Advertisement

by The Royally United Provinces » Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:29 pm

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:30 pm
Saiwania wrote:I'm against the US lifting the embargo on Cuba, it may not work- but point is that Cuba never intends to provide any compensation for the foreign owned property that was nationalized in their 1959 revolution and no nation has the right to trade with the US if the US decides that they aren't doing business with certain governments.
Neither the US or Cuba need the other, both nations have plenty of other trading partners. The US isn't missing out on anything spectacular in choosing not to trade with Cuba. Only Cuba would primarily benefit from the embargo being lifted.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by L Ron Cupboard » Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:31 pm

by Eastern Equestria » Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:31 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Eastern Equestria wrote:
I agree. But Cuba is still a fucking shitty place to live for all but those in the upper echelons of its communist party.
Oh indeed, I never disputed that.
I'm just saying the United States opening relations with Cuba isn't surprising from any angle, we were going to have to do it sooner or later, if not out of the war hawks becoming irrelevant and people seeing the embargo is fucking pointless, it was going to be out of pragmatist politics to preserve our national security interests abroad (which would also come to the conclusion that the embargo is fucking pointless).

by Nickel Empire » Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:31 pm

by Penguin Union Nation » Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:35 pm

by Lancaster of Wessex » Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:36 pm
L Ron Cupboard wrote:So the conservative view point seems to be that America is better off having Cuba as an enemy in their backyard, rather than as an ally and depriving Russia and/or China of an ally in the region.

by Saiwania » Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:38 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Except, what if our purpose is not to enhance economic ties but strengthen our security hegemony in the Western Hemisphere?
Under that light, we'll give Cuba what they want and even lift the embargo if we have to. Establishing relations with Cuba will help us with keeping Russia out of our backyard and we can just dump a small fraction of our exports into Cuba, which is a win-win for us since our companies have a new market.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:43 pm
Saiwania wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:Except, what if our purpose is not to enhance economic ties but strengthen our security hegemony in the Western Hemisphere?
Under that light, we'll give Cuba what they want and even lift the embargo if we have to. Establishing relations with Cuba will help us with keeping Russia out of our backyard and we can just dump a small fraction of our exports into Cuba, which is a win-win for us since our companies have a new market.
Knowing Cuba, they'd accept the embargo ending while taking up Russia's offers. Why bother? I don't take Russia as a serious threat anymore in terms of their non-nuclear capabilities, it is all about China now.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by The Seleucids (Ancient) » Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:48 pm

by Eastern Equestria » Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:56 pm

by Eastern Equestria » Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:07 pm
Skinia wrote:Lancaster of Wessex wrote:
I'd hardly call Cuba a failed nation.
From Wiki:
HDI (Human Development Index, 2013) Steady 0.815 (out of 100)
Ranked: very high · 44th
Just a teensy weensy little correction: steady 0.815 out of 1.0, right?
I would love to see Cuba's inequality-adjusted HDI standing.

by Geilinor » Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:11 pm

by Skinia » Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:12 pm
Eastern Equestria wrote:Skinia wrote:Just a teensy weensy little correction: steady 0.815 out of 1.0, right?
I would love to see Cuba's inequality-adjusted HDI standing.
^This
If plain old HDI is all we're judging by, then we could say that the U.S. contains less socioeconomic disparity than Sweden or Canada.

by The Emerald Dragon » Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:14 pm

by Geilinor » Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:15 pm
Eastern Equestria wrote:Skinia wrote:Just a teensy weensy little correction: steady 0.815 out of 1.0, right?
I would love to see Cuba's inequality-adjusted HDI standing.
^This
If plain old HDI is all we're judging by, then we could say that the U.S. contains less socioeconomic disparity than Sweden or Canada.

by Zakuvia » Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:15 pm

by Greater Mackonia » Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:18 pm

by Beta Test » Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:18 pm


by Imyoji » Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:19 pm

by Eastern Equestria » Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:20 pm
Geilinor wrote:Eastern Equestria wrote:
^This
If plain old HDI is all we're judging by, then we could say that the U.S. contains less socioeconomic disparity than Sweden or Canada.
http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/inequality-adjusted-hdi They don't have an inequality-adjusted figure calculated, so Cuba remains at 44th.

by Geilinor » Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:23 pm
Eastern Equestria wrote:Geilinor wrote:http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/inequality-adjusted-hdi They don't have an inequality-adjusted figure calculated, so Cuba remains at 44th.
It's HDI is 44th. The ranking in that list is based off of regular HDI. Cuba would undoubedtly be much lower on a list of countries ranked by their IHDI.

by The balkens » Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:24 pm

by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:32 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Fartsniffage, Fractalnavel, Neu California
Advertisement