Kentucky senator proposes transphobic bathroom "bounty"

by **Desperate Measures** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 6:49 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Ifreann wrote:At least this way you still have your hearing, and haven't been eaten by bears.

I wouldn't be so sure about whether DM has ever been eaten by a bear....

by **Fartsniffage** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 6:55 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
I wouldn't be so sure about whether DM has ever been eaten by a bear....

Om nom nom, delicious DM?

How would I know? *avoids darkness, beautiful or otherwise.....*

by **Ifreann** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 6:56 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Om nom nom, delicious DM?

How would I know? *avoids darkness, beautiful or otherwise.....*

Wise decision. In the darkness, you are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

by **Nord Amour** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 6:59 pm

I fail to understand why there are segregated bathrooms to begin with.

by **Desperate Measures** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:01 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Om nom nom, delicious DM?

How would I know? *avoids darkness, beautiful or otherwise.....*

Unavoidable. Knows all. Sees all.

and i taste terrific

by **Ifreann** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:03 pm

Nord Amour wrote:I fail to understand why there are segregated bathrooms to begin with.

Because periods are loud or something.

by **Galloism** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:08 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Nord Amour wrote:I fail to understand why there are segregated bathrooms to begin with.

Because periods are loud or something.

With practice, women can shoot their period like a Spider-Man web.

by **Liriena** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:11 pm

Galloism wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Because periods are loud or something.

With practice, women can shoot their period like a Spider-Man web.

That's... quite the mental image.

by **Fartsniffage** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:11 pm

Galloism wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Because periods are loud or something.

With practice, women can shoot their period like a Spider-Man web.

Now this would be niche porn....

by **Threlizdun** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:12 pm

Nord Amour wrote:I fail to understand why there are segregated bathrooms to begin with.

Cooties! Didn't you go to elementary school?

by **Galloism** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:12 pm

Liriena wrote:
Galloism wrote:With practice, women can shoot their period like a Spider-Man web.

That's... quite the mental image.

It's a lot louder, though.

by **Galloism** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:13 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Galloism wrote:With practice, women can shoot their period like a Spider-Man web.

Now this would be niche porn....

I made someone imagine it. Therefore, rule 34 must apply.

by **Shaggai** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:16 pm

The United Colonies of Earth wrote:
Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:Just send him a Uncyclopedia link and it'll be better.

My transphobic brother-in-law told me about MtF sex reassignment surgery.
Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:Eww, RationalWiki.

What's wrong with RW?

http://www.getstungbymillionsofwasps.com/ Slogan: "At least we're not RationalWiki"

by **Scomagia** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:17 pm

Galloism wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Because periods are loud or something.

With practice, women can shoot their period like a Spider-Man web.

I could have done without that image. Thanks Gallo.

by **Revanchism** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:20 pm

Galloism wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Because periods are loud or something.

With practice, women can shoot their period like a Spider-Man web.

Hot.

by **Master Shake** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:22 pm

Edgy Opinions wrote:The language used to explain the problem was deficient. No one was born anything, people just imposed social customs and roles based on anatomy but that is just useless, backwards, sexist garbage to the most part.

Socialist Tera wrote:It [is always a potential source of abuse and violence] for [any] trans woman to go into a men's bathroom.

Fixed that for you.

I agree whole heartedly.

I have a friend going to a University in Kentucky and I hope they don't fuck with her.

If they do then I'm willing to make a 2,080 mile drive and beat the fuck out of whoever tries to sue her!

by **Farnhamia** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:26 pm

Master Shake wrote:
Edgy Opinions wrote:The language used to explain the problem was deficient. No one was born anything, people just imposed social customs and roles based on anatomy but that is just useless, backwards, sexist garbage to the most part.

Fixed that for you.

I agree whole heartedly.

I have a friend going to a University in Kentucky and I hope they don't fuck with her.

If they do then I'm willing to make a 2,080 mile drive and beat the fuck out of whoever tries to sue her!

No one is going to be able to sue individual students. The bill's foolishness lies in people being able to sue the schools.

by **Talvezout** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:29 pm

Master Shake wrote:
Edgy Opinions wrote:The language used to explain the problem was deficient. No one was born anything, people just imposed social customs and roles based on anatomy but that is just useless, backwards, sexist garbage to the most part.

Fixed that for you.

I agree whole heartedly.

I have a friend going to a University in Kentucky and I hope they don't fuck with her.

If they do then I'm willing to make a 2,080 mile drive and beat the fuck out of whoever tries to sue her!

People... haven't actually used someone for being transgender right? If someone did do that, then my god, what the hell.

by **Master Shake** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:35 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Master Shake wrote:
I agree whole heartedly.

I have a friend going to a University in Kentucky and I hope they don't fuck with her.

If they do then I'm willing to make a 2,080 mile drive and beat the fuck out of whoever tries to sue her!

No one is going to be able to sue individual students. The bill's foolishness lies in people being able to sue the schools.

Well,then...The tax payers/schools will definitely suffer. You will have stupid kids who are desperate for cash suing the schools because they saw a short haired girl who dresses tomboyishly in the girls room. Or my favorite an effeminate emo boy who dresses scene going into the Men's room.

by **Threlizdun** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:37 pm

Master Shake wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:No one is going to be able to sue individual students. The bill's foolishness lies in people being able to sue the schools.

Well,then...The tax payers/schools will definitely suffer. You will have stupid kids who are desperate for cash suing the schools because they saw a short haired girl who dresses tomboyishly in the girls room. Or my favorite an effeminate emo boy who dresses scene going into the Men's room.

Even in Kentucky, it isn't going to pass.

by **Threlizdun** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:38 pm

Do I get bonus points for replying to this in the women's restroom?

by **Master Shake** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:39 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Master Shake wrote:
Well,then...The tax payers/schools will definitely suffer. You will have stupid kids who are desperate for cash suing the schools because they saw a short haired girl who dresses tomboyishly in the girls room. Or my favorite an effeminate emo boy who dresses scene going into the Men's room.
Even in Kentucky, it isn't going to pass.

Then there is still hope for this nation. I swear everyday that goes by we get closer to becoming the society featured in Idiocracy!

by **Galloism** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:41 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Galloism wrote:With practice, women can shoot their period like a Spider-Man web.

I could have done without that image. Thanks Gallo.

Revanchism wrote:
Galloism wrote:With practice, women can shoot their period like a Spider-Man web.

Hot.

It's not really a sexual thing. It's a defense mechanism, like octopus ink.

by **Farnhamia** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:43 pm

Master Shake wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:No one is going to be able to sue individual students. The bill's foolishness lies in people being able to sue the schools.

Well,then...The tax payers/schools will definitely suffer. You will have stupid kids who are desperate for cash suing the schools because they saw a short haired girl who dresses tomboyishly in the girls room. Or my favorite an effeminate emo boy who dresses scene going into the Men's room.

Yes, but remember, the bill gives the ability to bring a suit against the school, it doesn't guarantee victory. It does put already precarious school budgets at risk. In some places in this country, "small government" seems to mean "bleed the school systems dry." I can't imagine that this many people had bad experiences in public school and then were elected to state legislatures. The mind boggles.

by **Master Shake** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:46 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Master Shake wrote:
Well,then...The tax payers/schools will definitely suffer. You will have stupid kids who are desperate for cash suing the schools because they saw a short haired girl who dresses tomboyishly in the girls room. Or my favorite an effeminate emo boy who dresses scene going into the Men's room.

Yes, but remember, the bill gives the ability to bring a suit against the school, it doesn't guarantee victory. It does put already precarious school budgets at risk. In some places in this country, "small government" seems to mean "bleed the school systems dry." I can't imagine that this many people had bad experiences in public school and then were elected to state legislatures. The mind boggles.

Well they shouldn't have used the school restrooms in their youth. I never used a bathroom in all my years going to school because they smelled worse then a sewer and were NOT maintained up to code. Hell most people at my high school would use them as "sex rooms".

EDIT...how you ask?

Well the boy leaves class to go to the restroom and texts his girlfriend to ask to go to the bathroom. They meet up and "wham chicka bam bam!"

Kentucky senator proposes transphobic bathroom "bounty"

Who is online