NATION

PASSWORD

French mag. Charlie Hebdo--12 killed, many injured in attack

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54744
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:54 pm

Papait wrote:
Risottia wrote:No.
Because satirising a religious figure isn't racism.


How would you feel if a drew an offensive cartoon of your mother?

My mother is a living person who could choose to feeling offended by your picture, should you publish it, and sue you for compensation. I wouldn't be involved hence my feelings are irrelevant.
Also, offensive does not imply racism. Also, false analogy as Muhammad isn't a living person.
Last edited by Risottia on Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Kantona
Envoy
 
Posts: 331
Founded: Dec 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Kantona » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:54 pm

This is a repeat what happened already.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tours

User avatar
Ontorisa
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8672
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ontorisa » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:55 pm

Olerand wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Nope. Just those of you that don't wish to live in modern society.

How quaint. And yet, I am not of those 70% of French polled who want to ban the hijab in public. So counting them, and people like me, that gives you......Uhm....Probably 80~90% of ethnic French. Lots of people.


No offence, but what's up with the Francais and les Francophones hating the religious symbols? I mean we have the French who want the Hijab to be banned and we have the Quebecois who passed a bill banning major religious symbols from being worn by public employees.

This is how you piss off religions.

User avatar
Papait
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1302
Founded: Jun 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Papait » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:55 pm

Ontorisa wrote:
Papait wrote:
How would you feel if a drew an offensive cartoon of your mother?


I'm fine with that.

I mean apparently I have 50 dads I never knew about on Xbox Live.


Cool, i bet they're all around the age of twelve. Right?
My point was that drawing a offensive cartoon of somebodies mother i have never met who has not done anything to me is the same as drawing a offensive cartoon of the prophet muhammed.
Positive: EU, Catalan Independence, Scottish Independence, Brabant Autonomy, Hezbollah, Fatah, Iran, Lebanon, LGB-Rights, Religion, Secularism, Kemalism, Facism
Neutral: The rights of T's, UN, Hamas, Capitalism, Socialism, Assad
Negative: USA, Israel, India, Saudi Arabia, Abortion, Theocracy, Tenchnocracy, Nazism, Racism, IS

Embassy: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=294523

User avatar
The Carlisle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10024
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Carlisle » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:56 pm

United Marxist Nations wrote:
The Carlisle wrote:So.... international criminals... of terrorism...

Also, I was more triggered by the "lining them up, shooting them, and dumping their bodies in the river". In fact, you never stated at all about combat, which I'm fine with if they fire first.

Of course, anyone who goes out killing these men out on the street is a murderer. Unless you want vigilantes and mob justice to rule this day. I want France to track and arrest these men and put them on trial, not shoot them on the streets.

I said "stopping them, shooting them", I never said lining them up was a prerequisite.

Logic would suggest they will not allow themselves to be captured.

I guess.

Of course. And if French police and military forces capture them alive, the course of action is to not execute them but to imprison them for trial.

Papait wrote:
The Carlisle wrote:So.... international criminals... of terrorism...

Also, I was more triggered by the "lining them up, shooting them, and dumping their bodies in the river". In fact, you never stated at all about combat, which I'm fine with if they fire first.

Of course, anyone who goes out killing these men out on the street is a murderer. Unless you want vigilantes and mob justice to rule this day. I want France to track and arrest these men and put them on trial, not shoot them on the streets.


Any french soldier has the right to execute them if they manage to capture them.

I'm pretty sure they don't.
Call me Carly
Gayism enabler
Trans Girl
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:56 pm

Papait wrote:
Ontorisa wrote:
I'm fine with that.

I mean apparently I have 50 dads I never knew about on Xbox Live.


Cool, i bet they're all around the age of twelve. Right?
My point was that drawing a offensive cartoon of somebodies mother i have never met who has not done anything to me is the same as drawing a offensive cartoon of the prophet muhammed.


