NATION

PASSWORD

Boo To Age Restrictions

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Warkus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 778
Founded: Nov 21, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Boo To Age Restrictions

Postby Warkus » Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:32 am

People, i am 11 years old. And today i phoned St.Johns First Aid Course Centre in Whyalla(Australia) Guess what? You have to be 15 , which is a punch in the pants since i really interested in doing a first aid course. And personally someone who is 11 isn't a guaranteed intellcually insuperior to someone who is age 15. When i asked the reason for the restriction they claimed "Children under 15 should not be in control of someones life in a dangerous situation as they may not remember what to do or fall under the pressure" Pressure? Memory? Oh please i'm not exactly 2 here, it's not that hard to "handle the pressure" and remembering? Children have better memories than adults so i don't know what she was on about. Besides thats just my story, many children "under the right age" have been denied access to certain things, even though they are comeptant enough. Of course i understand about alcohol and ciggarettes and things like that.

But enough about me. Some age restrictions have either got to be lowered or abolished completly, it is tearing some possible important things from childrens lives. Back in the old day children hanged around their suburb with basically no restrictions to what they can do. Sure theirs some downs but theirs some ups too.
Host of the 11th International Basketball Championship

User avatar
Kobrania
Minister
 
Posts: 3446
Founded: May 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Kobrania » Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:36 am

The reason for lack of restrictions in the past was mainly because parents were a lot stricter...and the fact you couldn't be sued for every mishap.
"Only when you acknowledge that your country has done evil and ignore it will you be a patriot." -TJ.

ZIONISM = JUSTIFYING GENOCIDE WITH GOD.

Kobrania, the anti-KMA.

User avatar
Warkus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 778
Founded: Nov 21, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Warkus » Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:42 am

Kobrania wrote:The reason for lack of restrictions in the past was mainly because parents were a lot stricter...and the fact you couldn't be sued for every mishap.

Well, yes people can sue for basically anything now. But i don't mean something like this:

Example: Grizzly Bear Hunt! Any Age Allowed!

I mean:

Example: Basic Chemistry And Biology! Ages 8 And Up!

I don't mean getting rid of all age restrictions. Some restrictions are plain stupid and need to be lowered or abolished , while others make a point and should stay.
Host of the 11th International Basketball Championship

User avatar
Mean Feat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 962
Founded: Dec 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Mean Feat » Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:47 am

Warkus wrote:People, i am 11 years old. And today i phoned St.Johns First Aid Course Centre in Whyalla(Australia) Guess what? You have to be 15 , which is a punch in the pants since i really interested in doing a first aid course.


St. John's isn't the only organization which can legally certify people for first aid. You might not have any choice in Wyalla, but it might be worth your while to see if some other organization will certify you at your age.

Another possibility is that you might be able to get the training without the certification. So you'd be confident of your own ability to do the right thing (at least not put the person at further risk, as incompetent 'first aid' can do) ... that should be all you're after, right? You don't need the certification for some job you're applying for, or to give you legal cover if something goes wrong. You just want to be able to save a life, amiright?
— written by Mean Feat.

Mean Feat wrote:The Latham of the Liberals. Tony Abbott.

Tanya Plibersek Mon 22 Feb 2010 wrote:"Tony is the 'Mark Latham' of the Liberal Party.

She didn't get to explain why.

User avatar
Cennazluga
Diplomat
 
Posts: 825
Founded: Nov 18, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Cennazluga » Mon Jan 11, 2010 3:04 am

Mean Feat wrote:
Warkus wrote:People, i am 11 years old. And today i phoned St.Johns First Aid Course Centre in Whyalla(Australia) Guess what? You have to be 15 , which is a punch in the pants since i really interested in doing a first aid course.


St. John's isn't the only organization which can legally certify people for first aid. You might not have any choice in Wyalla, but it might be worth your while to see if some other organization will certify you at your age.

Yeah, do you have access to something like the Boy Scouts. IIRC, I was 11 when I did the First Aid merit badge course. And the next year, we completed the Emergency Preparedness badge, through which many boys became CPR certified.
beauty simplicity reason
Lenyo wrote:Cennazluga is God.
Economic Left/Right: -9.62 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.28
[ NSWiki | NSEconomy | SunsetEconomy ]

I love you New Sociopia.

