Why do people hate republicans?

[Skinia]

All of which actually aren't.

Don't lie.

Finns Party: "The party combines left-wing economic policies with conservative social values, socio-cultural authoritarianism, and ethnic nationalism. Several researchers have described the party as fiscally centre-left, socially conservative, a "centre-based populist party" or the "most left-wing of the non-socialist parties", whereas other scholars have described them as radically right-wing populist."

Freedom Party of Austria: "The Freedom Party of Austria (German: Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs, FPÖ) is a right-wing populist and far right political party in Austria."

Freedom Party of the Netherlands I'll concede, but it's probably not the one you meant to begin with.

Alternative for Germany: I don't even need to look them up to tell you that significant parts of their leadership and voter base are associated with the far right and even neonazis. [/German privilege]

Sweden Democrats: "The Sweden Democrats or Swedish Democrats (Swedish: Sverigedemokraterna, SD) are a far-right, right-wing populist, and anti-immigration political party in Sweden that was founded in 1988."

Democrats in Norway: "The Democrats in Norway (Norwegian: Demokratene i Norge, DIN), formerly and commonly known as the Democrats, is a radical right-wing populist political party in Norway without parliamentary representation."

UKIP: "The UK Independence Party (UKIP, sometimes styled and colloquially known as Ukip /ˈjuːkɪp/) is a Eurosceptic right-wing populist political party in the United Kingdom, founded in 1993 by members of the Anti-Federalist League. The party describes itself in its constitution as a "democratic, libertarian party"."

Danish People's Party: "The Danish People's Party (DPP) (Danish: Dansk Folkeparti, DF) is a political party in Denmark which is described as right-wing populist by academics to "far-right" by the international media."

QED.

Half of those even you said aren't far right, just right-wing as they are.

[Dejanic]

Don't lie.

Finns Party: "The party combines left-wing economic policies with conservative social values, socio-cultural authoritarianism, and ethnic nationalism. Several researchers have described the party as fiscally centre-left, socially conservative, a "centre-based populist party" or the "most left-wing of the non-socialist parties", whereas other scholars have described them as radically right-wing populist."

Freedom Party of Austria: "The Freedom Party of Austria (German: Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs, FPÖ) is a right-wing populist and far right political party in Austria."

Freedom Party of the Netherlands I'll concede, but it's probably not the one you meant to begin with.

Alternative for Germany: I don't even need to look them up to tell you that significant parts of their leadership and voter base are associated with the far right and even neonazis. [/German privilege]

Sweden Democrats: "The Sweden Democrats or Swedish Democrats (Swedish: Sverigedemokraterna, SD) are a far-right, right-wing populist, and anti-immigration political party in Sweden that was founded in 1988."

Democrats in Norway: "The Democrats in Norway (Norwegian: Demokratene i Norge, DIN), formerly and commonly known as the Democrats, is a radical right-wing populist political party in Norway without parliamentary representation."

UKIP: "The UK Independence Party (UKIP, sometimes styled and colloquially known as Ukip /ˈjuːkɪp/) is a Eurosceptic right-wing populist political party in the United Kingdom, founded in 1993 by members of the Anti-Federalist League. The party describes itself in its constitution as a "democratic, libertarian party"."

Danish People's Party: "The Danish People's Party (DPP) (Danish: Dansk Folkeparti, DF) is a political party in Denmark which is described as right-wing populist by academics to "far-right" by the international media."

QED.

Half of those even you said aren't far right, just right-wing as they are.

Why is an "Anarcho Communist" basically being an apologist for the far-right, even the wishy washy Liberal media calls these parties far-right, yet an Anarcho Communist can't see it?

[Skinia]

Half of those even you said aren't far right, just right-wing as they are.

Why is an "Anarcho Communist" basically being an apologist for the far-right, even the wishy washy Liberal media calls these parties far-right, yet an Anarcho Communist can't see it?

Is this the day reminding people to use correct terms is far right apologism?

[Kincoboh]

Why is an "Anarcho Communist" basically being an apologist for the far-right, even the wishy washy Liberal media calls these parties far-right, yet an Anarcho Communist can't see it?

Is this the day reminding people to use correct terms is far right apologism?

Well, those are far right parties. See Dejanic's post in the last page.

The Finns Party, Freedom Parties of Austria and the Netherlands, Alternative for Germany, Sweden Democrats, Democrats of Norway, UK Independence Party and Danish People's Party would like a word with you.

Most of those, if not all of those parties, are actually to the Left of the GOP. All of them economically, and most of them Socially.

