NATION

PASSWORD

'PEGIDA' Anti-Islam protests

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Sat Jan 10, 2015 6:59 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
You're right, it's 34%

Furthermore, if Christian extremism is bad, what makes it less bad than Islamic extremism? Is loss of life caused by radical Christianity better than loss of life caused by radical Islam?


the death tolls on both sides are drastically differne't, i mean really it's ridiculous. Niether are better but islam is by far worse perpetrator, especially in the modern era.


Where's the threat to free speech in the West? You've yet to show me such a threat posed by Islamists. Anti Muslim groups on the other hand...
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Jan 10, 2015 6:59 pm

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Southern Hampshire wrote:
Escaping extremism by bringing it over here? sounds more like colonialism. 1% of Christians in the West want a theocracy? heavily doubtful. Even then I am in no way condoning Christian extremism or lack of integration, it's almost as bad as it's Islamic counterpart


You're right, it's 34%

Now I'm honestly scared, those people not only destroy one constitutional principle, but the entire document.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
The Wolven League
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5390
Founded: Sep 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Wolven League » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:01 pm

A Christian theocracy? Scary stuff
For anyone wondering, I joined this website during my edgy teenage years. I made a lot of dumb, awkward posts, flip-flopped between various extreme ideologies, and just generally embarrassed myself. I denounce a sizable amount of my past posts. I am no longer active on NationStates and this nation/account is no longer used.

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:01 pm

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
the death tolls on both sides are drastically differne't, i mean really it's ridiculous. Niether are better but islam is by far worse perpetrator, especially in the modern era.


Where's the threat to free speech in the West? You've yet to show me such a threat posed by Islamists. Anti Muslim groups on the other hand...


it's their ideology that's a threat, just as much as the ideology of nazism would be a threat, just as much as the ideology of absolute monarchism would be a threat.
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:02 pm

The Wolven League wrote:A Christian theocracy? Scary stuff

In all fairness, any theocracy, whether Hindu, Christian, or Muslim, is scary.
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:02 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Where's the threat to free speech in the West? You've yet to show me such a threat posed by Islamists. Anti Muslim groups on the other hand...


it's their ideology that's a threat, just as much as the ideology of nazism would be a threat, just as much as the ideology of absolute monarchism would be a threat.

You've yet to show me why. You keep saying it's a threat, but why?
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
The Wolven League
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5390
Founded: Sep 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Wolven League » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:02 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Where's the threat to free speech in the West? You've yet to show me such a threat posed by Islamists. Anti Muslim groups on the other hand...


it's their ideology that's a threat, just as much as the ideology of nazism would be a threat, just as much as the ideology of absolute monarchism would be a threat.

I'm an absolute monarchist irl. So, I'm a threat to the delicate social balance of the world?
For anyone wondering, I joined this website during my edgy teenage years. I made a lot of dumb, awkward posts, flip-flopped between various extreme ideologies, and just generally embarrassed myself. I denounce a sizable amount of my past posts. I am no longer active on NationStates and this nation/account is no longer used.

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:03 pm

The Wolven League wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
it's their ideology that's a threat, just as much as the ideology of nazism would be a threat, just as much as the ideology of absolute monarchism would be a threat.

I'm an absolute monarchist irl. So, I'm a threat to the delicate social balance of the world?


Not you per se but your ideology is.

(btw im not talking about benevolent monarchism, im refering to ivan the terrible status)
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Glaesigelureyjar
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Jan 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Glaesigelureyjar » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:03 pm

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Southern Hampshire wrote:
Escaping extremism by bringing it over here? sounds more like colonialism. 1% of Christians in the West want a theocracy? heavily doubtful. Even then I am in no way condoning Christian extremism or lack of integration, it's almost as bad as it's Islamic counterpart


You're right, it's 34%

Furthermore, if Christian extremism is bad, what makes it less bad than Islamic extremism? Is loss of life caused by radical Christianity better than loss of life caused by radical Islam?


