Advertisement

by Papait » Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:25 am

by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:25 am
Papait wrote:That's like completely wrong
Australia is Australia, Tasmania, New Guinea and Timor.
New Zealand is part of Oceania, never part of australia


by Bulgar Rouge » Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:25 am

by The Archregimancy » Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:29 am
The Althing Confederacy wrote:2) Old Chris Colombo who actually discovered, and exploited what is now Cuba, and Haiti (He never once landed in what is now North America)!

by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:34 am
The Archregimancy wrote:The Althing Confederacy wrote:2) Old Chris Colombo who actually discovered, and exploited what is now Cuba, and Haiti (He never once landed in what is now North America)!
Yes he did.
On his fourth voyage, Columbus landed on the continental landmass of North America on the 14th of August, 1502, at what's now Puerto Castilla, Honduras. He continued down the Caribbean coast of Central America - the "southernmost, isthmian portion of the North American continent" - as far as Panama.
Columbus also landed on the continental landmass of the Americas on his third voyage in 1498, albeit in South America, in what's now Venezuela.


by Southern Arkansas » Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:42 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:The Archregimancy wrote:
Yes he did.
On his fourth voyage, Columbus landed on the continental landmass of North America on the 14th of August, 1502, at what's now Puerto Castilla, Honduras. He continued down the Caribbean coast of Central America - the "southernmost, isthmian portion of the North American continent" - as far as Panama.
Columbus also landed on the continental landmass of the Americas on his third voyage in 1498, albeit in South America, in what's now Venezuela.
That is not North America for those who speak Portuguese, Spanish, French and Italian!

by New Waterford » Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:44 am

by Buse » Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:44 am
The Althing Confederacy wrote:Quite simply it was the NATIVE AMERICAN INDIANS who discovered the Americas! All the others came much later!
The only archeological evidence for european rediscovery/conquests (in order);
1) The vikings under Leif Erikson circa 1000ad (near L'ans aux meadows, Canada)
2) Old Chris Colombo who actually discovered, and exploited what is now Cuba, and Haiti (He never once landed in what is now North America)!
3) All the other european nations driven by manifest destiny, and imperial colonialism.

by The Holy Therns » Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:45 am
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:50 am

by Rupudska » Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:52 am
Hladgos wrote:Scantly clad women, more like tanks
seem to be blowing up everyones banks
with airstrikes from girls with wings to their knees
which show a bit more than just their panties

by The Archregimancy » Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:55 am

by Lydenburg » Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:59 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Lydenburg wrote:
Capital. If he works at Elmina he's undoubtedly aware of the "French Battery" there. I'm not sure if there's more than one on site, or if if indeed several French batteries existed on the particular site throughout history, but the term was used in the logs of Michael Hemmersam to describe where an earlier fortification was built by French explorers who were the first possessors of the place.
Either way Mr. De Corse will be familiar with the term and it'd be helpful if you make mention of this when you begin your correspondence.
I confess I may have rather naively assumed the reference to founding a settlement at Cape Bojador automatically equated to an undertaking of similar proportions at Elmina if indeed Normans were also present in that region. However, Hemmersman mentions a battery so I conjectured a colony of a more static nature.
The French were not the first 'possessors' of Elmina - the Portuguese were. The Portuguese built São Jorge da Mina castle in 1482; "el mina" = the mine.
Are you absolutely sure that you're wholly up to date with the archaeology of the site? You keep mentioning things like the West African Archaeological Newsletter, but that was only published from 1964-1971 before it turned into the Journal, and its short paper on the French Battery was published in 1968. The most recent citation you've offered is the Calvocoressi article from 1977. So I just have this nagging feeling that you're relying on some seriously outdated analysis.
You're clearly sincerely interested in the site, so if perhaps read Dr De Corse's 2001 book An Archaeology of Elmina if you haven't done so already; I recommend it to all of my students studying the archaeology of early modern globalisation.
You might also be interested in this: http://www.academia.edu/796757/Beads_as ... rchaeology
In any case, I'll likely see Chris De Corse at a conference in January, so I can ask him then if I don't ask him before then.

by Southern Arkansas » Sun Nov 16, 2014 5:01 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Southern Arkansas wrote:
I didn't know Honduras was in North America for anyone.
The moden concept of Central America is largely a social construct rather than a purely geographical one. Leaving aside social and political geography, and focusing solely on physical geography - which would be most relevant to a 1498 definition pre-dating colonialism - Central America is part of the North American landmass; it is the southernmost isthmus of the North American continent, though there are different definitions depending on the broader socio-political context.


by Gezi Park » Sun Nov 16, 2014 5:04 am
Estenia wrote:Erdogan smokes weed, too uch weed, he needs to learn history.
), so I wouldn't be surprised if he had a background full of this nasty stuff.
by Ravenflight » Sun Nov 16, 2014 5:06 am

by The Archregimancy » Sun Nov 16, 2014 5:07 am
Lydenburg wrote:Incidentally I was at the 14th Pan-African Archaeological Congress right here in Braam this past July, may have even seen Dr. De Corse there. Or even a certain NS moderator....that is, if he goes to Africanist archaeologist conferences...


by L Ron Cupboard » Sun Nov 16, 2014 5:23 am

by Ravenflight » Sun Nov 16, 2014 5:27 am

by Pola » Sun Nov 16, 2014 5:29 am
.
by Summerset Plains » Sun Nov 16, 2014 5:30 am

by CTALNH » Sun Nov 16, 2014 5:31 am

by CTALNH » Sun Nov 16, 2014 5:32 am
Summerset Plains wrote:The vikings abandoned america. They only colonised NewFoundLand
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bemolian Lands, Cannot think of a name, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Hurdergaryp, Narland, New Kowloon Bay, Old Tyrannia, Pizza Friday Forever91, Rary, Stellar Colonies, Sussy Susness, Techocracy101010, The Holy Rat, The Jamesian Republic, The Pirateariat, The Two Jerseys, Uiiop
Advertisement