You see, most far-right parties in Europe are socially far-right and economically very centrist, the GOP is fairly unique in that they're far-right socially AND economically, they're more ideologically close to outright Fascism and Corporatism, than modern European ultra-nationalism.

[Skinia]

Is this the day reminding people to use correct terms is far right apologism?

Well, those are far right parties. See Dejanic's post in the last page.

Most of those, if not all of those parties, are actually to the Left of the GOP. All of them economically, and most of them Socially.

You see, most far-right parties in Europe are socially far-right and economically very centrist, the GOP is fairly unique in that they're far-right socially AND economically, they're more ideologically close to outright Fascism and Corporatism, than modern European ultra-nationalism.

I concede. Doesn't matter what they're called, they're fuckers either way.

[Kincoboh]

Well, those are far right parties. See Dejanic's post in the last page.

I concede. Doesn't matter what they're called, they're fuckers either way.

Yup. I mean, this does not lessen the fucky-ness of the GOP either.

[United Prefectures of Appia]

If Reagan ran on a Democrat ticket, he'd be maimed and dismembered by the Democrat party for being a pinko Commie bastard. That's how far right-wing the American government has been reduced to.

[The Batorys]

I'm a republican, most people here on nation states don't like my kind. I'm from Texas, that sets off a signal for democrats here on NS too start too hate me. I don't know why.

So the question is simple. Why do you democrats hate republicans. I want too see it from a democrats point of view. Why do you hate republicans? What do you not like about them. I just want too know. Tell me in a civilized way. I don't want too see this "BECAUSE YOU REPUBLICANS ARE STUPID, DUMB ASS PEOPLE WHO HATE THE NATURE!". Nothing like that. So in a civilized way, democrats of nation states! Tell me why you hate the republicans! Or dislike us republicans!

People in NSG hate alot of things including India, don't let them get you

No, I think it's that they hate you, specifically, not India.

[Kingdom of Viana]

If Reagan ran on a Democrat ticket, he'd be maimed and dismembered by the Democrat party for being a pinko Commie bastard. That's how far right-wing the American government has been reduced to.

He wasn't a communist...

[Kingdom of Viana]

If Reagan ran on a Democrat ticket, he'd be maimed and dismembered by the Democrat party for being a pinko Commie bastard. That's how far right-wing the American government has been reduced to.

I'm sure that most American people will vote for Reagan since, like I said, he is an AMERICAN HERO and his policies don't even effect us since we got that idiot Obama now.

[Kingdom of Viana]

I concede. Doesn't matter what they're called, they're fuckers either way.

Yup. I mean, this does not lessen the fucky-ness of the GOP either.

Hmm I thought liberals were supposed to be tolerant towards other people, guess not!

[Papait]

Well, believing that I'm a subhuman and that children should be taught that what I am is an unnatural and sinful lifestyle choice is certainly a good reason for me not to be too well-disposed to them.

I'm assuming you're gay? Or are you trans-sexual? Ether way, I b that gays should have the right too marrie! I believe every one should be able too do stuff or change stuff about their bodies. But wih in good reason. You can change your gender, but once you do, you should stay that gender. Or you could be both genders! If that's what you wish too be.

Yes but those are your political views, not of the Republican Party, who actively oppose that.
So they have dislike to you, even though you support their rights, because you support a group that wants to limit their rights

[Stormwind-City]

If Reagan ran on a Democrat ticket, he'd be maimed and dismembered by the Democrat party for being a pinko Commie bastard. That's how far right-wing the American government has been reduced to.

I'm sure that most American people will vote for Reagan since, like I said, he is an AMERICAN HERO and his policies don't even effect us since we got that idiot Obama now.

American hero for doing what? And please, President Obama has a law degree from Harvard and is a successful author, I doubt his intelligence is lacking.

[Neutraligon]

If Reagan ran on a Democrat ticket, he'd be maimed and dismembered by the Democrat party for being a pinko Commie bastard. That's how far right-wing the American government has been reduced to.

I'm sure that most American people will vote for Reagan since, like I said, he is an AMERICAN HERO and his policies don't even effect us since we got that idiot Obama now.

No e isn't. Many of the problems we face today are a direct result of the actions he took during his presidency. More then that the actions he too during the presidency harmed the country during his presidency. Just because some people idolize Reagan, and make him seem perfect does not mean he is or was.

[Neutraligon]

Yup. I mean, this does not lessen the fucky-ness of the GOP either.

Hmm I thought liberals were supposed to be tolerant towards other people, guess not!

The GOP is not people, the GOP is a group. Second, tolerance of intolerance is not a good thing.

