NATION

PASSWORD

No Indictment for Eric Garner's Killer

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should there have been a trial?

Yes
168
86%
No
27
14%
 
Total votes : 195

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Thu Dec 04, 2014 5:29 pm

The United States of North Amerigo wrote:
Sevvania wrote:What if you've been harassed by the police time and time again? Do you still go with them even if you haven't commited a crime? What about "innocent until proven guilty"?

Non-compliance should not be synonymous with a license to kill.

Dude, he was selling cigars illegally. If the police catch you doing such things and they tell you to come with them THEN YOU COME WITH THEM! The police have a right to accuse you, and they can't detain you until they have certain evidence that allow them to.

No, he was suspected of having done so. Either way, passive non-compliance does not warrant the methods used by the officers.

User avatar
Islamic State of UKIP
Envoy
 
Posts: 241
Founded: Nov 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Islamic State of UKIP » Thu Dec 04, 2014 5:30 pm

Despicable. What's next, police don't need to obey traffic laws? Oh wait. It's not quite there yet, but violence against police is almost justifiable at this point. A 7 year old near Detroit was recently shot for no reason as well. America, put your police in their place. They are public servants, not the other way around

User avatar
Insaeldor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5373
Founded: Aug 26, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Insaeldor » Thu Dec 04, 2014 5:34 pm

Merizoc wrote:
The United States of North Amerigo wrote:Dude, he was selling cigars illegally. If the police catch you doing such things and they tell you to come with them THEN YOU COME WITH THEM! The police have a right to accuse you, and they can't detain you until they have certain evidence that allow them to.

No, he was suspected of having done so. Either way, passive non-compliance does not warrant the methods used by the officers.

Even then it's only worth a ticket, barely worse then a speeding ticket.
Time is a prismatic uniform polyhedron

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Dec 04, 2014 5:39 pm

When Dawon Gore gets convicted and fired, I get the feeling there's going to be bunch of Louis Heads screaming "BURN THIS BITCH DOWN" all across the country.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
New Oyashima
Minister
 
Posts: 2267
Founded: Oct 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Oyashima » Thu Dec 04, 2014 6:26 pm

The United States of North Amerigo wrote:
Scomagia wrote:They deliberately performed a potentially lethal maneuver that they have been instructed not to use for almost twenty years.

Headlock, not chokehold.

Look familiar?

User avatar
New Oyashima
Minister
 
Posts: 2267
Founded: Oct 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Oyashima » Thu Dec 04, 2014 6:30 pm

-The West Coast- wrote:
Scomagia wrote:You'd only think that if you had no understanding how the human body works.

Well, I was in several choke holds and tackled many times for 3 months in Army basic training, and I could breathe every time, so I don't see your point?

What you sound like.

User avatar
Islamic State of UKIP
Envoy
 
Posts: 241
Founded: Nov 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Islamic State of UKIP » Thu Dec 04, 2014 6:56 pm

Kistan wrote:Source is Al-Jazeera.

....

[/ignore]


Because ignoring a credible source is so edgy and cool...

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Dec 04, 2014 6:58 pm

Islamic State of UKIP wrote:
Kistan wrote:Source is Al-Jazeera.

....

[/ignore]


Because ignoring a credible source is so edgy and cool...


It's what happens when your eyes see "Al-Jazeera" and your brain registers "Al-Qaeda News Network".
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Thu Dec 04, 2014 6:59 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Islamic State of UKIP wrote:
Because ignoring a credible source is so edgy and cool...


It's what happens when your eyes see "Al-Jazeera" and your brain registers "Al-Qaeda News Network".

Honestly surprised that Murky didn't say anything about it.

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:08 pm

-The West Coast- wrote:
Occupied Deutschland wrote:And Garner was sure violent.
After all, those cigarettes he was (allegedly, I'm actually unclear on the veracity of this claim) selling may have indirectly contributed to the people who were buying them getting cancer in 30+ years, right?

He resisted arrest and assaulted police officers.

Pretty much the definition of violent. Assaulting an officer of the peace is DEFINITELY a violent act.

