Advertisement

by Des-Bal » Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:57 pm
In modern Western society, non-binary genders have only recently become socially acceptable enough for people to express that they experience them, and recently the American Psychological Association has recognised us (1, 2). Since researchers cannot even agree on what causes binary transgenderness, they have yet to discover what causes people to have non-binary genders, but there have been some studies done that offer some explanations (1, 2).
Now, let's go through a little exercise. I don't know your gender, so for my purposes I'm going to assume that you are a cis male. Now, why don't you explain what being male means?
Does it mean acting masculine, doing masculine things, speaking in a masculine manner, dressing in a masculine way?
Well, no, that all has to do with gender expression, and there are many women who do all that.
Does it mean having XY chromosomes or having a penis?
No, you've already admitted that you accept that people can have a different binary gender than that which they were assigned at birth
Does it mean being sexually attracted to females? No, there are many men who are attracted to men, or to all genders, or to no gender at all.
What does it mean, then?
Explain it.
Being all scientific would be helpful, too, since you apparently love scientific proof so much.
Oh? You can't?
Well, then how do you expect us to explain what being non-binary means to us?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by The United Colonies of Earth » Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:57 pm
Nature-Spirits wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
I'm not arguing you're some kind of self aware robot I'm telling you I don't believe you have an accurate picture of who you are. If you said "I have laser beam eyes" and I said "prove it" I'm not arguing that you don't exist. I view Transexualism as completely valid and supported by evidence the idea that gender should go beyond male/female is not.
There's no evidence to support any others.
If you believe you're right demonstrate it.
Alright.
Throughout human history and across many cultures, there have been accounts of more than two genders (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). These "third genders" have been a standard part of these cultures for decades, centuries, or in some cases millennia. Hence, the historical cross-cultural precedent for non-binary genders.
In modern Western society, non-binary genders have only recently become socially acceptable enough for people to express that they experience them, and recently the American Psychological Association has recognised us (1, 2). Since researchers cannot even agree on what causes binary transgenderness, they have yet to discover what causes people to have non-binary genders, but there have been some studies done that offer some explanations (1, 2).
Now, let's go through a little exercise. I don't know your gender, so for my purposes I'm going to assume that you are a cis male. Now, why don't you explain what being male means?
Does it mean acting masculine, doing masculine things, speaking in a masculine manner, dressing in a masculine way? Well, no, that all has to do with gender expression, and there are many women who do all that. Does it mean having XY chromosomes or having a penis? No, you've already admitted that you accept that people can have a different binary gender than that which they were assigned at birth. Does it mean being sexually attracted to females? No, there are many men who are attracted to men, or to all genders, or to no gender at all.
What does it mean, then? Explain it. Being all scientific would be helpful, too, since you apparently love scientific proof so much.
Oh? You can't?
Well, then how do you expect us to explain what being non-binary means to us?

by Grenartia » Tue Jan 27, 2015 10:19 pm
Nature-Spirits wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Amen.
Although, I will say that there is at least one study dealing with non-binary individuals.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22364652
I was actually just looking at that same study. I have to say, it's of particular interest to me. It'd be nice to be able to understand why my gender is the way it is.
![]()
Love you too.
North Pacific Economic Commonwealth wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Amen.
Although, I will say that there is at least one study dealing with non-binary individuals.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22364652
PHANTOM BREASTS sounds like an amazing name for a band.

by Nature-Spirits » Tue Jan 27, 2015 10:32 pm
orDes-Bal wrote:As the individual experiences it it comes down to viewing oneself as male.
Des-Bal wrote:The brains [sic] perception of itself as male

by Edgy Opinions » Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:08 am


by Grenartia » Wed Jan 28, 2015 8:18 am
Edgy Opinions wrote:"In addition, similar to transsexual individuals, the majority of bigender individuals experience phantom breasts or genitalia corresponding to the non-biologic gender when they are in a trans-gender state."
Are they seriously going for this fucking language and these fucking standards?
To be honest, I always look a lot like a girl - an attractive, slim girl - in both my thoughts about myself, my actions in the future, and my dreams, and I too imagine past me as far cuter than what it actually was, but I've never felt bodily dysphoria about anything unrelated to my face or my hair. Will people now say that there are faces inherently male and those inherently female now, and that my only chance at being a tru trans is desiring complex, expensive, endless, painful plastic surgeries to alter my bone structure?

