NATION

PASSWORD

Abortion: Humane or not?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Abortion Humane or not?

Should be legalized and is humane
229
33%
Abortion kills innocent babies and should be stopped!
150
22%
What's abortion?
12
2%
Abortion depend on the circumstance
160
23%
It's the woman's choice
143
21%
 
Total votes : 694

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:33 pm

http://www.kmph-kfre.com/story/26659890 ... -only-soda

Soda companies didn't release official statements condemning this. Clearly soda companies condone robbery over sodas.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Stormwind-City
Minister
 
Posts: 2481
Founded: Dec 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stormwind-City » Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:36 pm

Mavorpen wrote:http://www.kmph-kfre.com/story/26659890/store-owner-beaten-thieves-take-only-soda

Soda companies didn't release official statements condemning this. Clearly soda companies condone robbery over sodas.

What?

E: Oh, nvm.
Last edited by Stormwind-City on Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I am a woman.
Ambassador Alyssa Brightspark(Yes, a gnome)
Extra!Extra!: King dead at 89! Prince abdicates! Adopted Vanessa heir presumptive! (See FB)
Now Officially a funny poster:
If you have any questions/comments, or just need someone to talk to and a shoulder to cry on, TG me. I'll be happy to help.

User avatar
Luminesa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60407
Founded: Dec 09, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Luminesa » Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:37 pm

Godular wrote:
Luminesa wrote:
I have no idea what you mean to accomplish by that first part. Abortion is indeed the systematic torture and murder of individuals in cold blood. And nobody has yet to give me a legal definition of 'personhood'. I'm talking legal documents, stating, "Okay, this here is a person, this here is not."

I am not depraved, and if I was I would be in the loony house. Now, I might have a ragingly-insane imagination, but that is only due to me watching too many cartoons and reading lots of books.

Um, here's my problem with the second part:
1.) There's a thread for homosexuality, if you want to talk about that. I don't mind.
2.) I don't discriminate against LGBT couples and people. I have relatives and friends who are gay, and I love them regardless. My problem is when a person says, "Well, I don't agree with gay marriage", and they get called "hateful, intolerant, bigot, etc." by society at large. Meanwhile, you have people in Oklahoma doing Satanic rituals, desecrating the Catholic Church's most precious teaching (Holy Eucharist), and nobody calls that "hateful, intolerant, bigoted, etc." I find this double-standard appalling.

I wouldn't say you're close. Problem is, calling the Church "hateful" is one of the most used arguments I have seen, when browsing the Internet. If you want to talk about the Church, send me a telegram and we can get down to it. Bottom line: the abortion industry is involved in a new sort of holocaust on unborn children. I'm pretty darn close. :/


1) https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=&oq=depravity+definition&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGNI_enUS558US558&q=depravity+definition&gs_l=hp...0l3j0i22i30l2.0.0.0.3526...........0.yLfALOArXUU The definition of depravity. In this case trying to equate a medical procedure used as the last line of defense against getting pregnant when undesired to a systematic program of mass torture and murder against born people who are capable of experiencing pain and suffering, and not understanding that its a terrible comparison from both a functional and emotional standpoint.

It has nothing to do with sanity. It has to do with what people such as yourself deem as 'permissible'.

2) Fetuses cannot feel pain and suffering. Seriously, we slapped you in the face over this before.

3) Didn't stop you from divulging your story with Cerebral Palsy, even though this thread is about abortion, not euthanasia (which I support, but hey, its the person's choice)

4) You may not discriminate against LGBT, its fundamentally irrelevant. The simple fact of the matter is yes, mine is closer than your comparison between Abortion and the Holocaust because you are supporting an anachronistic system that continues to believe in women as little more than unnecessarily complicated walking gestation pods. You can deny this all you like, but it is most assuredly exactly what you are doing.

Luminesa wrote:
1.) Pretty sure we got into that. Yep, sex is also about feeling good and making bonds with your husband/wife. It's not a bad thing.

2.) Gimme a second:

http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2014/ ... on-rights/
(This is what abortion activists say to a guy who wants to keep the baby.)

http://saynsumthn.wordpress.com/2010/10 ... -abortion/
(Here's just one story where a guy beats his girlfriend for not having an abortion. As you can plainly see, when this woman and her baby are traumatized, Planned Parenthood and pro-choice activists are clearly missing from the picture. If they really cared about women, they would have heard about this case and spoken up.)

3.) Okay, your point?


1. Slut shaming. If the woman wants to have sex before getting married, who are you to say whether that's good or bad? Also, if she wants to have sex, but does not feel like she's ready for motherhood, who are you to say tough luck?

2. Mav dealt with those.

3. That you keep tossing out appeals to emotion as if you expect to convince us of anything. Really, it just makes your own position look worse and worse.


1.) "A last line of defense against getting pregnant"...wait...what? Did I miss something? Isn't the woman pregnant when she gets the abortion? Did I miss something?
A fetus is capable of feeling pain at 20 weeks. It's why all that legislation went through about it.
And I would call smashing a fetus's skull and sucking its brain out with a small vacuum pretty depraved...and then throwing babies' bodies in dumpsters behind abortion clinics also isn't a very pretty, humane idea, to say the least...

2.) "Unnecessarily complicated walking gestation pods"...
Man, I keep hearing that and all I can think is...Wow. I mean, what do I say to that? I don't think that at all. I mean, pregnancy on this thread is looked at as a disease. It's appalling.

3.) Okay. Point taken.

4.) "Who am I to say tough luck"...okay...I had a friend who got pregnant outside of marriage. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say she should have waited until marriage (would have been a much more ideal situation if she had the baby within the marriage, right? Not to mention the guy she was with wasn't a nice person.)
And if she doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't have sex. For the most part, when a girl has sex, there is a high chance she will get pregnant.
"With great power comes great responsibility," as an awesome comic book character's uncle once said. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say, "You might want to wait, because...you know...it's not the easiest thing raising a child as a teen mom."

5.) I like how people on here have been using 'us'. I mean, I dunno...it sounds like ganging-up. Not like I haven't had that happen before, but you know...just something I noticed. Huh.
I mean, as far as emotional appeals, the "quality of life" thing is a very emotional issue. Just sayin'.
Catholic, pro-life, and proud of it. I prefer my debates on religion, politics, and sports with some coffee and a little Aquinas and G.K. CHESTERTON here and there. :3
Unofficial #1 fan of the Who Dat Nation.
"I'm just a singer of simple songs, I'm not a real political man. I watch CNN, but I'm not sure I can tell you the difference in Iraq and Iran. But I know Jesus, and I talk to God, and I remember this from when I was young:
faith, hope and love are some good things He gave us...
and the greatest is love."
-Alan Jackson
Help the Ukrainian people, here's some sources!
Help bring home First Nation girls! Now with more ways to help!
Jesus loves all of His children in Eastern Europe - pray for peace.
Pray for Ukraine, Wear Sunflowers In Your Hair

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:39 pm

Luminesa wrote:2.) "Unnecessarily complicated walking gestation pods"...
Man, I keep hearing that and all I can think is...Wow. I mean, what do I say to that? I don't think that at all. I mean, pregnancy on this thread is looked at as a disease. It's appalling.

Well for me, it might as well be. If I were pregnant it would be the worst experience of my life.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:41 pm

Luminesa wrote:
Godular wrote:
Hmm. Lets see here, a woman deciding that she doesn't want to carry a pregnancy to term... compared to millions of actual PERSONS being systematically tortured and murdered in cold blood. I find myself entertained by the sheer depths of human depravity that people will engage in when they think that they are in the right.

Almost like those folks who try and hide behind their bible and 'religious freedom' as an excuse to discriminate against LGBT couples and people. Yeah. I just compared pro-life to anachronistic hatred. Best part? Mine's closer than yours.


I have no idea what you mean to accomplish by that first part. Abortion is indeed the systematic torture and murder of individuals in cold blood. And nobody has yet to give me a legal definition of 'personhood'. I'm talking legal documents, stating, "Okay, this here is a person, this here is not."

I am not depraved, and if I was I would be in the loony house. Now, I might have a ragingly-insane imagination, but that is only due to me watching too many cartoons and reading lots of books.

Um, here's my problem with the second part:
1.) There's a thread for homosexuality, if you want to talk about that. I don't mind.
2.) I don't discriminate against LGBT couples and people. I have relatives and friends who are gay, and I love them regardless. My problem is when a person says, "Well, I don't agree with gay marriage", and they get called "hateful, intolerant, bigot, etc." by society at large. Meanwhile, you have people in Oklahoma doing Satanic rituals, desecrating the Catholic Church's most precious teaching (Holy Eucharist), and nobody calls that "hateful, intolerant, bigoted, etc." I find this double-standard appalling.

I wouldn't say you're close. Problem is, calling the Church "hateful" is one of the most used arguments I have seen, when browsing the Internet. If you want to talk about the Church, send me a telegram and we can get down to it. Bottom line: the abortion industry is involved in a new sort of holocaust on unborn children. I'm pretty darn close. :/


Okay, let me laugh at you for this:

:rofl:

Done. Now. Stop spreading misinformation and stupid relationships between the holocaust/genocide and abortion. It's not. You can't perform genocide upon cells that are not sentient. Or do we now perform genocide against cockroaches and they deserve our sympathy? Are we not to use rats in chemical research (and I have my issues with how they are being used, but this is not the thread for it).
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:43 pm

Luminesa wrote:
Godular wrote:
1) https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=&oq=depravity+definition&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGNI_enUS558US558&q=depravity+definition&gs_l=hp...0l3j0i22i30l2.0.0.0.3526...........0.yLfALOArXUU The definition of depravity. In this case trying to equate a medical procedure used as the last line of defense against getting pregnant when undesired to a systematic program of mass torture and murder against born people who are capable of experiencing pain and suffering, and not understanding that its a terrible comparison from both a functional and emotional standpoint.

It has nothing to do with sanity. It has to do with what people such as yourself deem as 'permissible'.

2) Fetuses cannot feel pain and suffering. Seriously, we slapped you in the face over this before.

3) Didn't stop you from divulging your story with Cerebral Palsy, even though this thread is about abortion, not euthanasia (which I support, but hey, its the person's choice)

4) You may not discriminate against LGBT, its fundamentally irrelevant. The simple fact of the matter is yes, mine is closer than your comparison between Abortion and the Holocaust because you are supporting an anachronistic system that continues to believe in women as little more than unnecessarily complicated walking gestation pods. You can deny this all you like, but it is most assuredly exactly what you are doing.



1. Slut shaming. If the woman wants to have sex before getting married, who are you to say whether that's good or bad? Also, if she wants to have sex, but does not feel like she's ready for motherhood, who are you to say tough luck?

2. Mav dealt with those.

3. That you keep tossing out appeals to emotion as if you expect to convince us of anything. Really, it just makes your own position look worse and worse.