:palm:
He did not resist arrest, and he certainly did not assault any officer. Have you seen the fucking video?
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Prezelly
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1101
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Prezelly » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:10 pm

I'm on the fence on this. He did resist arrest in a way, so the police had the right to detain him, but not to the point where he dies. So I am unsure
All opinions are accepted as long as they are the right one
Political Compass
Economic Right: 2.0
Social Authoritarian: 0.7

ISTP personality type

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:11 pm

-The West Coast- wrote:
Basseemia wrote:How did he assault the officer?

The only reason a Police officer resorts to restraining a suspect is when violence erupts. There would be no reason for a cop or cops to assault and kill him accidentally while arresting him if he was surrendering peacefully.

Are you stupid, or pretending to be?
Image
This kid violently attacked.... his fucking crib?
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:16 pm

-The West Coast- wrote:
Basseemia wrote:Okay then how did he die if he was able to breathe?

Well, he died of a heart attack in an ambulance.

Stop fucking lying.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:22 pm

The United States of North Amerigo wrote:He decided to sell "loosies" and none of this would have happened if he just complied and went with the police, but he decided not to. Was it wrong to put him in a chokehold? Probably, but he had asthma and he was obese, and black persons take in less air than white people (Yes it's actually true). So he might have survived in other circumstances. Should Eric Garner's Killer be arrested? No, to murder someone would mean to kill another individual human being on purpose.

Maybe if New York City and New York State hadn't decided to tax the shit out cigarettes, people would not be forced to buy, or sell loosies.

The taxes in New York State alone (ignoring NYC taxes, federal taxes, the actual cost and profits for the manufacturer, wholesaler, deliverers, retailers, and the sky high sales tax) are higher than the entire cost in other states.

When you tax something at extremely high rates, you get a black market for it.

And fuck you, if you think selling loose, untaxed cigarettes is a crime worthy of an arrest.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Prezelly
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1101
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Prezelly » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:24 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
The United States of North Amerigo wrote:He decided to sell "loosies" and none of this would have happened if he just complied and went with the police, but he decided not to. Was it wrong to put him in a chokehold? Probably, but he had asthma and he was obese, and black persons take in less air than white people (Yes it's actually true). So he might have survived in other circumstances. Should Eric Garner's Killer be arrested? No, to murder someone would mean to kill another individual human being on purpose.

Maybe if New York City and New York State hadn't decided to tax the shit out cigarettes, people would not be forced to buy, or sell loosies.

The taxes in New York State alone (ignoring NYC taxes, federal taxes, the actual cost and profits for the manufacturer, wholesaler, deliverers, retailers, and the sky high sales tax) are higher than the entire cost in other states.

When you tax something at extremely high rates, you get a black market for it.

And fuck you, if you think selling loose, untaxed cigarettes is a crime worthy of an arrest.

Well if it is illegal, then yes it is worthy of arrest. That is the point
All opinions are accepted as long as they are the right one
Political Compass
Economic Right: 2.0
Social Authoritarian: 0.7

ISTP personality type

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:24 pm

Prezelly wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Maybe if New York City and New York State hadn't decided to tax the shit out cigarettes, people would not be forced to buy, or sell loosies.

The taxes in New York State alone (ignoring NYC taxes, federal taxes, the actual cost and profits for the manufacturer, wholesaler, deliverers, retailers, and the sky high sales tax) are higher than the entire cost in other states.

When you tax something at extremely high rates, you get a black market for it.

And fuck you, if you think selling loose, untaxed cigarettes is a crime worthy of an arrest.

Well if it is illegal, then yes it is worthy of arrest. That is the point


No, it's worthy of a ticket. Not arrest.

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11858
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Liberated Territories » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:25 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:
It was supposed to operate to provide justice, not murder.

It's a government system designed to protect the government. It operated effectively.


Similar to:

The people are supposed to protect the people.

It obviously isn't working.
"Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig."
—Robert Heinlein

a libertarian, which means i want poor babies to die or smth

User avatar
Prezelly
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1101
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Prezelly » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:26 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Prezelly wrote:Well if it is illegal, then yes it is worthy of arrest. That is the point


No, it's worthy of a ticket. Not arrest.

I should probably look into the actual process. I made the assumption that it was arrest worthy, I am not quite sure
All opinions are accepted as long as they are the right one
Political Compass
Economic Right: 2.0
Social Authoritarian: 0.7

ISTP personality type

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:26 pm

Prezelly wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Maybe if New York City and New York State hadn't decided to tax the shit out cigarettes, people would not be forced to buy, or sell loosies.

