Lel
Advertisement

by Stormwind-City » Sun Jan 11, 2015 3:58 pm

by The Batorys » Sun Jan 11, 2015 4:18 pm

by MERIZoC » Sun Jan 11, 2015 4:19 pm
The Batorys wrote:
Including the Communist Party, the Socialist Worker Party, the Peace and Freedom Party, the Rent Is Too Damn High Party, and the Green Party?
Somehow I doubt that you are posting sincerely rather than just trying to get reactions.

by Constaniana » Sun Jan 11, 2015 4:20 pm
The Batorys wrote:
Including the Communist Party, the Socialist Worker Party, the Peace and Freedom Party, the Rent Is Too Damn High Party, and the Green Party?
Somehow I doubt that you are posting sincerely rather than just trying to get reactions.
Ameriganastan wrote:I work hard to think of those ludicrous Eric adventure stories, but I don't think I'd have come up with rescuing a three armed alchemist from goblin-monkeys in a million years.
Kudos.

by The Nuclear Fist » Sun Jan 11, 2015 4:32 pm
Constaniana wrote:The Batorys wrote:Including the Communist Party, the Socialist Worker Party, the Peace and Freedom Party, the Rent Is Too Damn High Party, and the Green Party?
Somehow I doubt that you are posting sincerely rather than just trying to get reactions.
Also the Hawaiian Independence Party. Clearly a bastion of true American patriotism.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by Ripoll » Sun Jan 11, 2015 5:32 pm
Salandriagado wrote:Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:I was being sarcastic. Men like him will keep the Republican Party in mainstream obscurity for years. His record as Governor is atrocious and totally contradictory to all of his presidential policies. We don't need another Bushite in the White House. And anyway, he's unelectable. He couldn't beat McCain, he couldn't beat Obama, and he won't beat Hillary.
Rand Paul is the only sane, non-warmongering, non-bigoted leading member of the GOP. People who care about the party's long term survival - and America's future, as well - should vote for him instead.
But then, historically speaking, poor performance as a governor hasn't necessarily translated to not becoming president - look at Reagan, for example.Kelinfort wrote:I knew you were being sarcastic. I don't see how the Republican Party is in obscurity though...?
They're on the wrong side of a demographic shift that isn't going anywhere. Absent some far more effective voter suppression and managing to force through some serious gerrymandering, they're unlikely to win an election until the next major party realignment.

by Ripoll » Sun Jan 11, 2015 5:33 pm
Empire of Vlissingen wrote:I think Rand Paul has better chances than Mitt Romney but to be fair the media will not likely give rand the opportunity by spreading lies about Rand just like in 2012 with Ron Paul.

by MERIZoC » Sun Jan 11, 2015 5:41 pm
Ripoll wrote:Empire of Vlissingen wrote:I think Rand Paul has better chances than Mitt Romney but to be fair the media will not likely give rand the opportunity by spreading lies about Rand just like in 2012 with Ron Paul.
Rand Paul would be awful for our country, it's good they don't pay much attention to him.

by Ripoll » Sun Jan 11, 2015 5:52 pm

by Kargintina » Sun Jan 11, 2015 5:55 pm

by Southern Hampshire » Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:04 pm
The Batorys wrote:
Including the Communist Party, the Socialist Worker Party, the Peace and Freedom Party, the Rent Is Too Damn High Party, and the Green Party?
Somehow I doubt that you are posting sincerely rather than just trying to get reactions.

by Gauthier » Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:23 pm
Kargintina wrote:Romney is one of the worst candidates for Republican, but he still will be better then whatever the Democrats blurt out.

by District XIV » Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:30 pm
Southern Hampshire wrote:The Batorys wrote:Including the Communist Party, the Socialist Worker Party, the Peace and Freedom Party, the Rent Is Too Damn High Party, and the Green Party?
Somehow I doubt that you are posting sincerely rather than just trying to get reactions.
Absolutely. Whether I agree with their policies is a different story. Hawaiian I.P and Communist? Nope.
Southern Hampshire wrote:Love all the other parties though.
These type of parties seek to destroy the U.S inside out
and are anti-American.
Democrat Party fits in very well.

