This is demonstrably incorrect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_Earth
Advertisement

by The Archregimancy » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:01 am

by Dyakovo » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:01 am

by Infected Mushroom » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:03 am
Crysuko wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
its not more open-minded. It does one of two things.
1) it just assumes a default position of their being no God
2) it demonstrates a lack of faith
Neither of the above two options necessarily demonstrates a more open mind
1. conclusion based on evidence
2. a nessecity of the above
but they don't demonstrate a closed mind, either.

by Creepoc Infinite » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:05 am
The Smith Protectorate wrote:Creepoc Infinite wrote:It doesn't have to offer you value because atheism doesn't offer anything but a more open mind.
(In regards to science and evidence)
There is no evidence that directly contradicts a deist god. May I ask why you waste your time believing in something if there's no reason for you to? And that's not supported by science?
A flat world doesn't flood, also Greeks are accurate to within 1% of earth's circumference.

by Dyakovo » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:05 am

by Conserative Morality » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:08 am
Sociobiology wrote:Whereas I have evidence that is the best way to treat people if you want a healthy, safe society.
and their of plenty of people who take it on principle that minorities should not be treated equal and as long as they justify it by faith you have no claim that they are wrong because that is exactly what you are using.
regardless of evidence = without concern to evidence in any way, I think you just proved my point.
and I can show that is how it is used with a single phrase.
"sometimes you just gotta have faith"

by The Smith Protectorate » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:08 am

by Dyakovo » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:10 am

by Creepoc Infinite » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:12 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:Creepoc Infinite wrote:It doesn't have to offer you value because atheism doesn't offer anything but a more open mind.
(In regards to science and evidence)
There is no evidence that directly contradicts a deist god. May I ask why you waste your time believing in something if there's no reason for you to? And that's not supported by science?
its not more open-minded. It does one of two things.
1) it just assumes a default position of their being no God
2) it demonstrates a lack of faith
Neither of the above two options necessarily demonstrates a more open mind

by Infected Mushroom » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:13 am

by Conserative Morality » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:13 am
Banana Isle wrote:Why is he unlikely? The universe is a big place?
And who's to say, if he exists, that he would even be in this universe?
It would be like me siting on a spec of dust in a closed cardboard box, telling you how light doesn't exist because there is no evidence of it.
There's no way anyone could tell you that light exists because it is impossible to see outside of the box, and if you look for that evidence of light in the closed cardboard box, you'll never find it.
This is why no one can explain the existence of God to an atheist, because if a god was to exist, he would be beyond naturalistic boundaries and comprehension.

by Crysuko » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:13 am
Manhat wrote:Sad to see they are the most hated group in the US

by New Socialist South Africa » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:13 am
Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.

by Crysuko » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:15 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Familiarize yourself with the Null Hypothesis and what atheism is.
the null hypothesis is itself a religion.
''I believe/assume nothing exists until it has been proven by a man-made tool known as the Scientific Method.''
This is a form of belief, not intellectual superiority.

by Infected Mushroom » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:15 am
New Socialist South Africa wrote:
I assume by that you mean Gnostic Atheism and not Agnostic Atheism? As Agnostic Atheism already observes that truth and expresses that we believe in things based on evidence that they do exist rather than on a lack of evidence that they don't exist.

by Infected Mushroom » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:16 am
Crysuko wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
the null hypothesis is itself a religion.
''I believe/assume nothing exists until it has been proven by a man-made tool known as the Scientific Method.''
This is a form of belief, not intellectual superiority.
sorry, what. the null hypothesis states that there is no connection between two observred phenomena. how in blue blazes is that even close to a religion.

by Creepoc Infinite » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:16 am
The Smith Protectorate wrote:Creepoc Infinite wrote:1. Where's your citations?
2. Who said that the bible ever made total sense?
3. The flood didn't happen so who cares
and the greeks?, the flat world was a play on words and you didn't Google globus cruciger and your last number was very ignorant, citation for OP?! no. so please don't contradict, it's a discussion not a bash.

by Crysuko » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:17 am

by Creepoc Infinite » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:17 am

by New Socialist South Africa » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:18 am
Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.

by Infected Mushroom » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:18 am

by Creepoc Infinite » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:19 am
New Socialist South Africa wrote:Crysuko wrote:maybe not THE most hated, but I see what you mean
According to a poll we are just slightly less hated than Muslims in the USA.
http://www.salon.com/2014/07/21/the_numbers_are_in_america_still_distrusts_atheists_and_muslims_partner/

by The Rich Port » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:20 am
New Socialist South Africa wrote:Crysuko wrote:maybe not THE most hated, but I see what you mean
According to a poll we are just slightly less hated than Muslims in the USA.
http://www.salon.com/2014/07/21/the_numbers_are_in_america_still_distrusts_atheists_and_muslims_partner/

by New Socialist South Africa » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:21 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:New Socialist South Africa wrote:
I assume by that you mean Gnostic Atheism and not Agnostic Atheism? As Agnostic Atheism already observes that truth and expresses that we believe in things based on evidence that they do exist rather than on a lack of evidence that they don't exist.
i suppose...
Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Albaaa, Bear Stearns, Comfed, Commonwealth of Adirondack, Dimetrodon Empire, Emotional Support Crocodile, Escalia, Fahran, Heavenly Assault, Kenmoria, North Cromch, Rusozak
Advertisement