The taxes in New York State alone (ignoring NYC taxes, federal taxes, the actual cost and profits for the manufacturer, wholesaler, deliverers, retailers, and the sky high sales tax) are higher than the entire cost in other states.

When you tax something at extremely high rates, you get a black market for it.

And fuck you, if you think selling loose, untaxed cigarettes is a crime worthy of an arrest.

Well if it is illegal, then yes it is worthy of arrest. That is the point

Is jaywalking worthy of arrest? What about speeding? Illegal parking?

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:26 pm

Ukrainian Cossacks wrote:There was not enough evidence to prove he did anything to kill him on purpose. That is the purpose of a grand jury. And when you insult the case, you don't only insult the officer but the jury, who were citizens just like you and me. Why is it when a black guy kills a black guy, no one says anything. A black guy kills a white guy, makes it into local news. But when a white police officer kills a black man, THE WHOLE NATION GO NUTS! You don't realize that all you peace out against racism, while you are all being racist by jumping to the conclusion that the white man was racist and guilty. Which is not only illogical but racist. I just hope the protest would be peaceful.

This was, at the very least, negligent homicide.

Black men are four times as likely to be killed by the police, as men of other races. If you don't think that's a pattern or a problem, you're an idiot.

And plenty of black people protest black on black crime. Your comment, is ignorant.

http://www.theatlantic.com/national/arc ... ce/255329/

http://www.theatlantic.com/national/arc ... me/378629/
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Prezelly
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1101
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Prezelly » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:27 pm

Merizoc wrote:
Prezelly wrote:Well if it is illegal, then yes it is worthy of arrest. That is the point

Is jaywalking worthy of arrest? What about speeding? Illegal parking?

They can be in some circumstances
All opinions are accepted as long as they are the right one
Political Compass
Economic Right: 2.0
Social Authoritarian: 0.7

ISTP personality type

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:29 pm

The United States of North Amerigo wrote:
Sevvania wrote:What if you've been harassed by the police time and time again? Do you still go with them even if you haven't commited a crime? What about "innocent until proven guilty"?

Non-compliance should not be synonymous with a license to kill.

Dude, he was selling cigars illegally. If the police catch you doing such things and they tell you to come with them THEN YOU COME WITH THEM! The police have a right to accuse you, and they can't detain you until they have certain evidence that allow them to.

Oh no! Selling cigars? Certainly worthy of the death penalty.

He was selling cigarettes. Allegedly. No evidence has been presented to support the claim.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:32 pm

Prezelly wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Maybe if New York City and New York State hadn't decided to tax the shit out cigarettes, people would not be forced to buy, or sell loosies.

The taxes in New York State alone (ignoring NYC taxes, federal taxes, the actual cost and profits for the manufacturer, wholesaler, deliverers, retailers, and the sky high sales tax) are higher than the entire cost in other states.

When you tax something at extremely high rates, you get a black market for it.

And fuck you, if you think selling loose, untaxed cigarettes is a crime worthy of an arrest.

Well if it is illegal, then yes it is worthy of arrest. That is the point

No, it's not. Using your logic, people would be arrested for parking in a no parking zone, jaywalking, speeding by a few miles an hour, paying tickets late and host of other "crimes."
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:33 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:It's a government system designed to protect the government. It operated effectively.


Similar to:

The people are supposed to protect the people.

It obviously isn't working.

It's working exactly as designed.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Prezelly
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1101
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Prezelly » Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:33 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Prezelly wrote:Well if it is illegal, then yes it is worthy of arrest. That is the point

No, it's not. Using your logic, people would be arrested for parking in a no parking zone, jaywalking, speeding by a few miles an hour, paying tickets late and host of other "crimes."

And people can be, under certain circumstances
All opinions are accepted as long as they are the right one
Political Compass
Economic Right: 2.0
Social Authoritarian: 0.7

ISTP personality type

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Elejamie, Ethel mermania, Gallade, Google [Bot], Hidrandia, Ifreann, Independent Galactic States, The Huskar Social Union, The Republic of Western Sol, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads