Advertisement

by Britanno » Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:39 pm

by Liberty and Linguistics » Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:42 pm
Britanno wrote:Austerity can work if it's done in the right way. Greece's government has simply taken it up the arse from the EU and decided to just cut the shite out of spending.

by Martean » Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:43 pm

by Unholy Byzantium » Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:44 pm

by Liberty and Linguistics » Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:47 pm
Unholy Byzantium wrote:SYRIZA cannot deliver on its promises nor do I foresee it having the will, once elected, to stand up to the Merkelreich.
A better choice will be from the right. Perhaps ANEL or Golden Dawn.

by Chestaan » Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:51 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Britanno wrote:Austerity can work if it's done in the right way. Greece's government has simply taken it up the arse from the EU and decided to just cut the shite out of spending.
How can austerity be done properly? I'm curious to hear your opinion, since it appears that the UK, Ireland, Germany, and a few other states have gotten out of the recession with austerity. Erstwhile, the Southern European countries have tried austerity, and it's failed miserably. My hypothesis is simply that because the financial recession hit the Southern European countries so hard, perhaps there is no silver-bullet solution to their problems.

by Unholy Byzantium » Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:53 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Unholy Byzantium wrote:SYRIZA cannot deliver on its promises nor do I foresee it having the will, once elected, to stand up to the Merkelreich.
A better choice will be from the right. Perhaps ANEL or Golden Dawn.
Ah, so you're fine with Neo-Nazism? And, you're also fine with ridiculously stupid conspiracy theories?

by Liberty and Linguistics » Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:55 pm
Unholy Byzantium wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Ah, so you're fine with Neo-Nazism? And, you're also fine with ridiculously stupid conspiracy theories?
Look at the poll on the first page. Even in NS the Golden Dawn does better than any of the 'mainstream parties'
And no I don't like Neo Nazis, but I also recognize that this term is thrown around far more often than reflects reality. It is used to discredit nationalist opposition to an unpopular status quo.
Calling Greek Nationalists Nazis is an insult to those who suffered from actual Nazis.

by Slakonian » Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:57 pm
Turmenista wrote:>USA/Obama drops bombs in Syria for over a year, nobody bats an eye or says a word.
>Russia/Putin drops bombs in Syria for a day and-
WE INTERRUPT THIS SHITPOST TO INFORM YOU THAT VLADIMIR PUTIN AND RUSSIA ARE TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!!

by Martean » Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:04 pm
Slakonian wrote:Maybe the junta should come back?..... anyhow to see how stupid this whole situation is we got ourselves in first place is that we do NOT vote our own president which we should because they are like elected monarchs by the Parliament. As Lazopoulos said: Βασιλιά δεν είχαμε, αλλά Βασιλιά έχουμε, which means " We didn't had a king(since the 1970's) but we still have a King...

by Baltenstein » Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:10 pm
Slakonian wrote:Maybe the junta should come back?..... anyhow to see how stupid this whole situation is we got ourselves in first place is that we do NOT vote our own president which we should because they are like elected monarchs by the Parliament. As Lazopoulos said: Βασιλιά δεν είχαμε, αλλά Βασιλιά έχουμε, which means " We didn't had a king(since the 1970's) but we still have a King...

by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:12 pm
Slakonian wrote:Maybe the junta should come back?..... anyhow to see how stupid this whole situation is we got ourselves in first place is that we do NOT vote our own president which we should because they are like elected monarchs by the Parliament. As Lazopoulos said: Βασιλιά δεν είχαμε, αλλά Βασιλιά έχουμε, which means " We didn't had a king(since the 1970's) but we still have a King...
by Shofercia » Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:26 pm
Baltenstein wrote:Greece leaving the Eurozone is not on Syriza's agenda.
Baltenstein wrote:Guardian did another piece on the four most important parties and their positions in Greece right now:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/j ... s-policies

by Baltenstein » Fri Jan 23, 2015 2:51 am
Martean wrote:20,000 people today in Syriza's mitin, with leaders like Pablo Iglesias and Cayo Lara. I think Syriza will definetely win the elections.


by Greed and Death » Fri Jan 23, 2015 4:23 am

by Chestaan » Fri Jan 23, 2015 6:31 am
Pooria wrote:why are the spaniards so interested on the greeck elections?