In that neither is racism (well, unless there's a racist joke included) yes.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Kantona
Envoy
 
Posts: 331
Founded: Dec 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Kantona » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:56 pm

Ereria wrote:What do you guys think about people drawing Muhammad as sort of a revenge and showing support to the journalists?

Im a muslim my self and its quite sad to see people offending me and my religion for the sake of shitting on the extremists. Whenever I see a painting of Muhammad, I feel offended, and im not an easy person to offend. Not because it's racists posting it, because that shit im used to, but your everyday person posting that to insult us muslims.

I mean, I get that you guys ask, why not draw them? Im just saying, why do that? Don't you have 9 billion others things to draw? Why draw something that offends people unnecessarily? Just my point of view tho. If you want to insult the terrorists, make charicatures degrading ISIS and terrorists, no need to fuck rest of us over. I hate them as much as the next person, but I can't stand the casual racism you feel me?

In that case I politely recomend you that living in Europe is not for you.

User avatar
Edgy Opinions
Senator
 
Posts: 4400
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Edgy Opinions » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:56 pm

Olerand wrote:We certainly do. Hell, new immigrants to France must sign a contract with the State promising to integrate, and are refused citizenship if they don't. We. Most. Certainly. Do.

Sorry cultural relativism isn't popular outside the quaint world-views of the Anglo-Saxon lefties.

Did you ever realize I'm actually South American?

Forced cultural assimilation is something we associate with historical nationalist objectives that ended up oppressing not only immigrants, but also Indigenous populations and descendants of slaves who resisted our white supremacist institutions.
Kotturheim's contagious despair.
100% self-impressed 20-year-old cadoneutrois-pangender imprigender genderblur fluidflux bi-pan/gray-ace/gray-aro Brazilian.
Into: your gender, anarchism/communism, obliteration of kyriarchy, environment, other obvious '-10.00, -9.13 in political compass' stuff
Anti: your gender (undo it interacting with me), Born This Way (also medicalism/pathologization/eugenics), outer space, abuse/predation, owners, power, hierarchy, internalization/privilege goggles (essential to the continuity of identity with power/hierarchy systems), essentialism/determinism, nihilism/defeatism

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:57 pm

Kantona wrote:This is a repeat what happened already.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tours

….In what sense?

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54744
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:57 pm

Papait wrote:
Ontorisa wrote:
I'm fine with that.

I mean apparently I have 50 dads I never knew about on Xbox Live.


Cool, i bet they're all around the age of twelve. Right?
My point was that drawing a offensive cartoon of somebodies mother i have never met who has not done anything to me is the same as drawing a offensive cartoon of the prophet muhammed.

Then your point is stupid.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Ontorisa
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8672
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ontorisa » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:57 pm

Papait wrote:
Ontorisa wrote:
I'm fine with that.

I mean apparently I have 50 dads I never knew about on Xbox Live.


Cool, i bet they're all around the age of twelve. Right?
My point was that drawing a offensive cartoon of somebodies mother i have never met who has not done anything to me is the same as drawing a offensive cartoon of the prophet muhammed.


Two different things you're comparing here. One is a religious symbol worshipped by millions, if not billions (some of which are extremely devout followers and are willing to protect his image, example being Malaysia, who passed a law saying that non-Islamic believers cannot say Islamic holy words like "Allah", etc. I experienced that law first hand btw, it's not fun, it's fucking scary.) while the other one is someone you haven't met before.
Last edited by Ontorisa on Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
United Marxist Nations
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33804
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United Marxist Nations » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:57 pm

Ontorisa wrote:
Olerand wrote:How quaint. And yet, I am not of those 70% of French polled who want to ban the hijab in public. So counting them, and people like me, that gives you......Uhm....Probably 80~90% of ethnic French. Lots of people.


No offence, but what's up with the Francais and les Francophones hating the religious symbols? I mean we have the French who want the Hijab to be banned and we have the Quebecois who passed a bill banning major religious symbols from being worn by public employees.

This is how you piss off religions.

Probably has to to with the French Revolution.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.

Eastern Orthodox Catechumen. Religious communitarian with Sorelian, Marxist, and Traditionalist influences. Sympathies toward Sunni Islam. All flags/avatars are chosen for aesthetic or humor purposes only
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

User avatar
The Conez Imperium
Minister
 
Posts: 3053
Founded: Nov 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Conez Imperium » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:57 pm

Ontorisa wrote:
Olerand wrote:How quaint. And yet, I am not of those 70% of French polled who want to ban the hijab in public. So counting them, and people like me, that gives you......Uhm....Probably 80~90% of ethnic French. Lots of people.


No offence, but what's up with the Francais and les Francophones hating the religious symbols? I mean we have the French who want the Hijab to be banned and we have the Quebecois who passed a bill banning major religious symbols from being worn by public employees.

This is how you piss off religions.


It's most likely their Eurocentric views. I come from Australia a very multicultural society where literally anything passes as Auzzie but in Europe I can understand why foreign religions can be seen as "invading" on traditional cultural aspects. Hell they even started to hate on the Kebab. Hating on another culture's/countries food is one of the lowest denominators one could go to.
Salut tout le monde, c'est moi !

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:57 pm

Papait wrote:
Risottia wrote:No.
Because satirising a religious figure isn't racism.


How would you feel if a drew an offensive cartoon of your mother?


If my mother could grant me 72 virgins and eternal paradise, I honestly wouldn't care.

That's another thing I don't get about those Islamist jokers (and religious fundies in general). They know (at least they think so) that all of those nasty atheists, caricaturists, infidels, Western imperalists, homosexuals etc whatever are going to fry in the deepest pit of hell forever and ever, while they themselves will get all those pimptastic riches and delights beyond their imagination.
So why get all outraged over what happens in the few decades of a human life span? Why give a fuck?
Last edited by Baltenstein on Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Edgy Opinions
Senator
 
Posts: 4400
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Edgy Opinions » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:58 pm

Ontorisa wrote:No offence, but what's up with the Francais and les Francophones hating the religious symbols? I mean we have the French who want the Hijab to be banned and we have the Quebecois who passed a bill banning major religious symbols from being worn by public employees.

This is how you piss off religions.

Religions have no right not to be pissed.

Religious people have rights that the State should protect rather than deny or violate.
Kotturheim's contagious despair.
100% self-impressed 20-year-old cadoneutrois-pangender imprigender genderblur fluidflux bi-pan/gray-ace/gray-aro Brazilian.
Into: your gender, anarchism/communism, obliteration of kyriarchy, environment, other obvious '-10.00, -9.13 in political compass' stuff
Anti: your gender (undo it interacting with me), Born This Way (also medicalism/pathologization/eugenics), outer space, abuse/predation, owners, power, hierarchy, internalization/privilege goggles (essential to the continuity of identity with power/hierarchy systems), essentialism/determinism, nihilism/defeatism

User avatar
Kalifati Arab shqiptar
Minister
 
Posts: 2244
Founded: Aug 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Kalifati Arab shqiptar » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:58 pm

Stupid liberal French people, accepting and now surrendering to Algerians. After what I am seeing Western Europe should start a mass deportation of unwanted, irresponsible, criminal immigrants, Arabs are a threat for Europe, not Muslims, only Arabs.
Last edited by Kalifati Arab shqiptar on Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
United Marxist Nations
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33804
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United Marxist Nations » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:58 pm

The Carlisle wrote:
United Marxist Nations wrote:I said "stopping them, shooting them", I never said lining them up was a prerequisite.

Logic would suggest they will not allow themselves to be captured.

I guess.

Of course. And if French police and military forces capture them alive, the course of action is to not execute them but to imprison them for trial.

And then I would suggest execution as the sentence.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.

Eastern Orthodox Catechumen. Religious communitarian with Sorelian, Marxist, and Traditionalist influences. Sympathies toward Sunni Islam. All flags/avatars are chosen for aesthetic or humor purposes only
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

User avatar
Olerand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13169
Founded: Sep 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Olerand » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:58 pm

Ontorisa wrote:
Olerand wrote:How quaint. And yet, I am not of those 70% of French polled who want to ban the hijab in public. So counting them, and people like me, that gives you......Uhm....Probably 80~90% of ethnic French. Lots of people.