[Kingdom of Viana]

Hmm I thought liberals were supposed to be tolerant towards other people, guess not!

The GOP is not people, the GOP is a group. Second, tolerance of intolerance is not a good thing.

They are intolerant of people who don't agree with crap like abortion and gay marriage.

[Kingdom of Viana]

Hmm I thought liberals were supposed to be tolerant towards other people, guess not!

The GOP is not people, the GOP is a group. Second, tolerance of intolerance is not a good thing.

Don't overthink what I am saying.

[Stormwind-City]

The GOP is not people, the GOP is a group. Second, tolerance of intolerance is not a good thing.

They are intolerant of people who don't agree with crap like abortion and gay marriage.

Intolerant of people who seek to deny their fellow humans rights over arbitrary and bullshit reasons?

[Kingdom of Viana]

I'm sure that most American people will vote for Reagan since, like I said, he is an AMERICAN HERO and his policies don't even effect us since we got that idiot Obama now.

American hero for doing what? And please, President Obama has a law degree from Harvard and is a successful author, I doubt his intelligence is lacking.

Ending the cold war, helping to end the so called "communist" economy of the USSR. He helped clean up the mess Carter left behind, showed great compassion, kindness and affection unlike any of the democratic presidents like Obama.

[Kingdom of Viana]

They are intolerant of people who don't agree with crap like abortion and gay marriage.

Intolerant of people who seek to deny their fellow humans rights over arbitrary and bullshit reasons?

It's there opinion! And calling someone a Bigot because you don't like their opinion is NOT being tolerant.

[Neutraligon]

The GOP is not people, the GOP is a group. Second, tolerance of intolerance is not a good thing.

They are intolerant of people who don't agree with crap like abortion and gay marriage.

Not really. First there are Republicans who are pro-choie. Second most of the pro-choice liberals I have met are actually very much against abortion as a personal choice, but are very much for letting people choose should they want an abortion. That is, I myself am pro-choice but would not get one unless my life was in danger, the fetus was not viable, or if I was raped. However that is my personal decision for my own body and I refuse to make that decision for other females. That is the most common feeling I have met among pro-choice liberals and is very tolerant. Disagreeing with someone's opinion and voicing that disagreement is not intolerant. Same goes for gay marriage, many liberals would never even think about getting married to someone of the same gender, and are perfectly willing to have churches choose whether or not they will marry people before god, seems pretty tolerant to me.

[Skinia]

The GOP is not people, the GOP is a group. Second, tolerance of intolerance is not a good thing.

They are intolerant of people who don't agree with crap like abortion and gay marriage.

Tolerance of intolerance is like freeing people to do unfree things, like steal, kidnap, rape or murder. So no, it isn't tolerant to tolerate intolerance. It's rather counter-productive to tolerance to tolerate intolerance.

[Kingdom of Viana]

They are intolerant of people who don't agree with crap like abortion and gay marriage.

Not really. First there are Republicans who are pro-choie. Second most of the pro-choice liberals I have met are actually very much against abortion as a personal choice, but are very much for letting people choose should they want an abortion. That is, I myself am pro-choice but would not get one unless my life was in danger, the fetus was not viable, or if I was raped. However that is my personal decision for my own body and I refuse to make that decision for other females. That is the most common feeling I have met among pro-choice liberals and is very tolerant. Disagreeing with someone's opinion and voicing that disagreement is not intolerant. Same goes for gay marriage, many liberals would never even think about getting married to someone of the same gender, and are perfectly willing to have churches choose whether or not they will marry people before god, seems pretty tolerant to me.

You do know that the liberals were the ones to start using words like "Bigot" and "Homophobia" right?

[Kingdom of Viana]

They are intolerant of people who don't agree with crap like abortion and gay marriage.

Tolerance of intolerance is like freeing people to do unfree things, like steal, kidnap, rape or murder. So no, it isn't tolerant to tolerate intolerance. It's rather counter-productive to tolerance to tolerate intolerance.

What?!

[Neutraligon]

American hero for doing what? And please, President Obama has a law degree from Harvard and is a successful author, I doubt his intelligence is lacking.

Ending the cold war, helping to end the so called "communist" economy of the USSR. He helped clean up the mess Carter left behind, showed great compassion, kindness and affection unlike any of the democratic presidents like Obama.

He tripled the debt, increase the employment created the myth of the welfare queen and used it to scapegoat people, had the Iran Contra issue, propped up dictators, etc. As for kindness, compassion, and affection, I fail to see how he did any of those things, and are irrelevant