1.) "A last line of defense against getting pregnant"...wait...what? Did I miss something? Isn't the woman pregnant when she gets the abortion? Did I miss something?
A fetus is capable of feeling pain at 20 weeks. It's why all that legislation went through about it.
And I would call smashing a fetus's skull and sucking its brain out with a small vacuum pretty depraved...and then throwing babies' bodies in dumpsters behind abortion clinics also isn't a very pretty, humane idea, to say the least...

2.) "Unnecessarily complicated walking gestation pods"...
Man, I keep hearing that and all I can think is...Wow. I mean, what do I say to that? I don't think that at all. I mean, pregnancy on this thread is looked at as a disease. It's appalling.

3.) Okay. Point taken.

4.) "Who am I to say tough luck"...okay...I had a friend who got pregnant outside of marriage. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say she should have waited until marriage (would have been a much more ideal situation if she had the baby within the marriage, right? Not to mention the guy she was with wasn't a nice person.)
And if she doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't have sex. For the most part, when a girl has sex, there is a high chance she will get pregnant.
"With great power comes great responsibility," as an awesome comic book character's uncle once said. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say, "You might want to wait, because...you know...it's not the easiest thing raising a child as a teen mom."

5.) I like how people on here have been using 'us'. I mean, I dunno...it sounds like ganging-up. Not like I haven't had that happen before, but you know...just something I noticed. Huh.
I mean, as far as emotional appeals, the "quality of life" thing is a very emotional issue. Just sayin'.


It's not that pregnancy is seen as a disease.

It is that pregnancy carries risks associated to them.

Or would you actually suggest a woman who is epileptic and cannot be placed under inefficient, lower-toxicity drugs to preserve the child because of her stage of epilepsy to have a pregnancy at great risk of her life?

Also, nice move at proving to me you don't care about other people except your own little feelings on the matter. It is slut shaming to tell her that she should have waited until marriage to have sex. Why, if I'd have been a woman, and you friend, I'd have slapped you across the face for saying that.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Stormwind-City
Minister
 
Posts: 2481
Founded: Dec 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stormwind-City » Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:44 pm

Luminesa wrote:
Godular wrote:
1) https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=&oq=depravity+definition&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGNI_enUS558US558&q=depravity+definition&gs_l=hp...0l3j0i22i30l2.0.0.0.3526...........0.yLfALOArXUU The definition of depravity. In this case trying to equate a medical procedure used as the last line of defense against getting pregnant when undesired to a systematic program of mass torture and murder against born people who are capable of experiencing pain and suffering, and not understanding that its a terrible comparison from both a functional and emotional standpoint.

It has nothing to do with sanity. It has to do with what people such as yourself deem as 'permissible'.

2) Fetuses cannot feel pain and suffering. Seriously, we slapped you in the face over this before.

3) Didn't stop you from divulging your story with Cerebral Palsy, even though this thread is about abortion, not euthanasia (which I support, but hey, its the person's choice)

4) You may not discriminate against LGBT, its fundamentally irrelevant. The simple fact of the matter is yes, mine is closer than your comparison between Abortion and the Holocaust because you are supporting an anachronistic system that continues to believe in women as little more than unnecessarily complicated walking gestation pods. You can deny this all you like, but it is most assuredly exactly what you are doing.



1. Slut shaming. If the woman wants to have sex before getting married, who are you to say whether that's good or bad? Also, if she wants to have sex, but does not feel like she's ready for motherhood, who are you to say tough luck?

2. Mav dealt with those.

3. That you keep tossing out appeals to emotion as if you expect to convince us of anything. Really, it just makes your own position look worse and worse.


1.) "A last line of defense against getting pregnant"...wait...what? Did I miss something? Isn't the woman pregnant when she gets the abortion? Did I miss something?
A fetus is capable of feeling pain at 20 weeks. It's why all that legislation went through about it.
And I would call smashing a fetus's skull and sucking its brain out with a small vacuum pretty depraved...and then throwing babies' bodies in dumpsters behind abortion clinics also isn't a very pretty, humane idea, to say the least...

2.) "Unnecessarily complicated walking gestation pods"...
Man, I keep hearing that and all I can think is...Wow. I mean, what do I say to that? I don't think that at all. I mean, pregnancy on this thread is looked at as a disease. It's appalling.

3.) Okay. Point taken.

4.) "Who am I to say tough luck"...okay...I had a friend who got pregnant outside of marriage. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say she should have waited until marriage (would have been a much more ideal situation if she had the baby within the marriage, right? Not to mention the guy she was with wasn't a nice person.)
And if she doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't have sex. For the most part, when a girl has sex, there is a high chance she will get pregnant.
"With great power comes great responsibility," as an awesome comic book character's uncle once said. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say, "You might want to wait, because...you know...it's not the easiest thing raising a child as a teen mom."

5.) I like how people on here have been using 'us'. I mean, I dunno...it sounds like ganging-up. Not like I haven't had that happen before, but you know...just something I noticed. Huh.
I mean, as far as emotional appeals, the "quality of life" thing is a very emotional issue. Just sayin'.

4) Ehhh, no. Humans are very inefficient at that. And even when they do get pregnant, ~70% of pregnancies fail to implant or miscarriage without the woman noticing.
I am a woman.
Ambassador Alyssa Brightspark(Yes, a gnome)
Extra!Extra!: King dead at 89! Prince abdicates! Adopted Vanessa heir presumptive! (See FB)
Now Officially a funny poster:
If you have any questions/comments, or just need someone to talk to and a shoulder to cry on, TG me. I'll be happy to help.