No offence, but what's up with the Francais and les Francophones hating the religious symbols? I mean we have the French who want the Hijab to be banned and we have the Quebecois who passed a bill banning major religious symbols from being worn by public employees.

This is how you piss off religions.

Laïcité, a founding tenant of the French Republic. As for the Quebecois, they were being hypocrites, as apparently the massive cross in their Assembly would stay up. Hypocrites.

Religions must accommodate us and our laws. You have the universal right to practice your religion. France allows you to be Muslim, there are mosques in France, and prayers are held on Friday. Beyond that, it's up to you to accommodate us.
French citizen. Still a Socialist Party member. Ségolène Royal 2019, I guess Actually I might vote la France Insoumise.

Qui suis-je?:
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

User avatar
Burleson 2
Diplomat
 
Posts: 878
Founded: Dec 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Burleson 2 » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:58 pm

Religion of peace?
Formerly Burleson: August 8, 2014-December 8, 2014
Permanent sig coming soon
Italios wrote:In the south, Yankee sometimes is an insult. In the North East, it's not. In Boston, it's a declaration of war.

Alveda King wrote:To equate homosexuality with race is to give a death sentence to civil rights.

Ieperithem wrote:Hopefully. A nation whose majority consists of "aspiring artists", SNAP recipients, and identity politics obsessed professional victims rather than policemen, engineers, and farmers isn't going to last long.

Lol Democracy wrote:We should give him a Qur'an with a picture of Mohammed as the watermark on every page, can't remove stuff from the Qur'an, can't make pictures of Mohammed > Islam Explodes

User avatar
Ereria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 847
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ereria » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:59 pm

Talvezout wrote:
Ereria wrote:What do you guys think about people drawing Muhammad as sort of a revenge and showing support to the journalists?

Im a muslim my self and its quite sad to see people offending me and my religion for the sake of shitting on the extremists. Whenever I see a painting of Muhammad, I feel offended, and im not an easy person to offend. Not because it's racists posting it, because that shit im used to, but your everyday person posting that to insult us muslims.

I mean, I get that you guys ask, why not draw them? Im just saying, why do that? Don't you have 9 billion others things to draw? Why draw something that offends people unnecessarily? Just my point of view tho. If you want to insult the terrorists, make charicatures degrading ISIS and terrorists, no need to fuck rest of us over. I hate them as much as the next person, but I can't stand the casual racism you feel me?


Free speech gets violated or something if they can't draw what they want. I just have to say this: the problem with just drawing more and more cartoons of Muhammed in rather derogatory situation give the extremists more fuel for their attacks by saying "Look! Those dirty Western infidel/scum/pigs are disrespecting our dear prophet!" It just doesn't work out. And if we have to draw Muhammed, can't we just draw him in scenes of him doing good and cherry-pick verses from the Qur'an that support the goodwill?

Just my 2 cents/1/8 riyal.


Exactly. It will give fuel to even more terrorism. The real solution is to do like Norway did for example after the Breivik shootings. Show love to the dead and make it remarkable. Drawing muhammad I would not prefer as a muslim, but if everyone just had to draw a man just cuz (I guess when something is like ''illegal'' ((not really)) , it makes it feel better to draw, sort of like when something is illegal people become more tempted to do that thing)) I would prefer him properly drawn yes.

You don't even have to cherry pick verses. Actually, if you posted a whole sura which contains violence, you could show people that violence is only allowed as self defence, and never ever is act of violence encouraged for anything else than self defence.
"Vatan savunmasında gereğinden fazla merhamet vatana ihanettir."
- Mustafa Kemal Atatürk

Kılıç kınından çıkmadıkça it sürüsü dağılmaz.

User avatar
Ontorisa
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8672
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ontorisa » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:59 pm

The Conez Imperium wrote:
Ontorisa wrote:
No offence, but what's up with the Francais and les Francophones hating the religious symbols? I mean we have the French who want the Hijab to be banned and we have the Quebecois who passed a bill banning major religious symbols from being worn by public employees.

This is how you piss off religions.


It's most likely their Eurocentric views. I come from Australia a very multicultural society where literally anything passes as Auzzie but in Europe I can understand why foreign religions can be seen as "invading" on traditional cultural aspects. Hell they even started to hate on the Kebab. Hating on another culture's/countries food is one of the lowest denominators one could go to.


You're right.

Quebec believes that they're the last bastion of French in Canada, which is total bullshit by the way since there's a lot of French-speakers here in the Maritimes as well as in Ontario, saying that they need to preserve the French culture in Quebec by phasing out English.

User avatar
Edgy Opinions
Senator
 
Posts: 4400
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Edgy Opinions » Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:59 pm

Kalifati Arab shqiptar wrote:Stupid liberal French people, accepting and now surrendering to Algerians. After what I am seeing Western Europe should start a mass deportation of unwanted, irresponsible, criminal immigrants, Arabs are a threat for Europe, not Muslims, only Arabs.

So now we swap religionism for open racism. :palm:
Kotturheim's contagious despair.
100% self-impressed 20-year-old cadoneutrois-pangender imprigender genderblur fluidflux bi-pan/gray-ace/gray-aro Brazilian.
Into: your gender, anarchism/communism, obliteration of kyriarchy, environment, other obvious '-10.00, -9.13 in political compass' stuff
Anti: your gender (undo it interacting with me), Born This Way (also medicalism/pathologization/eugenics), outer space, abuse/predation, owners, power, hierarchy, internalization/privilege goggles (essential to the continuity of identity with power/hierarchy systems), essentialism/determinism, nihilism/defeatism

User avatar
The Carlisle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10024
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Carlisle » Wed Jan 07, 2015 4:00 pm

United Marxist Nations wrote:
The Carlisle wrote:I guess.

Of course. And if French police and military forces capture them alive, the course of action is to not execute them but to imprison them for trial.

And then I would suggest execution as the sentence.

Capital punishment is illegal in France. Unless they want to tear up their constitution to get petty revenge.
Call me Carly
Gayism enabler
Trans Girl
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.

User avatar
Olerand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13169
Founded: Sep 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Olerand » Wed Jan 07, 2015 4:01 pm

Edgy Opinions wrote:
Olerand wrote:We certainly do. Hell, new immigrants to France must sign a contract with the State promising to integrate, and are refused citizenship if they don't. We. Most. Certainly. Do.

Sorry cultural relativism isn't popular outside the quaint world-views of the Anglo-Saxon lefties.

Did you ever realize I'm actually South American?

Forced cultural assimilation is something we associate with historical nationalist objectives that ended up oppressing not only immigrants, but also Indigenous populations and descendants of slaves who resisted our white supremacist institutions.

The idea originated amongst the Anglo-Saxon New Left, it has propagated since. It also exists in France, albeit in consistently fewer minds.

We don't have slaves or indigenous peoples. We have immigrants. They must integrate. I don't care about Brazil, America, Peru, or China.
French citizen. Still a Socialist Party member. Ségolène Royal 2019, I guess Actually I might vote la France Insoumise.

Qui suis-je?:
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

User avatar
Kantona
Envoy
 
Posts: 331
Founded: Dec 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Kantona » Wed Jan 07, 2015 4:01 pm

Edgy Opinions wrote:
Kalifati Arab shqiptar wrote:Stupid liberal French people, accepting and now surrendering to Algerians. After what I am seeing Western Europe should start a mass deportation of unwanted, irresponsible, criminal immigrants, Arabs are a threat for Europe, not Muslims, only Arabs.

So now we swap religionism for open racism. :palm:

Actually there are a lot Albanians and Bosnians who are angry of always being associated with Arabs (Buse).

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Eurocom, Nilokeras, The Black Hand of Nod, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads