NATION

PASSWORD

Louisiana Democrat: "One more time's not going to hurt"

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Ieperithem
Diplomat
 
Posts: 573
Founded: Feb 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Louisiana Democrat: "One more time's not going to hurt"

Postby Ieperithem » Tue Dec 02, 2014 3:54 pm

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/39 ... -john-fund

How desperate are Louisiana Democrats to save the Senate seat of incumbent Mary Landrieu in Saturday’s runoff? Desperate enough to publicly call on crowds to commit voter fraud.

Don Cravins Sr., a former state senator who is now mayor of Opelousas, was caught on videotape last month just before the first round of voting in the Senate race: “If you early-voted, go vote again tomorrow. One more time’s not going to hurt.” Just in case anyone doubted that Cravins was serious, he told the crowd they had an insurance policy — the local prosecutor would look the other way: “Tomorrow we’re gonna elect Earl Taylor as the D.A. so he won’t prosecute you if you vote twice.” The crowd on the tape laughs uproariously at Cravins’s remarks and then bursts into wild cheering.

But the Cravins family isn’t stopping at urging voter fraud to get out the vote. Don Cravins Jr., the mayor’s son and current chief-of-staff to Senator Landrieu, can be seen on a separate videotape telling a crowd: “I’m asking you tomorrow to go out and vote for Senator Landrieu. She will go on to support Barack Obama 97 percent of the time!”

As David Weigel of Bloomberg notes, the reference is to Republican attack ads that slam Landrieu for marching in lockstep with Obama. She responded by telling Louisiana voters that she was independent and had often bucked the Obama White House. Now her chief of staff is claiming that she and Obama are joined at the hip. As Weigel sardonically notes: “Whatever works.” Except in this case, neither voter fraud nor political manipulation are likely to save Mary Landrieu. She trails in the latest polls by double digits.


I, for one, believe it is despicable that the left continues to suppress attempts to inform the public about criminal voting, and uses its activist judges and the Justice Department to restrict states and communities from even trying to preserve the legitimacy of their elections. Despite the numerous cases of voter fraud, the left continues to claim that asking people to prove their citizenship in order to vote is somehow unfair to the poor, despite the fact that India, a democracy vastly poorer than the United States of America, has a far stricter system in place.

I must wonder why the Democrats so fear an informed and legitimate electorate, throwing every buzzword, attack, and claim of racism that they can at any measure that might ensure that only Americans can vote in American elections.

Additional information on voter fraud and the delegitimization of the electoral process:

http://www.cato.org/publications/congre ... oter-fraud
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/3 ... -john-fund
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... ter-fraud/
http://dailycaller.com/2011/07/29/missi ... ter-fraud/
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/jamie- ... her-shame/
Political Spectrum Test
Economic Right: 69.8%
Social Libertarian: 29.3%
Foreign Policy Neoconservative: 36.0%
Cultural conservative: 22.6%
"There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all."
-Theodore Roosevelt

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue Dec 02, 2014 3:56 pm

Ieperithem wrote:...
Just in case anyone doubted that Cravins was serious, he told the crowd they had an insurance policy — the local prosecutor would look the other way: “Tomorrow we’re gonna elect Earl Taylor as the D.A. so he won’t prosecute you if you vote twice.” The crowd on the tape laughs uproariously at Cravins’s remarks ...


Yeah, everyone bursting into laughter => totally serious.
.

User avatar
Kingdom of Viana
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 170
Founded: Oct 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Kingdom of Viana » Tue Dec 02, 2014 3:56 pm

Mary Landrieu is a lost cause. Being down double digits in opinion polls, I don't think she can do anything to win. Plus, even the democrats are abandoning her, it's not worth all the money.
For - Pro-Life, Christianity, Israel, Conservatism, Capitalism, Traditional Family Values.
Against - LGBTQ, Feminism, Liberalism, Sociallism, Abortion.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Tue Dec 02, 2014 3:59 pm

Forget about Landrieu. Spending money on blue dogs like her is a waste that'll only hurt the country. She's caused too much shit over the Keystone pipeline for me to have any sympathy for her.

User avatar
Ieperithem
Diplomat
 
Posts: 573
Founded: Feb 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ieperithem » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:01 pm

Risottia wrote:
Ieperithem wrote:...
Just in case anyone doubted that Cravins was serious, he told the crowd they had an insurance policy — the local prosecutor would look the other way: “Tomorrow we’re gonna elect Earl Taylor as the D.A. so he won’t prosecute you if you vote twice.” The crowd on the tape laughs uproariously at Cravins’s remarks ...


Yeah, everyone bursting into laughter => totally serious.


Read the other sources.
Political Spectrum Test
Economic Right: 69.8%
Social Libertarian: 29.3%
Foreign Policy Neoconservative: 36.0%
Cultural conservative: 22.6%
"There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all."
-Theodore Roosevelt

User avatar
Burleson
Diplomat
 
Posts: 963
Founded: Aug 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Burleson » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:05 pm

Does anyone still wonder why Democrats oppose voter ID laws? :lol:
[b]OOC
God Bless America
NSG's resident homophobic, islamophobic, transphobic, redneck
99% - Republican Party
97% - Conservative Party
92% - Constitution Party
62% - Libertarian Party
4% - Democratic Party
1% - Green Party
1% - Socialist Party
http://www.isidewith.com

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:08 pm

I'm pretty sure this is a joke. i.e. humor
Last edited by Atlanticatia on Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Tyrinth
Diplomat
 
Posts: 706
Founded: Apr 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyrinth » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:19 pm

This kind of thing goes far beyond voter fraud, in my opinion, and is a symptom of a greater problem which infects the government as a whole.

