Advertisement
by SuperFruitland » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:38 pm
by Bombadil » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:51 pm
by Tsaraine » Thu Nov 13, 2014 7:44 pm
by Czechanada » Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:12 pm
by The Nihilistic view » Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:33 pm
by The Nihilistic view » Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:50 pm
The Archregimancy wrote:Sdaeriji wrote:At this point, UEFA nations should seriously consider withdrawing from FIFA. FIFA is beyond saving, IMO.
Not going to happen - UEFA president Michel Platini is far too desperate to be Sepp Blatter's successor.
Also, one of the Qatar bid's main supporters was... Michel Platini. Blatter is widely believed to have voted for the United States.Platini has admitted voting for Qatar and lobbying for the move to winter, but has insisted that a much scrutinised meeting with the then French president Nicolas Sarkozy, the now Emir of Qatar and the Qatar prime minister did not result in pressure being put on him. "I knew Sarkozy wanted the people from Qatar to buy PSG," Platini told the Guardian in May. "I understood that Sarkozy supported the candidature of Qatar. But he never asked me, or to vote for Russia [for the 2018 World Cup]. He knows my personality. I always vote for what is good for football. Not for myself, not for France."
http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... -world-cup
So UEFA are hardly going to withdraw from FIFA here given how heavily implicated the head of UEFA is in the whole Qatar disaster to begin with.
I instead suggest we disband all formal football governing structures and return to grassroots sport; small boys in the park... jumpers for goalposts...
by Herskerstad » Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:58 am
by Risottia » Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:12 am
The Archregimancy wrote:1) Should FIFA continue to try and stop the release of the full Garcia report?
2) Can FIFA possibly do anything even more incompetent to make this increasingly uncomfortable farce any worse?
The answers, incidentally, are "no" and "oh, probably".
by Risottia » Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:13 am
SuperFruitLand wrote:So, I suppose with #FIFAlogic (we should get that trending) 2026 is going to Greenland/Iceland/Antarctica?
by The Archregimancy » Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:37 am
Bombadil wrote:FIFA are genius, they really just don't care at all, and why should they?
They could make the criteria 'the country that stuffs the most amount of money in this big bag' if they wanted to, not only are they not bound by any country, they can even bend the rules, change the law, within countries.
They had a special FIFA court in South Africa if I remember correctly.
I think it was an Australian who most harshly criticized them around the bidding process, and England always do.. and who's pointed out as corrupt.. England and Australia.
FIFA don't care, they're do what they like, they only conducted the report for a laugh as it is.
Anyway, fool England and Australia for complying, they should have followed Russia who basically said 'what? emails? umm.. we deleted them all, sorry, were they important?'
by Vassenor » Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:41 am
Bombadil wrote:They could make the criteria 'the country that stuffs the most amount of money in this big bag' if they wanted to, not only are they not bound by any country, they can even bend the rules, change the law, within countries.
They had a special FIFA court in South Africa if I remember correctly.
by Laerod » Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:42 am
The Archregimancy wrote:I do think Garcia is making a mistake by attempting to appeal FIFA's decision via FIFA's own internal appeals process.
He should just leak his full report himself, and damn the consequences.
by Risottia » Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:44 am
Vassenor wrote:Yup. They got the Brazilian "no alcohol sold at sporting venues" law overturned so that Budweiser, the OFFICIAL BEER OF THE 2014 FIFA WORLD CUP™, could be sold there.
by The Archregimancy » Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:46 am
by Laerod » Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:46 am
Risottia wrote:Vassenor wrote:Yup. They got the Brazilian "no alcohol sold at sporting venues" law overturned so that Budweiser, the OFFICIAL BEER OF THE 2014 FIFA WORLD CUP™, could be sold there.
I don't have a problem with the anti-alcohol law being overturned or suspended.
I have lots of problems with Budweiser being considered beer.
by Laerod » Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:48 am
The Archregimancy wrote:With Morocco pulling out of hosting the African Cup of Nations only two months before the event is held over fears of visiting fans from nations with an Ebola outbreak, ...
by The Archregimancy » Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:50 am
Laerod wrote:The Archregimancy wrote:I do think Garcia is making a mistake by attempting to appeal FIFA's decision via FIFA's own internal appeals process.
He should just leak his full report himself, and damn the consequences.
Speaks more for his integrity and the validity of his original report though.
by Risottia » Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:52 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Laerod wrote:Speaks more for his integrity and the validity of his original report though.
It does, and I can understand why he wants to follow due process, and go out of his way to exhaust the internal legal avenues. I do respect him for holding the line.
But we all know that FIFA doesn't give a rat's arse about due process; so at this point he should probably bite the bullet and leak. If there's a confidentiality clause in his contract - which there almost certainly is - I doubt he'd have too much difficulty finding people to offer him legal and financial support.
by The Four Taxmen of the Apocalypse » Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:55 am
by The Archregimancy » Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:56 am
by Laerod » Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:02 am
The Four Taxmen of the Apocalypse wrote:Fuck it. All future World Cup events are to be held on Mars. Teams not present will be instantly disqualified, and if no Earth teams attend then the host team will be declared the winner, even if the host team does not exist.
The Archregimancy wrote:Laerod wrote:I thought they wanted it delayed and then got booted for asking as much?
The specific set of events was:
1) Morocco asked for a postponement until 2016.
2) CAF decided not to grant a postponement, and on the 2nd of November sent Morocco a letter asking for clarification on whether they still wanted to host, setting an 8th of November deadline for a reply.
3) Morocco failed to reply to the letter from the CAF.
4) Following Morocco's failure to reply to the request for clarification, CAF then confirmed that Morocco would not act as hosts, and couldn't participate in the tournament.
There's some room for semantics over whether Morocco pulled out or were booted out, and much depends on who's arguing the point - but the Royal Morocco Football Association's failure to reply to CAF's request for a clarification was a de facto withdrawal from hosting.
by The Four Taxmen of the Apocalypse » Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:34 am
Laerod wrote:The Four Taxmen of the Apocalypse wrote:Fuck it. All future World Cup events are to be held on Mars. Teams not present will be instantly disqualified, and if no Earth teams attend then the host team will be declared the winner, even if the host team does not exist.
I for one look forward to England complaining about how they lost because of the lack of an atmosphere =P
by The Archregimancy » Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:09 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Not directly related to the thread topic, but an interesting tangent broadly relevant to Qatar's bid.
With Morocco pulling out of hosting the African Cup of Nations only two months before the event is held over fears of visiting fans from nations with an Ebola outbreak, it looks like Qatar is offering to step in to act as an emergency host (despite very obviously not being in Africa) "because of its strong relation with Issa Hayatou, president of the Confederation of African Football".
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Sarduri, Shrillland
Advertisement