by Ashmoria » Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:37 pm
Rebellious Fishermen wrote:Does anyone have legitimate concerns with Romney?
Please leave out the political dogma and stick to policy matters, if you can. i. e. None of the "rich" propaganda and off-handed comments that every politician makes.

by MERIZoC » Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:41 pm
District XIV wrote:Southern Hampshire wrote:
Absolutely. Whether I agree with their policies is a different story. Hawaiian I.P and Communist? Nope.
Really? Because I thought you said youSouthern Hampshire wrote:Love all the other parties though.
I'm unsure how you "love" parties that are actually more "un-American" than the Democratic Party. Do you love this one too?


by District XIV » Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:44 pm
The Anti-American Party is an official political party that is currently under review by the FEC. We do not promote violence, illegal activities, or Islamic extremism. However, we DO promote the idea that supporting any of the above would fall into so called Pro-American ideology. The Tea Party has repeatedly done harm to us by pointing out our original assembly, The Secret Society of Anti-Americans, and Michelle Bachmann has threatened to prosecute us. Now, we have joined together in a political party to promote: Peace, Freedom, Liberty, Unity, Individuality, and Skepticism (and satirical opposition to Tea Party Politics.) Meanwhile, the U.S. is in the midst of a worldwide reign of violent terror that vehemently opposes all of the values associated with Anti-Americans. Since modern imperialism, corporate welfare, and subjugation of the masses are apparently the values associated with Pro-American thought, the Anti-American Party is the only choice for any rational citizen. VOTE ANTI-AMERICA 2012!!!! DEATH TO AMERICA!!!!
Please see our website to read our Un-Call to Action, History, 11 Principles, or learn about our brainwashing rituals and our alliance with the NWO; you can also send a request to JOIN NOW!!!!

by The Black Forrest » Sun Jan 11, 2015 7:05 pm

by Gauthier » Sun Jan 11, 2015 7:08 pm

by The Black Forrest » Sun Jan 11, 2015 7:08 pm
Nord Amour wrote:Rebellious Fishermen wrote:Does anyone have legitimate concerns with Romney?
Please leave out the political dogma and stick to policy matters, if you can. i. e. None of the "rich" propaganda and off-handed comments that every politician makes.
He is a flip-flopper, he has no policies.

by The Black Forrest » Sun Jan 11, 2015 7:10 pm
Ashmoria wrote:Rebellious Fishermen wrote:Does anyone have legitimate concerns with Romney?
Please leave out the political dogma and stick to policy matters, if you can. i. e. None of the "rich" propaganda and off-handed comments that every politician makes.
hes a republican and would promote republican policies and appoint republicans to office.
if I were a republican I would find him to be just fine. the only downside is that he is a loser.

by Gauthier » Sun Jan 11, 2015 7:11 pm

by -Ebola- » Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:08 pm

by Kelinfort » Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:15 pm
Southern Hampshire wrote:The Batorys wrote:Including the Communist Party, the Socialist Worker Party, the Peace and Freedom Party, the Rent Is Too Damn High Party, and the Green Party?
Somehow I doubt that you are posting sincerely rather than just trying to get reactions.
Absolutely. Whether I agree with their policies is a different story. Hawaiian I.P and Communist? Nope.
These type of parties seek to destroy the U.S inside out and are anti-American. Democrat Party fits in very well.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bagiyagaram, Cannot think of a name, Drongonia, EuroStralia, Hispida, Kanaia, Luminerra, Maineiacs, Port Caverton, Senkaku, Stellar Colonies, The Pirateariat, The Sherpa Empire, Washington Resistance Army, Washington-Columbia
Advertisement