User avatar
Soselo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1223
Founded: Jun 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Soselo » Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:48 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Luminesa wrote:
I have no idea what you mean to accomplish by that first part. Abortion is indeed the systematic torture and murder of individuals in cold blood. And nobody has yet to give me a legal definition of 'personhood'. I'm talking legal documents, stating, "Okay, this here is a person, this here is not."

I am not depraved, and if I was I would be in the loony house. Now, I might have a ragingly-insane imagination, but that is only due to me watching too many cartoons and reading lots of books.

Um, here's my problem with the second part:
1.) There's a thread for homosexuality, if you want to talk about that. I don't mind.
2.) I don't discriminate against LGBT couples and people. I have relatives and friends who are gay, and I love them regardless. My problem is when a person says, "Well, I don't agree with gay marriage", and they get called "hateful, intolerant, bigot, etc." by society at large. Meanwhile, you have people in Oklahoma doing Satanic rituals, desecrating the Catholic Church's most precious teaching (Holy Eucharist), and nobody calls that "hateful, intolerant, bigoted, etc." I find this double-standard appalling.

I wouldn't say you're close. Problem is, calling the Church "hateful" is one of the most used arguments I have seen, when browsing the Internet. If you want to talk about the Church, send me a telegram and we can get down to it. Bottom line: the abortion industry is involved in a new sort of holocaust on unborn children. I'm pretty darn close. :/


Okay, let me laugh at you for this:

:rofl:

Done. Now. Stop spreading misinformation and stupid relationships between the holocaust/genocide and abortion. It's not. You can't perform genocide upon cells that are not sentient. Or do we now perform genocide against cockroaches and they deserve our sympathy? Are we not to use rats in chemical research (and I have my issues with how they are being used, but this is not the thread for it).

Cockroaches are alive and they do deserve our sympathy. Must rats be killed during research? As to the ethics of abortion; both sides have legitimate values. I consider myself agnostic on the abortion topic. I will say cockroaches deserve our sympathy.
Things do not change; we change.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:49 pm

Soselo wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Okay, let me laugh at you for this:

:rofl:

Done. Now. Stop spreading misinformation and stupid relationships between the holocaust/genocide and abortion. It's not. You can't perform genocide upon cells that are not sentient. Or do we now perform genocide against cockroaches and they deserve our sympathy? Are we not to use rats in chemical research (and I have my issues with how they are being used, but this is not the thread for it).

Cockroaches are alive and they do deserve our sympathy. Must rats be killed during research? As to the ethics of abortion; both sides have legitimate values. I consider myself agnostic on the abortion topic. I will say cockroaches deserve our sympathy.


Well, yes, but if I call an exterminator to kill all the roaches in my house because they are a pest am I now engaging in genocide?
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
The United Colonies of Earth
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9727
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Colonies of Earth » Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:54 pm

Stormwind-City wrote:
Luminesa wrote:
1.) "A last line of defense against getting pregnant"...wait...what? Did I miss something? Isn't the woman pregnant when she gets the abortion? Did I miss something?
A fetus is capable of feeling pain at 20 weeks. It's why all that legislation went through about it.
And I would call smashing a fetus's skull and sucking its brain out with a small vacuum pretty depraved...and then throwing babies' bodies in dumpsters behind abortion clinics also isn't a very pretty, humane idea, to say the least...

2.) "Unnecessarily complicated walking gestation pods"...
Man, I keep hearing that and all I can think is...Wow. I mean, what do I say to that? I don't think that at all. I mean, pregnancy on this thread is looked at as a disease. It's appalling.

3.) Okay. Point taken.

4.) "Who am I to say tough luck"...okay...I had a friend who got pregnant outside of marriage. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say she should have waited until marriage (would have been a much more ideal situation if she had the baby within the marriage, right? Not to mention the guy she was with wasn't a nice person.)
And if she doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't have sex. For the most part, when a girl has sex, there is a high chance she will get pregnant.
"With great power comes great responsibility," as an awesome comic book character's uncle once said. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say, "You might want to wait, because...you know...it's not the easiest thing raising a child as a teen mom."

5.) I like how people on here have been using 'us'. I mean, I dunno...it sounds like ganging-up. Not like I haven't had that happen before, but you know...just something I noticed. Huh.
I mean, as far as emotional appeals, the "quality of life" thing is a very emotional issue. Just sayin'.

4) Ehhh, no. Humans are very inefficient at that. And even when they do get pregnant, ~70% of pregnancies fail to implant or miscarriage without the woman noticing.

The people here now are badasses in my opinion.
As for abortion, well, who am I to judge? Let the gravida decide.
The United Colonies of Earth exists:
to encourage settlement of all habitable worlds in the Galaxy and perhaps the Universe by the human race;
to ensure that human rights are respected, with force if necessary, and that all nations recognize the inevitable and unalienable rights of all human beings regardless of their individual and harmless differences, or Idiosyncrasies;
to represent the interests of all humankind to other sapient species;
to protect all humanity and its’ colonies from unneeded violence or danger;
to promote technological advancement and scientific achievement for the happiness, knowledge and welfare of all humans;
and to facilitate cooperation in the spheres of law, transportation, communication, and measurement between nation-states.

User avatar
Stormwind-City
Minister
 
Posts: 2481
Founded: Dec 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stormwind-City » Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:56 pm

The United Colonies of Earth wrote:
Stormwind-City wrote:4) Ehhh, no. Humans are very inefficient at that. And even when they do get pregnant, ~70% of pregnancies fail to implant or miscarriage without the woman noticing.

The people here now are badasses in my opinion.
As for abortion, well, who am I to judge? Let the gravida decide.

Thanks?
I am a woman.
Ambassador Alyssa Brightspark(Yes, a gnome)
Extra!Extra!: King dead at 89! Prince abdicates! Adopted Vanessa heir presumptive! (See FB)
Now Officially a funny poster:
If you have any questions/comments, or just need someone to talk to and a shoulder to cry on, TG me. I'll be happy to help.

User avatar
Soselo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1223
Founded: Jun 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Soselo » Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:57 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Soselo wrote:Cockroaches are alive and they do deserve our sympathy. Must rats be killed during research? As to the ethics of abortion; both sides have legitimate values. I consider myself agnostic on the abortion topic. I will say cockroaches deserve our sympathy.


Well, yes, but if I call an exterminator to kill all the roaches in my house because they are a pest am I now engaging in genocide?
Unfortunately, you are and you get away with it because they're smaller than you. There are more humane(ironic word choice) ways of handling infestation.
Last edited by Soselo on Wed Jan 07, 2015 11:24 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Things do not change; we change.

User avatar
Godular
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11902
Founded: Sep 09, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Godular » Wed Jan 07, 2015 11:22 pm

Luminesa wrote:
Godular wrote:
1) https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=&oq=depravity+definition&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGNI_enUS558US558&q=depravity+definition&gs_l=hp...0l3j0i22i30l2.0.0.0.3526...........0.yLfALOArXUU The definition of depravity. In this case trying to equate a medical procedure used as the last line of defense against getting pregnant when undesired to a systematic program of mass torture and murder against born people who are capable of experiencing pain and suffering, and not understanding that its a terrible comparison from both a functional and emotional standpoint.

It has nothing to do with sanity. It has to do with what people such as yourself deem as 'permissible'.

2) Fetuses cannot feel pain and suffering. Seriously, we slapped you in the face over this before.

3) Didn't stop you from divulging your story with Cerebral Palsy, even though this thread is about abortion, not euthanasia (which I support, but hey, its the person's choice)

4) You may not discriminate against LGBT, its fundamentally irrelevant. The simple fact of the matter is yes, mine is closer than your comparison between Abortion and the Holocaust because you are supporting an anachronistic system that continues to believe in women as little more than unnecessarily complicated walking gestation pods. You can deny this all you like, but it is most assuredly exactly what you are doing.



1. Slut shaming. If the woman wants to have sex before getting married, who are you to say whether that's good or bad? Also, if she wants to have sex, but does not feel like she's ready for motherhood, who are you to say tough luck?

2. Mav dealt with those.

3. That you keep tossing out appeals to emotion as if you expect to convince us of anything. Really, it just makes your own position look worse and worse.


1.) "A last line of defense against getting pregnant"...wait...what? Did I miss something? Isn't the woman pregnant when she gets the abortion? Did I miss something?
A fetus is capable of feeling pain at 20 weeks. It's why all that legislation went through about it.
And I would call smashing a fetus's skull and sucking its brain out with a small vacuum pretty depraved...and then throwing babies' bodies in dumpsters behind abortion clinics also isn't a very pretty, humane idea, to say the least...

2.) "Unnecessarily complicated walking gestation pods"...
Man, I keep hearing that and all I can think is...Wow. I mean, what do I say to that? I don't think that at all. I mean, pregnancy on this thread is looked at as a disease. It's appalling.

3.) Okay. Point taken.

4.) "Who am I to say tough luck"...okay...I had a friend who got pregnant outside of marriage. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say she should have waited until marriage (would have been a much more ideal situation if she had the baby within the marriage, right? Not to mention the guy she was with wasn't a nice person.)
And if she doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't have sex. For the most part, when a girl has sex, there is a high chance she will get pregnant.
"With great power comes great responsibility," as an awesome comic book character's uncle once said. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say, "You might want to wait, because...you know...it's not the easiest thing raising a child as a teen mom."

5.) I like how people on here have been using 'us'. I mean, I dunno...it sounds like ganging-up. Not like I haven't had that happen before, but you know...just something I noticed. Huh.
I mean, as far as emotional appeals, the "quality of life" thing is a very emotional issue. Just sayin'.


1. Well, obviously if contraceptives fail and she gets pregnant anyway, she shouldn't have to keep it because Damn that's one tenacious zygote... or 'Wow God REALLY wanted you preggers!'

Also, random synaptic patterns does not pain and suffering registry make. Seriously, you've been arguing against people with biology degrees and somehow you keep acting as if you know more on the subject.

2. Not a disease, but something that a woman shouldn't have to endure just because you have some righteousness complex.

4. News flash, not everybody shares your moral code. Also news flash, kids are impulsive. Abstinence only horseshit is worthless. Better to educate teens on how to avoid pregnancy if they choose to engage in such activities because somebody is damn well gonna. But you know, completely derailing your life to raise a kid when your not ready is totes the moral thing to do.
Last edited by Godular on Wed Jan 07, 2015 11:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RL position
Active RP: ASCENSION
Active RP: SHENRYAX
Dormant RP: Throne of the Fallen Empire

Faction 1: The An'Kazar Control Framework of Godular-- An enormously advanced collective of formerly human bioborgs that are vastly experienced in both inter-dimensional travel and asymmetrical warfare.
A 1.08 civilization, according to this Nation Index Thingie
A 0.076 (or 0.067) civilization, according to THIS Nation Index Thingie
I don't normally use NS stats. But when I do, I prefer Dos Eckis I can STILL kill you.
Post responsibly.

