Costa Fierro wrote:Shouldn't the OP be concerned about the plight of Indians in India rather than Indians abroad?
This^. As one of the people Manisdog is supposedly concerned about, I don't need his concern.
Advertisement

by Geilinor » Sun Dec 21, 2014 5:02 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:Shouldn't the OP be concerned about the plight of Indians in India rather than Indians abroad?

by Rio Cana » Sun Dec 21, 2014 5:03 pm


by Greater-London » Sun Dec 21, 2014 5:08 pm
Manisdog wrote:
96 murders in 21 years equally to around 4.5 murders in one year, which does constitute as a trend coupled with other issues like this and many more that I have not touched or know about

by Greater-London » Sun Dec 21, 2014 5:15 pm
Chucky Arla wrote:
And this isn't a discussion of every culture. It particularly looks at a UK case.
You can't try to hand wave it away with "the other kids did it too" childishness

by Tagmatium » Sun Dec 21, 2014 5:24 pm
Greater-London wrote:Chucky Arla wrote:
And this isn't a discussion of every culture. It particularly looks at a UK case.
You can't try to hand wave it away with "the other kids did it too" childishness
Your right in that "everyone else does it" isn't a way of justifying something bad. There is racism in the UK, we all know this and its embarrassing.
However whilst it doesn't justify racism in the UK it is important to look at these instance comparatively before going for an all out hatchet job against the UK.
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

by Fartsniffage » Sun Dec 21, 2014 5:26 pm
Tagmatium wrote:Greater-London wrote:
Your right in that "everyone else does it" isn't a way of justifying something bad. There is racism in the UK, we all know this and its embarrassing.
However whilst it doesn't justify racism in the UK it is important to look at these instance comparatively before going for an all out hatchet job against the UK.
Why try to deny that all us British people are evil?
Everyone else in the world knows it.

by Marcurix » Sun Dec 21, 2014 5:27 pm

by Fartsniffage » Sun Dec 21, 2014 5:30 pm

by Tagmatium » Sun Dec 21, 2014 5:32 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

by Katganistan » Sun Dec 21, 2014 5:35 pm

by Greater-London » Sun Dec 21, 2014 5:38 pm
Marcurix wrote:Does a kilt cancel any of that out?

by Manisdog » Mon Dec 22, 2014 12:48 am
Fartsniffage wrote:Manisdog wrote:
The question is why was such an argument been presented could it be stated that it also implies that Indians would be safer in Britain because they won't be murdered by fellow Indians, I see the white man's burden argument here
Personal safety, security of possessions, involvement in the political process, right to a fair trial, education prospects, freedom to work.
These are just some of the things I would be considering if I were to emigrate. Personal safety comes first on my list so it is what I would consider first. Not being dead is very important when it comes to taking advantage of those other things I'd like in my new nation.
My point is simple, statistically speaking an Indian is less likely to be murdered in the UK than in India so it is safer. Therefore, despite all your bitching and moaning about racially motivated murder in the UK, it isn't an argument against travelling to the west.
by The Matthew Islands » Mon Dec 22, 2014 12:58 am
Manisdog wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Personal safety, security of possessions, involvement in the political process, right to a fair trial, education prospects, freedom to work.
These are just some of the things I would be considering if I were to emigrate. Personal safety comes first on my list so it is what I would consider first. Not being dead is very important when it comes to taking advantage of those other things I'd like in my new nation.
My point is simple, statistically speaking an Indian is less likely to be murdered in the UK than in India so it is safer. Therefore, despite all your bitching and moaning about racially motivated murder in the UK, it isn't an argument against travelling to the west.
From that list Singapore, Algeria, Hong Kong ( Which is fucking awesome), Indonesia are better than Britain. There are more murders in the United states than in India, does that make the case of people from the USA should emigrate to India because India is safer for Americans than America ?
I am deducing everything from your own source
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

by European Socialist Republic » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:18 am

by Manisdog » Mon Dec 22, 2014 2:56 am

by Dewhurst-Narculis » Mon Dec 22, 2014 3:01 am
Manisdog wrote:Another example of a racist judge
http://rt.com/uk/215595-g4s-impunity-ma ... r-mubengo/
in light of this new evidence, my arguement has become ever more stronger and better
by The Matthew Islands » Mon Dec 22, 2014 3:27 am
Manisdog wrote:Another example of a racist judge
http://rt.com/uk/215595-g4s-impunity-ma ... r-mubengo/
in light of this new evidence, my arguement has become ever more stronger and better
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

by Manisdog » Mon Dec 22, 2014 3:29 am
The Matthew Islands wrote:Manisdog wrote:Another example of a racist judge
http://rt.com/uk/215595-g4s-impunity-ma ... r-mubengo/
in light of this new evidence, my arguement has become ever more stronger and better
And this isn't even its final form!
The judge decided that the texts had nothing to do with the case. They were being charged with manslaughter, not a racially motivated attack.

by Manisdog » Mon Dec 22, 2014 3:31 am
Manisdog wrote:The Matthew Islands wrote:And this isn't even its final form!
The judge decided that the texts had nothing to do with the case. They were being charged with manslaughter, not a racially motivated attack.
I am sure that in a "civilized and liberal" democracy like Britain racially motivated attacks carry additional terms and the judge withheld crucial information
by The Matthew Islands » Mon Dec 22, 2014 3:31 am
Manisdog wrote:The Matthew Islands wrote:And this isn't even its final form!
The judge decided that the texts had nothing to do with the case. They were being charged with manslaughter, not a racially motivated attack.
I am sure that in a "civilized and liberal" democracy like Britain racially motivated attacks carry additional terms and the judge withheld crucial information
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

by Manisdog » Mon Dec 22, 2014 3:34 am
The Matthew Islands wrote:Manisdog wrote:
I am sure that in a "civilized and liberal" democracy like Britain racially motivated attacks carry additional terms and the judge withheld crucial information
Well yes, crucial information if they were being charged with a racially motivated attack. They were charged with manslaughter.

by Hirota » Mon Dec 22, 2014 3:38 am
By Manisdog "logic", not only can we make that declaration, but we can continue to make it regardless of how many rational counterpoints are made.The Matthew Islands wrote:*edit* Christ, It took me like, 3 seconds to find evidence of racist attacks in India. By your logic, do we get to declare all of India racist?

by Dewhurst-Narculis » Mon Dec 22, 2014 3:39 am
by The Matthew Islands » Mon Dec 22, 2014 3:42 am
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Bawkie, Duvniask, Google [Bot]
Advertisement