Ratateague wrote:Sooo... the consumer of said shirt is criticized and not the producer?
Apparently it was custom-made, so it's not like the manufacturer is actually marketing it.
Advertisement
by The Two Jerseys » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:24 am
Ratateague wrote:Sooo... the consumer of said shirt is criticized and not the producer?
by Ifreann » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:24 am
by The Holy Therns » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:25 am
Ifreann wrote:The Holy Therns wrote:
Oho! Something constructive. Got a link, hon?
https://twitter.com/Fyre_flye/status/533503115707023360
https://twitter.com/Fyre_flye/status/533354979768029184
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.
by Frazers » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:25 am
Glasgia wrote:Frazers wrote:Ridiculous. The man did something incredible and the petty idiots used him for there own stupid little agenda. The man should be lauded.
"used him" = Asked him to apologise and were apparently satisfied when he did so. He's been correctly celebrated for what he did right, so he should also apologise for what he did wrong.
by Novorobo » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:26 am
Socialist Nordia wrote:Oh shit, let's hope we don't have to take in any /pol/ refugees.
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:27 am
Laerod wrote:In the effort of salvaging the discussion: I'd disagree. The inherent problem isn't so much that he owns and wears a shirt like this, it's the context in which he wore it. That would be a responsibility beyond the manufacturer's scope.
by Alyakia » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:28 am
Novorobo wrote:So apparently it's not reasonable to complain about women wearing skimpy clothing, but it's reasonable to complain about men wearing something that shows a woman wearing skimpy clothing?
Frazers wrote:Glasgia wrote:
"used him" = Asked him to apologise and were apparently satisfied when he did so. He's been correctly celebrated for what he did right, so he should also apologise for what he did wrong.
He did absolutely nothing wrong. They're small people with small minds who can't fathom that perhaps everything isn't an attack on them. They can fuck right off. It doesn't matter that they're satisfied that they achieved a stupid aim. They should never have aimed for it in the first place. This was more about furthering their own agenda than actually giving a shit about him. He was nothing more than a very public figure to attach their message to. Fuck the lot of them.
by Frazers » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:30 am
Alyakia wrote:Novorobo wrote:So apparently it's not reasonable to complain about women wearing skimpy clothing, but it's reasonable to complain about men wearing something that shows a woman wearing skimpy clothing?
swing and a miss.Frazers wrote:
He did absolutely nothing wrong. They're small people with small minds who can't fathom that perhaps everything isn't an attack on them. They can fuck right off. It doesn't matter that they're satisfied that they achieved a stupid aim. They should never have aimed for it in the first place. This was more about furthering their own agenda than actually giving a shit about him. He was nothing more than a very public figure to attach their message to. Fuck the lot of them.
to be fair taking off your proper professional clothes to put on a comic shirt probably isn't the best idea period
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:31 am
Frazers wrote:He did absolutely nothing wrong. They're small people with small minds who can't fathom that perhaps everything isn't an attack on them. They can fuck right off. It doesn't matter that they're satisfied that they achieved a stupid aim. They should never have aimed for it in the first place. This was more about furthering their own agenda than actually giving a shit about him. He was nothing more than a very public figure to attach their message to. Fuck the lot of them.
by Revanchism » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:31 am
Do you even have a job?Frazers wrote:Alyakia wrote:
swing and a miss.
to be fair taking off your proper professional clothes to put on a comic shirt probably isn't the best idea period
And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.
I suppose he was asking for it given what he was wearing though. Right guys?
Norstal wrote:You ever watched a bad movie that is so bad, that it's enlightening? Like, you start asking yourself, "why did I watched this movie. What is the meaning of life after I watched this movie."
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Excuse me, I believe that the proper term is Satanic-American.
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Does Queen Elsa have a partnership with the Rothschild family in the film?
by Alyakia » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:31 am
Frazers wrote:Alyakia wrote:
swing and a miss.
to be fair taking off your proper professional clothes to put on a comic shirt probably isn't the best idea period
And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.
I suppose he was asking for it given what he was wearing though. Right guys?
by Washington Resistance Army » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:32 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Glasgia wrote:[T]hough it's absolutely horrible that people have obviously hurt such an intelligent man
No. It's exactly because he's intelligent and has a reputation of intelligence, that he shouldn't do dumb things that are harmful to people who hold less relevance to other people's eyes.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:Screw them, it's a fucking shirt it doesn't dissuade women from doing anything.
Not directly.
Indirectly, symbolism would have, depending on the perspective of who sees it, a big man doing something great in the history of mankind where woman are a secondary figure of aesthetics and sexualization under the gaze of tru protagonists of history.
You have a male perspective. So don't be so eager to call BS and desperate attempts of gathering controversy.
by Frazers » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:33 am
Alyakia wrote:Frazers wrote:
And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.
I suppose he was asking for it given what he was wearing though. Right guys?
it's ridiclous that he decided to take off his professional uniform to put on something unprofessional. i'm not saying get the pikes out but really.
by Glasgia » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:33 am
Frazers wrote:Glasgia wrote:
"used him" = Asked him to apologise and were apparently satisfied when he did so. He's been correctly celebrated for what he did right, so he should also apologise for what he did wrong.
He did absolutely nothing wrong. They're small people with small minds who can't fathom that perhaps everything isn't an attack on them. They can fuck right off. It doesn't matter that they're satisfied that they achieved a stupid aim. They should never have aimed for it in the first place. This was more about furthering their own agenda than actually giving a shit about him. He was nothing more than a very public figure to attach their message to. Fuck the lot of them.
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:33 am
Frazers wrote:And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.
by Alyakia » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:34 am
by Frazers » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:34 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Frazers wrote:And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.
Academicism is ugly.
Sometimes scientists are oppressive too. We should expect high standards from them exactly because, like politicians, educators, people who work in the media, and so on, they are powerful and advance certain ideologies.
In his case, it's exactly because he's estimated as a symbol of power through knowledge.
by Frazers » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:35 am
Alyakia wrote:Frazers wrote:
He put on something he felt comfortable in to celebrate the culmination of a careers work. Fuck that guy
yes. it's the culmination of a careers work. the presidents of several countries are watching. if you want to be comfortable do it when you're not talking to the world. he was apparently comfortable enough that he didn't decide to wear it until the event, after which he promptly took it off again. ho hum.
by Laerod » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:35 am
Frazers wrote:And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.
I suppose he was asking for it given what he was wearing though. Right guys?
by Murkwood » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:38 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:39 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Sorry but I'm just not seeing it, yes it's a cheesy shirt and not something you should wear for something so official but the SJW's are just being stupid like always. It's a shirt, they just need to get over it because no one was hurt by it.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Cyptopir, Hypron, Keltionialang, Moloto Japan, Neu California, Talibanada, Uiiop
Advertisement