NATION

PASSWORD

Worst Leader your (RL) Country ever had?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Camelza
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12604
Founded: Mar 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Camelza » Tue Nov 18, 2014 5:43 pm

Otto I Wittelsbach, for best clueless Bavarian scapegoat.
Second? Propably dictator-president Pagalos, he was a complete failure.
Pagalos though, is most certainly challenged for the title by the infamously corrupt and authoritarian dictatorical triandry of the late sixties and early seventies.

User avatar
Luziyca
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38036
Founded: Nov 13, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Luziyca » Tue Nov 18, 2014 5:55 pm

Merizoc wrote:
Kincoboh wrote:Most definitely, positively Stephen Harper. What an arrogant asshole. I am so glad there is an election next year! Only 11 months to go! :lol:
Mulroney comes a close second, in signing NAFTA and lying and general scumbaggery.

Some would argue Trudeau, but I'd say he's probably far and away the best PM we've had in modern times. His thing with Alberta was kind of shitty, but it could have been a lot worse. He signing a lot of good laws in more than makes up for that.

Oh yeah, I'm Canadian too. Definitely Harper, then Mulroney. Not so confident about the election though...

Yeah. Hopefully, I can vote, but Harper in my opinion is a terrible PM.
|||The Kingdom of Rwizikuru|||
Your feeble attempts to change the very nature of how time itself has been organized by mankind shall fall on barren ground and bear no fruit
IIwikiFacebookKylaris: the best region for eight years runningAbout meYouTubePolitical compass

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36764
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:05 pm

The Polarian Empire wrote:Jackson and bush...ooh Bush annoys me to death x x

Blame Prescott Bush, and the rest of those fascist traitors who make up the descendants of several modern era presidents.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Sebastianbourg
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5717
Founded: Apr 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sebastianbourg » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:07 pm

Lydenburg wrote:Amazuma. And I thought we couldn't possibly get any worse with Mbeki.

You mean Jacob Zuma, right?

User avatar
Lydenburg
Senator
 
Posts: 4592
Founded: May 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lydenburg » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:08 pm

Sebastianbourg wrote:
Lydenburg wrote:Amazuma. And I thought we couldn't possibly get any worse with Mbeki.

You mean Jacob Zuma, right?


Quite so.

Ek bly in Australie nou, maar Afrika sal altyd in my hart wees. Maak nie saak wat gebeur nie, ek is trots om te kan sê ek is 'n kind van hierdie ingewikkelde soms wrede kontinent. Mis jou altyd my Suid-Afrika, hier met n seer hart al die pad van Melbourne af!


User avatar
Sanctus Byzantium
Envoy
 
Posts: 232
Founded: Nov 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctus Byzantium » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:09 pm

Constantinopolis wrote:
Sanctus Byzantium wrote:Obama, followed by Wilson.

Really? They're worse than presidents who committed ethnic cleansing and/or literally supported slavery?

The United States may have a much shorter history than most other countries represented here, but I think it's fair to say that anyone who names a president from the 20th or 21st centuries as "the worst" is doing it wrong.


Well I could have said Lincoln but I have a feeling I would have been ripped apart. Besides really most Presidents I have little to no opinion on. The few that I do are divided between those that I like: Theodore Roosevelt, Washington, Jackson, Grant, Mckinley, Truman, Coolidge, and Eisenhower. And those I dislike: Obama, Wilson, Nixon, Andrew Johnson, and to some extent Lincoln. Really it comes down to personal liking of them. And my personal opinion is that I think Obama is not a strong leader (which is something I respect) and I just have a personal disliking of Wilson. Though it also comes by my study of history.
Last edited by Sanctus Byzantium on Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sanctus Byzantium: Home of the Reactionary, Traditionalist, Monarchists.

Pro Pro-life, Monarchy, Death Penalty, Christian, Israel.
Anti Abortion, democracy, socialist, communist, modern feminism.
Ruler Emperor Alexios VI Hymenaios
Muinordgrad-Byzantine War: Peace Treaty, status quo
Byzantine Civil War: Complete victory for Emperor Alexios VI and his loyalists, Empress-Mother Irene executed
The Quenaedian Blitz: Complete victory

User avatar
Nuevo Gran Mexico
Attaché
 
Posts: 69
Founded: Oct 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Nuevo Gran Mexico » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:13 pm

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Porfirio Díaz was also pretty tyrannical.


No, Porfirio Díaz was not stupid. I started the modernisation of Mexico. He was tyrannical, but he didn't selled the petroleum. He didn't made stupid things as EPN.

User avatar
Rebellious Fishermen
Diplomat
 
Posts: 863
Founded: Aug 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rebellious Fishermen » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:18 pm

OBAMA!

Nah probably someone like Ulysses Grant or some no-name president.

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:20 pm

Nuevo Gran Mexico wrote:
Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:


No, Porfirio Díaz was not stupid. HE started the modernisation of Mexico. He was tyrannical, but he didn't selled the petroleum. He didn't made stupid things as EPN.

Never did I say he was he stupid. Stop the strawman.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Rebellious Fishermen
Diplomat
 
Posts: 863
Founded: Aug 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rebellious Fishermen » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:23 pm

Sanctus Byzantium wrote:
Constantinopolis wrote:Really? They're worse than presidents who committed ethnic cleansing and/or literally supported slavery?

The United States may have a much shorter history than most other countries represented here, but I think it's fair to say that anyone who names a president from the 20th or 21st centuries as "the worst" is doing it wrong.


Well I could have said Lincoln but I have a feeling I would have been ripped apart. Besides really most Presidents I have little to no opinion on. The few that I do are divided between those that I like: Theodore Roosevelt, Washington, Jackson, Grant, Mckinley, Truman, Coolidge, and Eisenhower. And those I dislike: Obama, Wilson, Nixon, Andrew Johnson, and to some extent Lincoln. Really it comes down to personal liking of them. And my personal opinion is that I think Obama is not a strong leader (which is something I respect) and I just have a personal disliking of Wilson. Though it also comes by my study of history.


I'm not a big Lincoln fan. Huge authoritarian that expanded the government and tried to control the states, successfully.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:07 pm

Sanctus Byzantium wrote:
Constantinopolis wrote:Really? They're worse than presidents who committed ethnic cleansing and/or literally supported slavery?

The United States may have a much shorter history than most other countries represented here, but I think it's fair to say that anyone who names a president from the 20th or 21st centuries as "the worst" is doing it wrong.


Well I could have said Lincoln but I have a feeling I would have been ripped apart. Besides really most Presidents I have little to no opinion on. The few that I do are divided between those that I like: Theodore Roosevelt, Washington, Jackson, Grant, Mckinley, Truman, Coolidge, and Eisenhower. And those I dislike: Obama, Wilson, Nixon, Andrew Johnson, and to some extent Lincoln. Really it comes down to personal liking of them. And my personal opinion is that I think Obama is not a strong leader (which is something I respect) and I just have a personal disliking of Wilson. Though it also comes by my study of history.


You realize, of course, that policy-wise, Obama is actually just a touch to the right of Eisenhower.

User avatar
Bojikami
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11276
Founded: Jul 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bojikami » Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:08 pm

Tsar Nicolas II.
Be gay, do crime.
23 year old nonbinary trans woman(She/They), also I'm a Marxist-Leninist.
Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.33

User avatar
Skappola
Minister
 
Posts: 2063
Founded: May 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Skappola » Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:13 pm

Andrew Jackson. I f***ing hate him. He crashed the economy, was completely unprofessional, and forced out the five civilized tribes, among other idiotic endeavours.

As a second, I would say Rutherford B Hayes, for his ending of reconstruction.
Political Compass: Economic: 1.63 Social: -6.72
Political Ideology: Neoliberal Civil Libertarian
I Enjoy: Blues, Paradox Games and Sci-fi

User avatar
Equusia
Envoy
 
Posts: 268
Founded: Nov 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Equusia » Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:26 pm

And I'd go with Bush, for America.

^ Doesn't need explaining
I'm 17 year old male who is not a bronie just bad at naming things. I am Fiscally conservative and socially liberal. FREEDOM!

User avatar
Lydenburg
Senator
 
Posts: 4592
Founded: May 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lydenburg » Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:39 pm

New Socialist South Africa wrote:
Murkwood wrote:Wilson. Hands down. Barack Obama is a far-second.


Wow. Apparently Jackson's Indian murdering and the support of slave ownership by him and other early US presidents is nowhere near as bad as world war 1 era Wilson (who was admittedly pretty awful) and Barrack Obama (who has been somewhere between bad and ok in my opinion).