User avatar
Free Market Paradise
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 21
Founded: Oct 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Market Paradise » Wed Jan 07, 2015 11:29 pm

If you mean humane as in inflicting minimal pain then I think abortion is humane since that is about the least amount of pain a person can experience throughout their life.

Any other definition no.

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Wed Jan 07, 2015 11:58 pm

Luminesa wrote:
Godular wrote:
1) https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=&oq=depravity+definition&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGNI_enUS558US558&q=depravity+definition&gs_l=hp...0l3j0i22i30l2.0.0.0.3526...........0.yLfALOArXUU The definition of depravity. In this case trying to equate a medical procedure used as the last line of defense against getting pregnant when undesired to a systematic program of mass torture and murder against born people who are capable of experiencing pain and suffering, and not understanding that its a terrible comparison from both a functional and emotional standpoint.

It has nothing to do with sanity. It has to do with what people such as yourself deem as 'permissible'.

2) Fetuses cannot feel pain and suffering. Seriously, we slapped you in the face over this before.

3) Didn't stop you from divulging your story with Cerebral Palsy, even though this thread is about abortion, not euthanasia (which I support, but hey, its the person's choice)

4) You may not discriminate against LGBT, its fundamentally irrelevant. The simple fact of the matter is yes, mine is closer than your comparison between Abortion and the Holocaust because you are supporting an anachronistic system that continues to believe in women as little more than unnecessarily complicated walking gestation pods. You can deny this all you like, but it is most assuredly exactly what you are doing.



1. Slut shaming. If the woman wants to have sex before getting married, who are you to say whether that's good or bad? Also, if she wants to have sex, but does not feel like she's ready for motherhood, who are you to say tough luck?

2. Mav dealt with those.

3. That you keep tossing out appeals to emotion as if you expect to convince us of anything. Really, it just makes your own position look worse and worse.


1.) "A last line of defense against getting pregnant"...wait...what? Did I miss something? Isn't the woman pregnant when she gets the abortion? Did I miss something?
A fetus is capable of feeling pain at 20 weeks. It's why all that legislation went through about it.
And I would call smashing a fetus's skull and sucking its brain out with a small vacuum pretty depraved...and then throwing babies' bodies in dumpsters behind abortion clinics also isn't a very pretty, humane idea, to say the least...

2.) "Unnecessarily complicated walking gestation pods"...
Man, I keep hearing that and all I can think is...Wow. I mean, what do I say to that? I don't think that at all. I mean, pregnancy on this thread is looked at as a disease. It's appalling.

3.) Okay. Point taken.

4.) "Who am I to say tough luck"...okay...I had a friend who got pregnant outside of marriage. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say she should have waited until marriage (would have been a much more ideal situation if she had the baby within the marriage, right? Not to mention the guy she was with wasn't a nice person.)
And if she doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't have sex. For the most part, when a girl has sex, there is a high chance she will get pregnant.
"With great power comes great responsibility," as an awesome comic book character's uncle once said. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say, "You might want to wait, because...you know...it's not the easiest thing raising a child as a teen mom."

5.) I like how people on here have been using 'us'. I mean, I dunno...it sounds like ganging-up. Not like I haven't had that happen before, but you know...just something I noticed. Huh.
I mean, as far as emotional appeals, the "quality of life" thing is a very emotional issue. Just sayin'.

1. Let me explain you a thing. Fetuses do not Experience Pain at That time.

2. Pregnancy isn't a disease but you aren't allowed to force women into remaining pregnant and giving birth.

4. Here's a little hint. You are not allowed to tell her what to do with her body and it is not your place to tell her whether or not you think she made a mistake. Abstinence is great for those who want to do that. Abstinence isn't going to happen for most people, though. And that is fine. That is their body, you need to realize that Not Your Body = Not Your Choice. If you want to stop abortions, don't say "be abstinent!" because studies have proven that Abstinence education Does Not Work
So, by thinking "everyone should just be abstinent and receive abstinence education" you are supporting measures that make abortion and unplanned pregnancy more common especially in teens.

5. You are talking to more than one person, of course we are going to use "us." That's what the grammatically intent of the word is.
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:02 am

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
Luminesa wrote:
1.) "A last line of defense against getting pregnant"...wait...what? Did I miss something? Isn't the woman pregnant when she gets the abortion? Did I miss something?
A fetus is capable of feeling pain at 20 weeks. It's why all that legislation went through about it.
And I would call smashing a fetus's skull and sucking its brain out with a small vacuum pretty depraved...and then throwing babies' bodies in dumpsters behind abortion clinics also isn't a very pretty, humane idea, to say the least...

2.) "Unnecessarily complicated walking gestation pods"...
Man, I keep hearing that and all I can think is...Wow. I mean, what do I say to that? I don't think that at all. I mean, pregnancy on this thread is looked at as a disease. It's appalling.

3.) Okay. Point taken.

4.) "Who am I to say tough luck"...okay...I had a friend who got pregnant outside of marriage. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say she should have waited until marriage (would have been a much more ideal situation if she had the baby within the marriage, right? Not to mention the guy she was with wasn't a nice person.)
And if she doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't have sex. For the most part, when a girl has sex, there is a high chance she will get pregnant.
"With great power comes great responsibility," as an awesome comic book character's uncle once said. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say, "You might want to wait, because...you know...it's not the easiest thing raising a child as a teen mom."

5.) I like how people on here have been using 'us'. I mean, I dunno...it sounds like ganging-up. Not like I haven't had that happen before, but you know...just something I noticed. Huh.
I mean, as far as emotional appeals, the "quality of life" thing is a very emotional issue. Just sayin'.

1. Let me explain you a thing. Fetuses do not Experience Pain at That time.

2. Pregnancy isn't a disease but you aren't allowed to force women into remaining pregnant and giving birth.

4. Here's a little hint. You are not allowed to tell her what to do with her body and it is not your place to tell her whether or not you think she made a mistake. Abstinence is great for those who want to do that. Abstinence isn't going to happen for most people, though. And that is fine. That is their body, you need to realize that Not Your Body = Not Your Choice. If you want to stop abortions, don't say "be abstinent!" because studies have proven that Abstinence education Does Not Work
So, by thinking "everyone should just be abstinent and receive abstinence education" you are supporting measures that make abortion and unplanned pregnancy more common especially in teens.

5. You are talking to more than one person, of course we are going to use "us." That's what the grammatically intent of the word is.


I'm not sure if we should keep at this.

I mean I literally almost spill my dinner at her remark that abortion is like the Holocaust.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
The United Colonies of Earth
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9727
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Colonies of Earth » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:04 am

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
Luminesa wrote:
1.) "A last line of defense against getting pregnant"...wait...what? Did I miss something? Isn't the woman pregnant when she gets the abortion? Did I miss something?
A fetus is capable of feeling pain at 20 weeks. It's why all that legislation went through about it.
And I would call smashing a fetus's skull and sucking its brain out with a small vacuum pretty depraved...and then throwing babies' bodies in dumpsters behind abortion clinics also isn't a very pretty, humane idea, to say the least...

2.) "Unnecessarily complicated walking gestation pods"...
Man, I keep hearing that and all I can think is...Wow. I mean, what do I say to that? I don't think that at all. I mean, pregnancy on this thread is looked at as a disease. It's appalling.

3.) Okay. Point taken.

4.) "Who am I to say tough luck"...okay...I had a friend who got pregnant outside of marriage. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say she should have waited until marriage (would have been a much more ideal situation if she had the baby within the marriage, right? Not to mention the guy she was with wasn't a nice person.)
And if she doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't have sex. For the most part, when a girl has sex, there is a high chance she will get pregnant.
"With great power comes great responsibility," as an awesome comic book character's uncle once said. It is not 'slut-shaming' to say, "You might want to wait, because...you know...it's not the easiest thing raising a child as a teen mom."

5.) I like how people on here have been using 'us'. I mean, I dunno...it sounds like ganging-up. Not like I haven't had that happen before, but you know...just something I noticed. Huh.
I mean, as far as emotional appeals, the "quality of life" thing is a very emotional issue. Just sayin'.

1. Let me explain you a thing. Fetuses do not Experience Pain at That time.

2. Pregnancy isn't a disease but you aren't allowed to force women into remaining pregnant and giving birth.

4. Here's a little hint. You are not allowed to tell her what to do with her body and it is not your place to tell her whether or not you think she made a mistake. Abstinence is great for those who want to do that. Abstinence isn't going to happen for most people, though. And that is fine. That is their body, you need to realize that Not Your Body = Not Your Choice. If you want to stop abortions, don't say "be abstinent!" because studies have proven that Abstinence education Does Not Work
So, by thinking "everyone should just be abstinent and receive abstinence education" you are supporting measures that make abortion and unplanned pregnancy more common especially in teens.

5. You are talking to more than one person, of course we are going to use "us." That's what the grammatically intent of the word is.

5. They must think it's good to have more people by such backwards methods.
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:1. Let me explain you a thing. Fetuses do not Experience Pain at That time.

2. Pregnancy isn't a disease but you aren't allowed to force women into remaining pregnant and giving birth.

4. Here's a little hint. You are not allowed to tell her what to do with her body and it is not your place to tell her whether or not you think she made a mistake. Abstinence is great for those who want to do that. Abstinence isn't going to happen for most people, though. And that is fine. That is their body, you need to realize that Not Your Body = Not Your Choice. If you want to stop abortions, don't say "be abstinent!" because studies have proven that Abstinence education Does Not Work
So, by thinking "everyone should just be abstinent and receive abstinence education" you are supporting measures that make abortion and unplanned pregnancy more common especially in teens.

5. You are talking to more than one person, of course we are going to use "us." That's what the grammatically intent of the word is.


I'm not sure if we should keep at this.

I mean I literally almost spill my dinner at her remark that abortion is like the Holocaust.

Luminesa is female?
The United Colonies of Earth exists:
to encourage settlement of all habitable worlds in the Galaxy and perhaps the Universe by the human race;
to ensure that human rights are respected, with force if necessary, and that all nations recognize the inevitable and unalienable rights of all human beings regardless of their individual and harmless differences, or Idiosyncrasies;
to represent the interests of all humankind to other sapient species;
to protect all humanity and its’ colonies from unneeded violence or danger;
to promote technological advancement and scientific achievement for the happiness, knowledge and welfare of all humans;
and to facilitate cooperation in the spheres of law, transportation, communication, and measurement between nation-states.

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:06 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:1. Let me explain you a thing. Fetuses do not Experience Pain at That time.

2. Pregnancy isn't a disease but you aren't allowed to force women into remaining pregnant and giving birth.

4. Here's a little hint. You are not allowed to tell her what to do with her body and it is not your place to tell her whether or not you think she made a mistake. Abstinence is great for those who want to do that. Abstinence isn't going to happen for most people, though. And that is fine. That is their body, you need to realize that Not Your Body = Not Your Choice. If you want to stop abortions, don't say "be abstinent!" because studies have proven that Abstinence education Does Not Work
So, by thinking "everyone should just be abstinent and receive abstinence education" you are supporting measures that make abortion and unplanned pregnancy more common especially in teens.

5. You are talking to more than one person, of course we are going to use "us." That's what the grammatically intent of the word is.


I'm not sure if we should keep at this.

I mean I literally almost spill my dinner at her remark that abortion is like the Holocaust.

I love it when people equate the genocide of 6 million people + the associated systematic extermination of 20~ million to women choosing to not give birth against their will.
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:06 am

The United Colonies of Earth wrote:
Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:1. Let me explain you a thing. Fetuses do not Experience Pain at That time.

2. Pregnancy isn't a disease but you aren't allowed to force women into remaining pregnant and giving birth.

4. Here's a little hint. You are not allowed to tell her what to do with her body and it is not your place to tell her whether or not you think she made a mistake. Abstinence is great for those who want to do that. Abstinence isn't going to happen for most people, though. And that is fine. That is their body, you need to realize that Not Your Body = Not Your Choice. If you want to stop abortions, don't say "be abstinent!" because studies have proven that Abstinence education Does Not Work
So, by thinking "everyone should just be abstinent and receive abstinence education" you are supporting measures that make abortion and unplanned pregnancy more common especially in teens.

5. You are talking to more than one person, of course we are going to use "us." That's what the grammatically intent of the word is.

5. They must think it's good to have more people by such backwards methods.
Soldati senza confini wrote:
I'm not sure if we should keep at this.

I mean I literally almost spill my dinner at her remark that abortion is like the Holocaust.

Luminesa is female?


That's what she claimed in this very thread so that's how I treat her.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:11 am

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
I'm not sure if we should keep at this.

I mean I literally almost spill my dinner at her remark that abortion is like the Holocaust.

I love it when people equate the genocide of 6 million people + the associated systematic extermination of 20~ million to women choosing to not give birth against their will.


Not counting she also compares abortion doctors to Mengele.

The sheer historical ignorance, it hurts...
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
The United Colonies of Earth
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9727
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Colonies of Earth » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:11 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:5. They must think it's good to have more people by such backwards methods.

Luminesa is female?


That's what she claimed in this very thread so that's how I treat her.

Thanks for clearing that up.
On topic, she has a sadly twisted view of abortion. Sounds like "common sense" to me- and by that, I mean the common* impulsive human response to a situation when only basic information is presented.

*insofar as it is supposedly common
The United Colonies of Earth exists:
to encourage settlement of all habitable worlds in the Galaxy and perhaps the Universe by the human race;
to ensure that human rights are respected, with force if necessary, and that all nations recognize the inevitable and unalienable rights of all human beings regardless of their individual and harmless differences, or Idiosyncrasies;
to represent the interests of all humankind to other sapient species;
to protect all humanity and its’ colonies from unneeded violence or danger;
to promote technological advancement and scientific achievement for the happiness, knowledge and welfare of all humans;
and to facilitate cooperation in the spheres of law, transportation, communication, and measurement between nation-states.

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:12 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:I love it when people equate the genocide of 6 million people + the associated systematic extermination of 20~ million to women choosing to not give birth against their will.


Not counting she also compares abortion doctors to Mengele.

The sheer historical ignorance, it hurts...

The sheer ignorance in general...
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:13 am

The United Colonies of Earth wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
That's what she claimed in this very thread so that's how I treat her.

Thanks for clearing that up.
On topic, she has a sadly twisted view of abortion. Sounds like "common sense" to me- and by that, I mean the common* impulsive human response to a situation when only basic information is presented.

*insofar as it is supposedly common

honestly it's similar to a person rallying against vaccinations because "one time I got the flu shot and I got sick!"
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:17 am

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Thanks for clearing that up.
On topic, she has a sadly twisted view of abortion. Sounds like "common sense" to me- and by that, I mean the common* impulsive human response to a situation when only basic information is presented.

*insofar as it is supposedly common

honestly it's similar to a person rallying against vaccinations because "one time I got the flu shot and I got sick!"


Oh no, see, based on her logic abortion is icky to describe as well therefore it should be banned.

I wonder if she'd feel that way about placing a stent in a myocardial artery if I describe the procedure in all its glorious detail.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:20 am, edited 2 times in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
The United Colonies of Earth
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9727
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Colonies of Earth » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:26 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:honestly it's similar to a person rallying against vaccinations because "one time I got the flu shot and I got sick!"


Oh no, see, based on her logic abortion is icky to describe as well therefore it should be banned.

I wonder if she'd feel that way about placing a stent in a myocardial artery if I describe the procedure in all its glorious detail.

Gods no. Please don't tell me.
We might as well ban all surgeries, sex, living, existence based on ickiness.
The United Colonies of Earth exists:
to encourage settlement of all habitable worlds in the Galaxy and perhaps the Universe by the human race;
to ensure that human rights are respected, with force if necessary, and that all nations recognize the inevitable and unalienable rights of all human beings regardless of their individual and harmless differences, or Idiosyncrasies;
to represent the interests of all humankind to other sapient species;
to protect all humanity and its’ colonies from unneeded violence or danger;
to promote technological advancement and scientific achievement for the happiness, knowledge and welfare of all humans;
and to facilitate cooperation in the spheres of law, transportation, communication, and measurement between nation-states.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bawkie, Duvniask, Philjia, Picairn, Superpower Spain

Advertisement

Remove ads