Then that's what their hobby should be. And there is a good reason why ordinary citizens don't get to drag race in the streets. It is dangerous.
Advertisement

by Glamour » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:17 am

by Washington Resistance Army » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:19 am


by Glamour » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:20 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Glamour wrote:
No, thank fuck. It still happens though. Another child scarred for life by playing with adult toys. Which aren't really toys, or fun, except for those of a warped disposition.
Insulting people because they like something you don't probably isn't the best way to go about things


by Imperializt Russia » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:25 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Glamour » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:25 am

by Nirvash Type TheEND » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:26 am

by Glamour » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:27 am

by Imperializt Russia » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:29 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Glamour » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:32 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Glamour wrote:
Imagine me as the target next time if it helps you get over it.
Race drivers are allowed to race and die. Not everyone is allowed to drive racing cars and endanger themselves and others. Or give toddlers the keys to racecars.
This is why race drivers have a race licence and concealed carry holders have concealed carry licences.

by Imperializt Russia » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:34 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Nirvash Type TheEND » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:34 am

by Glamour » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:39 am
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Glamour wrote:
Now all we need is designated zones only for both racing and shooting and everything will be fine, and things like this wouldn't happen.
That stance is literally "Let's take this thing I think is a problem and put it in its own little box so it won't be a problem anymore." Good on ya.

by Nirvash Type TheEND » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:40 am
Glamour wrote:Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:That stance is literally "Let's take this thing I think is a problem and put it in its own little box so it won't be a problem anymore." Good on ya.
Nope. The stance is apply regulations to things that are objectively dangerous, so for example while you can drive around at whatever speed you want on your own land or shoot on your own land, you can't drag race in a mall car park or carry a gun in a mall. You can't let children get involved in either hobby, the same way you can't give them a cigarette. No matter the circumstances, if you run someone down or shoot someone, you're subject to investigation.

by Imperializt Russia » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:41 am
Glamour wrote:Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:That stance is literally "Let's take this thing I think is a problem and put it in its own little box so it won't be a problem anymore." Good on ya.
Nope. The stance is apply regulations to things that are objectively dangerous, so for example while you can drive around at whatever speed you want on your own land or shoot on your own land, you can't drag race in a mall car park or carry a gun in a mall. You can't let children get involved in either hobby, the same way you can't give them a cigarette. No matter the circumstances, if you run someone down or shoot someone, you're subject to investigation.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Glamour » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:54 am

by New Tsavon » Fri Jan 02, 2015 7:20 am

by Gauthier » Fri Jan 02, 2015 7:27 am
Big Jim P wrote:Atlanticatia wrote:Firearms should be required to safely locked away with bullets separated, with no carrying open or concealed, unless for employment, hunting, or sporting. I don't care about "blah blah 2nd amendment". It's time to end the gun culture once and for all. We need to cultural change to stamp out this culture where we regard firearms as normal and fun.
You want to watch crime skyrocket? When you can get all the predatory criminals in society to agree and adhere to that, then there will be no need for the average citizen to carry a gun. Until then, we have the right and the need.

by Big Jim P » Fri Jan 02, 2015 7:48 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Glamour wrote:
Nope. The stance is apply regulations to things that are objectively dangerous, so for example while you can drive around at whatever speed you want on your own land or shoot on your own land, you can't drag race in a mall car park or carry a gun in a mall. You can't let children get involved in either hobby, the same way you can't give them a cigarette. No matter the circumstances, if you run someone down or shoot someone, you're subject to investigation.
There is virtually nothing that prevents you from buying a car and letting your children drive it around on private land.
Same for firearms.
Of course in either instance, I'd have the parents (or any other competent adult) actually supervising them as they do either activity - but nothing prevents you from sharing this hobby with your children.

by Big Jim P » Fri Jan 02, 2015 7:50 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Glamour wrote:
No, thank fuck. It still happens though. Another child scarred for life by playing with adult toys. Which aren't really toys, or fun, except for those of a warped disposition.
Insulting people because they like something you don't probably isn't the best way to go about things

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Jan 02, 2015 8:14 am
Glamour wrote:Twilight Imperium wrote:
Son, are you on the dope?
People would still fight, they'd just send random people in to pillage/skirmish/raid/take over shit instead. Having a professional military to send instead keeps Joe Citizen from having to go and do it. One of the better ideas society has had, I'd say.
If that happened, they would be a military - a shit one.
Nobody should go to another country to fight anyone else. If nobody did, there would be no war. It's an individual's own decision whether or not to do that. I'd rather go to prison.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by WestRedMaple » Fri Jan 02, 2015 8:17 am
Glamour wrote:If you own a gun, it means you're open to the idea of shooting someone.
If you're open to the idea of shooting someone and you get shot, well, you know how it feels.
If you join the military and are killed by a stranger, too bad, you signed up to kill strangers. You just weren't good enough at your job.
The same way this woman wasn't really interested in guns enough to understand how to make them safe. She just wanted to feel edgy, or like she was in an action movie. I hope in her last moment she did feel like that if that's what she wanted.
The poor child will be ruined for life.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Jan 02, 2015 8:17 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Ameriganastan, Bombadil, Bovad, Elfenheim, EuroStralia, Floofybit, Golexald, Google [Bot], Greater Miami Shores 3, Honghai, Kong Xiang Utopia, Lackadaisia, Necroghastia, Shrillland, Uiiop
Advertisement