NATION

PASSWORD

Mitt Romney announces potential 2016 presidential run

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:59 am

Teemant wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Nobody implied that you didn't know anything about US politics. But, I don't know a ton about Estonian politics, and I presume that whenever someone says "GOP will win, I'm not American" they don't know much about my country's politics. The GOP is hated here. The midterms where the GOP won had a 30-35% turnout, it was fucking pathetic.


Obama didn't win with a landslide either last elections.

Did it without needing Florida. That was pretty impressive, actually.

User avatar
Xenotoca
Attaché
 
Posts: 70
Founded: Apr 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Xenotoca » Sat Jan 10, 2015 11:16 am

my grandmother's cat has better chance of getting elected.....

User avatar
Mount Godwin
Secretary
 
Posts: 35
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Mount Godwin » Sat Jan 10, 2015 11:20 am

Xenotoca wrote:my grandmother's cat has better chance of getting elected.....


Seriously?
The students in the school are not told to draw like Michelangelo, they, the students choose to. It's their decision.

User avatar
Xenotoca
Attaché
 
Posts: 70
Founded: Apr 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Xenotoca » Sat Jan 10, 2015 11:43 am

Mount Godwin wrote:
Xenotoca wrote:my grandmother's cat has better chance of getting elected.....


Seriously?



yep, Ol' Mitt doesn't stand a chance

User avatar
Dragonia Re Xzua
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1141
Founded: Jun 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dragonia Re Xzua » Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:05 pm

I'd take Romney over Hillary as a possible candidate any day. The last thing we need is another Clinton in the White House.
Humans are monsters, we will never change, we will always want to claw out the throats of those with a difference in opinion, we will never be in an age of peace because of our lust for war, poverty will continue to exist as long as monetary needs exist. We rape, enslave, and conquer with no regards to others. We live by the sword, and we will, justifiably, die by the sword.

Hope is for unrealistic idealists. Pessimism is your friend.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:07 pm

Dragonia Re Xzua wrote:I'd take Romney over Hillary as a possible candidate any day. The last thing we need is another Clinton in the White House.

Why does the candidate's last name matter? I hold the same principle for Jeb Bush. I don't care who a candidate's brother, father, or spouse is.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Caribica
Minister
 
Posts: 2037
Founded: Nov 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Caribica » Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:12 pm

now you all know why I don't consider myself to be a part of the GOP anymore, the spineless RINOs need to get their asses to the party they belong in, the democrats.
Last edited by Caribica on Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Empire of Narnia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5577
Founded: Oct 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Empire of Narnia » Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:14 pm

The Republicans should try and be a populist party. Romney is seen as a wealthy member of the corporate elite, he's not that appealing to the everyday person.

User avatar
Caribica
Minister
 
Posts: 2037
Founded: Nov 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Caribica » Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:15 pm

Empire of Narnia wrote:The Republicans should try and be a populist party. Romney is seen as a wealthy member of the corporate elite, he's not that appealing to the everyday person.

Yes thank you, finally, someone around here with a bit of common sense.

User avatar
The Lone Star Republics
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 149
Founded: Nov 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Lone Star Republics » Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:27 pm

Question

Is Mitt a RINO?
The Commonwealth of The Lone Star Republics
This nation mostly resembles my actual values. Mostly. With a bit of extremism.
JE SUIS CHARLIE
I STAND WITH UKRAINE
Economic Left/Right: 5.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.62

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:38 pm

The Lone Star Republics wrote:Question

Is Mitt a RINO?

Mitt is the very essence of what the Republican party wishes to achieve.

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:34 pm

Laerod wrote:
The Lone Star Republics wrote:Question

Is Mitt a RINO?

Mitt is the very essence of what the Republican party wishes to achieve.


Rich, white, religiously conservative? :meh:

Still has problems with foot in the mouth disease tho.

User avatar
Colbert Super PAC
Diplomat
 
Posts: 647
Founded: Jun 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Colbert Super PAC » Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:36 pm

Romney could win in 2016 if he runs on a more conservative platform than in 2012.
Cthulhu Trump 2016
Why Vote For The Lesser Evil?

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:36 pm

The Lone Star Republics wrote:Question

Is Mitt a RINO?


His beliefs are very much in line with his party.
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
Davinhia
Minister
 
Posts: 2024
Founded: Nov 18, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Davinhia » Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:49 pm

Please don't

Rand Paul should be the GOP 2016 front runner
Year: 2013
- President: x (PP)
- Vice President: x (PP)
- House Majority Leader: x (IKP)
- Senate Majority Leader: x (PP)
Capital City: Grove Street
RP Population: 45 Million
RP Military Population: 37 Thousand
5, peacetime

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:51 pm

Davinhia wrote:Please don't

Rand Paul should be the GOP 2016 front runner

I can't imagine Rand becoming president.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:55 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Davinhia wrote:Please don't

Rand Paul should be the GOP 2016 front runner

I can't imagine Rand becoming president.

moderates have the best chance of winning, so yeah, agreed.
American & German, ich kann auch Deutsch. I have a B.S. in finance.
Pro: Human rights, equality, LGBT rights, socialized healthcare, the EU in theory, green energy, public transportation, the internet as a utility
Anti: Authoritarian regimes and systems, the Chinese government, identity politics, die AfD, populism, organized religion, Erdogan, assault weapon ownership
Free Tibet and Hong Kong | Keep Taiwan Independent

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:56 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Davinhia wrote:Please don't

Rand Paul should be the GOP 2016 front runner

I can't imagine Rand becoming president.


