Ask me next November.
Advertisement

by Farnhamia » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:11 pm

by Liberty and Linguistics » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:12 pm

by Benuty » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:13 pm

by Organized States » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:13 pm

by New Frenco Empire » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:13 pm
Mount Godwin wrote:Everything he said was so spot on, its a shame that people couldn't see that he was the better candidate between Obama and Himself...

by Liberty and Linguistics » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:16 pm

by Organized States » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:17 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Estva wrote:Mitt is winning about half the current polls for most popular republican candidate,
Really? That surprises me. I figured the GOP would pick someone who's at least somewhat electable.....y'know what, there's only one such candidate, but he should just join the Democrats.

by Estva » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:17 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Estva wrote:Mitt is winning about half the current polls for most popular republican candidate,
Really? That surprises me. I figured the GOP would pick someone who's at least somewhat electable.....y'know what, there's only one such candidate, but he should just join the Democrats.

by Farnhamia » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:17 pm

by Liberty and Linguistics » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:20 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Not Mittens, that's for certain. Maybe Rand Paul if he decides to run, or Jeb Bush. I can't say who will win, but I can make educated guesses as to who won't win.
Just so you know, "Mittens" and other such nicknames for politicians are looked on with extreme disfavor. Seriously, don't get into the habit of doing it.

by Liberty and Linguistics » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:20 pm

by Estva » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:22 pm

by Liberty and Linguistics » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:24 pm
Estva wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Ugh, I did a google search, and you're entirely correct. But, whoever wins the primary is ultimately irrelevant, since the Democrats will undoubtedly win in 2016.
I hope so, but I feel Hillary might not be a popular as Obama was. She is known as a bit of a corporate shill. Then again, if she has the same popularity with women as Obama did with blacks, it will definitely be a Dem victory.

by Bezkoshtovnya » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:25 pm
Dante Alighieri wrote:There is no greater sorrow than to recall happiness in times of misery
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.

by Edward Richtofen » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:27 pm
The balkens wrote:Not this shit again.
Nationalist State of Knox wrote:It seems like Donald has pulled out his Trump card.
Corrian wrote: I'm freaking Corrian.
Death Metal wrote:By the OP's logic:
-Communists are big fans of capitalism
-Anarchists believe in the necessity of the state
-Vegans fucking love to eat meat.
-Christians actually worship Satan.
-Homosexual men all like to sleep with women.

by United Prefectures of Appia » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:37 pm
Estva wrote:Ugh, I did a google search, and you're entirely correct. But, whoever wins the primary is ultimately irrelevant, since the Democrats will undoubtedly win in 2016.

by Ashmoria » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:39 pm

by Liberty and Linguistics » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:43 pm
United Prefectures of Appia wrote:Estva wrote:Ugh, I did a google search, and you're entirely correct. But, whoever wins the primary is ultimately irrelevant, since the Democrats will undoubtedly win in 2016.
I'd rather have Hillary challenged by a true genuine Progressive politician if possible to win the primary spot.

by United Prefectures of Appia » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:48 pm

by Liberty and Linguistics » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:50 pm

by Romalae » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:56 pm

by Ashmoria » Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:58 pm
Romalae wrote:God, I can't wait for the Republican primary. It's gonna be a real shit-show this time; gonna make for some good entertainment.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Affghanistan, Ivartixi, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Restructured Russia, Southland, The Holy Therns
Advertisement