Frankly, whether or not this was a "joke", it's disgusting.
さあ、一緒に狂いましょう。
Ardoki wrote:Hitler was basically a libertarian, he supported the libertarian ideology of social Darwinism.

User avatar
Text People
Diplomat
 
Posts: 610
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Text People » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:21 pm

The U.S. is becoming a banana republic.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54796
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:21 pm

Risottia wrote:
Ieperithem wrote:...
Just in case anyone doubted that Cravins was serious, he told the crowd they had an insurance policy — the local prosecutor would look the other way: “Tomorrow we’re gonna elect Earl Taylor as the D.A. so he won’t prosecute you if you vote twice.” The crowd on the tape laughs uproariously at Cravins’s remarks ...


Yeah, everyone bursting into laughter => totally serious.


^ Pretty much this.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:22 pm

Ieperithem wrote:I, for one, believe it is despicable that the left continues to suppress attempts to inform the public about criminal voting, and uses its activist judges ...


Aw, it was all going so well. Why'd you have to go and ruin it?
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:23 pm

Burleson wrote:Does anyone still wonder why Democrats oppose voter ID laws? :lol:

Of course not. It's because the laws are racist. I would have thought that to be very clear.

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:25 pm

I lived in Chicago from 1969 to 1972 (and again later, in another neighborhood). This was the era of Mayor Daley, and our apartment building was owned by the local alderman. He coerced us into marching to the polls in a line, with himself at the head of the parade, waving his furled umbrella. He shouted: "Vote early! Vote often!"

It was amusing. And what Daley claimed was actually true: the city worked. The trash got picked up; the transit system ran on schedule.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:26 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Ieperithem wrote:I, for one, believe it is despicable that the left continues to suppress attempts to inform the public about criminal voting, and uses its activist judges ...

Aw, it was all going so well. Why'd you have to go and ruin it?

Contractual obligations, of course.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
Avenio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11113
Founded: Feb 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Avenio » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:34 pm

Y'know, I can't help but wonder if many of the Usual Suspects here would be crying 'manufactured outrage!' or 'political correctness gone mad!' if one of their own candidates made a similar joke.

User avatar
Rhodisia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 451
Founded: Sep 27, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodisia » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:47 pm

It's no surprise that the liberal factions in our country (aka the Democrats) have had to use fraudulent tactics to get their wholly unpopular opinions across, and the candidates selected by their political machinery elected.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro: Sortition, gold standard, small and efficient government, concise laws, community policing, responsible private gun ownership, school choice, absolutely free market, low taxes, net neutrality, press freedom, etc

Against: Dynasties, fiat currency, excessive bureaucracy, verbose laws, police militarization, gun control, state-only education, crony capitalism, high taxes, net non-neutrality, censorship, empire, etc
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:52 pm

Taking one person's remarks(which was likely a joke) and generalizing them to the entirety of Democrats? Sounds like partisan hackery to me.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:52 pm

Rhodisia wrote:It's no surprise that the liberal factions in our country (aka the Democrats) have had to use fraudulent tactics to get their wholly unpopular opinions across, and the candidates selected by their political machinery elected.


Meanwhile the GOP use electronic voting to flip the vote, so that a district with 60% Dem registration in Ohio got credited for a 60% GOP vote. The machines were made by Diebold, who employed felons to "maintain" them; Diebold said he would do anything possible to get the GOP into office.

Or they call up Dem voters and tell them that there are new times and places for voting; this happened in NC and FL.

Or they arrest station wagons full of blacks trying to get to the polls, claiming that the driver is an unlicensed taxicab; FL again.

Oh yeah, the GOP have the monopoly on electoral virtue.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Tue Dec 02, 2014 4:52 pm

Rhodisia wrote:It's no surprise that the liberal factions in our country (aka the Democrats) have had to use fraudulent tactics to get their wholly unpopular opinions across, and the candidates selected by their political machinery elected.

Stop lying.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Tue Dec 02, 2014 6:03 pm

She didn't have a chance of winning in the first place. She should've called Olivia Pope.

User avatar
Myrensis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5898
Founded: Oct 05, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Myrensis » Tue Dec 02, 2014 6:06 pm

Burleson wrote:Does anyone still wonder why Democrats oppose voter ID laws? :lol:


Because they're a bad joke designed to suppress voter turnout to favor Republicans?

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Tue Dec 02, 2014 6:08 pm

Othelos wrote:She didn't have a chance of winning in the first place. She should've called Olivia Pope.


I wonder if there's an IRL Olivia Pope.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Tue Dec 02, 2014 6:09 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:
Othelos wrote:She didn't have a chance of winning in the first place. She should've called Olivia Pope.


I wonder if there's an IRL Olivia Pope.

There are real crisis managers, but I don't think things always work out in favor for them.

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Tue Dec 02, 2014 6:10 pm

Myrensis wrote:
Burleson wrote:Does anyone still wonder why Democrats oppose voter ID laws? :lol:


Because they're a bad joke designed to suppress voter turnout to favor Republicans?

Nah, ID's aren't hard to obtain. You have to have ID to register to vote, anyway.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Tue Dec 02, 2014 6:13 pm

Politicians often joke about double voting, this seems to be a similar case.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hidrandia, Ineva, Jerzylvania, Likhinia, Philjia, The Vooperian Union, Trollgaard, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads