Luminesa wrote:OBJECTION!
Un Attimo! Si prega di ascoltare giudicare!
I tried.
Is there something wrong with me saying that?
No, however what was put down by you hinted at that.
Advertisement

by Furry Alairia and Algeria » Mon Apr 06, 2015 6:59 pm
Luminesa wrote:OBJECTION!
Is there something wrong with me saying that?

by Krieg-Deathworld » Mon Apr 06, 2015 7:03 pm

by Krieg-Deathworld » Mon Apr 06, 2015 7:11 pm
Salandriagado wrote:Jamzmania wrote:Except, it is evil. You are taking a baby, not even born yet, and killing it before it has a chance to live its life. You are squandering human life, making it meaningless as long as you can chant some mantra like "bodily sovereignty" while ruthlessly slaughtering millions of children. It's disgusting.
The same is true every time a (biological) man masturbates, every time a (biological) woman goes through her period. Every time you choose not to have sex. So unless you want to ban masturbation and make it compulsory for everybody to have sex at least once a month throughout their entire childbearing lives (when not pregnant), you don't have a leg to stand on.

by The Great Warrior Rivers » Mon Apr 06, 2015 7:12 pm
Krieg-Deathworld wrote:Salandriagado wrote:
The same is true every time a (biological) man masturbates, every time a (biological) woman goes through her period. Every time you choose not to have sex. So unless you want to ban masturbation and make it compulsory for everybody to have sex at least once a month throughout their entire childbearing lives (when not pregnant), you don't have a leg to stand on.
You are just full of bullshit today huh? I didn't know that sperm was a baby. If that is so, why do we need to combine it with an eg-ohhhhh, I get it now, and so should you....

by The Great Warrior Rivers » Mon Apr 06, 2015 7:13 pm
Krieg-Deathworld wrote:I understand that some sinners cannot be helped, and if they want an abortion, what am I going to do? I don't believe it should be normalized or trivialized like feminists seem to want.

by Malkorian Empire » Mon Apr 06, 2015 7:15 pm

by Krieg-Deathworld » Mon Apr 06, 2015 7:15 pm
The Great Warrior Rivers wrote:Krieg-Deathworld wrote:You are just full of bullshit today huh? I didn't know that sperm was a baby. If that is so, why do we need to combine it with an eg-ohhhhh, I get it now, and so should you....
A fetus isn't a baby either. It's a fetus. A potential baby. He's correct. Sperm and egg gametes are also both potential children.

by Krieg-Deathworld » Mon Apr 06, 2015 7:16 pm
The Great Warrior Rivers wrote:Krieg-Deathworld wrote:I understand that some sinners cannot be helped, and if they want an abortion, what am I going to do? I don't believe it should be normalized or trivialized like feminists seem to want.
I don't think anyone wants it normalized. That's just disgusting. Just fund provided contraception and safe-sex courses.

by The Great Warrior Rivers » Mon Apr 06, 2015 7:35 pm

by Russels Orbiting Teapot » Mon Apr 06, 2015 8:13 pm
Krieg-Deathworld wrote:They are half of a potential child. A car cut down the middle is not the same as a car missing some doors and a little interior work.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Mon Apr 06, 2015 8:43 pm
Krieg-Deathworld wrote:The Great Warrior Rivers wrote:A fetus isn't a baby either. It's a fetus. A potential baby. He's correct. Sperm and egg gametes are also both potential children.
They are half of a potential child. A car cut down the middle is not the same as a car missing some doors and a little interior work.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Krieg-Deathworld » Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:07 pm

by Russels Orbiting Teapot » Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:08 pm
Krieg-Deathworld wrote:No, I mean there are clinics that are actually created to normalize it. I read an article about it in the times.

by Krieg-Deathworld » Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:09 pm
Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:Krieg-Deathworld wrote:They are half of a potential child. A car cut down the middle is not the same as a car missing some doors and a little interior work.
They are effectively the same until the engine is fully installed.
(In this metaphor, that means the fetus having an active brain, which has not been shown earlier than 25 weeks.)

by Soldati Senza Confini » Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:13 pm
Krieg-Deathworld wrote:Russels Orbiting Teapot wrote:
They are effectively the same until the engine is fully installed.
(In this metaphor, that means the fetus having an active brain, which has not been shown earlier than 25 weeks.)
Nah, it has the engine, it's just not running until 25 weeks. A car without an engine is useless, a car with a nonfunctional engine has potential.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Krieg-Deathworld » Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:15 pm

by Krieg-Deathworld » Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:17 pm

by Russels Orbiting Teapot » Mon Apr 06, 2015 11:34 pm
Krieg-Deathworld wrote:That has little to do with it. A fetus has a brain pretty early. It may not be functional, but it is there. Sperm and egg cells do not have brains last time I checked.

by Libronyscien » Thu Apr 09, 2015 7:58 pm

by Libronyscien » Thu Apr 09, 2015 8:01 pm

by Galloism » Thu Apr 09, 2015 8:20 pm
Libronyscien wrote:Given time, a fetus could turn into a baby. No amount of time will turn sperm or eggs into a baby. I'm meaning human sperm, human eggs, human fetus, and human baby.

by Celsuis » Thu Apr 09, 2015 8:23 pm

by Othelos » Thu Apr 09, 2015 9:01 pm
Celsuis wrote:At the moment, I believe in banning abortion at the point of viability with exceptions for rape. (though I'm torn between completely banning abortion with exceptions for rape and completely legalizing abortion :/ For me, it's a property rights v rights to life problem)

by Celsuis » Thu Apr 09, 2015 9:06 pm
Othelos wrote:Celsuis wrote:At the moment, I believe in banning abortion at the point of viability with exceptions for rape. (though I'm torn between completely banning abortion with exceptions for rape and completely legalizing abortion :/ For me, it's a property rights v rights to life problem)
property rights?
No, the issue is that people should be able to decide what they want to do with their own bodies. No one has the right to use your body against your will.

by Mondoncon » Thu Apr 09, 2015 10:02 pm
Celsuis wrote:Othelos wrote:property rights?
No, the issue is that people should be able to decide what they want to do with their own bodies. No one has the right to use your body against your will.
Your body is your property since you inherently own yourself, therefore it is a matter of property rights. And similarly to what you stated, no one has the right to use your property against your will.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Atrito, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bradfordville, Cannot think of a name, Dimetrodon Empire, Elejamie, Elwher, Hapilopper, Immoren, Imperiul romanum, Moltian, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Old Temecula, Shrillland, Tinhampton, Utquiagvik, Valoptia, Valyxias, Vassenor, Verkhoyanska, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement