Advertisement

by Camelza » Tue Nov 18, 2014 5:43 pm

by Luziyca » Tue Nov 18, 2014 5:55 pm
Merizoc wrote:Kincoboh wrote:Most definitely, positively Stephen Harper. What an arrogant asshole. I am so glad there is an election next year! Only 11 months to go!![]()
Mulroney comes a close second, in signing NAFTA and lying and general scumbaggery.
Some would argue Trudeau, but I'd say he's probably far and away the best PM we've had in modern times. His thing with Alberta was kind of shitty, but it could have been a lot worse. He signing a lot of good laws in more than makes up for that.
Oh yeah, I'm Canadian too. Definitely Harper, then Mulroney. Not so confident about the election though...

by Benuty » Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:05 pm
The Polarian Empire wrote:Jackson and bush...ooh Bush annoys me to death x x

by Sebastianbourg » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:07 pm
Lydenburg wrote:Amazuma. And I thought we couldn't possibly get any worse with Mbeki.

by Lydenburg » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:08 pm

by Sanctus Byzantium » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:09 pm
Constantinopolis wrote:Sanctus Byzantium wrote:Obama, followed by Wilson.
Really? They're worse than presidents who committed ethnic cleansing and/or literally supported slavery?
The United States may have a much shorter history than most other countries represented here, but I think it's fair to say that anyone who names a president from the 20th or 21st centuries as "the worst" is doing it wrong.

by Nuevo Gran Mexico » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:13 pm

by Rebellious Fishermen » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:18 pm

by Furry Alairia and Algeria » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:20 pm

by Rebellious Fishermen » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:23 pm
Sanctus Byzantium wrote:Constantinopolis wrote:Really? They're worse than presidents who committed ethnic cleansing and/or literally supported slavery?
The United States may have a much shorter history than most other countries represented here, but I think it's fair to say that anyone who names a president from the 20th or 21st centuries as "the worst" is doing it wrong.
Well I could have said Lincoln but I have a feeling I would have been ripped apart. Besides really most Presidents I have little to no opinion on. The few that I do are divided between those that I like: Theodore Roosevelt, Washington, Jackson, Grant, Mckinley, Truman, Coolidge, and Eisenhower. And those I dislike: Obama, Wilson, Nixon, Andrew Johnson, and to some extent Lincoln. Really it comes down to personal liking of them. And my personal opinion is that I think Obama is not a strong leader (which is something I respect) and I just have a personal disliking of Wilson. Though it also comes by my study of history.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:07 pm
Sanctus Byzantium wrote:Constantinopolis wrote:Really? They're worse than presidents who committed ethnic cleansing and/or literally supported slavery?
The United States may have a much shorter history than most other countries represented here, but I think it's fair to say that anyone who names a president from the 20th or 21st centuries as "the worst" is doing it wrong.
Well I could have said Lincoln but I have a feeling I would have been ripped apart. Besides really most Presidents I have little to no opinion on. The few that I do are divided between those that I like: Theodore Roosevelt, Washington, Jackson, Grant, Mckinley, Truman, Coolidge, and Eisenhower. And those I dislike: Obama, Wilson, Nixon, Andrew Johnson, and to some extent Lincoln. Really it comes down to personal liking of them. And my personal opinion is that I think Obama is not a strong leader (which is something I respect) and I just have a personal disliking of Wilson. Though it also comes by my study of history.

by Skappola » Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:13 pm

by Lydenburg » Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:39 pm
New Socialist South Africa wrote:Murkwood wrote:Wilson. Hands down. Barack Obama is a far-second.
Wow. Apparently Jackson's Indian murdering and the support of slave ownership by him and other early US presidents is nowhere near as bad as world war 1 era Wilson (who was admittedly pretty awful) and Barrack Obama (who has been somewhere between bad and ok in my opinion).
In South Africa the award has to go to Prime Minister H.F. Verwoerd, the "architect of Apartheid", who strengthened the Apartheid system created by Prime Minister D.F. Malan, and was in office when the Sharpeville Massacre occurred.

by Legendardisch » Tue Nov 18, 2014 11:03 pm
The United Federation of Legendardisch
Pegasus Armed Dealership | De Volkscourant | Embassy Program | Factbook | Legendardisch.gov
PROUD MEMBER OF: I.S.A , I.C.O.N , V.N.T , U.P.A , I.F.C , I.E.S.P , I.A.T.A , I.C.D , D.S.A , U.T.A
Some very cool links: Flickr | DeviantART | Personal Website
Nederlander | Je Suis Charlie | PEGIDA

by Dracoria » Tue Nov 18, 2014 11:20 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:I am an American. Worst president is nixon. He destroyed the people's trust in the presidency.

by Baltenstein » Wed Nov 19, 2014 2:20 am
I'd rather make that assertion on evidence, not opinion. Why, with evidence, is Merkel the worst PM so far Germany's had?

by Toronina » Wed Nov 19, 2014 2:31 am

by BlueShores » Wed Nov 19, 2014 2:37 am
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Sanctus Byzantium wrote:
Well I could have said Lincoln but I have a feeling I would have been ripped apart. Besides really most Presidents I have little to no opinion on. The few that I do are divided between those that I like: Theodore Roosevelt, Washington, Jackson, Grant, Mckinley, Truman, Coolidge, and Eisenhower. And those I dislike: Obama, Wilson, Nixon, Andrew Johnson, and to some extent Lincoln. Really it comes down to personal liking of them. And my personal opinion is that I think Obama is not a strong leader (which is something I respect) and I just have a personal disliking of Wilson. Though it also comes by my study of history.
You realize, of course, that policy-wise, Obama is actually just a touch to the right of Eisenhower.

by Laerod » Wed Nov 19, 2014 2:39 am
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Sanctus Byzantium wrote:
Well I could have said Lincoln but I have a feeling I would have been ripped apart. Besides really most Presidents I have little to no opinion on. The few that I do are divided between those that I like: Theodore Roosevelt, Washington, Jackson, Grant, Mckinley, Truman, Coolidge, and Eisenhower. And those I dislike: Obama, Wilson, Nixon, Andrew Johnson, and to some extent Lincoln. Really it comes down to personal liking of them. And my personal opinion is that I think Obama is not a strong leader (which is something I respect) and I just have a personal disliking of Wilson. Though it also comes by my study of history.
You realize, of course, that policy-wise, Obama is actually just a touch to the right of Eisenhower.

by New Socialist South Africa » Wed Nov 19, 2014 2:46 am
The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:New Socialist South Africa wrote:
How do you measure the will to improve? Do you get rewarded for that? Is that like giving people the dole in the UK if they keep on trying to find employment even if they keep on failing due to under qualification?
How about someone who is severely mentally handicapped from a poor background, or someone else who lacks the actual capacity to improve, what about them?
If they lack the capacity to improve, they don't. People from a poor background do not lack the capacity to improve, I myself was born into poverty and so were my parents, but now I have an income in the top 20%.
I didn't get it free, for sure.
Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aerlanica, Anarchic States, Eahland, Galloism, Luziyca, Neo-American States, Pizza Friday Forever91, South Northville, The Acolyte Confederacy, Vivida Vis Animi, Vylumiti
Advertisement