NATION

PASSWORD

Ferguson Megathread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Tarsonis Survivors
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15693
Founded: Feb 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tarsonis Survivors » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:01 pm

The Seleucids wrote:
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:
Exactly, you don't care about evidence, logic, reason, the right thing, or even justice. You just want to see a mother fucker burn. I'd have more respect if you would just admit that.


I do, i do, i do and i do. I just happen to live in a country where logic, reason, the right thing and justice matter.


you already said you would vote to indict regardless of the evidence presented. You admitted you have no care for the truth, you just want to see a mother fucker burn.

User avatar
Inyourfaceistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12585
Founded: Aug 20, 2012
Anarchy

Postby Inyourfaceistan » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:01 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Inyourfaceistan wrote:
Were you on the grand jury?
What leads you to this conclusion?
Did you see the evidence which the rest of us did not?
If so, please enlighten me.


Here's what makes me believe that justice was not served:

The usual process when presenting evidence before a grand jury is for the prosecutor to show the evidence that a crime was committed, and to ask for a particular indictment. There is no requirement that a prosecutor give any information that might be considered favorable to the defense, and indeed, it is almost unheard of for a prosecutor to do so. In this case, the prosecutor simply dumped all of the information into their laps, including information that could be seen as favorable to the defense, and gave a laundry list of possible charges. There was no serious attempt to indict. The fact that defense attorneys are not allowed to mount a defense during grand jury proceedings was meaningless in this case, since the prosecutor did their job for them.


I have to say I still disagree with you.
The prosecution very well could have been trying to hit him with any of those laundry lists of charges, or they could have just realized they didn't have a case themselves.

But thank you for giving a rational response to the question.


It's not French,it's not Spanish,it's Inyurstan
"Inyourfaceistan" refers to my player/user name, "Inyursta" is my IC name. NOT INYURSTAN. IF YOU CALL INYURSTA "INYURSTAN" THEN IT SHOWS THAT YOU CANT READ. Just refer to me as IYF or Stan.

User avatar
G-Tech Corporation
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 62452
Founded: Feb 03, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby G-Tech Corporation » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:01 pm

Jinos wrote:
The balkens wrote:
He tried to fight the officer and failed spectacularly .


Fighting =/= Running away.

Had they been soldiers, what Darren Wilson did would be a war crime.


Uhuh.

And running away after assaulting an officer is fleeing a crime scene. Note that Wilson didn't fire until Brown turned and began coming back towards him, likely with intent to fight.

Was a fleeing criminal shot? Nope.

Was a criminal bent on attacking the officer trying to apprehend him shot? Sure seems like it.
TG if you have questions about RP. If I don't know the answer, I know someone who does.

Quite the unofficial fellow. P2TM Mentor specializing in faction and nation RPs, as well as RPGs.

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:01 pm

Arcturus Novus wrote:Is now a good time to move far, far away?

I hear there's some violent riots going on in multiple systems under the control of the Galactic Empire as well, so you probably wouldn't gain much from it.

Jinos wrote:
The balkens wrote:
He tried to fight the officer and failed spectacularly .


Fighting =/= Running away.

Had they been soldiers, what Darren Wilson did would be a war crime.

It's hard to shoot someone who's running away in the front.

And no, even if such was the case, it wouldn't be a war crime.
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
The Seleucids (Ancient)
Diplomat
 
Posts: 989
Founded: Nov 03, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Seleucids (Ancient) » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:01 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
The Seleucids wrote:
No i was not, if i was in it they would never come to an agreement.
Already said multiple times.
Nope, don't have to either.


A Grand Jury isn't a panel of legal professionals.


I know, so why on earth are they the ones making such decisions?

User avatar
Archeuland and Baughistan
Minister
 
Posts: 2614
Founded: Aug 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Archeuland and Baughistan » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:01 pm

Good news everyone! The scanner says that a local Walgreens is on fire. This is justice in action. #justice4mikebrown
Standing on the truth of God's word and the gospel.
Learn more about the true history of the world here.
You must be born again? What does that mean?
Islam, the religion of peace? What does history tell us?
The Israelites were "genocidal"? No they weren't!
Agenda 21 map - it affects us all!
Let's rebuild Noah's Ark to serve as a reminder about the true history of Earth!
Proud Foreign Minister of the Christian Liberty Alliance

☩Founder of the Alliance of Protestant Nations - Join today! Learn more here

User avatar
Jinos
Minister
 
Posts: 2424
Founded: Oct 10, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Jinos » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:01 pm

The balkens wrote:
Jinos wrote:
Fighting =/= Running away.

Had they been soldiers, what Darren Wilson did would be a war crime.


A war crime?

Being dramatic a bit much?


Killing a surrendered soldier is a war crime. I don't see why it should be any different for Michael Brown, is his life worth less than an enemy combatants?
Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -5.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.97

Map of the Grand Commonwealth

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202532
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:02 pm

G-Tech Corporation wrote:
The Seleucids wrote:
Law should promote justice, period.


And justice was served.

You know what wasn't? Revenge.


I think that is an excellent distinction to make. I think there were many bent on revenge, not justice.

This is, however, not to say that the death of Michael Brown was tragic or that we need to be aware that there are iniquities in how law enforcement in the US tends to handle issues that involve black people, even tangentially.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Herskerstad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10259
Founded: Dec 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Herskerstad » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:02 pm

Jinos wrote:
Lavan Tiri wrote:
Then fix the damn problems! But rioting won't do that!


Nothing will be done, not by those in power. Obama could've directed the DoJ to intervene and charge DW themselves, or any other kind of person, he could instruct the FBI to start investigating these police brutalities. Congress could pass a law doing the same. Who knows? Maybe that will happen, I doubt it though.

The only recourse for the people is to take justice into their own hands. It is undesirable, mob violence is a terrible thing.

But what is worse? A riot? Or a lack of faith in our justice system? I believe the latter to be less desirable.


If Obama would have directed the DoJ, now without a head prosecutor mind you, to follow through with this and most likely fail come trial, then that's not going to spell good for how the community which now largely feels offended will feel about him.

But on a more pragmatic note, I don't think the head of the nation should get bogged down into individual trials like these. There is a system in place and one can be certain that a hot topic issue like this would not reach a conclusion lightly.
Although the stars do not speak, even in being silent they cry out. - John Calvin

User avatar
Timmy City
Minister
 
Posts: 3480
Founded: Feb 16, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Timmy City » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:02 pm

Apparently apart of a Walgreens in Ferguson is on fire.
Hurricane Matthew 2016!

User avatar
Arcturus Novus
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6694
Founded: Dec 03, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Arcturus Novus » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:02 pm

The balkens wrote:
Jinos wrote:
Fighting =/= Running away.

Had they been soldiers, what Darren Wilson did would be a war crime.


A war crime?

Being dramatic a bit much?

Correct me if I'm wrong, and I often am, but the murder of civillians by military personnel would be a war crime.
China state-affiliated media
Arcy (she/her), NS' fourth-favorite transsexual communist!
My posts do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer, President Xi Jinping.
me - my politics - my twitter
Ceterum autem censeo Americam esse delendam.
౿ᓕ  ̤Ꜥ·⦣

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:02 pm

And the Missouri grand jury declares that it's acceptable for police to shoot black teenagers for whatever reason as long as they have hands.

How many people sincerely believe if a black cop shot an unarmed white teenager he would have not been indicted either?
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Insaeldor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5373
Founded: Aug 26, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Insaeldor » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:02 pm

Eastern Equestria wrote:
Jinos wrote:
Worse than the racists over at Yahoo who are talking about how this "thug" deserved to be gunned down from behind for stealing a few cigars?

Yeah. We're the worst :roll:


You both look like fools.


Basicly. Call for the death of people who have already been show innocent. No worse that the people say it was a good thing for Michael Brown to die.

You look like a fool and should be ashamed of yourself for the advocation of murder.
Time is a prismatic uniform polyhedron

User avatar
The Seleucids (Ancient)
Diplomat
 
Posts: 989
Founded: Nov 03, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Seleucids (Ancient) » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:02 pm

Tarsonis Survivors wrote:
The Seleucids wrote:
Who said they would be the same?


If there wasn't enough evidence to warrant an indictment, there damn sure wasn't enough to garner a conviction.


That's your opinion.

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:02 pm

Jinos wrote:
Lavan Tiri wrote:Whoa. Mike Brown's chest was backward? I thought I was the only one?


I exaggerated slightly. Since Darren Wilson was such a coward, he managed to mostly miss his fleeing target, and was only able to execute Michael Brown when he stopped and turned around to surrender.

But that sounds MUCH worse when I elaborate on the details.


Because bullets fly straight all the time, guys.

User avatar
Tarsonis Survivors
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15693
Founded: Feb 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tarsonis Survivors » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:02 pm

Emile Zola wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Here's what makes me believe that justice was not served:

The usual process when presenting evidence before a grand jury is for the prosecutor to show the evidence that a crime was committed, and to ask for a particular indictment. There is no requirement that a prosecutor give any information that might be considered favorable to the defense, and indeed, it is almost unheard of for a prosecutor to do so. In this case, the prosecutor simply dumped all of the information into their laps, including information that could be seen as favorable to the defense, and gave a laundry list of possible charges. There was no serious attempt to indict. The fact that defense attorneys are not allowed to mount a defense during grand jury proceedings was meaningless in this case, since the prosecutor did their job for them.

