Advertisement

by Murkwood » Mon Jan 12, 2015 12:56 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Liberty and Linguistics » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:03 pm
Dejanic wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:
If they are any similar to the FDP of Germany and VVD of the Netherlands, then most likely they'd be socially liberal, or at least socially moderate. It's the liberal tradition.
Reform seems like a Classical Liberal party to me, they're to the right of the "Conservative Liberal" VVD, but to the left of the American Libertarian party.

by Liberty and Linguistics » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:04 pm
Murkwood wrote:Pro Patria and Res Publica Union or the Estonian Reform Party. I can't decide.


by Murkwood » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:05 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Liberty and Linguistics » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:05 pm
Scepez wrote:I'm not old enough to vote, but I certainly can see that the Reform Party is not doing anything of use. Sure they might promise something, but they just end up changing absolutely nothing.

by Liberty and Linguistics » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:06 pm


by Arkolon » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:07 pm

by Murkwood » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:08 pm

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Liberty and Linguistics » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:09 pm
Arkolon wrote:Hnng, Reform Party, without a shadow of a doubt. I've had this strange desire to emigrate to Estonia recently. Low tax, upstart and business-friendly, it might just be an adequate neighbourhood for me. Any Estonians mind giving me some insight as to whether or not this would be a good idea? Within the bounds of relevance to the thread, of course.


by Scepez » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:11 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Scepez wrote:I'm not old enough to vote, but I certainly can see that the Reform Party is not doing anything of use. Sure they might promise something, but they just end up changing absolutely nothing.
Really? In the 1990's, Estonia was in a terrible place, but the Reform Party has overseen over almost two decades of rapid economic growth, a growth in the quality of life, which has led to the term "the Baltic Tiger."

by Liberty and Linguistics » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:12 pm
by Calimera II » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:13 pm

by Liberty and Linguistics » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:14 pm
Scepez wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Really? In the 1990's, Estonia was in a terrible place, but the Reform Party has overseen over almost two decades of rapid economic growth, a growth in the quality of life, which has led to the term "the Baltic Tiger."
I'm not going to even argue against that, cause it's true, however they aren't putting enough emphasis on actual quality of life. The minimum wage is still quite poor, and our PM doesn't seem to have a strong enough hand to be capable of doing something big.

by Arkolon » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:14 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Arkolon wrote:Hnng, Reform Party, without a shadow of a doubt. I've had this strange desire to emigrate to Estonia recently. Low tax, upstart and business-friendly, it might just be an adequate neighbourhood for me. Any Estonians mind giving me some insight as to whether or not this would be a good idea? Within the bounds of relevance to the thread, of course.
I'm not Estonian, but I wouldn't be able to stand the perpetually gloomy and melancholy Baltic weather. I live in the scorching desert Southwest, I need sunshine and 90F+ temperatures.

by Liberty and Linguistics » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:16 pm
Calimera II wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Indeed. I shouldn't say I'm "pretty right wing", since I'm about as socially liberal as one gets. But, when it comes to the economy, I firmly believe in privatizing just about all the things.
One question: Don't you think that the wealth of national resources of a country belong to its citizens?

by Liberty and Linguistics » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:17 pm
Arkolon wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
I'm not Estonian, but I wouldn't be able to stand the perpetually gloomy and melancholy Baltic weather. I live in the scorching desert Southwest, I need sunshine and 90F+ temperatures.
Google says it bites, but it's only an average 2-3 degrees celsius lower all year round than where I currently live..


by Scepez » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:18 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Scepez wrote:
I'm not going to even argue against that, cause it's true, however they aren't putting enough emphasis on actual quality of life. The minimum wage is still quite poor, and our PM doesn't seem to have a strong enough hand to be capable of doing something big.
In all fairness, Estonia's minimum wage is higher than that of it's other Baltic neighbors. Obviously, it doesn't have a minimum wage akin to Western Europe, because it's not quite as developed. But, despite the fact that Estonia has a relatively low minimum wage, the wages are higher than in any of it's neighbors(well, except for Finland), and very few citizens live in poverty. Lastly, income inequality isn't a major problem in Estonia. All seems to be going well there, and as the economy continues to grow, as will a generous welfare state.
by Calimera II » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:18 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Calimera II wrote:
One question: Don't you think that the wealth of national resources of a country belong to its citizens?
When a country "creates wealth", generally the quality of life and median income rise, ergo, creating wealth for it's citizens. So, yes, of course. But, this is irrelevant to the thread, and privatizations. I've heard this hackneyed argument to argue against privatization before, and it tends to appeal to emotion instead of facts. Lastly, I don't support privatizing everything. Healthcare, education, the military, social services, and all of that jazz should remain in the hands of state.

by Arkolon » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:19 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Arkolon wrote:Google says it bites, but it's only an average 2-3 degrees celsius lower all year round than where I currently live..
You live in Luxembourg. You could easily adjust to a cloudy, cold climate, since you currently live in one. Maybe, just maybe, I'll consider moving to Estonia if global warming manages to make the temperature much warmer there.

by Liberty and Linguistics » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:20 pm


by Liberty and Linguistics » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:21 pm
Calimera II wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
When a country "creates wealth", generally the quality of life and median income rise, ergo, creating wealth for it's citizens. So, yes, of course. But, this is irrelevant to the thread, and privatizations. I've heard this hackneyed argument to argue against privatization before, and it tends to appeal to emotion instead of facts. Lastly, I don't support privatizing everything. Healthcare, education, the military, social services, and all of that jazz should remain in the hands of state.
You are right, this isn't the right topic to discuss this. I don't agree with you though, it isn't an appeal to emotion: examples are Bolivia and Venezuela, two countries that had been robbed of their natural resources. Their populations lived in poverty and the wealth created by these foreign corporations were never seen by the population. But well.. it isn't the right topic to discuss this...

by Liberty and Linguistics » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:23 pm
by Calimera II » Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:24 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Calimera II wrote:
You are right, this isn't the right topic to discuss this. I don't agree with you though, it isn't an appeal to emotion: examples are Bolivia and Venezuela, two countries that had been robbed of their natural resources. Their populations lived in poverty and the wealth created by these foreign corporations were never seen by the population. But well.. it isn't the right topic to discuss this...
Indeed, it's not. Perhaps one of us could start a thread discussing the benefits/drawbacks of privatization.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Benuty, Necroghastia, Stellar Colonies, The Archregimancy, The Most Grand Feline Empire
Advertisement