User avatar
Allbeama
Senator
 
Posts: 4367
Founded: May 26, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Allbeama » Mon Jan 11, 2010 3:11 am

Ahem. "Insuperior" is not a word. The word you want is "inferior".
Agonarthis Terra, My Homeworld.
The Internet loves you. mah Factbook

Hope lies in the smouldering rubble of Empires.

User avatar
Daistallia 2104
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7848
Founded: Jan 14, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Daistallia 2104 » Mon Jan 11, 2010 3:52 am

Warkus wrote:People, i am 11 years old. And today i phoned St.Johns First Aid Course Centre in Whyalla(Australia) Guess what? You have to be 15 , which is a punch in the pants since i really interested in doing a first aid course. And personally someone who is 11 isn't a guaranteed intellcually insuperior to someone who is age 15. When i asked the reason for the restriction they claimed "Children under 15 should not be in control of someones life in a dangerous situation as they may not remember what to do or fall under the pressure" Pressure? Memory? Oh please i'm not exactly 2 here, it's not that hard to "handle the pressure" and remembering? Children have better memories than adults so i don't know what she was on about. Besides thats just my story, many children "under the right age" have been denied access to certain things, even though they are comeptant enough. Of course i understand about alcohol and ciggarettes and things like that.

But enough about me. Some age restrictions have either got to be lowered or abolished completly, it is tearing some possible important things from childrens lives. Back in the old day children hanged around their suburb with basically no restrictions to what they can do. Sure theirs some downs but theirs some ups too.


I think maybe you should worry less about what first aid courses you can take, and concentrate on your school work. You appear to be failing English class...
NSWiki|HP
Stupidity is like nuclear power; it can be used for good or evil, and you don't want to get any on you. - Scott Adams
Sometimes it's better to light a flamethrower than curse the darkness. - Terry Pratchett
Sometimes the smallest softest voice carries the grand biggest solutions
How our economy really works.
Obama is a conservative, not a liberal, and certainly not a socialist.

User avatar
Mean Feat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 962
Founded: Dec 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Mean Feat » Mon Jan 11, 2010 3:53 am

Allbeama wrote:Ahem. "Insuperior" is not a word. The word you want is "inferior".


Something can be insuperable without being insuperior ? Damn our language sucks.
— written by Mean Feat.

Mean Feat wrote:The Latham of the Liberals. Tony Abbott.

Tanya Plibersek Mon 22 Feb 2010 wrote:"Tony is the 'Mark Latham' of the Liberal Party.

She didn't get to explain why.

User avatar
Mean Feat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 962
Founded: Dec 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Mean Feat » Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:23 am

Cennazluga wrote:
Mean Feat wrote:
Warkus wrote:People, i am 11 years old. And today i phoned St.Johns First Aid Course Centre in Whyalla(Australia) Guess what? You have to be 15 , which is a punch in the pants since i really interested in doing a first aid course.


St. John's isn't the only organization which can legally certify people for first aid. You might not have any choice in Wyalla, but it might be worth your while to see if some other organization will certify you at your age.


Yeah, do you have access to something like the Boy Scouts. IIRC, I was 11 when I did the First Aid merit badge course. And the next year, we completed the Emergency Preparedness badge, through which many boys became CPR certified.


From the Scouts website, about an upcoming event:

The first Scouts in Action Week will focus on first aid, and if you’re looking for a way to incorporate first aid into your program, it doesn’t get much easier than this!

All Sections of Scouting (Joey Scouts to Rovers), including Leaders, will be able participate in a range of first aid programs that have been developed specifically for Scouting and which align with each Section’s Award Scheme. Groups will be encouraged to link with their local St John Ambulance Division who will assist by providing training, equipment, and even helping to set up mock emergencies to make the experience as realistic as possible. Groups might even like to invite St John Ambulance members along to a combined camp that has a first aid theme.


From St John's Ambulance (qld):

Scouts in Action Week – First Aid is a concept developed by John Parr, who has 35 years of Scouting experience in Victoria and Queensland. John approached Scouts Australia earlier this year (2009) after receiving funding from the Vodafone Australia Foundation’s World of Difference Program to dedicate a year of his life teaching 50,000 young Australians first aid skills through St John Ambulance Queensland. From that, the concept of a Scouts in Action Week was created.



