Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Tarsonis Survivors wrote:
He gave the Grand Jury ALL the information instead of suppressing evidence that didn't support a case. Man what a fucking dick.
You do know what a Brady Violation is right? While not applicable to a Grand Jury process it was by far more ethical than normal. GJ should be apprised of all information not just what the prosecutor wants them to get.
Not giving the Grand Jury evidence favorable to the defense is not a Brady violation. Withholding said information from defense attorneys is a Brady violation. The prosecutor's only obligation when it comes to a Grand Jury is to provide evidence that a crime MIGHT have been committed. This was, again, not ethical. This was an abdication of professional responsibilities to thoroughly prosecute a case on behalf of the people.
If you think that Grand Juries should get all evidence, that's fine, but it's not how things work right now, and if they aren't doing that with every single Grand Jury in Ferguson, then the unusual approach to this case is evidence of self-sabotage.
I acknowledged it wasn't a brady violation just using that as reference point.
Prosecutors have leeway on what evidence they provide to the GJ. The prosecutor gave ALL the information in this case. It was perfectly ethical.





