Is that with the capacity to? I don't know but around here Walmart's at most have around a few hundred people at a time.
Advertisement
by Parhe » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:14 pm
by Tubbsalot » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:15 pm
Galloism wrote:So what should this woman have done with her gun? Left it at home?
Gun Manufacturers wrote:Here's 3 examples of a concealed carry permit holder using a concealed weapon in self defense.
... So Jabbar went outside to the sidewalk and pulled a gun on a man who had just bought the shoes, Phares said. Only, the man had a gun, too.
... Lummus, who has a concealed handgun permit, pulled out his gun and fired several shots, hitting Carmillio as he was trying to get away in a vehicle. ... Carmillio drove off, but eventually died in the car, causing it to crash into a parked vehicle.
... Van Hermert entered a bedroom and returned with a loaded handgun. Smith, believing that his and his sister’s lives were in danger, drew his own handgun and fired five shots at Van Hemert.
by MERIZoC » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:16 pm
Galloism wrote:Merizoc wrote:Kept it out of reach of the child, for one. And then kept the safety on (if there was one), not have it cocked, and all in all, not have it immediately ready to fire. Though keeping it at home is fine too.
Well, I mean, I don't think a purse is a responsible place to carry. It's too easy to lift (as this has shown). I'm very much a proponent of body carrying, where the weight is noticeable and not easily forgotten about.
However, leaving the gun at home, unless in a very fixed heavy safe, is pretty irresponsible. One of the largest ways criminals get guns is via home theft.
by Tubbsalot » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:16 pm
Galloism wrote:However, leaving the gun at home, unless in a very fixed heavy safe, is pretty irresponsible. One of the largest ways criminals get guns is via home theft.
by Hawshia » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:17 pm
by Spoder » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:18 pm
Hawshia wrote:This is exactly why the US should be more like England and just outlaw guns and take them away permanently . Not sating they can;t hunt but Handguns ? SO I can't buy a stupid chocolate Kinder Egg in a USA Walmart but I can buy a bunch of Handguns ? Honestly ?
by Kazirstan » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:19 pm
by Master Shake » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:19 pm
Cyrisnia wrote:Master Shake wrote:
I'd put that kid up for adoption if it were my son. Two years old and already pointing a gun at its mother. Yeah I'm sure junior won't wait to shot his dad too...
F'ing school shooters. Cowards!!! Grow balls and fight your bullies with your fists and not your daddy's AR15!!!!
I had to fight all my battles with my fists and I don't go around shooting for fun...
by St Williams Parr County » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:20 pm
Master Shake wrote:St Williams Parr County wrote:
At least the father was there by his side while he was growing up. Of course, when he is growing up.
I'd put that kid up for adoption if it were my son. Two years old and already pointing a gun at its mother. Yeah I'm sure junior won't wait to shot his dad too...
F'ing school shooters. Cowards!!! Grow balls and fight your bullies with your fists and not your daddy's AR15!!!!
I had to fight all my battles with my fists and I don't go around shooting for fun...
by Parhe » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:20 pm
Hawshia wrote:This is exactly why the US should be more like England and just outlaw guns and take them away permanently . Not sating they can;t hunt but Handguns ? SO I can't buy a stupid chocolate Kinder Egg in a USA Walmart but I can buy a bunch of Handguns ? Honestly ?
by Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:20 pm
Master Shake wrote:St Williams Parr County wrote:
At least the father was there by his side while he was growing up. Of course, when he is growing up.
I'd put that kid up for adoption if it were my son. Two years old and already pointing a gun at its mother. Yeah I'm sure junior won't wait to shot his dad too...
F'ing school shooters. Cowards!!! Grow balls and fight your bullies with your fists and not your daddy's AR15!!!!
I had to fight all my battles with my fists and I don't go around shooting for fun...
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Tubbsalot » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:23 pm
Parhe wrote:Hawshia wrote:This is exactly why the US should be more like England and just outlaw guns and take them away permanently . Not sating they can;t hunt but Handguns ? SO I can't buy a stupid chocolate Kinder Egg in a USA Walmart but I can buy a bunch of Handguns ? Honestly ?
I don't see that being very useful in a country already with an existing "gun population" and culture. I don't see the government being able to really confiscate guns forcibly from everyone. They could outlaw it and, if it passed, people may turn in their handguns but the people least likely to are either those with the strongest gun culture and/or those inclined to criminal acts that may involve use of a handgun. I support the idea but I don't see it as something that can be enforced with available technology and funds.
by Geilinor » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:23 pm
by WestRedMaple » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:24 pm
Tubbsalot wrote:WestRedMaple wrote:Alrighty, your claim is obviously ridiculous, but let's give you a chance to support your wild claim: A guy walks up a few feet away from you on the sidewalk, points a gun at you, and threatens your life.....what tool for self-defense would you prefer? How is a concealed firearm useless? (Especially given the fact that it has been used quite successfully in exactly such a situation).
If someone's pointing a gun at you and wants to kill you, you're fucked. Doesn't matter whether you have a gun, a knife, pepper spray or nothing. Your wallet would probably be a much better option than any of those.
But if you really wanted to try, you'd probably have the best chance if you lunged at them and attempted to grapple the gun away unarmed.
edit: oh yeah, it's also worth noting that I asked for realistic scenarios. This is not a realistic scenario. People don't just walk up to random strangers and inform them they're going to be shot. The closest you'd get is in gang initiations, and even then, no.Big Jim P wrote:No, I am correcting your erroneous assumption. I do not care if you agree with my views. They are backed by evidence. For example (should you be inclined to look at evidence of your error), see the two conveniently labeled links in my sig.
Great. "You're wrong but I can't be bothered explaining why, just read through these giant lists which may or may not have anything to do with your question. Don't worry about the site being called 'guns save lives,' they're not biased or cherrypicking or anything like that. Peace out."
by Master Shake » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:25 pm
by Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:25 pm
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Organized States » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:26 pm
Kazirstan wrote:If civilians were not allowed to carry firearms around in public, then none of this would have happened. Why do you even need to carry your gun around in Walmart? In Canada, we don't carry firearms around with us, and the country is still running (and has a lower murder rate, and a less corrupt government). It's pointless, and dangerous.
by Tubbsalot » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:26 pm
WestRedMaple wrote:You asked for realistic scenarios, and I gave you one that has actually happened. It sounds like maybe you're confused by the meaning of "realistic".
WestRedMaple wrote:If you think you're better with your hands than with a firearm, then you must be woefully useless with a handgun.
by Master Shake » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:26 pm
by Geilinor » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:26 pm
by WestRedMaple » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:27 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:WestRedMaple wrote:
If the alternative is worse, then most certainly. A guy I went to high school with did it and survived without a scratch.....which would be far better in my opinion than getting shot by the criminal
That just seems like the most stupid action one could take in such a circumstance. Unless one is subject to a mob hit then surely the odds of surviving the encounter are much higher if one just complies with the demands of the criminal.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Barinive, Big Eyed Animation, Herador, New haven america, New Temecula, Shazbotdom, Stellar Colonies, Tillania, Trump Almighty, Varsemia
Advertisement