by Liberty and Linguistics » Fri Jan 23, 2015 6:56 am
Pooria wrote:why are the spaniards so interested on the greeck elections?

by Martean » Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:56 am
Pooria wrote:why are the spaniards so interested on the greeck elections?

by Slakonian » Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:11 pm
Turmenista wrote:>USA/Obama drops bombs in Syria for over a year, nobody bats an eye or says a word.
>Russia/Putin drops bombs in Syria for a day and-
WE INTERRUPT THIS SHITPOST TO INFORM YOU THAT VLADIMIR PUTIN AND RUSSIA ARE TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!!

by Britanno » Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:42 pm
Chestaan wrote:I would argue that the countries you mentioned got out of recession despite austerity rather than because of it. UK also had stimulated the economy in the early part of the recession through fiscal and monetary measures which helped them avoid the worst.

by Esperantujo 2 » Fri Jan 23, 2015 3:21 pm
Olerand wrote:European Socialist Republic wrote:Maybe Greece could vote for Golden Dawn, start a war with the USA, get defeated and then hope for a Marshall plan to rebuild the country.
Golden Dawn doesn't really want a war with America; it has more national and regional aspirations.
Also, America doesn't have the money to give Greece as a new Marshall Plan.

by Chestaan » Fri Jan 23, 2015 3:51 pm
Britanno wrote:Chestaan wrote:I would argue that the countries you mentioned got out of recession despite austerity rather than because of it. UK also had stimulated the economy in the early part of the recession through fiscal and monetary measures which helped them avoid the worst.
You're misunderstanding the pro-austerity argument in the UK.
I don't think cutting the deficit and slashing spending cures economic problems. I would agree that in many places it does the opposite. What I'm saying is that, if done properly, the shirt term impacts can be reduced without sacrificing long term aims. I want to run a surplus. Why? Because it means that when we hit another financial crisis, we don't have to bankrupt ourselves by putting money into the economy. Spending goes up following a crisis. If we had been running a surplus, then we would be running a small deficit after the crisis. If we'd been running a deficit, then we would be running a big deficit after the crisis.
It's about the long term. If austerity can happen without fucking shit up (as it has in Britain), then it's worth it.

by Chestaan » Fri Jan 23, 2015 3:53 pm
Esperantujo 2 wrote:Olerand wrote:Golden Dawn doesn't really want a war with America; it has more national and regional aspirations.
Also, America doesn't have the money to give Greece as a new Marshall Plan.
I don't think this is true, or, even if it is true, it would only apply to the US government, not to billionaires. Perhaps the new dictator of Saudi Arabia will buy Greece, as part of a plan to re-establish the Ottoman Empire. Any let's face it. Greece will default, whoever wins the election. Best to end austerity and give Greeks a decent life.
by Calimera II » Fri Jan 23, 2015 3:53 pm
Chestaan wrote:Britanno wrote:You're misunderstanding the pro-austerity argument in the UK.
I don't think cutting the deficit and slashing spending cures economic problems. I would agree that in many places it does the opposite. What I'm saying is that, if done properly, the shirt term impacts can be reduced without sacrificing long term aims. I want to run a surplus. Why? Because it means that when we hit another financial crisis, we don't have to bankrupt ourselves by putting money into the economy. Spending goes up following a crisis. If we had been running a surplus, then we would be running a small deficit after the crisis. If we'd been running a deficit, then we would be running a big deficit after the crisis.
It's about the long term. If austerity can happen without fucking shit up (as it has in Britain), then it's worth it.
Running a surplus isn't a bad idea, but it should be done when the economy is doing well. Sure, you can try running austerity measures during a recession/stagnation but it's kind of like closing the stable door after the horse has bolted. A surplus should have been ran before the recession and then that money could have been used to deal with the crisis that started in 2008. It's also very hard to run a surplus during a recession as government revenues naturally fall (unemployment, lower VAT etc) while spending naturally rises as welfare must increase etc.
My thinking would to be continue to run a modest deficit until the economy begins to pick up. Then when growth returns and revenue increases, you can run a surplus and start paying for the deficit and saving for a rainy day.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Cavirfi, Necroghastia, Ryemarch, Skelleftella, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement