Advertisement

by Lalaki » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:06 pm

by Saiwania » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:07 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:That would take way too much time to train them.

by Margno » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:07 pm

by The Seleucids (Ancient) » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:07 pm

by Greater Weselton » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:07 pm

by Paddy O Fernature » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:08 pm
The Seleucids wrote:
Please explain how justice was serverd. A person dead, the one who killed him got to walk off without a trial or anything. I don't know from what backwards country you're from but over here that isn't called justice.

by The Seleucids (Ancient) » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:08 pm
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:The Seleucids wrote:
I do, i do, i do and i do. I just happen to live in a country where logic, reason, the right thing and justice matter.
you already said you would vote to indict regardless of the evidence presented. You admitted you have no care for the truth, you just want to see a mother fucker burn.

by Jinos » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:08 pm
The balkens wrote:Jinos wrote:
Do you people even listen to yourselves? Really? Who in their right mind would charge at someone holding a gun at them, while they were already bleeding from being shot twice?
Not only did Darren Wilson shoot at a fleeing Michael Brown (who was hit in his arm, which caused him to stop and turn around) he shot a surrendering Michael Brown...even as said person was falling down to the ground (which is how the fatal bullet ended up hitting the top of his head).
Fucking make an effort to look at the evidence, AND I MEAN PHYSICAL EVIDENCE. not i witnesses.

by Margno » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:08 pm

by Kalifati Arab shqiptar » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:08 pm

by Ethel mermania » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:08 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Inyourfaceistan wrote:
Were you on the grand jury?
What leads you to this conclusion?
Did you see the evidence which the rest of us did not?
If so, please enlighten me.
Here's what makes me believe that justice was not served:
The usual process when presenting evidence before a grand jury is for the prosecutor to show the evidence that a crime was committed, and to ask for a particular indictment. There is no requirement that a prosecutor give any information that might be considered favorable to the defense, and indeed, it is almost unheard of for a prosecutor to do so. In this case, the prosecutor simply dumped all of the information into their laps, including information that could be seen as favorable to the defense, and gave a laundry list of possible charges. There was no serious attempt to indict. The fact that defense attorneys are not allowed to mount a defense during grand jury proceedings was meaningless in this case, since the prosecutor did their job for them.
by Vjaarland » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:08 pm
[16:08] <Arkiasis> What's Vjaarland doing tonight? The same thing he does every night. Try and take over the world!Proud American and Conservative
My nation does not always reflect my RL views (which are much changed from years past) and is not to be taken seriously. If you think it's too stupid/crazy to be true, it probably is.

by Insaeldor » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:08 pm
Greater Weselton wrote:This rioting is making me fucking mad!

by Southern Arkansas » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:08 pm

by Inyourfaceistan » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:09 pm
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:Gauthier wrote:And the Missouri grand jury declares that it's acceptable for police to shoot black teenagers for whatever reason as long as they have hands.
How many people sincerely believe if a black cop shot an unarmed white teenager he would have not been indicted either?
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/58472 ... l.html.csp
Damn, how does it feel to be wrong?

by United States Kingdom » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:09 pm

by The balkens » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:09 pm
Jinos wrote:The balkens wrote:
Fucking make an effort to look at the evidence, AND I MEAN PHYSICAL EVIDENCE. not i witnesses.
Evidence of what? We have audio evidence of the shooting, if you listen, DW shoots several times, then PAUSES for several seconds (presumably after MB stops) and he begins shooting again. We have physical evidence of a bullet hitting the back of his arm, and a bullet entering the top of his head. That's pretty damned good if I do say so.

by Tarsonis Survivors » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:09 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
That's not acting ethically. That's acting unprofessionally. It's nearly unheard of for prosecutors to do the defense's job for them, and it's evidence that the D.A.'s office never had any desire to fire charges.

by Archeuland and Baughistan » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:09 pm

by Greater Weselton » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:09 pm

by The Seleucids (Ancient) » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:09 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Arval Va, Bovad, Cerespasia, Ethel mermania, Galactic Powers, Google [Bot], Greater Marine, Haganham, Hrofguard, Kenmoria, Maurnindaia, Northern Seleucia, Old Tyrannia, Opluentia, The Jamesian Republic, Utquiagvik
Advertisement