It looks to me like the Scouts use St John's. For the certification anyway (the tests).
— written by Mean Feat.

Mean Feat wrote:The Latham of the Liberals. Tony Abbott.

Tanya Plibersek Mon 22 Feb 2010 wrote:"Tony is the 'Mark Latham' of the Liberal Party.

She didn't get to explain why.

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Tagmatium » Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:34 am

Mean Feat wrote:
Allbeama wrote:Ahem. "Insuperior" is not a word. The word you want is "inferior".


Something can be insuperable without being insuperior ? Damn our language sucks.

Probably because they come from different roots.
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
Mean Feat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 962
Founded: Dec 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Mean Feat » Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:40 am

From the St. John's website, conditions of participating in a Senior First Aid course:

Prerequisite
Participants must be 14 years or older. Participants under 14 years must provide written permission to attend the course from their parent or legal guardian.


(If the link doesn't work, go to it's parent page St John's Queensland and click on 'read more' under 'book a First Aid course').

The first and second sentences contradict each other. The rule could be read either way.

Therefore, it is worth calling another office (Towoomba or Gold Coast) and seeing if you get a different answer. Or call the State office.

If you really want to throw your weight around like an adult, apply in writing.
— written by Mean Feat.

Mean Feat wrote:The Latham of the Liberals. Tony Abbott.

Tanya Plibersek Mon 22 Feb 2010 wrote:"Tony is the 'Mark Latham' of the Liberal Party.

She didn't get to explain why.

User avatar
Mean Feat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 962
Founded: Dec 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Mean Feat » Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:42 am

Tagmatium wrote:
Mean Feat wrote:
Allbeama wrote:Ahem. "Insuperior" is not a word. The word you want is "inferior".


Something can be insuperable without being insuperior ? Damn our language sucks.

Probably because they come from different roots.


Oh come on. I don't get even a little laugh for that one ?
— written by Mean Feat.

Mean Feat wrote:The Latham of the Liberals. Tony Abbott.

Tanya Plibersek Mon 22 Feb 2010 wrote:"Tony is the 'Mark Latham' of the Liberal Party.

She didn't get to explain why.

User avatar
Quelesh
Minister
 
Posts: 2942
Founded: Jun 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Quelesh » Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:44 am

Warkus wrote:People, i am 11 years old. And today i phoned St.Johns First Aid Course Centre in Whyalla(Australia) Guess what? You have to be 15 , which is a punch in the pants since i really interested in doing a first aid course. And personally someone who is 11 isn't a guaranteed intellcually insuperior to someone who is age 15. When i asked the reason for the restriction they claimed "Children under 15 should not be in control of someones life in a dangerous situation as they may not remember what to do or fall under the pressure" Pressure? Memory? Oh please i'm not exactly 2 here, it's not that hard to "handle the pressure" and remembering? Children have better memories than adults so i don't know what she was on about. Besides thats just my story, many children "under the right age" have been denied access to certain things, even though they are comeptant enough. Of course i understand about alcohol and ciggarettes and things like that.

But enough about me. Some age restrictions have either got to be lowered or abolished completly, it is tearing some possible important things from childrens lives. Back in the old day children hanged around their suburb with basically no restrictions to what they can do. Sure theirs some downs but theirs some ups too.


I agree with you. Most age restrictions are completely arbitrary and counterproductive.
"I hate mankind, for I think myself one of the best of them, and I know how bad I am." - Samuel Johnson

"Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." - George Bernard Shaw
Political Compass | Economic Left/Right: -7.75 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -10.00

User avatar
Kingdom Brittania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 565
Founded: Jul 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Kingdom Brittania » Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:48 am

Warkus wrote:People, i am 11 years old. And today i phoned St.Johns First Aid Course Centre in Whyalla(Australia) Guess what? You have to be 15 , which is a punch in the pants since i really interested in doing a first aid course. And personally someone who is 11 isn't a guaranteed intellcually insuperior to someone who is age 15. When i asked the reason for the restriction they claimed "Children under 15 should not be in control of someones life in a dangerous situation as they may not remember what to do or fall under the pressure" Pressure? Memory? Oh please i'm not exactly 2 here, it's not that hard to "handle the pressure" and remembering? Children have better memories than adults so i don't know what she was on about. Besides thats just my story, many children "under the right age" have been denied access to certain things, even though they are comeptant enough. Of course i understand about alcohol and ciggarettes and things like that.

But enough about me. Some age restrictions have either got to be lowered or abolished completly, it is tearing some possible important things from childrens lives. Back in the old day children hanged around their suburb with basically no restrictions to what they can do. Sure theirs some downs but theirs some ups too.


You don't need to be sad. Inquire to your local boy scout's council and be one of us.

13 years old Boy Scout
Kingdom Brittania

Information:
Emperor - Emperor Michael VI the Great
Prince Heir - Prince Michael Andrew
Minister of the Empire - Minister Valdez Ramoz
Minister of War - Senior General Alvino Gureora
Minister of Finance - Minister Alvin Rattla
Minister of Environmental Protection - Minister Tranz Vaude
Minister of International Affairs - Minister Gold Brown
Minister of Arms Control - Minister Hanz Vekasw
Minister of Space Control - Minister William Solo

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Tagmatium » Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:52 am

Mean Feat wrote:
Tagmatium wrote:
Mean Feat wrote:
Allbeama wrote:Ahem. "Insuperior" is not a word. The word you want is "inferior".

Something can be insuperable without being insuperior ? Damn our language sucks.

Probably because they come from different roots.

Oh come on. I don't get even a little laugh for that one ?

The internet is serious business.

Plus, I didn't know you'd made one...
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
The Archiepelago
Diplomat
 
Posts: 590
Founded: Dec 16, 2009
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The Archiepelago » Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:54 am

Warkus wrote:People, i am 11 years old. And today i phoned St.Johns First Aid Course Centre in Whyalla(Australia) Guess what? You have to be 15 , which is a punch in the pants since i really interested in doing a first aid course. And personally someone who is 11 isn't a guaranteed intellcually insuperior to someone who is age 15. When i asked the reason for the restriction they claimed "Children under 15 should not be in control of someones life in a dangerous situation as they may not remember what to do or fall under the pressure" Pressure? Memory? Oh please i'm not exactly 2 here, it's not that hard to "handle the pressure" and remembering? Children have better memories than adults so i don't know what she was on about. Besides thats just my story, many children "under the right age" have been denied access to certain things, even though they are comeptant enough. Of course i understand about alcohol and ciggarettes and things like that.

But enough about me. Some age restrictions have either got to be lowered or abolished completly, it is tearing some possible important things from childrens lives. Back in the old day children hanged around their suburb with basically no restrictions to what they can do. Sure theirs some downs but theirs some ups too.


Well it always use to annoy me when i was your age. I'm 19 but look younger o I still have the people who do like free samples at stores ask where my mom is.I just show them the Class Ring and it works. Haha. But good luck to you in the future.
"Their betrayal will be dealt with. After you have killed all the Jedi in the temple, go to the Mustafar system, wipe out Viceroy Gunray and the other separatist leaders. Once more, the Sith will rule the Galaxy. And... we shall have... peace."
―Darth Sidious to Anakin Skywalker

User avatar
Lunatic Goofballs
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 23629
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Lunatic Goofballs » Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:58 am

In Connecticut, you have to be at least 16 to operate a motor vehicle(a multi-ton conglomeration of steel and glass) on public roads with thousands of other people in any weather at any time of day or night without restriction. However, you have to be 18 to operate a deli slicer because you might cut off your thumb.

:blink:
Life's Short. Munch Tacos.

“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!”
Hunter S. Thompson

User avatar
Tokos
Senator
 
Posts: 4870
Founded: Oct 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tokos » Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:58 am

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:In Connecticut, you have to be at least 16 to operate a motor vehicle(a multi-ton conglomeration of steel and glass) on public roads with thousands of other people in any weather at any time of day or night without restriction. However, you have to be 18 to operate a deli slicer because you might cut off your thumb.

:blink:


It's probably not the same people making each law.

If it is, then they are retarded, though.
The Confederal Fasces of Tokos

Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.05

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55276
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:17 am

Daistallia 2104 wrote:I think maybe you should worry less about what first aid courses you can take, and concentrate on your school work. You appear to be failing English class...


Absolutely so.
Which, I'm afraid, would prevent the OP from learning from manuals and books about the proper procedures, or writing a proper report.
.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:20 am

Warkus wrote:People, i am 11 years old. And today i phoned St.Johns First Aid Course Centre in Whyalla(Australia) Guess what? You have to be 15 , which is a punch in the pants since i really interested in doing a first aid course. And personally someone who is 11 isn't a guaranteed intellcually insuperior to someone who is age 15. When i asked the reason for the restriction they claimed "Children under 15 should not be in control of someones life in a dangerous situation as they may not remember what to do or fall under the pressure" Pressure? Memory? Oh please i'm not exactly 2 here, it's not that hard to "handle the pressure" and remembering? Children have better memories than adults so i don't know what she was on about. Besides thats just my story, many children "under the right age" have been denied access to certain things, even though they are comeptant enough. Of course i understand about alcohol and ciggarettes and things like that.

But enough about me. Some age restrictions have either got to be lowered or abolished completly, it is tearing some possible important things from childrens lives. Back in the old day children hanged around their suburb with basically no restrictions to what they can do. Sure theirs some downs but theirs some ups too.

I was certified in first aid through the boy scouts when I was 8.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55276
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:24 am

greed and death wrote:I was certified in first aid through the boy scouts when I was 8.


I'm afraid that the OPer is looking for an higher degree of certification.
Last edited by Risottia on Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
.

User avatar
Reimu
Secretary
 
Posts: 40
Founded: Jan 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Reimu » Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:29 am

I daresay someone in danger would feel a lot better with an adult applying the first aid than a child. Face it, age barriers exist for a reason.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:30 am

Risottia wrote:
greed and death wrote:I was certified in first aid through the boy scouts when I was 8.


I'm afraid that the OPer is looking for an higher degree of certification.

No it was about as high of a certification as you can get without getting an emergency medical Tech certification.
And I am actually licensed to certify people now.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163951
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:43 am

Warkus wrote:Pressure? Memory? Oh please i'm not exactly 2 here, it's not that hard to "handle the pressure" and remembering?

How would you know how easy it is to handle the pressure? I'm not trying to be a dick, but if you haven't experienced it then you can't know how easy it would be.


Kobrania wrote:The reason for lack of restrictions in the past was mainly because parents were a lot stricter...and the fact you couldn't be sued for every mishap.

Ignorance too. Child molesters didn't just appear in the last 10-15 years, they've been around forever. But people didn't have access to 24/7 news so they didn't hear about it until it happened locally. And then they figured it for a one in a million thing. After all, they'd never heard of it happening before. Today you'd be hard pressed to find a parent who'd happily leave their child alone with a priest they don't know personally.


Warkus wrote:I mean:

Example: Basic Chemistry And Biology! Ages 8 And Up!

That's a suggestion, not a restriction.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:In Connecticut, you have to be at least 16 to operate a motor vehicle(a multi-ton conglomeration of steel and glass) on public roads with thousands of other people in any weather at any time of day or night without restriction. However, you have to be 18 to operate a deli slicer because you might cut off your thumb.

:blink:

A metal box on wheels powered by explosions is obviously far safer than a deli slicer.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Celtica and Neotopia
Attaché
 
Posts: 81
Founded: Oct 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Celtica and Neotopia » Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:19 am

Ifreann wrote:Today you'd be hard pressed to find a parent who'd happily leave their child alone with a priest they don't know personally.


That's not necessarily a good thing, of course.

But on topic, the reason given doesn't seem very sensible. You don't get put "in control of someone's life" because you know first aid. If someone near you has a heart attack, is choking, breaks a bone, etc. then you're forced into the situation. Knowing first aid tends to be a very big help in those cases.

Some age limits are for convenience. There's certainly people under 16 who could be very responsible about driving cars, but testing would be quite a massive and costly operation so its much easier to just draw the line somewhere.

In this case, this doesn't apply. As I said, the reason they gave you isn't a good one. If it's about competence, it should become fairly obvious if you're not competent to learn first aid within the first few classes, regardless of age.

Movie ratings are similar. While their intent is good, problems arise when they're no longer taken as mere advice. A lot of media is rated a classification higher than it should be in my opinion, but regardless of that it's simply terrible when parents hang to ratings as the gospel (not taking their child's actual maturity into account, merely clinging onto their statistic of days alive) or worse, when it's written into law. When it comes to ratings, Australia's a whole 'nother world anyway.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerespasia, Dazchan, Emotional Support Crocodile, Umeria

Advertisement

Remove ads