by Edgy Opinions » Wed Jan 28, 2015 8:49 am
Grenartia wrote:Edgy Opinions wrote:"In addition, similar to transsexual individuals, the majority of bigender individuals experience phantom breasts or genitalia corresponding to the non-biologic gender when they are in a trans-gender state."
Are they seriously going for this fucking language and these fucking standards?
To be honest, I always look a lot like a girl - an attractive, slim girl - in both my thoughts about myself, my actions in the future, and my dreams, and I too imagine past me as far cuter than what it actually was, but I've never felt bodily dysphoria about anything unrelated to my face or my hair. Will people now say that there are faces inherently male and those inherently female now, and that my only chance at being a tru trans is desiring complex, expensive, endless, painful plastic surgeries to alter my bone structure?
You seem to have missed a crucial statement qualifier.


by Des-Bal » Wed Jan 28, 2015 9:55 am
Nature-Spirits wrote:So how, then, would it be different for anyone of any other gender? Viewing yourself as male obviously means that you simultaneously view yourself as "not female". So one can extrapolate, then, that if one views themself as "not male" and "not female", then they must view themself as -- and therefore be -- non-binary.
There. Non-binary genders proven, using your own logic.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Udinia » Wed Jan 28, 2015 10:07 am
Des-Bal wrote:Nature-Spirits wrote:So how, then, would it be different for anyone of any other gender? Viewing yourself as male obviously means that you simultaneously view yourself as "not female". So one can extrapolate, then, that if one views themself as "not male" and "not female", then they must view themself as -- and therefore be -- non-binary.
There. Non-binary genders proven, using your own logic.
Only if you assume individuals are perfect in their perception of themselves. The way you generally experience your gender is the feeling of being either male or female but the way you experience a broken bone is usually "ow that feels broken." If the bone is broken and it doesn't hurt it's still broken if it hurts and it's not broken it's still not broken. Someone saying they have a nonbinary gender isn't saying they have a broken bone it's someone saying they have a bone that constantly vibrates to the tune of the Imperial March. I see no reason to believe that's a thing that can happen and am therefore skeptical.

by Des-Bal » Wed Jan 28, 2015 10:08 am
Udinia wrote:
You're thinking in conventional 1s and 0s, someone like myself that identifies as androgynous is more like a quantum bit 1 and 0 simultaneously. In other words, it isn't as simple as one or the other it is at times both or neither.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Udinia » Wed Jan 28, 2015 10:12 am

by Libronyscien » Wed Jan 28, 2015 10:54 am

by Farnhamia » Wed Jan 28, 2015 10:56 am
Libronyscien wrote:Bleerrrguhhhh. This thread is starting to piss me off.
I'm going to list what I have so far. Correct me if I'm wrong or forgetting something.
Male. His he.
Female. Her she.
Androgynous. They.
Agender. None of the above. They.

by Xomic » Wed Jan 28, 2015 11:01 am
Nature-Spirits wrote:Throughout human history and across many cultures, there have been accounts of more than two genders (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). These "third genders" have been a standard part of these cultures for decades, centuries, or in some cases millennia. Hence, the historical cross-cultural precedent for non-binary genders.
Wikipedia's Two-Spirit wrote:Third and fourth gender roles historically embodied by two-spirit people include performing work and wearing clothing associated with both men and women. Not all tribes have rigid gender roles. Among those that do, some tribes consider there to be at least four genders:
- masculine men
- feminine men
- masculine women
- feminine women.

by Libronyscien » Wed Jan 28, 2015 11:13 am
Farnhamia wrote:Libronyscien wrote:Bleerrrguhhhh. This thread is starting to piss me off.
I'm going to list what I have so far. Correct me if I'm wrong or forgetting something.
Male. His he.
Female. Her she.
Androgynous. They.
Agender. None of the above. They.
You're forgetting that you're in NSG, where every day is an endless round of the same thing, over and over.