What on earth would be gained by creating a theocracy? It's quite incredible, however, that a massive 34% percent (which is an alarmingly high number considering they want a theocracy) want a Christian Theocracies. Theocracies, historically, have stifled social, medical and scientific progress. Remember a little period in Europe called the Dark Ages? The Church suppressed the heliocentric model for almost 400 years. Imagine how much sooner mariners might have discovered the New World if they understood that the Earth was not the center of the universe. Perhaps if the Church did not consider certain medical treatments for the Black Plague to be unchristian, 2/3 of Europe wouldn't have died.

(Yes, i'm just ranting about theocracies here, my actual opinions on this event are below)

Ok, now that i'm done venting, speaking of radical Christianity, Radical Christianity is just as bad as Islamic Radicalism. It's sad, however, how news networks such as Fox news deliberately avoid reporting on cases of Christian Extremism while paying massive attention over Muslim Radicalism. However, the problem is, Muslim Radicalism is much more prevalent than Christian Radicalism, and since news networks seem to report that Muslim radicalism is spreading faster than Ebola, fear of Muslim radicalism, which can lead to Islamophobia becomes common in the public. So to say the least, although I completely disagree with PEGIDA, it's hard not to understand why some people have a (albeit ignorant and quite frankly, stupid) fear of Islam
Last edited by Glaesigelureyjar on Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Please note: my nation name means "the Elegant Islands" in Glaesigelar (my fictional derivative of Old Norse, English, and Modern Icelandic) Additionally, my nation is basically a crossover between Norway, Iceland, Denmark, and the Faroe Islands

Pro: Pacifism, Liberalism, Socialism, Environmentalism, LBGT Rights, Gender Neutrality and Equality, Racial and Religious Tolerance, European Union, Public Education and Healthcare, Business Regulation, Green Policies, Renewable Energy, Advanced and Clean Technology, Science Funding

Anti: Capitalism, Totalitarianism, Extremism, Bigotry, Conservatism, Social Conservatism, Pro-Business Policies, Racial Inequality, Authoritarianism, Communism, Marxism, Privatized Healthcare, Fascism

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:04 pm

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
it's their ideology that's a threat, just as much as the ideology of nazism would be a threat, just as much as the ideology of absolute monarchism would be a threat.

You've yet to show me why. You keep saying it's a threat, but why?


im not going to bother quoting the muslim holy book cause im sure ill be told im "misinterpreting it"
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Southern Hampshire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 819
Founded: May 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Southern Hampshire » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:05 pm

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
point i was trying to make was that groups who hate the ideals of personal freedom usually are all for protests until they come into power. These groups have an advantage in our nations because they are tolerated and any kind of aggression is pushed aside as fringe.


Alright. Islamic political parties don't hold seats in West Europe. Most Islamist politicians are part of democratic, free parties. Your point is absolute shit.


Checked out your suggestion and looked for British Muslim politicians. Found Shabana Mahmood, a Labour MP in a muslim-majority area. In August 2014 she organised a boycott against Israel and trashed a Tesco in Birmingham along with fellow muslims in aisles with Israeli goods or firms that produce there (Coca Cola etc)

No, I want those kind od 'politicians' immediately deported back to the hellhole their ancestors came from. It is ABHORRENT that they are in public duty paid by taxes and these are the things they do.

Thank you for opening my eyes. If this is what is meant to come out of muslim-majority electorates as well as that numbnut Galloway in Bradford West, another muslim majority srea, then I say no to them.
Last edited by Southern Hampshire on Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
#standwithisrael
Pro: America, Israel, Kosovo, South Korea, Federalized Europe, Laissez-faire Capitalism, Opportunities, Secondary Monopoly, Intergratory Immigration, Privatization, Municipalization, Mass Militarization, Nuclear weapons, NATO, South East England + London independence from UK
Anti: Russia, North Korea, Argentina, Mediterranean & Red Sea Arabic countries, Liberal Europe, Socialism, Third Way, Elitism, Nationalization, CIS, Defence cuts, Hippie Bastards, Welfare, NHS, Anything north of London - Oxford - Bristol line,

User avatar
The Wolven League
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5390
Founded: Sep 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Wolven League » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:05 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
The Wolven League wrote:I'm an absolute monarchist irl. So, I'm a threat to the delicate social balance of the world?


Not you per se but your ideology is.