In South Africa the award has to go to Prime Minister H.F. Verwoerd, the "architect of Apartheid", who strengthened the Apartheid system created by Prime Minister D.F. Malan, and was in office when the Sharpeville Massacre occurred.


Verwoerd gets blamed for everything, but everybody forgets that forced removals and discriminatory labour laws peaked under Strijdom. I mean, the man tried to ban nonwhites from participating in urban industry. In RSA. That's how out of touch he was with the real world.

Under his watch we had the first wave of foreign disinvestment.

Ek bly in Australie nou, maar Afrika sal altyd in my hart wees. Maak nie saak wat gebeur nie, ek is trots om te kan sê ek is 'n kind van hierdie ingewikkelde soms wrede kontinent. Mis jou altyd my Suid-Afrika, hier met n seer hart al die pad van Melbourne af!


User avatar
Pragia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7540
Founded: May 08, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Pragia » Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:48 pm

Benuty wrote:
The Polarian Empire wrote:Jackson and bush...ooh Bush annoys me to death x x

Blame Prescott Bush, and the rest of those fascist traitors who make up the descendants of several modern era presidents.

Who must obviously be worse than previously mentioned racists, genocidal maniacs, and inept bastards?

User avatar
Legendardisch
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1632
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Legendardisch » Tue Nov 18, 2014 11:03 pm

Prime minister Mark Rutte by far is the worst.
Has been destroying the netherlands piece by piece
The United Federation of Legendardisch


Pegasus Armed Dealership | De Volkscourant | Embassy Program | Factbook | Legendardisch.gov
PROUD MEMBER OF: I.S.A , I.C.O.N , V.N.T , U.P.A , I.F.C , I.E.S.P , I.A.T.A , I.C.D , D.S.A , U.T.A

Some very cool links: Flickr | DeviantART | Personal Website
Nederlander | Je Suis Charlie | PEGIDA

User avatar
Dracoria
Senator
 
Posts: 4575
Founded: Oct 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dracoria » Tue Nov 18, 2014 11:20 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:I am an American. Worst president is nixon. He destroyed the people's trust in the presidency.


To be fair, unlike many of the other 'worst presidents' brought up, he showed regret for doing just that and attempted to make up for it, meeting with foreign leaders, writing books and trying to restore not just his own image, but the image of politics in the US. He also was responsible for a number of positive things; warming relations with China and widening their divide with the USSR, enforcing civil rights, ending US involvement in Vietnam (yes, he first increased involvement, but so did JFK and people still love that old corpse). Even things the left'd like, introducing the EPA for instance. There are plenty of American leaders who are far worse than he was.
Also, chocobos.

I show solidarity with the Tea Party by drinking more tea.
I show solidarity with Occupy Wall Street by painting my toilet as a police cruiser.

User avatar
Brissia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9162
Founded: Apr 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Brissia » Wed Nov 19, 2014 12:38 am

Andrew Jackson.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.2121
Shimon-Zhivago wrote:
Brissia wrote:I'm Jewish, so I guess I'll just stare at your windows, waving a menorah at Christmas Carolers.

But you won't because Hanukkah is at Thanksgiving.
Just imagine; "Friends, family, I'd just like to say before I cut the Turkey BARUCH ATA ADONAI..."

User avatar
Middelburgsrijk
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Nov 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Middelburgsrijk » Wed Nov 19, 2014 2:14 am

Mark Rutte

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Wed Nov 19, 2014 2:20 am

Laerod wrote:
Mesrane wrote:I think he's saying she's the worst since the Nazis.

Nope. He's saying she's worse than Kurt Kiesinger, a Nazi and the Chancellor in power during the heavy handed dealings with student protests in the late sixties.


Depends on your point of view, I guess. Before Helmut Kohl, German chancellors and their policies were generally pretty irrelevant to the people outside West Germany and the GDR.

I'd rather make that assertion on evidence, not opinion. Why, with evidence, is Merkel the worst PM so far Germany's had?


You could make an argument that she's the German chancellor whose decisions have influenced more lives of people outside Germany in a negative way than any other German chancellor since 1945 and seriously endangering the political and economical infrastructure of the European Union.

I'm not saying that one opinion is right and the other wrong. I think both naming Kiesinger for his domestic policies and Merkel for her European policies are legitimate nominations.

Also, one should clarify that when talking about the leaders of post-1945 Germany, he is talking about the Federal Republic of Germany. Obviously, the people in charge of a country-sized, secret police-run prison camp that shot its own citizens for trying to escape were worse than any federal German chancellor by default.
Last edited by Baltenstein on Wed Nov 19, 2014 2:40 am, edited 10 times in total.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Toronina
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6660
Founded: Oct 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Toronina » Wed Nov 19, 2014 2:31 am

Our current PM, one Tony Abbott. Seriously, he acts like a baby when he doesn't get his way. I get the feeling that all the other country's are laughing at us for electing him. He's a homophobe, misogynist, the list goes on and on and on.
Now I'm back in the ring to take another swing

User avatar
BlueShores
Secretary
 
Posts: 30
Founded: Nov 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby BlueShores » Wed Nov 19, 2014 2:37 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Sanctus Byzantium wrote:
Well I could have said Lincoln but I have a feeling I would have been ripped apart. Besides really most Presidents I have little to no opinion on. The few that I do are divided between those that I like: Theodore Roosevelt, Washington, Jackson, Grant, Mckinley, Truman, Coolidge, and Eisenhower. And those I dislike: Obama, Wilson, Nixon, Andrew Johnson, and to some extent Lincoln. Really it comes down to personal liking of them. And my personal opinion is that I think Obama is not a strong leader (which is something I respect) and I just have a personal disliking of Wilson. Though it also comes by my study of history.


You realize, of course, that policy-wise, Obama is actually just a touch to the right of Eisenhower.


Shhhh.... this is the big secret that Fox News doesnt want you to know...

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Wed Nov 19, 2014 2:39 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Sanctus Byzantium wrote:
Well I could have said Lincoln but I have a feeling I would have been ripped apart. Besides really most Presidents I have little to no opinion on. The few that I do are divided between those that I like: Theodore Roosevelt, Washington, Jackson, Grant, Mckinley, Truman, Coolidge, and Eisenhower. And those I dislike: Obama, Wilson, Nixon, Andrew Johnson, and to some extent Lincoln. Really it comes down to personal liking of them. And my personal opinion is that I think Obama is not a strong leader (which is something I respect) and I just have a personal disliking of Wilson. Though it also comes by my study of history.


You realize, of course, that policy-wise, Obama is actually just a touch to the right of Eisenhower.

Clearly the qualifier then is that Obama hasn't toppled enough democratically elected governments at the behest of multinational corporations.

User avatar
New Socialist South Africa
Minister
 
Posts: 3406
Founded: Aug 31, 2013
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby New Socialist South Africa » Wed Nov 19, 2014 2:46 am

The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:
New Socialist South Africa wrote:
How do you measure the will to improve? Do you get rewarded for that? Is that like giving people the dole in the UK if they keep on trying to find employment even if they keep on failing due to under qualification?

How about someone who is severely mentally handicapped from a poor background, or someone else who lacks the actual capacity to improve, what about them?

If they lack the capacity to improve, they don't. People from a poor background do not lack the capacity to improve, I myself was born into poverty and so were my parents, but now I have an income in the top 20%.

I didn't get it free, for sure.


Ya. You got there based on a mixture of luck, intelligence and talent you were born with (so more luck) and being born and raised in a way that gave you the motivation to work hard (so even more luck). Not everyone is born with that much luck, sure some are born with even more luck in that they are already rich in addition to being born intelligent, talented and being raised to have a good work ethic, but others lack all of those factors. my question is what about the truly unlucky? What about someone who is born poor, without being born lucky, talented or intelligent and is not raised to have a good work ethic, or is extremely sick or mentally and / or physically handicapped?
"I find that offensive" is never a sound counter argument.
"Men in general are quick to believe that which they wish to be true." - Gaius Julius Caesar
"I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against." - Malcolm X
"The soul of a nation can be seen in the way it treats its children" - Nelson Mandela
The wealth of humanity should be determined by that of the poorest individual.

"What makes a man

Strength enough to build a home
Time enough to hold a child
and Love enough to break a heart".

Terry Pratchett


Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aerlanica, Anarchic States, Eahland, Galloism, Luziyca, Neo-American States, Pizza Friday Forever91, South Northville, The Acolyte Confederacy, Vivida Vis Animi, Vylumiti

Advertisement

Remove ads