Leftist Michael Moore calls snipers "cowards"

[Ostroeuropa]

Snipers don't die in wars, as we all know well.

And obviously, if we're fighting a war and trying to kill people, we want to be sporting about it and give them a chance to kill us. It wouldn't be fair without a death count on both sides, we need more dead people on our side, because as I said, snipers just don't die in wars.

(Poes law disclaimer . I'm being sarcastic.)

[The Two Jerseys]

I fail to see what's so cowardly about being alone in an isolated position that's going to be targeted with every sort of weapon imaginable as soon as you're spotted.

That really takes some balls.

Except when your a bigoted bully (referring to the actual sniper).

Well yeah, gunning down unarmed people at random for no good reason is an asshole move no matter how you do the shooting.

But on the battlefield when your target can shoot back with field artillery, it does take some balls.

[New Hampshire Republic]

Snipers don't die in wars, as we all know well.

And obviously, if we're fighting a war and trying to kill people, we want to be sporting about it and give them a chance to kill us. It wouldn't be fair without a death count on both sides, we need more dead people on our side, because as I said, snipers just don't die in wars.

(Poes law disclaimer.)

RPGs don't discriminate...

[Gauthier]

Snipers don't die in wars, as we all know well.

And obviously, if we're fighting a war and trying to kill people, we want to be sporting about it and give them a chance to kill us. It wouldn't be fair without a death count on both sides, we need more dead people on our side, because as I said, snipers just don't die in wars.

(Poes law disclaimer.)

RPGs don't discriminate...

But there is discrimination against RPGs since anyone who plays them are derided as unwashed virgin neckbeards.

[New Hampshire Republic]

RPGs don't discriminate...

But there is discrimination against RPGs since anyone who plays them are derided as unwashed virgin neckbeards.

[Alyakia]

….Based on what, exactly?

The fact that we live in a world with different cultures living in different areas with limited resources.

Imagine two men on a life raft with only enough food and water to sustain one of them until rescue.
It's perfectly reasonable for one to attempt to kill the other, and perfectly justifiable for the other to fight back and kill the attacker.

A lot of societies in the world are in the same position as the two men.

all i did was take their women and plunder their crops. perfectly reasonable. yet everyone gives me so much shit over it.

[Uxupox]

Cool. That doesn't support the notion that people will always fight.

More importantly, however, Tule's analogy is not actually valid. The two men on the life raft are fighting for survival, but our wars haven't been about survival in a long time.

There are "limited resources" in the world in the sense that it's not possible for all people to live like millionaires, but it's entirely possible for all people to live comfortable lives.

Hopefully this won't happen but there is a distinct possibility.

[Second Blazing]

I read the tittle as Leftover Micheal Moore, which is actually more accurate since his opinion is as relevant as week old leftovers.

[Benuty]

I read the tittle as Leftover Micheal Moore, which is actually more accurate since his opinion is as relevant as week old leftovers.

Someone tell that to Romney since they are considering running again.

[Gauthier]

I read the tittle as Leftover Micheal Moore, which is actually more accurate since his opinion is as relevant as week old leftovers.

Someone tell that to Romney since they are considering running again.

Reheating Leftovers: You're Doing It Wrong

[WestRedMaple]

Soldiers aren't heroes, no matter which side they shoot people from.

I agree, though I'd make an exception for medics.

Irrelevant, heroism isn't based on specific job.

[In Gentem Et De Libris Scientiam]

I think snipers are a bit cowards, as they don't meet in the battlefield, and get slain by machine guns. They fight from far back, but are also facing people that are looking for them, and only them.

[Conserative Morality]

I think if you aren't killing your enemy with your DAMN BARE HANDS while naked, you're a coward.

[Gauthier]

I think if you aren't killing your enemy with your DAMN BARE HANDS while naked, you're a coward.

So Putin is still underpants too cowardly.

[WestRedMaple]

But that's the thing: there's no form of warfare that will not result in similar civilian casualties. If one is committed to war, one is committed to civilian casualties on a large scale. There is no middle ground.

You were saying people complained about indirect approaches because they want U.S. soldiers to die.

Which certainly happens. I've seen people complain about them specifically because those operating them are not at risk of death in the operation

[Second Blazing]

Someone tell that to Romney since they are considering running again.

Reheating Leftovers: You're Doing It Wrong

Romney2016: This horse ain't dead enough yet.

[WestRedMaple]

Even when the killing involves stopping a clearly malevolent force from doing harm?

You become the malevolent force doing harm.

Incorrect. Protecting others does not mean you are being evil

[Master Shake]

RPGs don't discriminate...

But there is discrimination against RPGs since anyone who plays them are derided as unwashed virgin neckbeards.

Shave your neckbeard and you won't have anything to worry about.

I say we dress Mr. Moore in cow colored camo colors and see how long he lasts out in the field of battle. Hunters will snipe that fat fuck so fast!

[Kravanica]

Dude, Dresden was a transportation and industrial heartland of the Third Reich. Air campaigns like that were vital for the war effort.

Late-war fearmongering. A defeated enemy is so before it declares itself one, and the case of the third reich in 1945 is a textbook case of such, lacking both its maritime trade routes and cash colonies.

I wouldn't say these actions were right, but they were practical, necessary to ending the war as quickly as possible, thus abating casualties.

United Marxist Nations is a Marxist and Russophile, you can expect this.

I'm more leninist than lenin himself

Pounding them into submission made the war end quicker. Or would you prefer to have prolonged it so more could die?

[WestRedMaple]

Snipers don't die in wars, as we all know well.

And obviously, if we're fighting a war and trying to kill people, we want to be sporting about it and give them a chance to kill us. It wouldn't be fair without a death count on both sides, we need more dead people on our side, because as I said, snipers just don't die in wars.

(Poes law disclaimer.)

RPGs don't discriminate...

Nonsense, they say my career options and promotion potential are restricted based on race!

[Kravanica]

Why is it alright to insult Isis, however people who call out the American military (who have killed more people in their history) are instantly bitches/butthurt/trolling/idiots?

Because ISIS is a genocidal terrorist group that beheads children on a regular basis?

[Second Blazing]

RPGs don't discriminate...

Nonsense, they say my career options and promotion potential are restricted based on race!

That's because orcs are subhuman scum.

[Kravanica]

Of-course Clint Eastwood directed this movie...damn Dirty Harry how far from the rabbit hole you gone.

You're asking this about the same Clint Eastwood who argued with an empty chair?

Yes, because that shit was funny.

[Napkiraly]

RPGs don't discriminate...

But there is discrimination against RPGs since anyone who plays them are derided as unwashed virgin neckbeards.

Until you mention that Vin Diesel is a massive DnD nerd And a Tolkien fan since one of his DnD characters was named Melkor.

[Napkiraly]

Nonsense, they say my career options and promotion potential are restricted based on race!

That's because orcs are subhuman scum.

#EldarMasterRace