Advertisement

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:49 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Western-Ukraine » Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:52 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:But the concept is no different.
He has achieved nothing except on the back of his parents. He has made no struggle and had no strive.
This is a something for nothing culture. It's just not the something for nothing culture he opposes.
This is classism.
Factbooks: National Politics
Region: U R N

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:53 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Western-Ukraine » Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:55 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Apart from the fact that it's not.
Factbooks: National Politics
Region: U R N

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:59 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Katganistan » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:00 am
The United States of North Amerigo wrote:Hello Nationstates General. Today I have another question. Do you approve of the United Kingdom? The United Kingdom follows the United States on its tours around the world, always by its side. It is also a critical component in NATO. However, it has recently taken unpopular actions, like ignored radical Islam for fear of being labeled as a racist country. Or if the UKIP party wins, and it looks like it is, it will leave the European Union. But still, on the other hand, it is sending troops to Estonia to help prepare Estonian troops. It was the country that has given birth to the most influential powers around the world. I.E Australia, Canada, United States, New Zealand. So my question is, do you approval or disapprove?

by Patria Magna » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:01 am

by The Nuclear Fist » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:02 am
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by United Anglosphere Federation » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:02 am
Patria Magna wrote:I can't approve of them when their entire political structure is based off of attacking Catholics.

by United Anglosphere Federation » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:02 am

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:03 am
Patria Magna wrote:I can't approve of them when their entire political structure is based off of attacking Catholics.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Western-Ukraine » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:03 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Western-Ukraine wrote:How is it not theft when it's taken from money earned with hard work?
I thought I told you to stop using that buzzword.
The state's job is to provide its citizens with access to the means of defence, healthcare and personal security. It does this through taxes. This is part of your duty to the state, and your fellow man within the state.
Factbooks: National Politics
Region: U R N

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:05 am
Western-Ukraine wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:I thought I told you to stop using that buzzword.
The state's job is to provide its citizens with access to the means of defence, healthcare and personal security. It does this through taxes. This is part of your duty to the state, and your fellow man within the state.
I don't consider that my duty. I am in no way bond to support other people. No state should be able to force people to help other people live. This is partly authoritarianism. The state should be minimal.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by The Nuclear Fist » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:07 am
Western-Ukraine wrote:The lower classes don't deserve equal quantity because they don't have the responsibility and the ambition that for example the businessmen need to succeed. They could go for business if they wanted to. It's about choice.
The difference with something for nothing system and inheritance is the fact that when the government "helps" the lower class they take from others while in inheritance money is given out of your free will.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by Old Tyrannia » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:11 am
Patria Magna wrote:I can't approve of them when their entire political structure is based off of attacking Catholics.
Katganistan wrote:The United States of North Amerigo wrote:Hello Nationstates General. Today I have another question. Do you approve of the United Kingdom? The United Kingdom follows the United States on its tours around the world, always by its side. It is also a critical component in NATO. However, it has recently taken unpopular actions, like ignored radical Islam for fear of being labeled as a racist country. Or if the UKIP party wins, and it looks like it is, it will leave the European Union. But still, on the other hand, it is sending troops to Estonia to help prepare Estonian troops. It was the country that has given birth to the most influential powers around the world. I.E Australia, Canada, United States, New Zealand. So my question is, do you approval or disapprove?
I was unaware that a sovereign nation required my approval. Actually, I quite doubt it does. Nevertheless, they have it.

by Norfolk and Suffolk » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:12 am

by The Atheist State of Greater London » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:12 am

by Katganistan » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:15 am
Old Tyrannia wrote:Katganistan wrote:I was unaware that a sovereign nation required my approval. Actually, I quite doubt it does. Nevertheless, they have it.
If a nation doesn't have a moderator's approval, it may be DEATed. Thankfully the United Kingdom's flag, motto, currency and national animal are all neither obscene nor offensive.

by Old Tyrannia » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:16 am

by Jute » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:18 am
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by The Atheist State of Greater London » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:20 am

by The Nihilistic view » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:20 am

by Calimera II » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:21 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Arikea, Bagiyagaram, Bawkie, Bienenhalde, Blargoblarg, Driyc Shium, Ellese, Escalia, Fahran, Fartsniffage, Femcia, Fractalnavel, Kostane, Kunderland, Lativs, Necroghastia, Neo-American States, Ostroeuropa, Pizza Friday Forever91, Querria, Senkaku, Settentrionalia, Shidei, South Africa3, The North Polish Union, Umeria
Advertisement