I did once, i will never sleep right again.

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:57 pm

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
The Lone Star Republics wrote:Question

Is Mitt a RINO?


His beliefs are very much in line with his party.

His party is a fractured amalgam of religious conservatives, economic neoliberals, neoclassical, neo-Keynesian and supply-siders, and a handful of social liberals who vaguely agree with some portions of one or more of the aforementioned economic categories to overcome their distaste of the religious conservatives they are forced to share bunk with.

Saying he's in line with his party just begs the question of what exactly the party is in line with and it's been arguing over that since, at the latest, his last presidential run (and even before then and into the 2008 campaign if one wishes to go historical).
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Nord Amour
Diplomat
 
Posts: 872
Founded: Nov 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nord Amour » Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:59 pm

He was a weak candidate the first time around, and he'll be an even weaker candidate in 2016.

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Sat Jan 10, 2015 2:05 pm

Nord Amour wrote:He was a weak candidate the first time around, and he'll be an even weaker candidate in 2016.

He seemed weak because he wasn't absorbed by religious right hysteria like the rest of the candidates.
American & German, ich kann auch Deutsch. I have a B.S. in finance.
Pro: Human rights, equality, LGBT rights, socialized healthcare, the EU in theory, green energy, public transportation, the internet as a utility
Anti: Authoritarian regimes and systems, the Chinese government, identity politics, die AfD, populism, organized religion, Erdogan, assault weapon ownership
Free Tibet and Hong Kong | Keep Taiwan Independent

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Sat Jan 10, 2015 2:11 pm

Empire of Vlissingen wrote:
Shilya wrote:I think your sarcasm dedector may need some calibration ;)

I thought this was a more serious place than f7.


That's like being higher altitude than the Netherlands.

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
His beliefs are very much in line with his party.

His party is a fractured amalgam of religious conservatives, economic neoliberals, neoclassical, neo-Keynesian and supply-siders, and a handful of social liberals who vaguely agree with some portions of one or more of the aforementioned economic categories to overcome their distaste of the religious conservatives they are forced to share bunk with.

Saying he's in line with his party just begs the question of what exactly the party is in line with and it's been arguing over that since, at the latest, his last presidential run (and even before then and into the 2008 campaign if one wishes to go historical).


And Mitt flipped randomly between any and all of the above throughout his previous campaign. Seems perfectly matched, to me.
Last edited by Salandriagado on Sat Jan 10, 2015 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Sat Jan 10, 2015 2:15 pm

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
His beliefs are very much in line with his party.

His party is a fractured amalgam of religious conservatives, economic neoliberals, neoclassical, neo-Keynesian and supply-siders, and a handful of social liberals who vaguely agree with some portions of one or more of the aforementioned economic categories to overcome their distaste of the religious conservatives they are forced to share bunk with.

Saying he's in line with his party just begs the question of what exactly the party is in line with and it's been arguing over that since, at the latest, his last presidential run (and even before then and into the 2008 campaign if one wishes to go historical).

What is the party in line with? The mainstream appears to have gone batshit.

User avatar
Nord Amour
Diplomat
 
Posts: 872
Founded: Nov 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nord Amour » Sat Jan 10, 2015 2:20 pm

Othelos wrote:
Nord Amour wrote:He was a weak candidate the first time around, and he'll be an even weaker candidate in 2016.

He seemed weak because he wasn't absorbed by religious right hysteria like the rest of the candidates.


Maybe, but he also had an incredibly poorly developed platform and a highly divided following. Next to Bush's funding and the Tea Party's polarizing ideologies, he will hardly stand a chance.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Jan 10, 2015 2:22 pm

Nord Amour wrote:
Othelos wrote:He seemed weak because he wasn't absorbed by religious right hysteria like the rest of the candidates.


Maybe, but he also had an incredibly poorly developed platform and a highly divided following. Next to Bush's funding and the Tea Party's polarizing ideologies, he will hardly stand a chance.

He had a poorly developed platform because he tried to cater to too many groups.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bagiyagaram, Dimetrodon Empire, Drongonia, EuroStralia, Google [Bot], Hispida, Kanaia, Luminerra, Maineiacs, Port Caverton, Senkaku, Stellar Colonies, The Pirateariat, The Sherpa Empire, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads