NATION

PASSWORD

What are your thoughts on Atheism?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29265
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:01 am

Creepoc Infinite wrote:
The Smith Protectorate wrote:
Why do you believe Christians 'of old' thought the world as flat?

The bible implies it and everyone thought the world was flat at that point in time when the Old Testament was written.


This is demonstrably incorrect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_Earth

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:01 am

Transyl wrote:
Crysuko wrote:wrong again. when will the LACK of belief defintion sink in?

We do not lack in belief, our belief is that god doesnt exist.

Wrong.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:03 am

Crysuko wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
its not more open-minded. It does one of two things.

1) it just assumes a default position of their being no God

2) it demonstrates a lack of faith

Neither of the above two options necessarily demonstrates a more open mind

1. conclusion based on evidence
2. a nessecity of the above
but they don't demonstrate a closed mind, either.


1. It's more like just a starting assumption. They just assume the default position is... if it can't be proven, it doesn't exist. That's really a subjective call mascarading as unchangeable rationality. Its also a very self-serving position for scientists.

2. If you mindlessly assume the supremacy of the scientific method and its assumptions (it's just a man-made tool/framework), then I would say the close-mindedness is comparable to that of many religious fanatics

User avatar
Creepoc Infinite
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1573
Founded: Jan 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Creepoc Infinite » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:05 am

The Smith Protectorate wrote:
Creepoc Infinite wrote:It doesn't have to offer you value because atheism doesn't offer anything but a more open mind.
(In regards to science and evidence)
There is no evidence that directly contradicts a deist god. May I ask why you waste your time believing in something if there's no reason for you to? And that's not supported by science?


A flat world doesn't flood, also Greeks are accurate to within 1% of earth's circumference.

1. Where's your citations?

2. Who said that the bible ever made total sense?

3. The flood didn't happen so who cares
Signed, Creepoc Infinite
Secularism should be implemented everywhere at all times, get god out of politics. Get god away from impressionable children while you're at it.
check out my region, here.
Star Wars:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=328953

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:05 am

Vazdaria wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
It is not logical to assume anything without evidence.

The skeptical view is absolutely insane and illogical. You would need proof that Zimbabwe exists! Or some other country. All of the maps could be lying you know :P

There is evidence that Zimbabwe exists.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Manhat
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 105
Founded: May 23, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Manhat » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:08 am

Sad to see they are the most hated group in the US

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:08 am

Sociobiology wrote:Whereas I have evidence that is the best way to treat people if you want a healthy, safe society.

Whose health and safety are we concerned with?
and their of plenty of people who take it on principle that minorities should not be treated equal and as long as they justify it by faith you have no claim that they are wrong because that is exactly what you are using.

Why would I have no claim that they're wrong?
regardless of evidence = without concern to evidence in any way, I think you just proved my point.
and I can show that is how it is used with a single phrase.
"sometimes you just gotta have faith"

Not at all. In fact, both of my examples say the exact opposite.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
The Smith Protectorate
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 157
Founded: Oct 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Smith Protectorate » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:08 am

Creepoc Infinite wrote:
The Smith Protectorate wrote:
A flat world doesn't flood, also Greeks are accurate to within 1% of earth's circumference.

1. Where's your citations?

2. Who said that the bible ever made total sense?

3. The flood didn't happen so who cares


and the greeks?, the flat world was a play on words and you didn't Google globus cruciger and your last number was very ignorant, citation for OP?! no. so please don't contradict, it's a discussion not a bash.
I'm glad you clicked, have a good day.
  1. Age: 19
  2. Christian
  3. Democratic Socialist
  4. Aspergers syndrome

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:10 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:its not a rational position...

God COULD exist. It can't be disproved.

Familiarize yourself with the Null Hypothesis and what atheism is.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Creepoc Infinite
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1573
Founded: Jan 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Creepoc Infinite » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:12 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Creepoc Infinite wrote:It doesn't have to offer you value because atheism doesn't offer anything but a more open mind.
(In regards to science and evidence)
There is no evidence that directly contradicts a deist god. May I ask why you waste your time believing in something if there's no reason for you to? And that's not supported by science?


its not more open-minded. It does one of two things.

1) it just assumes a default position of their being no God

2) it demonstrates a lack of faith

Neither of the above two options necessarily demonstrates a more open mind

1. Atheism is the LACK OF BELIEF IN A GOD. A response to a claim, and is not a positive assertion. (Unless you're talking about gnostic atheists)

2. It is a lack of faith. So how is that a bad thing? I don't believe anything without a good reason, faith is the opposite.
Signed, Creepoc Infinite
Secularism should be implemented everywhere at all times, get god out of politics. Get god away from impressionable children while you're at it.
check out my region, here.
Star Wars:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=328953

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:13 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:its not a rational position...

God COULD exist. It can't be disproved.

Familiarize yourself with the Null Hypothesis and what atheism is.


the null hypothesis is itself a religion.

''I believe/assume nothing exists until it has been proven by a man-made tool known as the Scientific Method.''

This is a form of belief, not intellectual superiority.
Last edited by Infected Mushroom on Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:13 am

Banana Isle wrote:Why is he unlikely? The universe is a big place?

And who's to say, if he exists, that he would even be in this universe?

It would be like me siting on a spec of dust in a closed cardboard box, telling you how light doesn't exist because there is no evidence of it.

There's no way anyone could tell you that light exists because it is impossible to see outside of the box, and if you look for that evidence of light in the closed cardboard box, you'll never find it.

Because there isn't any evidence for them. When you find some evidence, tell me, and I might bump up the probability from practically nil to nearly nil.
This is why no one can explain the existence of God to an atheist, because if a god was to exist, he would be beyond naturalistic boundaries and comprehension.

If you can't explain something within naturalistic bounds, even wrong naturalistic bounds, you can't explain it and you don't understand it. If you think the Divine is incomprehensible, fine - but if you do anything regarding the Divine, you're playing with fire, because by your own admission you understand nothing about it. Why would prayer please a God more than murder? Truth more than lies? You're hedging your bets not on the idea that some sort of divine power might be out there somewhere, but on a very narrow cultural conception of a creator born from bronze-age desert tribes and refined through a bunch of backwoods farmers who just got over losing all semblance of civilization.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Crysuko
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7300
Founded: Feb 26, 2013
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Crysuko » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:13 am

Manhat wrote:Sad to see they are the most hated group in the US

maybe not THE most hated, but I see what you mean
Quotes:
Xilonite wrote: cookies are heresy.

Kelinfort wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:A terrorist attack on a disabled center doesn't make a lot of sense, unless to show no one is safe.

This will take some time to figure out, i am afraid.

"No one is safe, not even your most vulnerable and insecure!"

Cesopium wrote:Welp let's hope armies of 10 million don't just roam around and Soviet their way through everything.

Yugoslav Memes wrote:
Victoriala II wrote:Ur mom has value

one week ban for flaming xd

Dumb Ideologies wrote:Much better than the kulak smoothies. Their texture was suspiciously grainy.

Official thread euthanologist
I USE Qs INSTEAD OF Qs

User avatar
New Socialist South Africa
Minister
 
Posts: 3406
Founded: Aug 31, 2013
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby New Socialist South Africa » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:13 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:its not a rational position...

God COULD exist. It can't be disproved.


I assume by that you mean Gnostic Atheism and not Agnostic Atheism? As Agnostic Atheism already observes that truth and expresses that we believe in things based on evidence that they do exist rather than on a lack of evidence that they don't exist.
"I find that offensive" is never a sound counter argument.
"Men in general are quick to believe that which they wish to be true." - Gaius Julius Caesar
"I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against." - Malcolm X
"The soul of a nation can be seen in the way it treats its children" - Nelson Mandela
The wealth of humanity should be determined by that of the poorest individual.

"What makes a man

Strength enough to build a home
Time enough to hold a child
and Love enough to break a heart".

Terry Pratchett


Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.

User avatar
Crysuko
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7300
Founded: Feb 26, 2013
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Crysuko » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:15 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Familiarize yourself with the Null Hypothesis and what atheism is.


the null hypothesis is itself a religion.

''I believe/assume nothing exists until it has been proven by a man-made tool known as the Scientific Method.''

This is a form of belief, not intellectual superiority.

sorry, what. the null hypothesis states that there is no connection between two observred phenomena. how in blue blazes is that even close to a religion.
Quotes:
Xilonite wrote: cookies are heresy.

Kelinfort wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:A terrorist attack on a disabled center doesn't make a lot of sense, unless to show no one is safe.

This will take some time to figure out, i am afraid.

"No one is safe, not even your most vulnerable and insecure!"

Cesopium wrote:Welp let's hope armies of 10 million don't just roam around and Soviet their way through everything.

Yugoslav Memes wrote:
Victoriala II wrote:Ur mom has value

one week ban for flaming xd

Dumb Ideologies wrote:Much better than the kulak smoothies. Their texture was suspiciously grainy.

Official thread euthanologist
I USE Qs INSTEAD OF Qs

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:15 am

New Socialist South Africa wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:its not a rational position...

God COULD exist. It can't be disproved.


I assume by that you mean Gnostic Atheism and not Agnostic Atheism? As Agnostic Atheism already observes that truth and expresses that we believe in things based on evidence that they do exist rather than on a lack of evidence that they don't exist.


i suppose...

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:16 am

Crysuko wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
the null hypothesis is itself a religion.

''I believe/assume nothing exists until it has been proven by a man-made tool known as the Scientific Method.''

This is a form of belief, not intellectual superiority.

sorry, what. the null hypothesis states that there is no connection between two observred phenomena. how in blue blazes is that even close to a religion.


it was brought up by Dyakovo as a cornerstone of Atheism...

User avatar
Creepoc Infinite
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1573
Founded: Jan 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Creepoc Infinite » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:16 am

The Smith Protectorate wrote:
Creepoc Infinite wrote:1. Where's your citations?

2. Who said that the bible ever made total sense?

3. The flood didn't happen so who cares


and the greeks?, the flat world was a play on words and you didn't Google globus cruciger and your last number was very ignorant, citation for OP?! no. so please don't contradict, it's a discussion not a bash.

The Greeks did not live in mesopatamia at the time the Old Testament was written.
The areas in which it was written suffered from many unpredictable floods, and the way it was written, the writers of the bible viewed the world as if it was a flat world with a firmament sky, witha dome shape, because that's how it looks. Like we're inside a really really big snow globe is how they described it.
Signed, Creepoc Infinite
Secularism should be implemented everywhere at all times, get god out of politics. Get god away from impressionable children while you're at it.
check out my region, here.
Star Wars:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=328953

User avatar
Crysuko
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7300
Founded: Feb 26, 2013
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Crysuko » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:17 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Crysuko wrote:sorry, what. the null hypothesis states that there is no connection between two observred phenomena. how in blue blazes is that even close to a religion.


it was brought up by Dyakovo as a cornerstone of Atheism...

it means that it's a tool often used in arguments against god, nothing else.
Quotes:
Xilonite wrote: cookies are heresy.

Kelinfort wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:A terrorist attack on a disabled center doesn't make a lot of sense, unless to show no one is safe.

This will take some time to figure out, i am afraid.

"No one is safe, not even your most vulnerable and insecure!"

Cesopium wrote:Welp let's hope armies of 10 million don't just roam around and Soviet their way through everything.

Yugoslav Memes wrote:
Victoriala II wrote:Ur mom has value

one week ban for flaming xd

Dumb Ideologies wrote:Much better than the kulak smoothies. Their texture was suspiciously grainy.

Official thread euthanologist
I USE Qs INSTEAD OF Qs

User avatar
Creepoc Infinite
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1573
Founded: Jan 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Creepoc Infinite » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:17 am

Crysuko wrote:
Manhat wrote:Sad to see they are the most hated group in the US

maybe not THE most hated, but I see what you mean

We are just below Muslims.
Signed, Creepoc Infinite
Secularism should be implemented everywhere at all times, get god out of politics. Get god away from impressionable children while you're at it.
check out my region, here.
Star Wars:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=328953

User avatar
New Socialist South Africa
Minister
 
Posts: 3406
Founded: Aug 31, 2013
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby New Socialist South Africa » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:18 am

Crysuko wrote:
Manhat wrote:Sad to see they are the most hated group in the US

maybe not THE most hated, but I see what you mean


According to a poll we are just slightly less hated than Muslims in the USA.

http://www.salon.com/2014/07/21/the_numbers_are_in_america_still_distrusts_atheists_and_muslims_partner/
"I find that offensive" is never a sound counter argument.
"Men in general are quick to believe that which they wish to be true." - Gaius Julius Caesar
"I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against." - Malcolm X
"The soul of a nation can be seen in the way it treats its children" - Nelson Mandela
The wealth of humanity should be determined by that of the poorest individual.

"What makes a man

Strength enough to build a home
Time enough to hold a child
and Love enough to break a heart".

Terry Pratchett


Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:18 am

Crysuko wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
it was brought up by Dyakovo as a cornerstone of Atheism...

it means that it's a tool often used in arguments against god, nothing else.


to the extent that it is used as an argument against God, the irony is present that it is itself a system of assumption.

"If I can't prove it using the limits of the man-made Scientific Method, I will assume it does not exist and will tell anyone else who believes otherwise that they should learn about the Null Hypothesis.''

User avatar
Creepoc Infinite
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1573
Founded: Jan 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Creepoc Infinite » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:19 am

New Socialist South Africa wrote:
Crysuko wrote:maybe not THE most hated, but I see what you mean


According to a poll we are just slightly less hated than Muslims in the USA.

http://www.salon.com/2014/07/21/the_numbers_are_in_america_still_distrusts_atheists_and_muslims_partner/

The study I saw on secular talk says we are about the same with Muslims except Muslims are hated slightly less.
Signed, Creepoc Infinite
Secularism should be implemented everywhere at all times, get god out of politics. Get god away from impressionable children while you're at it.
check out my region, here.
Star Wars:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=328953

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:20 am

New Socialist South Africa wrote:
Crysuko wrote:maybe not THE most hated, but I see what you mean


According to a poll we are just slightly less hated than Muslims in the USA.

http://www.salon.com/2014/07/21/the_numbers_are_in_america_still_distrusts_atheists_and_muslims_partner/


There was another one I heard about where we were the most distrusted.

User avatar
New Socialist South Africa
Minister
 
Posts: 3406
Founded: Aug 31, 2013
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby New Socialist South Africa » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:21 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
New Socialist South Africa wrote:
I assume by that you mean Gnostic Atheism and not Agnostic Atheism? As Agnostic Atheism already observes that truth and expresses that we believe in things based on evidence that they do exist rather than on a lack of evidence that they don't exist.


i suppose...


Great, because I have literally never met a Gnostic Atheist. The vast majority of us are Agnostic Atheists.
"I find that offensive" is never a sound counter argument.
"Men in general are quick to believe that which they wish to be true." - Gaius Julius Caesar
"I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against." - Malcolm X
"The soul of a nation can be seen in the way it treats its children" - Nelson Mandela
The wealth of humanity should be determined by that of the poorest individual.

"What makes a man

Strength enough to build a home
Time enough to hold a child
and Love enough to break a heart".

Terry Pratchett


Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Albaaa, Bear Stearns, Comfed, Commonwealth of Adirondack, Dimetrodon Empire, Emotional Support Crocodile, Escalia, Fahran, Heavenly Assault, Kenmoria, North Cromch, Rusozak

Advertisement

Remove ads