(btw im not talking about benevolent monarchism, im refering to ivan the terrible status)

Benevolent monarchies are still absolute monarchies :P (unless, of course, it's a parliamentary monarchy or something, but what I'm saying is that "benevolent monarchies" are not a separate sect of monarchy :P)
For anyone wondering, I joined this website during my edgy teenage years. I made a lot of dumb, awkward posts, flip-flopped between various extreme ideologies, and just generally embarrassed myself. I denounce a sizable amount of my past posts. I am no longer active on NationStates and this nation/account is no longer used.

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:05 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:You've yet to show me why. You keep saying it's a threat, but why?


im not going to bother quoting the muslim holy book cause im sure ill be told im "misinterpreting it"


I'm not going to bother quoting the Christian holy book, since I know that most Christians don't take the Bible literally. The Bible has just as many disgusting verses as the Quran. Thankfully, the percentage of people who take either of these books literally are a mere vocal minority.
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:06 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:You've yet to show me why. You keep saying it's a threat, but why?


im not going to bother quoting the muslim holy book cause im sure ill be told im "misinterpreting it"


In case you're not ignoring me like you claim, do you have documented proof of actual Islamic political groups in Europe that are gaining power and getting closer to overturning established government like you keep implying?
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:07 pm

Southern Hampshire wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Alright. Islamic political parties don't hold seats in West Europe. Most Islamist politicians are part of democratic, free parties. Your point is absolute shit.


Checked out your suggestion and looked for British Muslim politicians. Found Shabana Mahmood, a Labour MP in a muslim-majority area. In August 2014 she organised a boycott against Israel and trashed a Tesco in Birmingham along with fellow muslims in aisles with Israeli goods or firms that produce there (Coca Cola etc)

No, I want those kind od 'politicians' immediately deported back to the hellhole their ancestors came from. It is ABHORRENT that they are in public duty paid by taxes and these are the things they do.

Thank you for opening my eyes. If this is what is meant to come out of muslim-majority electorates as well as that numbnut Galloway in Bradford West, another muslim majority srea, then I say no to them.


So, if you're Muslim No Free Speech For You even if you were duly elected? Nice.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:07 pm

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
im not going to bother quoting the muslim holy book cause im sure ill be told im "misinterpreting it"


I'm not going to bother quoting the Christian holy book, since I know that most Christians don't take the Bible literally. The Bible has just as many disgusting verses as the Quran. Thankfully, the percentage of people who take either of these books literally are a mere vocal minority.


agreed they both have horrible things in them, except yoiu know, the prophet of the bible was a war-mongering maruader who murdered people as a way of life.

that kind of raises the question...role models.
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:09 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
I'm not going to bother quoting the Christian holy book, since I know that most Christians don't take the Bible literally. The Bible has just as many disgusting verses as the Quran. Thankfully, the percentage of people who take either of these books literally are a mere vocal minority.


agreed they both have horrible things in them, except yoiu know, the prophet of the bible was a war-mongering maruader who murdered people as a way of life.

that kind of raises the question...role models.


The fuck are you smoking?
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:10 pm

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
agreed they both have horrible things in them, except yoiu know, the prophet of the bible was a war-mongering maruader who murdered people as a way of life.

that kind of raises the question...role models.


The fuck are you smoking?


Jesus was a peaceful person, Muhammed was far from it

hence people tend to follow their prophets examples, hence islam is more violent, hence you have the current situation were in hence why were on this forum right now.
Last edited by North Calaveras on Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:10 pm

Southern Hampshire wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Alright. Islamic political parties don't hold seats in West Europe. Most Islamist politicians are part of democratic, free parties. Your point is absolute shit.


Checked out your suggestion and looked for British Muslim politicians. Found Shabana Mahmood, a Labour MP in a muslim-majority area. In August 2014 she organised a boycott against Israel and trashed a Tesco in Birmingham along with fellow muslims in aisles with Israeli goods or firms that produce there (Coca Cola etc)

No, I want those kind od 'politicians' immediately deported back to the hellhole their ancestors came from. It is ABHORRENT that they are in public duty paid by taxes and these are the things they do.