Best summation of why people are upset.

What kind of prosecutor lets the accused testify for his defense at a grand jury?



Seriously, How dare he act so ethically.

User avatar
Paddy O Fernature
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12993
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Paddy O Fernature » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:03 pm

The Seleucids wrote:
Paddy O Fernature wrote:
Still leaps and bounds better then whatever 3rd world country you're apparently from, where lynch mobs and mass rioting and looting are acceptable ways of protest. :roll:


Whaha, 3rd world country XD
Ever compared the US to the Netherlands?
The US would be the 3rd world country here smartass.


Keep telling yourself that kid.

With people like you around, I fear for the future.

Proud Co-Founder of The Axis Commonwealth - Would you like to know more?
Mallorea and Riva should resign
SJW! Why? Some nobody on the internet who has never met me accused me of being one, so it absolutely MUST be true! *Nod Nod*

User avatar
The United States of North Amerigo
Diplomat
 
Posts: 626
Founded: Apr 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The United States of North Amerigo » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:03 pm

The Seleucids wrote:
Paddy O Fernature wrote:
Still leaps and bounds better then whatever 3rd world country you're apparently from, where lynch mobs and mass rioting and looting are acceptable ways of protest. :roll:


Whaha, 3rd world country XD
Ever compared the US to the Netherlands?
The US would be the 3rd world country here smartass.

FLAMING... also the US has major cities...
Amerigo.
Wouldn't mind a telegram. Forgive me for all the stupid shit I say
____________________________
http://wiki.greaterixnay.com/wiki/Unite ... th_Amerigo

User avatar
Asyir
Minister
 
Posts: 2387
Founded: Oct 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Asyir » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:03 pm

Kalifati Arab shqiptar wrote:
Asyir wrote:Same with Army/Navy/Air Force/Marine reservists. Are they not military either?

Then why are they called "National Guard" and not US-Military-Wingman-For-Oppressing-Black -Minorities? This is ridiculous. Black People loot, riot and they send the NG, and they feel oprressed.?

Wow. Just wow. Really?

They go through basics, they're soldiers in my book. Looting, rioting are illegal. If the police can't stop it, then the military should step in.
Team Pelinal for life!

User avatar
Margno
Minister
 
Posts: 2357
Founded: Sep 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Margno » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:03 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:Good news everyone! The scanner says that a local Walgreens is on fire. This is justice in action. #justice4mikebrown

You're lying.
Never, never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well-being of a person is at stake. Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way.
We have nothing to lose but the world. We have our souls to gain.
You!
Me.
Nothing you can possibly do can make God love you any more or any less.

User avatar
Tarsonis Survivors
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15693
Founded: Feb 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tarsonis Survivors » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:03 pm

The Seleucids wrote:
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:
If there wasn't enough evidence to warrant an indictment, there damn sure wasn't enough to garner a conviction.


That's your opinion.


No that's reality, and an understanding of how burden of proof works.

User avatar
The Seleucids (Ancient)
Diplomat
 
Posts: 989
Founded: Nov 03, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Seleucids (Ancient) » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:03 pm

Asyir wrote:
The Seleucids wrote:
Who said they would be the same?

I did. If the Grand Jury didn't have enough to indict him, why should I, a tax paying citizen, pay to get the same results from a trial? Espeically if my money could go in better places.


Becouse it would serve justice.
Anyhow, let me talk to you again once your kid gets killed by a cop and those random people decide that nothing reallly bad has happend.

User avatar
Greater Weselton
Senator
 
Posts: 3703
Founded: Aug 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Weselton » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:03 pm

The people her appear to support the rioting.
I am not a Nazi in real life.
_[' ]_
(-_Q)
If you support Capitalism put this in your Signature!
Proud Member of theConfederation of Sovereign Nations

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:03 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:Good news everyone! The scanner says that a local Walgreens is on fire. This is justice in action. #justice4mikebrown


I'm sure the local residents are delighted. :(
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:03 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
G-Tech Corporation wrote:
And justice was served.

You know what wasn't? Revenge.


I think that is an excellent distinction to make. I think there were many bent on revenge, not justice.

This is, however, not to say that the death of Michael Brown was tragic or that we need to be aware that there are iniquities in how law enforcement in the US tends to handle issues that involve black people, even tangentially.

There are also many who are quite honestly using this as an excuse to just do stupid shit.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Arval Va, Bovad, Ethel mermania, Galactic Powers, Greater Marine, Haganham, Hrofguard, Kenmoria, Northern Seleucia, Old Tyrannia, Opluentia, Raskana, The Jamesian Republic, Utquiagvik

Advertisement

Remove ads