by Des-Bal » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:52 pm
Libronyscien wrote:Bleerrrguhhhh. This thread is starting to piss me off.
I'm going to list what I have so far. Correct me if I'm wrong or forgetting something.
Male. His he.
Female. Her she.
Androgynous. They.
Agender. None of the above. They.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Bottle » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:59 pm

by Olivaero » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:04 pm
Libronyscien wrote:Bleerrrguhhhh. This thread is starting to piss me off.
I'm going to list what I have so far. Correct me if I'm wrong or forgetting something.
Male. His he.
Female. Her she.
Androgynous. They.
Agender. None of the above. They.

by Libronyscien » Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:21 pm
Olivaero wrote:Libronyscien wrote:Bleerrrguhhhh. This thread is starting to piss me off.
I'm going to list what I have so far. Correct me if I'm wrong or forgetting something.
Male. His he.
Female. Her she.
Androgynous. They.
Agender. None of the above. They.
You could really just refer to someone as they if you have trouble identifying the proper pronoun from a glance, if some one flips their shit at you for not calling them their preferred pronoun without them informing you of what it is first they are the ones at fault for being unreasonable assholes. If it's over the internet a glance at their sig will probably tell you what it is and defaulting to they is an even better idea there if they don't have it listed.

by Edgy Opinions » Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:51 pm
Bottle wrote:I have a biological sex (female). I do not have a "gender identity," just a personality which my culture strives to force into either a blue box or a pink one. The fact that my biological sex does not correspond with the gender-box my culture tries to shove me into just means that the boxes are bogus.


by Bottle » Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:59 pm
Edgy Opinions wrote:Bottle wrote:I have a biological sex (female). I do not have a "gender identity," just a personality which my culture strives to force into either a blue box or a pink one. The fact that my biological sex does not correspond with the gender-box my culture tries to shove me into just means that the boxes are bogus.
Gender identity is far more than bogus boxes.
Think of hydrangeas that have different flower colors according to the soil's pH. One's gender identity might be comparable to that~
And we have to keep the politics that surround these colors strong because once one feels comfortable dismissing it, people start to explain things through a lens of biological determinism, and that is no advancement.

by Nature-Spirits » Wed Jan 28, 2015 4:05 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Nature-Spirits wrote:So how, then, would it be different for anyone of any other gender? Viewing yourself as male obviously means that you simultaneously view yourself as "not female". So one can extrapolate, then, that if one views themself as "not male" and "not female", then they must view themself as -- and therefore be -- non-binary.
There. Non-binary genders proven, using your own logic.
Only if you assume individuals are perfect in their perception of themselves. The way you generally experience your gender is the feeling of being either male or female but the way you experience a broken bone is usually "ow that feels broken." If the bone is broken and it doesn't hurt it's still broken if it hurts and it's not broken it's still not broken. Someone saying they have a nonbinary gender isn't saying they have a broken bone it's someone saying they have a bone that constantly vibrates to the tune of the Imperial March. I see no reason to believe that's a thing that can happen and am therefore skeptical.
Des-Bal wrote:Libronyscien wrote:Bleerrrguhhhh. This thread is starting to piss me off.
I'm going to list what I have so far. Correct me if I'm wrong or forgetting something.
Male. His he.
Female. Her she.
Androgynous. They.
Agender. None of the above. They.
I think it's about 2-5% of the population that's transgender and the so called nonbinary are a segment of that. The proper pronouns aren't something to stress about.
Libronyscien wrote:Bleerrrguhhhh. This thread is starting to piss me off.
I'm going to list what I have so far. Correct me if I'm wrong or forgetting something.
Male. His he.
Female. Her she.
Androgynous. They.
Agender. None of the above. They.

by Shaggai » Wed Jan 28, 2015 4:09 pm
Bottle wrote:I have a biological sex (female). I do not have a "gender identity," just a personality which my culture strives to force into either a blue box or a pink one. The fact that my biological sex does not correspond with the gender-box my culture tries to shove me into just means that the boxes are bogus.

by Edgy Opinions » Wed Jan 28, 2015 4:16 pm
Bottle wrote:I don't believe in biological determinism or gender essentialism. That's why I believe the gender boxes are bogus.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Arval Va, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Dakran, Laka Strolistandiler, Necroghastia, Riverfoot, Ryemarch, The Two Jerseys, Washington Resistance Army, Whyachia
Advertisement