Thank you for opening my eyes. If this is what is meant to come out of muslim-majority electorates as well as that numbnut Galloway in Bradford West, another muslim majority srea, then I say no to them.


First of all, thank you so much for not answering my post telling you the percentage of Christians who support a theocracy. I feel so touched to know that you'll never admit that you're wrong. Thank you.

Secondly, is she a threat to free speech? Does she represent all Islamic politicians? No, move on.
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
Southern Hampshire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 819
Founded: May 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Southern Hampshire » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:10 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Southern Hampshire wrote:
Checked out your suggestion and looked for British Muslim politicians. Found Shabana Mahmood, a Labour MP in a muslim-majority area. In August 2014 she organised a boycott against Israel and trashed a Tesco in Birmingham along with fellow muslims in aisles with Israeli goods or firms that produce there (Coca Cola etc)

No, I want those kind od 'politicians' immediately deported back to the hellhole their ancestors came from. It is ABHORRENT that they are in public duty paid by taxes and these are the things they do.

Thank you for opening my eyes. If this is what is meant to come out of muslim-majority electorates as well as that numbnut Galloway in Bradford West, another muslim majority srea, then I say no to them.


So, if you're Muslim No Free Speech For You even if you were duly elected? Nice.


If Free speech in Islamic means fucking up anything that collaborates with Jews and rioting causing thousands of pounds of damage and destroying livelihoods, then yes, suppress their dking 'free speech'
#standwithisrael
Pro: America, Israel, Kosovo, South Korea, Federalized Europe, Laissez-faire Capitalism, Opportunities, Secondary Monopoly, Intergratory Immigration, Privatization, Municipalization, Mass Militarization, Nuclear weapons, NATO, South East England + London independence from UK
Anti: Russia, North Korea, Argentina, Mediterranean & Red Sea Arabic countries, Liberal Europe, Socialism, Third Way, Elitism, Nationalization, CIS, Defence cuts, Hippie Bastards, Welfare, NHS, Anything north of London - Oxford - Bristol line,

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:11 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
The fuck are you smoking?


Jesus was a peaceful person, Muhammed was far from it

hence people tend to follow their prophets examples, hence islam is more violent, hence you have the currention situation were in hence why were on this forum right now.


Have you read the Quran, or the Bible for that matter? I've read both, and I have reason to suspect that you haven't.
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:12 pm

Southern Hampshire wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
So, if you're Muslim No Free Speech For You even if you were duly elected? Nice.


If Free speech in Islamic means fucking up anything that collaborates with Jews and rioting causing thousands of pounds of damage and destroying livelihoods, then yes, suppress their dking 'free speech'


Way to be a total hypocrite. You say that Muslims threaten free speech, when you're the real threat to free speech. Bravo, well done. :clap:
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:12 pm

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
Jesus was a peaceful person, Muhammed was far from it

hence people tend to follow their prophets examples, hence islam is more violent, hence you have the currention situation were in hence why were on this forum right now.


Have you read the Quran, or the Bible for that matter? I've read both, and I have reason to suspect that you haven't.


then school me and tell me what kind of person muhammed was.
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:13 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Have you read the Quran, or the Bible for that matter? I've read both, and I have reason to suspect that you haven't.


then school me and tell me what kind of person muhammed was.


A prophet who said some bad things. The same goes for Jesus, he wasn't always "peaceful." Regardless, many followers of both religions don't take their prophets literally.
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
The Wolven League
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5390
Founded: Sep 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Wolven League » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:13 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Have you read the Quran, or the Bible for that matter? I've read both, and I have reason to suspect that you haven't.


then school me and tell me what kind of person muhammed was.

He certainly didn't massacre millions as you are suggesting.
For anyone wondering, I joined this website during my edgy teenage years. I made a lot of dumb, awkward posts, flip-flopped between various extreme ideologies, and just generally embarrassed myself. I denounce a sizable amount of my past posts. I am no longer active on NationStates and this nation/account is no longer used.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Fartsniffage, Greater Miami Shores 3, Grinning Dragon, Hispida, Rary, Shrillland, Stellar Colonies, Thermodolia, Vassenor, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads