NATION

PASSWORD

Rosetta mission scientist Dr Matt Taylor persecuted by SJWs

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Two Jerseys
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20979
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Two Jerseys » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:24 am

Ratateague wrote:Sooo... the consumer of said shirt is criticized and not the producer? :eyebrow:

Apparently it was custom-made, so it's not like the manufacturer is actually marketing it.
"The Duke of Texas" is too formal for regular use. Just call me "Your Grace".
"If I would like to watch goodness, sanity, God and logic being fucked I would watch Japanese porn." -Nightkill the Emperor
"This thread makes me wish I was a moron so that I wouldn't have to comprehend how stupid the topic is." -The Empire of Pretantia
Head of State: HM King Louis
Head of Government: The Rt. Hon. James O'Dell MP, Prime Minister
Ambassador to the World Assembly: HE Sir John Ross "J.R." Ewing II, Bt.
Join Excalibur Squadron. We're Commandos who fly Spitfires. Chicks dig Commandos who fly Spitfires.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163891
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:24 am

The Holy Therns wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I heard about this when I noticed small horse cartoonist and feminist Lauren Faust applauding Dr. Taylor on Twitter for apologising for his shirt. Fuckin' unreasonable SJWs, eh?


Oho! Something constructive. Got a link, hon?

Image

https://twitter.com/Fyre_flye/status/533503115707023360
https://twitter.com/Fyre_flye/status/533354979768029184
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
The Holy Therns
Post Czar
 
Posts: 30591
Founded: Jul 09, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Holy Therns » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:25 am



Lovely! Issue settled, then. Thank you for the clarification.
Platitude with attitude
Your new favorite.
MTF transperson. She/her. Lives in Sweden.
Also, N A N A ! ! !
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜

Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:25 am

Glasgia wrote:
Frazers wrote:Ridiculous. The man did something incredible and the petty idiots used him for there own stupid little agenda. The man should be lauded.


"used him" = Asked him to apologise and were apparently satisfied when he did so. He's been correctly celebrated for what he did right, so he should also apologise for what he did wrong.


He did absolutely nothing wrong. They're small people with small minds who can't fathom that perhaps everything isn't an attack on them. They can fuck right off. It doesn't matter that they're satisfied that they achieved a stupid aim. They should never have aimed for it in the first place. This was more about furthering their own agenda than actually giving a shit about him. He was nothing more than a very public figure to attach their message to. Fuck the lot of them.

User avatar
Novorobo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1776
Founded: Jan 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novorobo » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:26 am

EDIT: NVM, misinterpreted story.
Last edited by Novorobo on Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Socialist Nordia wrote:Oh shit, let's hope we don't have to take in any /pol/ refugees.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:27 am

Laerod wrote:In the effort of salvaging the discussion: I'd disagree. The inherent problem isn't so much that he owns and wears a shirt like this, it's the context in which he wore it. That would be a responsibility beyond the manufacturer's scope.

Yeah.

It's not like people are supposed to be sex-negative?

I think sex-critical (is it even a majority within social justice and feminism?) is nice and all, but it might be counterproductive if we direct it at the wrong audience in the wrong time. If anything dominant class folks who have an interest in less slut-shaming are useful allies, because they see use in our politics for their own benefit.

Gender is super organic and magic to me and other non-binary people, but do cis people like learning about it to the point they know it to a rainbow-puking point? Generally no. They only really learn about it, when they do, is because 1. they're already into our politics 2. they're trying to have empathy

People who are dominant class hate 1 because "feminism is nasty" and as average people they're not interested in 2, waxing about empathy when it comes to groups that aren't theirs and that they hold as a distant complementary role with fully different expectations and ~fate as inborn nature~ for their ultimate functions in life (dyadic cishet women) or that they shouldn't really enter in huge contact with or hold as an example to their own stuff (queer people) doesn't sound like a common exercise, given the popularity of people like Charlie Sheen. (Did I already say the Brazilian fandom of Two and A Half Men is repugnant and vile?)

So yeah, long story short, I doubt people are complaining about the shirt, or will ever do something similar in the future.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:28 am

Novorobo wrote:So apparently it's not reasonable to complain about women wearing skimpy clothing, but it's reasonable to complain about men wearing something that shows a woman wearing skimpy clothing?


swing and a miss.

Frazers wrote:
Glasgia wrote:
"used him" = Asked him to apologise and were apparently satisfied when he did so. He's been correctly celebrated for what he did right, so he should also apologise for what he did wrong.


He did absolutely nothing wrong. They're small people with small minds who can't fathom that perhaps everything isn't an attack on them. They can fuck right off. It doesn't matter that they're satisfied that they achieved a stupid aim. They should never have aimed for it in the first place. This was more about furthering their own agenda than actually giving a shit about him. He was nothing more than a very public figure to attach their message to. Fuck the lot of them.


to be fair taking off your proper professional clothes to put on a comic shirt probably isn't the best idea period
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:30 am

Alyakia wrote:
Novorobo wrote:So apparently it's not reasonable to complain about women wearing skimpy clothing, but it's reasonable to complain about men wearing something that shows a woman wearing skimpy clothing?


swing and a miss.

Frazers wrote:
He did absolutely nothing wrong. They're small people with small minds who can't fathom that perhaps everything isn't an attack on them. They can fuck right off. It doesn't matter that they're satisfied that they achieved a stupid aim. They should never have aimed for it in the first place. This was more about furthering their own agenda than actually giving a shit about him. He was nothing more than a very public figure to attach their message to. Fuck the lot of them.


to be fair taking off your proper professional clothes to put on a comic shirt probably isn't the best idea period


And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.

I suppose he was asking for it given what he was wearing though. Right guys?
Last edited by Frazers on Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Allancia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6571
Founded: Jul 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Allancia » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:31 am

Personally, I blame Obama.
"One of the great things about books is sometimes there are some fantastic pictures."
-George Bush

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:31 am

Frazers wrote:He did absolutely nothing wrong. They're small people with small minds who can't fathom that perhaps everything isn't an attack on them. They can fuck right off. It doesn't matter that they're satisfied that they achieved a stupid aim. They should never have aimed for it in the first place. This was more about furthering their own agenda than actually giving a shit about him. He was nothing more than a very public figure to attach their message to. Fuck the lot of them.

It's because of people like you that we should do it.

Manly frustration = mission accomplished.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Revanchism
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1846
Founded: Dec 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Revanchism » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:31 am

Frazers wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
swing and a miss.



to be fair taking off your proper professional clothes to put on a comic shirt probably isn't the best idea period

And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.

I suppose he was asking for it given what he was wearing though. Right guys?
Do you even have a job?
Last edited by Revanchism on Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
I'm back for a bit
Norstal wrote:You ever watched a bad movie that is so bad, that it's enlightening? Like, you start asking yourself, "why did I watched this movie. What is the meaning of life after I watched this movie."
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Excuse me, I believe that the proper term is Satanic-American.
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Does Queen Elsa have a partnership with the Rothschild family in the film?
Kolmya wrote:

Should have been titled A Trve Friend.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:
The Rodina wrote:It was american is hardly an argument.
It's the only argument I need.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:31 am

Frazers wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
swing and a miss.



to be fair taking off your proper professional clothes to put on a comic shirt probably isn't the best idea period


And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.

I suppose he was asking for it given what he was wearing though. Right guys?


it's ridiclous that he decided to take off his professional uniform to put on something unprofessional. i'm not saying get the pikes out but really.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:32 am

Revanchism wrote:
Frazers wrote:And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.

I suppose he was asking for it given what he was wearing though. Right guys?
Do you even have a job?


Actuary
Landlord

Yes.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54796
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:32 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Glasgia wrote:[T]hough it's absolutely horrible that people have obviously hurt such an intelligent man

No. It's exactly because he's intelligent and has a reputation of intelligence, that he shouldn't do dumb things that are harmful to people who hold less relevance to other people's eyes.


So wearing a cheesy shirt is dumb now :eyebrow:

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Screw them, it's a fucking shirt it doesn't dissuade women from doing anything.

Not directly.

Indirectly, symbolism would have, depending on the perspective of who sees it, a big man doing something great in the history of mankind where woman are a secondary figure of aesthetics and sexualization under the gaze of tru protagonists of history.

You have a male perspective. So don't be so eager to call BS and desperate attempts of gathering controversy.


Sorry but I'm just not seeing it, yes it's a cheesy shirt and not something you should wear for something so official but the SJW's are just being stupid like always. It's a shirt, they just need to get over it because no one was hurt by it.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:33 am

Alyakia wrote:
Frazers wrote:
And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.

I suppose he was asking for it given what he was wearing though. Right guys?


it's ridiclous that he decided to take off his professional uniform to put on something unprofessional. i'm not saying get the pikes out but really.


He put on something he felt comfortable in to celebrate the culmination of a careers work. Fuck that guy :roll:

User avatar
Glasgia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5665
Founded: Jul 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Glasgia » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:33 am

Frazers wrote:
Glasgia wrote:
"used him" = Asked him to apologise and were apparently satisfied when he did so. He's been correctly celebrated for what he did right, so he should also apologise for what he did wrong.


He did absolutely nothing wrong. They're small people with small minds who can't fathom that perhaps everything isn't an attack on them. They can fuck right off. It doesn't matter that they're satisfied that they achieved a stupid aim. They should never have aimed for it in the first place. This was more about furthering their own agenda than actually giving a shit about him. He was nothing more than a very public figure to attach their message to. Fuck the lot of them.


That's some cute language you're using there. I don't see how asking for Matt to apologise for a degrading shirt, without actually suggesting it as any kind of "attack on them", is "furthering their own agenda". He did the right, he apologised, people accepted the apology - End of.
Today's Featured Nation
Call me Glas, or Glasgia. Or just "mate".
Pal would work too.
Yeah, just call me whatever the fuck you want.




Market Socialist. Economic -8.12 Social -6.21
PRO: SNP, (Corbynite/Brownite/Footite) Labour Party, SSP, Sinn Féin, SDLP
ANTI: Blairite "New Labour", Tories, UKIP, DUP

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:33 am

Frazers wrote:And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.

Academicism is ugly.

Sometimes scientists are oppressive too. We should expect high standards from them exactly because, like politicians, educators, people who work in the media, and so on, they are powerful and advance certain ideologies.

In his case, it's exactly because he's estimated as a symbol of power through knowledge.
Last edited by Degenerate Heart of HetRio on Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:34 am

Frazers wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
it's ridiclous that he decided to take off his professional uniform to put on something unprofessional. i'm not saying get the pikes out but really.


He put on something he felt comfortable in to celebrate the culmination of a careers work. Fuck that guy :roll:


yes. it's the culmination of a careers work. the presidents of several countries are watching. if you want to be comfortable do it when you're not talking to the world. he was apparently comfortable enough that he didn't decide to wear it until the event, after which he promptly took it off again. ho hum.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:34 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Frazers wrote:And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.

Academicism is ugly.

Sometimes scientists are oppressive too. We should expect high standards from them exactly because, like politicians, educators, people who work in the media, and so on, they are powerful and advance certain ideologies.

In his case, it's exactly because he's estimated as a symbol of power through knowledge.


What bearing does his clothing have on any of that?

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:35 am

Alyakia wrote:
Frazers wrote:
He put on something he felt comfortable in to celebrate the culmination of a careers work. Fuck that guy :roll:


yes. it's the culmination of a careers work. the presidents of several countries are watching. if you want to be comfortable do it when you're not talking to the world. he was apparently comfortable enough that he didn't decide to wear it until the event, after which he promptly took it off again. ho hum.


Bow down to the authorities? I didn't expect that from you

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:35 am

Frazers wrote:And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.

Someone with that kind of avatar would say that...
I suppose he was asking for it given what he was wearing though. Right guys?

For comments on the appropriateness of his attire in the function he was in? Sure. Is implying that this is similar to rape a disgusting thing and should you be ashamed of yourself? Yes.

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:37 am

Laerod wrote:
Frazers wrote:And it's ridiculous that someone in his position and with his kind of achievement should be judged by what he's wearing rather than the calibre of his scientific mind.

Someone with that kind of avatar would say that...


Meaning?

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:38 am

I'm stuck between my prudishness and my intense dislike of SJWs.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:39 am

Washington Resistance Army wrote:Sorry but I'm just not seeing it, yes it's a cheesy shirt and not something you should wear for something so official but the SJW's are just being stupid like always. It's a shirt, they just need to get over it because no one was hurt by it.

No one was hurt, but it represents a pattern inside society!

Sexuality does represent class power when it's objectifying and in an unilateral way. It would even if said objectification became equal - what I doubt as we don't socially expect the acquiring of sexual conquest skills by women, we don't even hold it as biologically logical -, because [dyadic cishet] men are still historically privileged over other groups.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Sat Nov 15, 2014 8:39 am

The reaction to the reaction has completely outscaled the reaction itself.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Cyptopir, Hypron, Keltionialang, Moloto Japan, Neu California, Talibanada, Uiiop

Advertisement

Remove ads