

civil rights is for people and the only person involved in abortion is the woman getting one.

Once we invent abortion vending machines there won't even be a doctor involved.


the original roe v wade supreme court decision was decided on the freedom of the DOCTOR to perform abortions not on the right of a woman to get one.
whatever

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159079
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:14 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Once we invent abortion vending machines there won't even be a doctor involved.


the original roe v wade supreme court decision was decided on the freedom of the DOCTOR to perform abortions not on the right of a woman to get one.

Vending machines have rights, too.

User avatar
Arach-Naga Combine
Diplomat
 
Posts: 574
Founded: Apr 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arach-Naga Combine » Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:19 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Once we invent abortion vending machines there won't even be a doctor involved.


the original roe v wade supreme court decision was decided on the freedom of the DOCTOR to perform abortions not on the right of a woman to get one.

No it wasn't.

"right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the district court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy."
Undisputed snuggling champions of all realities across all multiverses

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:37 am

Arach-Naga Combine wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:
the original roe v wade supreme court decision was decided on the freedom of the DOCTOR to perform abortions not on the right of a woman to get one.

No it wasn't.

"right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the district court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy."

well what I meant by that is this

(a) For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman's attending physician. Pp. 163, 164.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/410/113

I cant go into it more right now im getting ready to go fishing.
whatever

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Sat Apr 11, 2015 11:50 am

Jacobania wrote:
FutureAmerica wrote:The world is overpopulated! Beware!


For every human being on this earth, there are over 1 million ants, and if we weighed all the ants on the earth with all of humanity, they would way the same.

How come no one is freaking out about the overpopulation of ants/chickens/numerous other creatures that outnumber people?

This is not true. The ant's weight is considerably greater.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Sat Apr 11, 2015 12:48 pm

Sun Wukong wrote:
Jacobania wrote:
For every human being on this earth, there are over 1 million ants, and if we weighed all the ants on the earth with all of humanity, they would way the same.

How come no one is freaking out about the overpopulation of ants/chickens/numerous other creatures that outnumber people?

This is not true. The ant's weight is considerably greater.

I step on an ant every time I see one. Don't know why the rest of you aren't doing your part.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
-Ebola-
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1872
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby -Ebola- » Sat Apr 11, 2015 9:31 pm

Jacobania wrote:
FutureAmerica wrote:The world is overpopulated! Beware!


For every human being on this earth, there are over 1 million ants, and if we weighed all the ants on the earth with all of humanity, they would way the same.

How come no one is freaking out about the overpopulation of ants/chickens/numerous other creatures that outnumber people?


The population of a species has little correlation to its impact on the environment. Pretty much any viral species you have ever heard of, even the ones you don't think of as being common, outnumbers human beings by a wide margin; but it still took thousands of years for human beings to even realize that we existed. People do freak out about "invasive species" and species that they have deemed "vermin" or "pathogens," but simply knowing how many ants or oak trees or amoebas there are on the planet does not tell you anything about how those species are affecting the ecosystem. If it was just a question of population, you would all be panicking about rhinoviruses, not animals or people or kudzu.
There are viruses on the internet! Make sure your computer is protected.
African, asexual, and proud.
Racism is foolish. You're all the same inside. I would know.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Bavarno, Bornada, Cannot think of a name, Chernobyl and Pripyat, Cybernetic Union, Dakran, El Lazaro, Google [Bot], Greater Miami Shores 3, Juansonia, Lativs, New Ciencia, Ryemarch, Shidei, The Rio Grande River Basin, Wallenburg

Advertisement

Remove ads