Sanctissima wrote:Galloism wrote:Actually, it works pretty well: Driving is a common activity that carries with it certain risks - much like sex.
In driving, we have certain things we use to mitigate that risk, such as brakes. In sex, we have certain things to mitigate that risk, such as condoms, hormonal birth control, vasectomies, spermicide and so on.
Sometimes, those things we use to mitigate that risk fail.
Yes, but sex isn't necessary, is it?
A lot of people need to drive because it's their only source of transportation.
Sex, on the other hand, is entirely optional.
Actually, without sex, you're at increased risk of heart attack, and, in women, it can cause vaginismus, which is particularly unpleasant. In men, not having sex regularly increases the risk of prostate cancer.
It also carries certain psychological risks not to have sex IF a person desires to have sex.
A significant portion of driving is not necessary. One could walk or bike instead unless they live more than 10-15 miles from where they're going. If they live in a locale that has it, they can also take public transportation. In most circumstances, for most people, driving is no more "necessary" than sex is.




